John and Joan (IVF grant recipients)

Locked
User avatar
actuallydear
Guru Gossiper
Guru Gossiper
Posts: 3639
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2014 6:53 am
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: John and Joan (IVF grant recipients)

Unread post by actuallydear »

RootBeerFloatie wrote:In reality, the more she grieves the less she'll be able to love anyone else
I don't think she cares
Popcorn
Amateur
Amateur
Posts: 36
Joined: Sun Apr 30, 2017 9:54 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: John and Joan (IVF grant recipients)

Unread post by Popcorn »

Her latest post is interesting. Not going to screenshot it as I use YTMD on my laptop and instagram on my phone. But it's a picture of the stuffed fox on Maeve's bench with the passage from The Velveteen Rabbit about how things become "real" by being loved.

It seems like an admission of everything that's been said here: she kind of knows that she has made Maeve into a "real"/imaginary person...but
User avatar
marshmallowfluf
True Gossiper
True Gossiper
Posts: 1428
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 6:52 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: John and Joan (IVF grant recipients)

Unread post by marshmallowfluf »

Popcorn wrote:Her latest post is interesting. Not going to screenshot it as I use YTMD on my laptop and instagram on my phone. But it's a picture of the stuffed fox on Maeve's bench with the passage from The Velveteen Rabbit about how things become "real" by being loved.

It seems like an admission of everything that's been said here: she kind of knows that she has made Maeve into a "real"/imaginary person...but
The most interesting thing about that post is that the fox is wearing a baby outfit..


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
User avatar
actuallydear
Guru Gossiper
Guru Gossiper
Posts: 3639
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2014 6:53 am
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: John and Joan (IVF grant recipients)

Unread post by actuallydear »

I definitely think she could benefit from an inpatient program.

I truly hope she can get better.
User avatar
lmmomSD
Super Moddie
Super Moddie
Posts: 25258
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2015 12:08 pm
Location: San Diego, Ca
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 18 times

Re: John and Joan (IVF grant recipients)

Unread post by lmmomSD »

actuallydear wrote:I definitely think she could benefit from an inpatient program.

I truly hope she can get better.
I definitely don't think that the multiple GFMs and using the situation to make $$ off people's sympathy is OK. But-- I do believe that she is really consumed by her grief and really needs more help than she is getting. I hope she can get better too. And I don't think bringing another baby into the mix is going to help, and it could really be damaging to the poor kid who will never live up to perfect Maeve.

Sent from my XT1080 using Tapatalk
cruelwinter
Amateur
Amateur
Posts: 23
Joined: Mon May 09, 2016 12:29 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

John and Joan (IVF grant recipients)

Unread post by cruelwinter »

lmmomSD wrote:
olivialinnea101 wrote:
CallieT wrote:Sorry if this is something that's been discussed, but why did Maeve pass away at 37 weeks? Was it preventable? And whatever it was, would it have affected her if she was born?
She had a growth restriction in utero. In most cases when it is caught and the mother is induced and the baby is born early they do just fine once they are surviving outside the mother. Maeve passed away because the growth restriction Joan had wasn't caught by her midwives, she went in multiple times due to decreased movement and they dismissed her and sadly Maeve passed and at her next checkup when her heartbeat wasn't detectable she was rushed to the hospital for induction and delivered Maeve dead. I am sure the reason for her intense agony was only heightened due to the fact that had her team caught it Maeve would have been alive and well, sadly medicine, doctors, and midwives aren't perfect.
They don't _know_ that Maeve would have been alive and well. They don't know what caused the growth restriction. That is why the lawyer said that they didn't have a case.

Sent from my XT1080 using Tapatalk
They do actually know what caused the growth restriction, she has said before that Maeve's placenta had a condition called "villitis of unknown etiology"

[img]//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201705 ... e2d4f8.png[/img]
skiingmama1
Gossiper
Gossiper
Posts: 621
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2017 7:30 pm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: John and Joan (IVF grant recipients)

Unread post by skiingmama1 »

She had a growth restriction in utero. In most cases when it is caught and the mother is induced and the baby is born early they do just fine once they are surviving outside the mother. Maeve passed away because the growth restriction Joan had wasn't caught by her midwives, she went in multiple times due to decreased movement and they dismissed her and sadly Maeve passed and at her next checkup when her heartbeat wasn't detectable she was rushed to the hospital for induction and delivered Maeve dead. I am sure the reason for her intense agony was only heightened due to the fact that had her team caught it Maeve would have been alive and well, sadly medicine, doctors, and midwives aren't perfect.[/quote]
They don't _know_ that Maeve would have been alive and well. They don't know what caused the growth restriction. That is why the lawyer said that they didn't have a case.

Sent from my XT1080 using Tapatalk[/quote]

They do actually know what caused the growth restriction, she has said before that Maeve's placenta had a condition called "villitis of unknown etiology"

Thats why I said in MOST cases the baby does well once it is thriving on its own. Of course there is always a chance this wouldn't be the case, but overall the prognosis is usually positive if it is caught and a mother is induced and a baby is born early.

