• Advertisement
    

FamilyFunPack

Re: FamilyFunPack

Postby Natxo » Wed Jan 03, 2018 7:05 am

I don’t really care that she gets toys, it’s just that her room is literally overflowing with those stuffed animals/toys. She does not have any more space in her room to add more crap. It feels like they didn’t put much thought into her presents, they seem to care more about quantity over quality. I’m sure there’s things out there that she would love, but would be of better quality and have her interested for more than 5 minutes. There’s not much she can get out of 200 stuffed animals.
Natxo
Informer
 
Posts: 355
Joined: Mon May 15, 2017 1:21 pm
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 1592 times

Advertisement

Re: FamilyFunPack

Postby lmmomSD » Wed Jan 03, 2018 7:55 am

Natxo wrote:I don’t really care that she gets toys, it’s just that her room is literally overflowing with those stuffed animals/toys. She does not have any more space in her room to add more crap. It feels like they didn’t put much thought into her presents, they seem to care more about quantity over quality. I’m sure there’s things out there that she would love, but would be of better quality and have her interested for more than 5 minutes. There’s not much she can get out of 200 stuffed animals.
It's weird, though. On the one hand, they seem to be trying to keep her a little girl, and on the other, they're really driving an obsession with cosmetics. She gets a TON of makeup. It makes for a really sick combo. I'm sure the pedophiles love screenshotting when she's trying on the bright red lipstick. The lack of foresight in these parents, or the ability to just pretend it's not out there, amazes me.

They really push the gender roles in that family. Those stupid headbands with big flowers that Alyssa wears every day, she almost always wears dresses, and the makeup-- at least they let her play soccer. Those headbands are awful. Are they trying to make her the next JoJo? It won't work. JoJo has charisma, for all the other things wrong with her.

I am glad they are sending Michael to preschool. I hope he does ok. He's not used to having to take turns and be accountable. Or use an inside voice. But I think he will benefit from it immensely. I still can't believe they started a channel for him. Greed.

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
User avatar
lmmomSD
Guru Gossiper
 
Posts: 15632
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2015 12:08 pm
Location: San Diego, Ca
Has thanked: 86880 times
Been thanked: 74455 times

Re: FamilyFunPack

Postby unionjack » Sun Jan 07, 2018 8:44 am

Their social blade estimates a monthly earning of 0$, could it be that they have been completely demonetized? :-o
The only other channel with an income of 0$, which I could find, was "The Tannerites", and they have most definitely been demonetized...
unionjack
Amateur
 
Posts: 72
Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2017 4:45 am
Has thanked: 108 times
Been thanked: 154 times

Re: FamilyFunPack

Postby lmmomSD » Sun Jan 07, 2018 9:10 am

unionjack wrote:Their social blade estimates a monthly earning of 0$, could it be that they have been completely demonetized? :-o
The only other channel with an income of 0$, which I could find, was "The Tannerites", and they have most definitely been demonetized...
We can only hope. Do they have ads playing before their videos?

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
User avatar
lmmomSD
Guru Gossiper
 
Posts: 15632
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2015 12:08 pm
Location: San Diego, Ca
Has thanked: 86880 times
Been thanked: 74455 times

Re: FamilyFunPack

Postby onbreak » Sun Jan 07, 2018 9:20 am

The end of the daily home movies???

Sent from my LG-M257 using Tapatalk
User avatar
onbreak
Guru Gossiper
 
Posts: 2645
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2017 8:30 am
Has thanked: 8094 times
Been thanked: 13060 times

Re: FamilyFunPack

Postby Natxo » Thu Jan 11, 2018 3:17 am

Oh my they’re moving once again, possibly to a different state because they want people to guess where they’re moving.They need a new house for every new year don’t they. Maybe it’s to do with them being demonetised.
Natxo
Informer
 
Posts: 355
Joined: Mon May 15, 2017 1:21 pm
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 1592 times

Re: FamilyFunPack

Postby iseeyou01 » Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:06 am

The family on social blade has their income showing so what makes people believe they have been sanctioned?
iseeyou01
Amateur
 
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:05 am
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 6 times

Re: FamilyFunPack

Postby Natxo » Fri Jan 12, 2018 12:46 pm

They’ve lost millions of views around December and some of their videos are gone. Either they deleted them or YouTube did. But they seem to still be making a lot of money.. unfortunately.
Alyssa is literally making enough money for an average family to live off on her own channel. I just hope that they’re saving it for her future and not using it.
Natxo
Informer
 
Posts: 355
Joined: Mon May 15, 2017 1:21 pm
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 1592 times

Re: FamilyFunPack

Postby iseeyou01 » Fri Jan 12, 2018 1:40 pm

The family seem very responsible and clearly have a very good family unit so I can not see them using the children’s money for themselves. They also don’t need to when their main channels is thriving.

