• Advertisement
    

E+J - Schrödinger's Baby | Part 26

Re: E+J - Schrödinger's Baby | Part 26

Postby ktrose1996 » Fri Jun 02, 2017 3:58 pm

Edenberry wrote:
HelloSweetie wrote:I don't think it's necessarily her. I think Ellie would appear far more sanctimonious and arrogant in defending herself. I just think it's a viewer that doesn't see what we see.

Plus Ellie is passive aggressive. She'll say something bitchy and add "have a nice day." The new poster is too tame.


Okay, my wild theory on this (and I'm so glad I'm not alone in the curiosity-dept), is that Ellie?? is asking these very specific questions about how we can tell certain things about how they vlog, which videos contain contradictions to their image, so she (or is it a HE?!!) can go back and remove those parts from those vlogs; also so they can make sure to never include those clues again!!

This person only seems interested in explaining away the facts we clearly see and asking specifically how we know these things and where to find them.

We could be 100% totally off base, but by god I hope we're right, lol!

No I am not Ellie. I asked because everything everyone is talking about in these threads I have never noticed while watching there videos.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk
ktrose1996
Amateur
 
Posts: 52
Joined: Mon May 29, 2017 4:57 pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 135 times

Advertisement

Re: E+J - Schrödinger's Baby | Part 26

Postby GymChick » Fri Jun 02, 2017 4:09 pm

ktrose1996 wrote:
gymchick43 wrote:Google her username, don't think it's her... Some young 20 year old from Ohio I think lol (Twitter)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It humors me that you took the time to Google my username. Which is also my twitter and instagram name. Although I haven't used in my twitter in almost 2 years, I still use my instagram. I joined YTMD, only a few days ago because I had Google something about Ellie and Jared and it brought me to YTMD, except the forum I was reading was all positive about Ellie and Jared. Then I come to some of the newer forums to see everyone is bad talking them. I really like them. I asked questions on here being genuine, really wanting to know why people dislike and thought the way they did about them. Maybe I was wrong about them and they aren't as good as they seem, or maybe I wasn't. Which is why I asked about them.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk


Took the time aka using the bathroom lol


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
User avatar
GymChick
Guru Gossiper
 
Posts: 2335
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2015 5:45 pm
Has thanked: 3225 times
Been thanked: 8697 times

Re: E+J - Schrödinger's Baby | Part 26

Postby thenightowl » Fri Jun 02, 2017 4:22 pm

Jackson running around outside in his underwear, unnecessary :(
User avatar
thenightowl
Extreme Gossiper
 
Posts: 1800
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2013 3:55 am
Has thanked: 2977 times
Been thanked: 5464 times

Re: E+J - Schrödinger's Baby | Part 26

Postby actuallydear » Fri Jun 02, 2017 4:26 pm

User avatar
actuallydear
Guru Gossiper
 
Posts: 3381
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2014 6:53 am
Has thanked: 9383 times
Been thanked: 18041 times

Re: E+J - Schrödinger's Baby | Part 26

Postby clashingpiglet » Sat Jun 03, 2017 12:31 am

Edenberry wrote:
HelloSweetie wrote:I don't think it's necessarily her. I think Ellie would appear far more sanctimonious and arrogant in defending herself. I just think it's a viewer that doesn't see what we see.

Plus Ellie is passive aggressive. She'll say something bitchy and add "have a nice day." The new poster is too tame.


Okay, my wild theory on this (and I'm so glad I'm not alone in the curiosity-dept), is that Ellie?? is asking these very specific questions about how we can tell certain things about how they vlog, which videos contain contradictions to their image, so she (or is it a HE?!!) can go back and remove those parts from those vlogs; also so they can make sure to never include those clues again!!

This person only seems interested in explaining away the facts we clearly see and asking specifically how we know these things and where to find them.

We could be 100% totally off base, but by god I hope we're right, lol!

Very 1984-esque lol

Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk
clashingpiglet
Amateur
 
Posts: 81
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2016 8:48 pm
Has thanked: 314 times
Been thanked: 431 times

Previous


  • Advertisement

Return to Ellie and Jared

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

  • Advertisement