Image[/quote]
skiingmama1
Gossiper
Gossiper
Posts: 621
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2017 7:30 pm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: John and Joan (IVF grant recipients)

Unread post by skiingmama1 »

actuallydear wrote:I definitely think she could benefit from an inpatient program.

I truly hope she can get better.

She did mention that she was invited to attend a retreat for grieving loss moms over the summer. Hopefully that can help her to start healing mentally and emotionally.
User avatar
lmmomSD
Super Moddie
Super Moddie
Posts: 25258
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2015 12:08 pm
Location: San Diego, Ca
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 18 times

Re: John and Joan (IVF grant recipients)

Unread post by lmmomSD »

olivialinnea101 wrote:She had a growth restriction in utero. In most cases when it is caught and the mother is induced and the baby is born early they do just fine once they are surviving outside the mother. Maeve passed away because the growth restriction Joan had wasn't caught by her midwives, she went in multiple times due to decreased movement and they dismissed her and sadly Maeve passed and at her next checkup when her heartbeat wasn't detectable she was rushed to the hospital for induction and delivered Maeve dead. I am sure the reason for her intense agony was only heightened due to the fact that had her team caught it Maeve would have been alive and well, sadly medicine, doctors, and midwives aren't perfect.
They don't _know_ that Maeve would have been alive and well. They don't know what caused the growth restriction. That is why the lawyer said that they didn't have a case.

Sent from my XT1080 using Tapatalk[/quote]

They do actually know what caused the growth restriction, she has said before that Maeve's placenta had a condition called "villitis of unknown etiology"

Thats why I said in MOST cases the baby does well once it is thriving on its own. Of course there is always a chance this wouldn't be the case, but overall the prognosis is usually positive if it is caught and a mother is induced and a baby is born early.

[img]//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201705 ... e2d4f8.png[/img][/quote][/quote]
Thanks. I must have misunderstood something along the line. My understanding was that there was no way to know if Maeve would have been OK. But thanks for clarifying!

Sent from my XT1080 using Tapatalk
User avatar
GymChick
Guru Gossiper
Guru Gossiper
Posts: 2403
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2015 5:45 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: John and Joan (IVF grant recipients)

Unread post by GymChick »

olivialinnea101 wrote:She had a growth restriction in utero. In most cases when it is caught and the mother is induced and the baby is born early they do just fine once they are surviving outside the mother. Maeve passed away because the growth restriction Joan had wasn't caught by her midwives, she went in multiple times due to decreased movement and they dismissed her and sadly Maeve passed and at her next checkup when her heartbeat wasn't detectable she was rushed to the hospital for induction and delivered Maeve dead. I am sure the reason for her intense agony was only heightened due to the fact that had her team caught it Maeve would have been alive and well, sadly medicine, doctors, and midwives aren't perfect.
They don't _know_ that Maeve would have been alive and well. They don't know what caused the growth restriction. That is why the lawyer said that they didn't have a case.

Sent from my XT1080 using Tapatalk[/quote]

They do actually know what caused the growth restriction, she has said before that Maeve's placenta had a condition called "villitis of unknown etiology"

Thats why I said in MOST cases the baby does well once it is thriving on its own. Of course there is always a chance this wouldn't be the case, but overall the prognosis is usually positive if it is caught and a mother is induced and a baby is born early.

[img]//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201705 ... e2d4f8.png[/img][/quote][/quote]

My coworker has this condition with one of her twins. She is high risk and they are monitoring growth and heart and they have an early section scheduled. If I were Joan my grief would most certainly be heightened by the fact that the midwives didn't catch it. If a baby has a genetic issues and going in you know their quality of life will be 0 I feel like, yes sad and devastating, it's easier to accept. Joan's situation makes it so much harder to accept because it was probably preventable. She is majorly depressed, and not very stable. I don't think I would ever recover if my doctor missed something obvious and my baby had a heart beat at 36 weeks and none the next week....God forbid, lock me in the nut house.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
User avatar
MommaLindsey2
Guru Gossiper
Guru Gossiper
Posts: 2503
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2016 7:13 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: John and Joan (IVF grant recipients)

Unread post by MommaLindsey2 »

If she was really worried about decreased movement she should have rushed herself to the hospital not her midwife and not wait till the next appointment to find out the baby died. I would start freaking in my pregnancies if I went more than an hour or two without feeling movement. I would lay on my side and drink juice (someone I know lost a baby due to the cord wrapping around the neck at 39 weeks so I've always been freaked out about this stuff) I know it's not her fault but damn this whole thing just seems like it could have been avoided. I know she trusted her midwife but maybe she trusted her a little too much.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
User avatar
flowerpuppy
Informer
Informer
Posts: 341
Joined: Tue May 24, 2016 9:18 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: John and Joan (IVF grant recipients)

Unread post by flowerpuppy »

their frozen embryo transfer gfm is STILL open! now, i'll admit that i'm not someone who is ashamed to accept monetary gifts or help from other people (so long as they are financially comfortable), but even to me, this is excessive! they are over 4000 dollars past their goal, and they're still keeping it open in hopes of squeaking more money out of people. it's so sketchy of them.
User avatar
Pineapples
Guru Gossiper
Guru Gossiper
Posts: 2285
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2016 8:33 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: John and Joan (IVF grant recipients)

Unread post by Pineapples »

Blehmieux wrote:their frozen embryo transfer gfm is STILL open! now, i'll admit that i'm not someone who is ashamed to accept monetary gifts or help from other people (so long as they are financially comfortable), but even to me, this is excessive! they are over 4000 dollars past their goal, and they're still keeping it open in hopes of squeaking more money out of people. it's so sketchy of them.

