E+J: No Longer Infertile, Just Insensitive | Part 34
- actuallydear
- Guru Gossiper
- Posts: 3639
- Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2014 6:53 am
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 2 times
Re: E+J: No Longer Infertile, Just Insensitive | Part 34
If they go for a non-family boys name, my bet is on Declan.
There was a name Ellie said she liked and it was Utah trendy. Can’t remember it though
There was a name Ellie said she liked and it was Utah trendy. Can’t remember it though
-
- Super Moddie
- Posts: 15415
- Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2014 7:33 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 4 times
Re: E+J: No Longer Infertile, Just Insensitive | Part 34
I can't remember it either, but it was a weird one.actuallydear wrote:If they go for a non-family boys name, my bet is on Declan.
There was a name Ellie said she liked and it was Utah trendy. Can’t remember it though
If Jared is mentioning Ellie smiling a lot in that tweet, my guess is it's a girl.
But also, whose husband feels the need to tweet that shit all the time. As someone that was once in an abusive relationship, I see so many red flags between those two . No one feels the need to talk their partner up like that unless they are hiding something.
- hellomydolly
- Informer
- Posts: 305
- Joined: Fri May 01, 2015 2:27 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
- onbreak
- Guru Gossiper
- Posts: 3583
- Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2017 7:30 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 8 times
Re: E+J: No Longer Infertile, Just Insensitive | Part 34
Everyones naming their baby girl Wyatt.
I like Lenore .. Rachel Lenore goes well together.. So fun
Sent from my LG-M257 using Tapatalk
I like Lenore .. Rachel Lenore goes well together.. So fun
Sent from my LG-M257 using Tapatalk
-
- Amateur
- Posts: 90
- Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2017 3:47 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: E+J: No Longer Infertile, Just Insensitive | Part 34
Has it been brought up that if they choose Jennifer that it would not only be named after Ellie's mom, but Jared also has a sister named Jennifer.... Just a thought. I personally don't love the name for a girl of current times. I feel it was a strongly overused name in the late 70's to mid 80's. I was almost a Jennifer myself, but two of the neighbor kids had that name already and my mom thought I'd be confused if I had that name too ( thanks for the confidence mom), lol.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: E+J: No Longer Infertile, Just Insensitive | Part 34
My guess for a boy is Aaron and for a girl. Clara.
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
-
- Gossiper
- Posts: 886
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2015 7:34 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: E+J: No Longer Infertile, Just Insensitive | Part 34
Telling from Bonnie’s video it sure seemed like they are having a girl.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- lmmomSD
- Super Moddie
- Posts: 25258
- Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2015 12:08 pm
- Location: San Diego, Ca
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 18 times
Re: E+J: No Longer Infertile, Just Insensitive | Part 34
I don't understand naming a child based on what is trendy. I have always loved the name Lauren (big Lauren Bacall fan). I didn't realize it was popular when I named my daughter that-- and I worked in pediatrics at the time! But picking a name for my children based on the popularity or lack thereof of a name just seems so shallow to me. Which definitely sounds like Ellie.f4k_oyevey wrote:Has it been brought up that if they choose Jennifer that it would not only be named after Ellie's mom, but Jared also has a sister named Jennifer.... Just a thought. I personally don't love the name for a girl of current times. I feel it was a strongly overused name in the late 70's to mid 80's. I was almost a Jennifer myself, but two of the neighbor kids had that name already and my mom thought I'd be confused if I had that name too ( thanks for the confidence mom), lol.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Why should it matter if a name was popular in the 70's if it means something to them? Several people have brought up that Jennifer was "popular in the 70's". Just curious why that is such an issue.
Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
Re: E+J: No Longer Infertile, Just Insensitive | Part 34
Hi all, I'm new here and this is my first post. Been reading about your take on Calvin and I just want to say that I actually find Calvin very cute, just not in the same way as Jackson. I'm so jealous of Calvin's eyelashes! With his beautiful eyes and nicely shaped lips, he looks a lot like Ellie. The two boys are different as night and day. Calvin will probably grow up to be a handsome man, but will have to go through an ugly duckling stage. Poor little guy because he won't be the most popular kid in school.
