• Advertisement
    

FamilyFunPack

Re: FamilyFunPack

Postby lmmomSD » Mon Nov 27, 2017 6:03 pm

The mom uploaded an insta story of Michael in the pantry with what looks like goldfish all over the floor. He's eating them off the floor. She is just laughing, and says "He was attempting to make his own lunch, which is sooo cute". Not only is it gross that he's eating goldfish off the floor, and his mom is just standing there laughing and filming him, he is growing up with such a warped sense of his own importance. Everything he does is adorable. But it's not. He's a little shit. He makes messes and blames other people, and whines and cries and hits when other people blow out the candles on their own birthday cake. When he gets to school, it's going to be a rude awakening.

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
User avatar
lmmomSD
Guru Gossiper
 
Posts: 13176
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2015 12:08 pm
Location: San Diego, Ca

Advertisement

Re: FamilyFunPack

Postby lmmomSD » Sun Dec 03, 2017 11:53 am

They (I think) got sent a "Christmas Party in a Box". They opened it outside, and the kids were all screaming bloody murder. I would hate to be their neighbors. Can you imagine? Those twins have the most obnoxious high pitched scream. We couldn't get through it.

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
User avatar
lmmomSD
Guru Gossiper
 
Posts: 13176
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2015 12:08 pm
Location: San Diego, Ca

Re: FamilyFunPack

Postby Natxo » Mon Dec 04, 2017 4:30 am

Why the hell did they get extra Christmas present now? They did the same thing last year didn’t they. It doesn’t matter if they have the money or not, it’s not teaching those kids anything good. How about teach your kids that Christmas only comes once a year and to be grateful for it, instead of giving them a shit ton of presents every week.
Natxo
Informer
 
Posts: 292
Joined: Mon May 15, 2017 1:21 pm

Re: FamilyFunPack

Postby lmmomSD » Wed Dec 13, 2017 9:12 pm

Bahahaha. They just got the boom lowered by YouTube. Looks like they were demonetized. Boo hoo. No more exploiting their children! Gonna have to get a real job again.

Wonder if Chrysler will still let them keep the Pacifica. [img]https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20171214/0be1f8971e0ab366c0e0fa769d5cf322.jpg[/img][img]https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20171214/a0401fc30a8a82ad7e0f199698be5974.jpg[/img]

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
User avatar
lmmomSD
Guru Gossiper
 
Posts: 13176
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2015 12:08 pm
Location: San Diego, Ca

Re: FamilyFunPack

Postby yoyo16 » Wed Dec 13, 2017 10:03 pm

How do we know they got demonetized? I thought that social blade doesn’t accurately reflect YouTube and the D- rating may be from deleting vlogs.
User avatar
yoyo16
Informer
 
Posts: 446
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2016 9:14 pm

Re: FamilyFunPack

Postby lmmomSD » Wed Dec 13, 2017 10:37 pm

yoyo16 wrote:How do we know they got demonetized? I thought that social blade doesn’t accurately reflect YouTube and the D- rating may be from deleting vlogs.
I'm assuming. I probably shouldn't have jumped to conclusions. If you watch, and see if they have an ad before their vlog, you'll know for sure. That plus the ZERO dollars for earnings, when a few days ago, it was a few million a year. Social Blade may be inaccurate, but that's beyond inaccuracy. When people say it's inaccurate, they usually mean it's off the general amounts that it claims vloggers earn.

Sorry for possibly spreading inaccurate information. I just saw that they have SO many views deleted, so I assumed. I mean, it's a lot. Several million. I refuse to give them a view to see if they have an ad play before their vlog.

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
User avatar
lmmomSD
Guru Gossiper
 
Posts: 13176
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2015 12:08 pm
Location: San Diego, Ca

Re: FamilyFunPack

Postby unionjack » Thu Dec 14, 2017 1:03 am

lmmomSD wrote:
yoyo16 wrote:How do we know they got demonetized? I thought that social blade doesn’t accurately reflect YouTube and the D- rating may be from deleting vlogs.
I'm assuming. I probably shouldn't have jumped to conclusions. If you watch, and see if they have an ad before their vlog, you'll know for sure. That plus the ZERO dollars for earnings, when a few days ago, it was a few million a year. Social Blade may be inaccurate, but that's beyond inaccuracy. When people say it's inaccurate, they usually mean it's off the general amounts that it claims vloggers earn.

Sorry for possibly spreading inaccurate information. I just saw that they have SO many views deleted, so I assumed. I mean, it's a lot. Several million. I refuse to give them a view to see if they have an ad play before their vlog.