The weird thing is the family say they moved a few weeks ago and are settled into their new Home and yet all the videos that have been uploaded are in the old house and definitely no packing went on. So the move makes no sense.
iseeyou01
Amateur
 
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:05 am
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 6 times

Re: FamilyFunPack

Postby unionjack » Sat Jan 13, 2018 3:33 am

iseeyou01 wrote:The family on social blade has their income showing so what makes people believe they have been sanctioned?


You're correct, one can see their income again, however a few days ago it was somehow gone/shown as being 0$.

Also: They are clearly somehow using their children's money for themselves, if they pretty much only film their kids, even for their main channel.
unionjack
Amateur
 
Posts: 72
Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2017 4:45 am
Has thanked: 108 times
Been thanked: 154 times

Re: FamilyFunPack

Postby iseeyou01 » Sat Jan 13, 2018 8:20 am

unionjack wrote:
iseeyou01 wrote:The family on social blade has their income showing so what makes people believe they have been sanctioned?


You're correct, one can see their income again, however a few days ago it was somehow gone/shown as being 0$.

Also: They are clearly somehow using their children's money for themselves, if they pretty much only film their kids, even for their main channel.


It is a family blog so of course they film the children. But all the kids seemingly enjoy it and have the best life’s possible while making millions. All the children are openly adored by the parents as well.

So what’s the harm?
iseeyou01
Amateur
 
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:05 am
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 6 times

Re: FamilyFunPack

Postby lmmomSD » Sat Jan 13, 2018 12:06 pm

iseeyou01 wrote:
unionjack wrote:
iseeyou01 wrote:The family on social blade has their income showing so what makes people believe they have been sanctioned?


You're correct, one can see their income again, however a few days ago it was somehow gone/shown as being 0$.

Also: They are clearly somehow using their children's money for themselves, if they pretty much only film their kids, even for their main channel.


It is a family blog so of course they film the children. But all the kids seemingly enjoy it and have the best life’s possible while making millions. All the children are openly adored by the parents as well.

So what’s the harm?
The harm?
The kids have no privacy. This isn't their choice. Owen and Michael for sure have been on camera since before they were born. It's not a normal way to live. People say that the kids can say if they don't want to be filmed, but I don't think it would occur to them. And being the moneymakers outs a lot of pressure on them. Nobody would watch the adults in this family. They're boring AF. It's the kids people watch for.
They get sent all kinds of crap from adoring fans. They've done nothing to deserve this but exist. They have no particular talent. So they're growing up thinking they're special snowflakes. They've filmed David shirtless. So they're exposing him to pedophiles. Nobody came to David's last birthday party, and I am willing to bet that either kids make fun of him for being in the vlogs, or parents didn't want their kids to be on YouTube. And it seemed that instead of maybe considering why, the mom chose to vlog about it as a sympathy grab. Their diet is horrific, but that doesn't have anything to do with vlogging.
The parents are greedy. They list the kids' sizes in their "About Us" section. They shouldn't be accepting gifts from random strangers. They (as you said) make millions. Definitely more than most of the people sending them stuff. Have they once said "Thank you for the thought, but we have more than enough. Please donate to a shelter or children's charity"? Nope. Just "Here are our sizes! Send us crap!"
"Family vloggers" make me disgusted. It's a whole cottage industry based on showing off your kids for money. And it's not jealousy on my part. I wouldn't want to live that way. The way these people spend, moving every year (which also isn't good for kids) I wonder how much they are putting aside for the future. I really hope there is a trust fund for each of those kids. They're the ones that earned all the money.

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
User avatar
lmmomSD
Guru Gossiper
 
Posts: 15632
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2015 12:08 pm
Location: San Diego, Ca
Has thanked: 86880 times
Been thanked: 74455 times