I also want to say that I feel that he's in no way autistic. I think he's suppressed his vocal abilities to a large extent because:
1) He often has Jackson speak for him. I don't know if you all have noticed but I've seen that in several videos down the line, whenever Calvin is asked a question, or asked to say something, Jackson jumps in with the answer. Now, Jackson is a little boy and cannot be blamed for doing this. He's only doing what his nature prompts him to do. He's always been enthusiastic and participatory and wants badly to please. But I think Jared and Ellie need to really work on Calvin and make him feel that he NEEDS to express his thoughts. The two boys are very close, and I can see a deep love between them... something that's very heartwarming to see... so perhaps Jackson can be asked to help Calvin with this.
2) I have issues with this kind of vlogging and don't think this is very good for kids, especially someone like Calvin who's pretty much a sponge. I remember seeing the vlogs when he was a baby (up until he turned 15 or so months) and he was pretty much on target on voicing his "thoughts" and expressing himself. Then something happened to shut him up... I don't think he has the right personality for this type of vlogging. If I was Ellie and Jared and worried even a bit about his vocal capabilities, I would wait until no more than when he turns 3 and get him pronto to a speech specialist. I also think putting him in pre-school might be painful but a big help. It will get him away from the vlogging camera to develop on his own. Right now, he's such a mama's boy, and also has a fairly protective older brother... maybe being with a bunch of other kids might help him open up and express himself FOR himself and his cohorts, not to please his mom/dad with the camera. Then again, he might react adversely and withdraw even more. It's so difficult because every kid is different, so you have to try various ways to help them.
NOTE: I was apparently a "silent child" and my parents were very worried. They moved a lot when I was a baby and I was similar to Calvin. I had a younger sibling, though, who was an early talker (by 14 months). Apparently, I waited to speak in full sentences around the time I turned three.
I also want to say that I feel that he's in no way autistic. I think he's suppressed his vocal abilities to a large extent because:
1) He often has Jackson speak for him. I don't know if you all have noticed but I've seen that in several videos down the line, whenever Calvin is asked a question, or asked to say something, Jackson jumps in with the answer. Now, Jackson is a little boy and cannot be blamed for doing this. He's only doing what his nature prompts him to do. He's always been enthusiastic and participatory and wants badly to please. But I think Jared and Ellie need to really work on Calvin and make him feel that he NEEDS to express his thoughts. The two boys are very close, and I can see a deep love between them... something that's very heartwarming to see... so perhaps Jackson can be asked to help Calvin with this.
2) I have issues with this kind of vlogging and don't think this is very good for kids, especially someone like Calvin who's pretty much a sponge. I remember seeing the vlogs when he was a baby (up until he turned 15 or so months) and he was pretty much on target on voicing his "thoughts" and expressing himself. Then something happened to shut him up... I don't think he has the right personality for this type of vlogging. If I was Ellie and Jared and worried even a bit about his vocal capabilities, I would wait until no more than when he turns 3 and get him pronto to a speech specialist. I also think putting him in pre-school might be painful but a big help. It will get him away from the vlogging camera to develop on his own. Right now, he's such a mama's boy, and also has a fairly protective older brother... maybe being with a bunch of other kids might help him open up and express himself FOR himself and his cohorts, not to please his mom/dad with the camera. Then again, he might react adversely and withdraw even more. It's so difficult because every kid is different, so you have to try various ways to help them.
NOTE: I was apparently a "silent child" and my parents were very worried. They moved a lot when I was a baby and I was similar to Calvin. I had a younger sibling, though, who was an early talker (by 14 months). Apparently, I waited to speak in full sentences around the time I turned three.