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk


I was hoping, that they were going to get demonetized, even though it may seem kind of rude to say something like that... :/
They really are one of the worst families on YouTube in my opinion, since most of their viewers are children, which are being preached consumerism and wastefulness... :? Their own kids are most definitely out of control, behave terribly and are incredibly spoiled. :|
unionjack
Amateur
 
Posts: 72
Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2017 4:45 am

Re: FamilyFunPack

Postby yoyo16 » Thu Dec 14, 2017 6:08 am

lmmomSD wrote:
yoyo16 wrote:How do we know they got demonetized? I thought that social blade doesn’t accurately reflect YouTube and the D- rating may be from deleting vlogs.
I'm assuming. I probably shouldn't have jumped to conclusions. If you watch, and see if they have an ad before their vlog, you'll know for sure. That plus the ZERO dollars for earnings, when a few days ago, it was a few million a year. Social Blade may be inaccurate, but that's beyond inaccuracy. When people say it's inaccurate, they usually mean it's off the general amounts that it claims vloggers earn.

Sorry for possibly spreading inaccurate information. I just saw that they have SO many views deleted, so I assumed. I mean, it's a lot. Several million. I refuse to give them a view to see if they have an ad play before their vlog.

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk


I went to check last night after I read what you wrote.
2 videos had ads before it, the rest did not.
So you may be correct.
User avatar
yoyo16
Informer
 
Posts: 446
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2016 9:14 pm

Re: FamilyFunPack

Postby Defuego » Thu Dec 14, 2017 1:10 pm

Imagine the wonderful Christmas so many children in their area would have if they did what Bonnie did. She kept all the toys she was sent to review for her children, and is giving them to children in need this Christmas. If these people set aside even half of the toys and clothes they're sent in a year, hundreds of children in need would have a good Christmas.
Defuego
Informer
 
Posts: 343
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 9:09 pm

Re: FamilyFunPack

Postby lmmomSD » Thu Dec 14, 2017 6:31 pm

They actually have the kids sizes in their "About" section. "People have been asking us for the kids sizes" and then they're all listed.
Greedy. How about "People have been asking us about the kids sizes. We don't need anything. We are very well able to provide for our children. Thank you so much for thinking of us, but please donate to the local homeless shelter or a family in need." But no. They actually list the kids' sizes. They're disgusting people.

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
User avatar
lmmomSD
Guru Gossiper
 
Posts: 13176
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2015 12:08 pm
Location: San Diego, Ca

Re: FamilyFunPack

Postby lmmomSD » Thu Dec 14, 2017 7:56 pm

This doesn't look good...[img]https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20171215/8f60925cc71b4c56cdf19de75a1e8c70.jpg[/img]

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
User avatar
lmmomSD
Guru Gossiper
 
Posts: 13176
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2015 12:08 pm
Location: San Diego, Ca

Re: FamilyFunPack

Postby onbreak » Thu Dec 14, 2017 8:52 pm

Whoa!

Sent from my LG-M257 using Tapatalk
User avatar
onbreak
Extreme Gossiper
 
Posts: 1648
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2017 8:30 am

Re: FamilyFunPack

Postby unionjack » Fri Dec 15, 2017 1:29 am

They have barely been uploading these last few weeks compared to their usual "new videos every day", so I bet something must definitely be going on, and I'm still hoping that it is demonetization (is that how you write it?). ;)

When they were sort of pretending to be "oh so generous and helpful" by donating pillow cases, which her Mum actually ended up making, they could have used that situation in order to give their kids a valuable lesson about giving back to the community, helping others and being generous by donating some of the million toys, which seem to be flying around in their home! But no, these greedy spoiled kids are most likely never going to learn something like that... :?
unionjack
Amateur
 
Posts: 72
Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2017 4:45 am

Re: FamilyFunPack

Postby Natxo » Sun Dec 17, 2017 4:00 pm

Haha I hope that they get demonetised for real. Time for the dad to go back to his job and for them to stop acting like disgusting greedy people. About time to teach the children valuable lessons, no more daily gifts and weekly vacations. God they annoy me so bad.

I remember they had 10 billion views just a few weeks ago and now it’s at 6 billion.
Natxo
Informer
 
Posts: 292
Joined: Mon May 15, 2017 1:21 pm

Re: FamilyFunPack

Postby Natxo » Mon Dec 18, 2017 9:28 am

I just checked back and their video called something like ‘baby home alone’, David’s night routine and their most popular 24hr videos are all gone
Natxo
Informer
 
Posts: 292
Joined: Mon May 15, 2017 1:21 pm

Re: FamilyFunPack

Postby coolusername1236 » Mon Dec 18, 2017 8:49 pm

I've known about them since their humble beginning with the twins escaping from their cribs. Nbd. But as Michael got older, I've always thought he was annoying! He broke the glass wedding gift, he cries, and then he doesn't even get a timeout! At the least! Whether he did it on purpose or not, they need to tell him he shouldn't touch glass! But they didn't!

I am SO happy there is a blog for this! :lol:
Snickerdoodles are the best
coolusername1236
Informer
 
Posts: 360
Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2017 2:29 pm

Re: FamilyFunPack

Postby lmmomSD » Fri Dec 22, 2017 11:18 am

So, the mom took the kids to Disneyland. She took a picture of them. "I just took a picture of all six of my kids all by myself. I am so proud!"
Wow. What high standards you set for yourself as a mom. You took a picture. You go, girl.

