FamilyFunPack

Unread post by **Caisflame** » Tue Nov 21, 2017 11:51 pm

They're selling plush versions of their dogs for $24 each, or $43 for both. I'm willing to bet the quality is shit. Gotta say though, I'm glad I didn't grow up as a kid in this youtube age, because I totally would have been the type to want 2 $43 stuffed animals.

Unread post by **unionjack** » Wed Nov 22, 2017 8:25 am

They advertise themselves as daily vloggers/youtubers, hence the "New videos every day" in their banner, as if, they definitely missed a few days last week and yet again no upload yesterday, and that is frequent...

It's not that I want to watch there videos and get sad, when they don't upload, but when you somehow promise new videos every day, you should either stick to that or leave it out of your description completely, especially if it is so obvious, that they never upload a video each day.

Unread post by **lmmomSD** » Sat Nov 25, 2017 9:04 am

"Buy our merch! Send us more crap!" The dogs aren't even cute. The mom is talking about how "adorable" the stuffed dogs are. They're not.

Going around the table saying what they are grateful for, and all the kids are saying family, blah blah blah. Get to Alyssa: "I'm thankful for all our toys and all our stuff". Good job raising a grateful child, mom and dad. Their table manners are atrocious.

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk

Unread post by **Natxo** » Sat Nov 25, 2017 11:04 am

They so told the kids what to say. What a coincidence that they all said different things, and Micheal said ‘peace’ with a look on his face that said I don’t have a clue what that means lol

Unread post by **lmmomSD** » Sat Nov 25, 2017 11:17 am

Natxo wrote:They so told the kids what to say. What a coincidence that they all said different things, and Micheal said ‘peace’ with a look on his face that said I don’t have a clue what that means lol

So I guess Alyssa was the only one who wasn't scripted, lol. At least she was honest.
And yeah--Michael saying "peace". Riiiight.

Don't get me started on their poor pool safety. Running and riding bikes by the pool? Real smart. But then again, ER trips get lots of views.

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk

Unread post by **lmmomSD** » Mon Nov 27, 2017 5:03 pm

The mom uploaded an insta story of Michael in the pantry with what looks like goldfish all over the floor. He's eating them off the floor. She is just laughing, and says "He was attempting to make his own lunch, which is sooo cute". Not only is it gross that he's eating goldfish off the floor, and his mom is just standing there laughing and filming him, he is growing up with such a warped sense of his own importance. Everything he does is adorable. But it's not. He's a little shit. He makes messes and blames other people, and whines and cries and hits when other people blow out the candles on their own birthday cake. When he gets to school, it's going to be a rude awakening.

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk

Unread post by **lmmomSD** » Sun Dec 03, 2017 10:53 am

They (I think) got sent a "Christmas Party in a Box". They opened it outside, and the kids were all screaming bloody murder. I would hate to be their neighbors. Can you imagine? Those twins have the most obnoxious high pitched scream. We couldn't get through it.

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk

Unread post by **Natxo** » Mon Dec 04, 2017 3:30 am

Why the hell did they get extra Christmas present now? They did the same thing last year didn’t they. It doesn’t matter if they have the money or not, it’s not teaching those kids anything good. How about teach your kids that Christmas only comes once a year and to be grateful for it, instead of giving them a shit ton of presents every week.

Unread post by **lmmomSD** » Wed Dec 13, 2017 8:12 pm

Bahahaha. They just got the boom lowered by YouTube. Looks like they were demonetized. Boo hoo. No more exploiting their children! Gonna have to get a real job again.

Wonder if Chrysler will still let them keep the Pacifica. [img]//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201712 ... 5cf322.jpg[/img][img]//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201712 ... be5974.jpg[/img]

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk

Unread post by **yoyo16** » Wed Dec 13, 2017 9:03 pm

How do we know they got demonetized? I thought that social blade doesn’t accurately reflect YouTube and the D- rating may be from deleting vlogs.

Unread post by **lmmomSD** » Wed Dec 13, 2017 9:37 pm

yoyo16 wrote:How do we know they got demonetized? I thought that social blade doesn’t accurately reflect YouTube and the D- rating may be from deleting vlogs.

I'm assuming. I probably shouldn't have jumped to conclusions. If you watch, and see if they have an ad before their vlog, you'll know for sure. That plus the ZERO dollars for earnings, when a few days ago, it was a few million a year. Social Blade may be inaccurate, but that's beyond inaccuracy. When people say it's inaccurate, they usually mean it's off the general amounts that it claims vloggers earn.

Sorry for possibly spreading inaccurate information. I just saw that they have SO many views deleted, so I assumed. I mean, it's a lot. Several million. I refuse to give them a view to see if they have an ad play before their vlog.