Re: FamilyFunPack

Postby unionjack » Sat Jan 13, 2018 12:37 pm

lmmomSD wrote:The harm?
The kids have no privacy. This isn't their choice. Owen and Michael for sure have been on camera since before they were born. It's not a normal way to live. People say that the kids can say if they don't want to be filmed, but I don't think it would occur to them. And being the moneymakers outs a lot of pressure on them. Nobody would watch the adults in this family. They're boring AF. It's the kids people watch for.
They get sent all kinds of crap from adoring fans. They've done nothing to deserve this but exist. They have no particular talent. So they're growing up thinking they're special snowflakes. They've filmed David shirtless. So they're exposing him to pedophiles. Nobody came to David's last birthday party, and I am willing to bet that either kids make fun of him for being in the vlogs, or parents didn't want their kids to be on YouTube. And it seemed that instead of maybe considering why, the mom chose to vlog about it as a sympathy grab. Their diet is horrific, but that doesn't have anything to do with vlogging.
The parents are greedy. They list the kids' sizes in their "About Us" section. They shouldn't be accepting gifts from random strangers. They (as you said) make millions. Definitely more than most of the people sending them stuff. Have they once said "Thank you for the thought, but we have more than enough. Please donate to a shelter or children's charity"? Nope. Just "Here are our sizes! Send us crap!"
"Family vloggers" make me disgusted. It's a whole cottage industry based on showing off your kids for money. And it's not jealousy on my part. I wouldn't want to live that way. The way these people spend, moving every year (which also isn't good for kids) I wonder how much they are putting aside for the future. I really hope there is a trust fund for each of those kids. They're the ones that earned all the money.

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk


That pretty much says it all...

I truly hope for the sake of these kids that they at least have a trust fund, they are probably going to need it in order to pay for a psychologist once their "YouTube career" is over... :|

Imagine going to college and all people have to do in order to pretty much know everything about your family is go on YouTube and watch your home videos, imagine applying for a job and the person interviewing you is able to find out when you were potty trained with just one simple click... :?

No, thank you, that is not a life I would want to live!
unionjack
Amateur
 
Posts: 72
Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2017 4:45 am
Has thanked: 108 times
Been thanked: 154 times

Re: FamilyFunPack

Postby iseeyou01 » Sat Jan 13, 2018 12:37 pm

The kids and family have privacy when they don’t film as nobody knows any info on them apart from they are from California.

The family are completely harmless and children can watch them and you don’t have to worry they are doing something inappropriate.

I am amazed at the criticism on here as they are totally harmless as a family. Also fans send the children gifts and kept asking them what sizes the kids were so of course to save time and stop answering the same question over and over they put up the sizes.

All the kids come across as very sincere and delighted hted when they open fan mail and always say thank you.

The only spoiled one seems to be Michel and that’s only because he was the baby for 4 years and everybody doted on him.
iseeyou01
Amateur
 
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:05 am
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 6 times

Re: FamilyFunPack

Postby lmmomSD » Sat Jan 13, 2018 6:48 pm

No, they don't _have to_ put their sizes up. They don't need anything. They have MORE than enough. Look at all the clutter in that house. They can say, in the same place they put the sizes, exactly what I said before: "Thank you for the thought. But we have more than enough. If you like, donate to a children's charity in our name" Or something along those lines.

Obviously, we disagree. You and I definitely have a very different idea of what "privacy" is. Sure, nobody knows where they live, but they know lots of other intimate details of their lives. I say again, it's not a normal way to live.
When you go to apply for a job, would you want your prospective boss to be able to Google you and find videos of you in diapers, or screaming like a banshee over a doughnut? They've exploited their kids' injuries _for money_. That's the reason they got demonetized. They purposely posted videos of their kids hurt, crying and in embarrassing positions. For money. I'll bet "Tragic Eye Injury" or whatever it was called, is one of the ones that got deleted. It was a bummer, for sure. But it wasn't "tragic". Clickbait, using a child's injury.

Anyway, I don't want to argue with you. You obviously like them, and don't see anything wrong with how they make their living. I personally think that staying home and posting videos of your children for other people's entertainment is a shitty way to make a living. Those kids don't have a choice. There are no laws to protect them, unlike child actors, and YouTube is only now starting to crack down on the exploitation. So we'll just have to agree to disagree.
Out of curiosity, if you like them so much, why are you participating in a gossip forum?

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
User avatar
lmmomSD
Guru Gossiper
 
Posts: 15632
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2015 12:08 pm
Location: San Diego, Ca
Has thanked: 86880 times
Been thanked: 74455 times

Re: FamilyFunPack

Postby iseeyou01 » Sun Jan 14, 2018 12:28 am

Because I don’t agree with everything they do but overall I find them pretty tame compared to some families who do this.

Like the video at Christmas giving presents to poor people outside what looked like a $1 dollar store was weird. Giving to charity to is always great but why on earth would you film you doing it and put the poor families on your YouTube as well.
iseeyou01
Amateur
 
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:05 am
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 6 times

Re: FamilyFunPack

Postby lmmomSD » Sun Jan 14, 2018 5:49 am

iseeyou01 wrote:Because I don’t agree with everything they do but overall I find them pretty tame compared to some families who do this.

Like the video at Christmas giving presents to poor people outside what looked like a $1 dollar store was weird. Giving to charity to is always great but why on earth would you film you doing it and put the poor families on your YouTube as well.
That's fine. I didn't mean to imply that you aren't welcome here. I was just curious. Thanks for answering, and for being respectful. Some people come in these forums and name call and get rude defending the vloggers they like. So forgive me for being a little paranoid.