You cannot close a gfm account. If people want to still donate they will. They have removed the links from their social media..


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
User avatar
flowerpuppy
Informer
Informer
Posts: 341
Joined: Tue May 24, 2016 9:18 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: John and Joan (IVF grant recipients)

Unread post by flowerpuppy »

Pineapples wrote:
Blehmieux wrote:their frozen embryo transfer gfm is STILL open! now, i'll admit that i'm not someone who is ashamed to accept monetary gifts or help from other people (so long as they are financially comfortable), but even to me, this is excessive! they are over 4000 dollars past their goal, and they're still keeping it open in hopes of squeaking more money out of people. it's so sketchy of them.

You cannot close a gfm account. If people want to still donate they will. They have removed the links from their social media..


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
really? i swear i've seen fundraisers that no longer have the option to donate, and after a quick google search i see instructions on the gofundme site for how to disable donations.
User avatar
yoyo16
Informer
Informer
Posts: 484
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2016 9:14 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: John and Joan (IVF grant recipients)

Unread post by yoyo16 »

I just looked on GofundMe's website. You can take a fundraiser down, you can even take down the donations button while leaving the page up. I think they're being lazy about it. They also know that people will continue to donate if they keep it up.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
cruelwinter
Amateur
Amateur
Posts: 23
Joined: Mon May 09, 2016 12:29 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: John and Joan (IVF grant recipients)

Unread post by cruelwinter »

I just read her latest ig post and in it she said her ivf doctor told her she could have the embryo transferred in two cycles but she said to John she doesn't think she'll be ready by then. So it seems she's actually realising she needs to take care of herself.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
HelloSweetie
Super Moddie
Super Moddie
Posts: 15415
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2014 7:33 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: John and Joan (IVF grant recipients)

Unread post by HelloSweetie »

cruelwinter wrote:I just read her latest ig post and in it she said her ivf doctor told her she could have the embryo transferred in two cycles but she said to John she doesn't think she'll be ready by then. So it seems she's actually realising she needs to take care of herself.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I disagree. I think it's just something she's saying for sympathy tbh.

She says her bleeding just stopped yesterday. This means she hasn't even finished one cycle yet, let alone two. She wants to avoid IVF around Maeve's birthday, but that is less than a month away. She also says Sweetpea will be 12 weeks at that time).

I'll be shocked if they don't try the IVF after June, just as she said from the start. Two cycles still seems to line up just right for that.
User avatar
crew96
Talker
Talker
Posts: 239
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 6:14 pm
Location: Columbus, OH
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: John and Joan (IVF grant recipients)

Unread post by crew96 »

MommaLindsey2 wrote:If she was really worried about decreased movement she should have rushed herself to the hospital not her midwife and not wait till the next appointment to find out the baby died. I would start freaking in my pregnancies if I went more than an hour or two without feeling movement. I would lay on my side and drink juice (someone I know lost a baby due to the cord wrapping around the neck at 39 weeks so I've always been freaked out about this stuff) I know it's not her fault but damn this whole thing just seems like it could have been avoided. I know she trusted her midwife but maybe she trusted her a little too much.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It's easy to say what you would have done because it didn't happen to you. It's similar to jury's on personal injury cases. They typically don't award much because "I would have looked both ways before going through the intersection when my light turned green. Thus the driver running the red light wouldn't have hit me."


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
User avatar
rodgerdodger
Gossiper
Gossiper
Posts: 805
Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2014 6:21 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: John and Joan (IVF grant recipients)

Unread post by rodgerdodger »

More and more Joan is acting like one of those crazy old women in 19th century novels who are still grieving the loss of their stillborn. All she needs is some petticoats and a fainting couch


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Image
Scar2016
Guru Gossiper
Guru Gossiper
Posts: 2134
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2016 10:06 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: John and Joan (IVF grant recipients)

Unread post by Scar2016 »

rodgerdodger wrote:More and more Joan is acting like one of those crazy old women in 19th century novels who are still grieving the loss of their stillborn. All she needs is some petticoats and a fainting couch
Don't forget the smelling salts for afterwards. Her instagram posts are reaching Shakespearean heights. People are telling her she should write a book. I'd say yes other than the fact it would mean opening yet another GFM account. I don't know how people survive in the rest of America without GFM's. How are y'all doing it?
I see NapTubers everywhere :coffee:
Locked

Return to “Ellie and Jared”