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk

Unread post by **unionjack** » Thu Dec 14, 2017 12:03 am

lmmomSD wrote:
yoyo16 wrote:How do we know they got demonetized? I thought that social blade doesn’t accurately reflect YouTube and the D- rating may be from deleting vlogs.
I'm assuming. I probably shouldn't have jumped to conclusions. If you watch, and see if they have an ad before their vlog, you'll know for sure. That plus the ZERO dollars for earnings, when a few days ago, it was a few million a year. Social Blade may be inaccurate, but that's beyond inaccuracy. When people say it's inaccurate, they usually mean it's off the general amounts that it claims vloggers earn.

Sorry for possibly spreading inaccurate information. I just saw that they have SO many views deleted, so I assumed. I mean, it's a lot. Several million. I refuse to give them a view to see if they have an ad play before their vlog.

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk

I was hoping, that they were going to get demonetized, even though it may seem kind of rude to say something like that... :/
They really are one of the worst families on YouTube in my opinion, since most of their viewers are children, which are being preached consumerism and wastefulness...

Their own kids are most definitely out of control, behave terribly and are incredibly spoiled.

Unread post by **yoyo16** » Thu Dec 14, 2017 5:08 am

lmmomSD wrote:
yoyo16 wrote:How do we know they got demonetized? I thought that social blade doesn’t accurately reflect YouTube and the D- rating may be from deleting vlogs.
I'm assuming. I probably shouldn't have jumped to conclusions. If you watch, and see if they have an ad before their vlog, you'll know for sure. That plus the ZERO dollars for earnings, when a few days ago, it was a few million a year. Social Blade may be inaccurate, but that's beyond inaccuracy. When people say it's inaccurate, they usually mean it's off the general amounts that it claims vloggers earn.

Sorry for possibly spreading inaccurate information. I just saw that they have SO many views deleted, so I assumed. I mean, it's a lot. Several million. I refuse to give them a view to see if they have an ad play before their vlog.

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk

I went to check last night after I read what you wrote.
2 videos had ads before it, the rest did not.
So you may be correct.

Unread post by **Caisflame** » Thu Dec 14, 2017 12:10 pm

Imagine the wonderful Christmas so many children in their area would have if they did what Bonnie did. She kept all the toys she was sent to review for her children, and is giving them to children in need this Christmas. If these people set aside even half of the toys and clothes they're sent in a year, hundreds of children in need would have a good Christmas.

Unread post by **lmmomSD** » Thu Dec 14, 2017 5:31 pm

They actually have the kids sizes in their "About" section. "People have been asking us for the kids sizes" and then they're all listed.
Greedy. How about "People have been asking us about the kids sizes. We don't need anything. We are very well able to provide for our children. Thank you so much for thinking of us, but please donate to the local homeless shelter or a family in need." But no. They actually list the kids' sizes. They're disgusting people.

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk

Unread post by **lmmomSD** » Thu Dec 14, 2017 6:56 pm

This doesn't look good...[img]//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201712 ... 1e8c70.jpg[/img]

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk

Unread post by **onbreak** » Thu Dec 14, 2017 7:52 pm

Whoa!

Sent from my LG-M257 using Tapatalk

Unread post by **unionjack** » Fri Dec 15, 2017 12:29 am

They have barely been uploading these last few weeks compared to their usual "new videos every day", so I bet something must definitely be going on, and I'm still hoping that it is demonetization (is that how you write it?).

When they were sort of pretending to be "oh so generous and helpful" by donating pillow cases, which her Mum actually ended up making, they could have used that situation in order to give their kids a valuable lesson about giving back to the community, helping others and being generous by donating some of the million toys, which seem to be flying around in their home! But no, these greedy spoiled kids are most likely never going to learn something like that...

Unread post by **Natxo** » Sun Dec 17, 2017 3:00 pm

Haha I hope that they get demonetised for real. Time for the dad to go back to his job and for them to stop acting like disgusting greedy people. About time to teach the children valuable lessons, no more daily gifts and weekly vacations. God they annoy me so bad.

I remember they had 10 billion views just a few weeks ago and now it’s at 6 billion.

Unread post by **Natxo** » Mon Dec 18, 2017 8:28 am

I just checked back and their video called something like ‘baby home alone’, David’s night routine and their most popular 24hr videos are all gone

FamilyFunPack

Re: FamilyFunPack

Re: FamilyFunPack

Re: FamilyFunPack

Re: FamilyFunPack

Re: FamilyFunPack

Re: FamilyFunPack

Re: FamilyFunPack

Re: FamilyFunPack

Re: FamilyFunPack

Re: FamilyFunPack

Re: FamilyFunPack

Re: FamilyFunPack

Re: FamilyFunPack

Re: FamilyFunPack

Re: FamilyFunPack

Re: FamilyFunPack

Re: FamilyFunPack

Re: FamilyFunPack

Re: FamilyFunPack

Re: FamilyFunPack