-
- Guru Gossiper
- Posts: 4771
- Joined: Sat Mar 16, 2013 11:20 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 4 times
Re: E+J: No Longer Infertile, Just Insensitive | Part 34
I don’t think a name being a bit old fashioned bothers them, Calvin is such an old man name. I think they’ll go with something “classic” like Maddison or maddelyn.f4k_oyevey wrote:Has it been brought up that if they choose Jennifer that it would not only be named after Ellie's mom, but Jared also has a sister named Jennifer.... Just a thought. I personally don't love the name for a girl of current times. I feel it was a strongly overused name in the late 70's to mid 80's. I was almost a Jennifer myself, but two of the neighbor kids had that name already and my mom thought I'd be confused if I had that name too ( thanks for the confidence mom), lol.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: E+J: No Longer Infertile, Just Insensitive | Part 34
For girl names I think they would do Elizabeth, Abigail and or the obvious Jennifer.
For boys I think Ethan or Andrew.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
For boys I think Ethan or Andrew.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: E+J: No Longer Infertile, Just Insensitive | Part 34
Why does every announcement have to be premature? We’ve seen what happens when they announce early *ahem* fake miscarriage and the recent miscarriage. Now gender reveal at what, 13weeks? That’s a little early to determine the sex unless she had a blood test. What’s next? Premature birth? Sheesh....
Catch a falling star and put in your pocket
☆彡
☆彡
E+J: No Longer Infertile, Just Insensitive | Part 34
At first I was thinking oh I hope they don’t take one of my name choices for my baby girl due in april...but then I remembered one of my name choices is literally a copy cat of Sam + Jenn (unintentional believe it or not because it was on my list when I had my first daughter in 2015/ and luckily Jenn and sam never ruined it for me but made me like it more)
Penelope Jane
And my other choice I’m 50/50 on is
Reese Elizabeth.
For some reason I could see them choosing the name “Molly”
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Penelope Jane
And my other choice I’m 50/50 on is
Reese Elizabeth.
For some reason I could see them choosing the name “Molly”
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: E+J: No Longer Infertile, Just Insensitive | Part 34
Molly Mecham! Totallygymchick43 wrote:At first I was thinking oh I hope they don’t take one of my name choices for my baby girl due in april...but then I remembered one of my name choices is literally a copy cat of Sam + Jenn (unintentional believe it or not because it was on my list when I had my first daughter in 2015/ and luckily Jenn and sam never ruined it for me but made me like it more)
Penelope Jane
And my other choice I’m 50/50 on is
Reese Elizabeth.
For some reason I could see them choosing the name “Molly”
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: E+J: No Longer Infertile, Just Insensitive | Part 34
Since E+J announced 2 weeks ago 12 videos have had the title/thumbnail surround pregnancy. Since samika announces a MONTH ago, only 5 videos have had the title/thumbnail surround pregnancy.
It’s annoying, if I talked that’s much about my pregnancy in real life I would look psycho lol. Her Jared knows how to market, possibly why he has more subscribers, he does what they have to do to get those views.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It’s annoying, if I talked that’s much about my pregnancy in real life I would look psycho lol. Her Jared knows how to market, possibly why he has more subscribers, he does what they have to do to get those views.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: E+J: No Longer Infertile, Just Insensitive | Part 34
Sorry double/triple post?? Lol I am creeping twitter waiting for gender reveal. And Jared said their Canada goose jackets are fake/knock offs and from China. They aren’t knock offs because they actually show the legit logo/name so they are counterfeit! Which is illegal is it not? For it to be legal the spelling of the name brand would need to be different.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- lmmomSD
- Super Moddie
- Posts: 25258
- Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2015 12:08 pm
- Location: San Diego, Ca
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 18 times
Re: E+J: No Longer Infertile, Just Insensitive | Part 34
Yes-- that would be illegal. Someone said that Bonnie has been sporting an Hermes bag. I totally would not put it past them to have gone shopping for counterfeit stuff in China. And that really, really makes me angry. Because not only is it illegal, the whole counterfeit luxury trade depends on slavery. Child slavery, too. They chain children to sewing machines. Such a good thing for a "Christian" to support. Bryan brought Missy back a counterfeit Michael Kors bag from Cambodia. So, he went to a mission that supposedly saves people from human trafficking, and then supported the people who do the trafficking.gymchick43 wrote:Sorry double/triple post?? Lol I am creeping twitter waiting for gender reveal. And Jared said their Canada goose jackets are fake/knock offs and from China. They aren’t knock offs because they actually show the legit logo/name so they are counterfeit! Which is illegal is it not? For it to be legal the spelling of the name brand would need to be different.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
If it's true, and they bought counterfeit goods, I certainly won't believe anything either these people say about "protecting the children", or doing service.