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
User avatar
lmmomSD
Guru Gossiper
 
Posts: 13176
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2015 12:08 pm
Location: San Diego, Ca

Re: FamilyFunPack

Postby lmmomSD » Mon Dec 25, 2017 5:56 pm

This is ridiculous. A fan sent them this giant box.

WTF? Are they SO greedy that they can't even see what is wrong with this?[img]https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20171226/bd360d14161c7d53cb4beef4b91dd2c2.jpg[/img]

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
User avatar
lmmomSD
Guru Gossiper
 
Posts: 13176
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2015 12:08 pm
Location: San Diego, Ca

Re: FamilyFunPack

Postby unionjack » Tue Dec 26, 2017 2:52 am

lmmomSD wrote:This is ridiculous. A fan sent them this giant box.

WTF? Are they SO greedy that they can't even see what is wrong with this?

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk


This is getting out of hand, they definitely need to close their mail box, otherwise they are going to end up drowning in useless, cheap crap... :-o

Furthermore, if they say or write "Isn't Owen the cutest ...?" one more time, I will freak out. Yes, he is a baby, babies tend to be cute, still that does most definitely not mean you have to point out that he is the cutest little baby, whenever you get a chance to do so... :?
unionjack
Amateur
 
Posts: 72
Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2017 4:45 am

Re: FamilyFunPack

Postby Natxo » Sun Dec 31, 2017 7:27 am

They bought a ton of things to donate for Christmas, which is very nice of them. It looks like it cost a lot of money so only people with as much money as them could buy this huge amount of stuff, unfortunately not all rich people would do this. Good on them, although it would have been a good idea to also donate some toys/clothes that they already own as they have so much, and it would free up space in their house.

Is it some kind of miracle that they didn’t upload a video of Christmas morning like they do every year, showing off tons of presents that they get lol
Natxo
Informer
 
Posts: 292
Joined: Mon May 15, 2017 1:21 pm

Re: FamilyFunPack

Postby lmmomSD » Sun Dec 31, 2017 10:02 am

I don't believe that everyone who sends them stuff makes anywhere near what they do. Number one, they likely make over a couple of million dollars a year. They have a lot of viewers in foreign countries, and people are weird about the YouTubers they love. These kids that watch them will spend their allowance on sending them crap just to get a shout out in the vlogs.

Sorry, I just don't buy that argument. And even if it's true, the bottom line is that they don't need anything. And putting the kids' sizes in their "about us" is just greedy and obnoxious

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
User avatar
lmmomSD
Guru Gossiper
 
Posts: 13176
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2015 12:08 pm
Location: San Diego, Ca

Re: FamilyFunPack

Postby Defuego » Sun Dec 31, 2017 12:56 pm

Natxo wrote:They bought a ton of things to donate for Christmas, which is very nice of them. It looks like it cost a lot of money so only people with as much money as them could buy this huge amount of stuff, unfortunately not all rich people would do this. Good on them, although it would have been a good idea to also donate some toys/clothes that they already own as they have so much, and it would free up space in their house.

Is it some kind of miracle that they didn’t upload a video of Christmas morning like they do every year, showing off tons of presents that they get lol


The mom posted on Facebook that they were all sick over Christmas, which is why a video hadn't been posted.
Defuego
Informer
 
Posts: 343
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 9:09 pm

Re: FamilyFunPack

Postby lmmomSD » Mon Jan 01, 2018 10:21 am

Michael has his own channel. Michael.

I am speechless.

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
User avatar
lmmomSD
Guru Gossiper
 
Posts: 13176
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2015 12:08 pm
Location: San Diego, Ca

Re: FamilyFunPack

Postby unionjack » Tue Jan 02, 2018 11:23 am

They have uploaded a video of Michael's first day at preschool, I was honestly more than surprised about their decision to put him in preschool and I hope for his own sake that he will benefit from it, learn how to share for example and waiting one's turn etc. :-o

Furthermore Alyssa uploaded a video of her "Christmas Haul", she's eleven years old and most of the stuff she got were stuffed animals and some things, which looked a little like "Shopkins", if that's what it's called (I#m not American, so thereby I have never seen it myself)... It seems as though they are trying really hard to prevent her from growing up, at age eleven I asked mostly for books and maybe a board game for Christmas, but most definitely not for stuffed animals... :?
unionjack
Amateur
 
Posts: 72
Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2017 4:45 am

Re: FamilyFunPack

Postby Defuego » Tue Jan 02, 2018 4:49 pm

I was a lot like Alyssa at her age as far as toys go. To be honest at 11 years old I would've loved everything she got and probably asked for similar things at that age. I've never grown out of stuffed animals. Still to this day if I see one that's cute, I'll get it. I just bought a Bambi from the Disney store a few days ago. Kids these days act much older than kids did 10 years ago. If it were 2008 and not 2018, I don't think we'd be questioning Alyssa's gifts and interests. I love that she's still a kid like she should be.
Defuego
Informer
 
Posts: 343
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 9:09 pm

PreviousNext

Return to A-H

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

  • Advertisement