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
User avatar
lmmomSD
Guru Gossiper
 
Posts: 15632
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2015 12:08 pm
Location: San Diego, Ca
Has thanked: 86880 times
Been thanked: 74455 times

Re: FamilyFunPack

Postby iseeyou01 » Mon Jan 15, 2018 8:23 am

So the family have moved to Hawaii, this was one hell of a quick move unless this is a gimmick and they are planning a long vacation or something.

And not a very good start if they have permanently moved to be caught up in the hoax missile scare over the weekend.
iseeyou01
Amateur
 
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:05 am
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 6 times

Re: FamilyFunPack

Postby Natxo » Mon Jan 15, 2018 1:44 pm

Wonder if the aunt moved with them? She’s lived with them this whole time hasn’t she
Natxo
Informer
 
Posts: 355
Joined: Mon May 15, 2017 1:21 pm
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 1592 times

Re: FamilyFunPack

Postby coolusername1236 » Mon Jan 15, 2018 3:44 pm

lmmomSD wrote:Michael has his own channel. Michael.

I am speechless.

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
I experienced pain while watching the channel trailer
"Are you a jealous type?"
Only if the person next to me has better food than I do.
coolusername1236
Gossiper
 
Posts: 701
Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2017 2:29 pm
Has thanked: 1252 times
Been thanked: 2877 times

Re: FamilyFunPack

Postby iseeyou01 » Mon Jan 15, 2018 5:27 pm

Natxo wrote:Wonder if the aunt moved with them? She’s lived with them this whole time hasn’t she



She was in today’s video so you would assume so. None of it makes any sense. Up until about November they basically blogged every single day. Absolutely no mention of a move and the house showed no signs of being packed up.

Suddenly they have moved, what happened to the dogs they had or the fact the family moved closer to them as they lived further apart for years.

It’s literally like they clicked their fingers and moved with 6 kids in tow.
iseeyou01
Amateur
 
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:05 am
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 6 times

Re: FamilyFunPack

Postby abeks » Mon Jan 15, 2018 10:21 pm

Seems like they moved to Hawaii. If they did, they are in for a big culture shock. Beautiful place, but expensive af. I’m sure they can afford it but it really is expensive, especially with all those kids. Most people who move there from the states thinking they are excited to live in paradise move back in like 3 years. The public school system there sucks and the kids, hate to say it will be teased simply for being white and from the “mainland”. I’m blonde hair blue eyed, I grew up there (from kindergarten) and I still was bullied for being white/“Haole”. Racism is very real there against whites. Sad, but true. Certain areas aren’t as bad but it’s a definite issue. If they go to private school, that will be so expensive with all those kids. Could you imagine lol. The dogs likely are being quarantined (required when shipping animals there). I don’t give them more than 3 years there. Lol.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
abeks
Amateur
 
Posts: 12
Joined: Tue May 16, 2017 2:54 pm
Has thanked: 847 times
Been thanked: 38 times

Re: FamilyFunPack

Postby abeks » Mon Jan 15, 2018 10:25 pm

That is..if they even moved there. Lol.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
abeks
Amateur
 
Posts: 12
Joined: Tue May 16, 2017 2:54 pm
Has thanked: 847 times
Been thanked: 38 times

Re: FamilyFunPack

Postby iseeyou01 » Tue Jan 16, 2018 3:21 pm

So they did a live video on Instagram that they then deleted quite quickly but they are going to be posting less videos, they are also taking a break from YouTube and won’t be posting as they want some privacy to settle in and some the videos had been deleted due to them having glitches but they will be reposted soon.
iseeyou01
Amateur
 
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:05 am
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 6 times

Re: FamilyFunPack

Postby lmmomSD » Thu Jan 18, 2018 3:00 pm

I don't think they moved to Hawaii. They just posted a vlog of the twins' birthday at Universal Studios.

Shay's sister Carlie just vacationed in Hawaii and is all hot to move there now. But she won't. She said she wanted to move to Texas after a few days in Dallas. People who up and move somewhere because they enjoyed a vacation there are pretty dumb in my book. Of course you like a place when you're there on vacation! But living there isn't vacation. And everything you don't like about yourself at home is still going to be there for you to deal with.

Back to these people-- I don't understand why they move so much! The place they were in seemed really nice. And maybe that's why nobody came to David's birthday party-- he was still a new kid. Kids need stability, not a new house every year!

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
User avatar
lmmomSD
Guru Gossiper
 
Posts: 15632
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2015 12:08 pm
Location: San Diego, Ca
Has thanked: 86880 times
Been thanked: 74455 times

PreviousNext


  • Advertisement

Return to A-H

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

  • Advertisement