Unfortunately, even though it's illegal, they don't seem to do anything to people who buy counterfeit goods. Maybe if they did, the demand would decrease.
Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
E+J: No Longer Infertile, Just Insensitive | Part 34
lmmomSD wrote:Yes-- that would be illegal. Someone said that Bonnie has been sporting an Hermes bag. I totally would not put it past them to have gone shopping for counterfeit stuff in China. And that really, really makes me angry. Because not only is it illegal, the whole counterfeit luxury trade depends on slavery. Child slavery, too. They chain children to sewing machines. Such a good thing for a "Christian" to support. Bryan brought Missy back a counterfeit Michael Kors bag from Cambodia. So, he went to a mission that supposedly saves people from human trafficking, and then supported the people who do the trafficking.gymchick43 wrote:Sorry double/triple post?? Lol I am creeping twitter waiting for gender reveal. And Jared said their Canada goose jackets are fake/knock offs and from China. They aren’t knock offs because they actually show the legit logo/name so they are counterfeit! Which is illegal is it not? For it to be legal the spelling of the name brand would need to be different.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
If it's true, and they bought counterfeit goods, I certainly won't believe anything either these people say about "protecting the children", or doing service.
Unfortunately, even though it's illegal, they don't seem to do anything to people who buy counterfeit goods. Maybe if they did, the demand would decrease.
Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
Someone should tweet that out to him. I would but I’m blocked lmao (from a year ago disagreeing with Ellie saying buying a pure bred dog is equivalent of choosing not to adopt). This information is from the Canada goose website- it’s talks about how the jackets are made in gross contaminated materials (raccoon poop, other animal fur inside jackets) and the child labour. [img]//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201712 ... 7a5e8f.jpg[/img][img]//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201712 ... d74738.jpg[/img]
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- ewokfan11
- Guru Gossiper
- Posts: 2882
- Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2016 10:00 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: E+J: No Longer Infertile, Just Insensitive | Part 34
It could be fake, but the way the photo is posed makes the brand name really prominent - and it looks exactly like one currently for sale for $800 on their website. Even if it's fake from China, I'll bet the fur is still real. Even the counterfeit coats like these sell for several $100s in China.gymchick43 wrote:Sorry double/triple post?? Lol I am creeping twitter waiting for gender reveal. And Jared said their Canada goose jackets are fake/knock offs and from China. They aren’t knock offs because they actually show the legit logo/name so they are counterfeit! Which is illegal is it not? For it to be legal the spelling of the name brand would need to be different.
E+J: No Longer Infertile, Just Insensitive | Part 34
“Someone” tweeted at Jared about the counterfeit and he backpeddled and erased without replying/owning up to it.
These were his tweets claiming they were fake: [img]//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201712 ... 92afdc.jpg[/img]
Here are the tweets informing him that it’s illegal and about child factories:
[img]//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201712 ... 519f7d.jpg[/img]
And 2 mins after that reply he deleted all the tweets about the jacket being from China: [img]//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201712 ... 44a1af.jpg[/img]
So fake.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
These were his tweets claiming they were fake: [img]//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201712 ... 92afdc.jpg[/img]
Here are the tweets informing him that it’s illegal and about child factories:
[img]//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201712 ... 519f7d.jpg[/img]
And 2 mins after that reply he deleted all the tweets about the jacket being from China: [img]//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201712 ... 44a1af.jpg[/img]
So fake.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Last edited by GymChick on Sat Dec 16, 2017 7:53 am, edited 1 time in total.