GQS: Quadchins he’s buying views again|Part 62

Locked
User avatar
4x4 year olds
True Gossiper
True Gossiper
Posts: 1043
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2019 3:53 pm
Has thanked: 4622 times
Been thanked: 6655 times

Re: GQS: Quadchins he’s buying views again|Part 62

Post by 4x4 year olds » Wed Oct 02, 2019 5:46 pm

alannah62 wrote:
Ireallydocare wrote:
Harpersmama2 wrote:
Wed Oct 02, 2019 10:14 am
Can someone explain to be what KAD stands for?
Thanks~
Kool Aid Drinker.

It is helpful when new members join the board to go back and read some of the previous threads to get caught up.
This board moves fast and generally we do not re-hash topics that have already been posted, unless of course, they happen again.
KAD has been explained many times in many of the topic threads.

Happy snarking!
Geez...she asked a simple question, no need to be bitching and lecturing. Are you the boss of the page? Yes, the word KAD has been mentioned many times, but the actual meaning has not and it would take her a long time to find it.

Sent from my SM-T580 using Tapatalk
In her defence, I’ve seen that same question replied to plenty of times on here, and I have to say that’s the politest way I’ve ever seen it written.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
User avatar
Snarkmeister
Informer
Informer
Posts: 447
Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2018 12:22 pm
Has thanked: 166 times
Been thanked: 1474 times

Re: GQS: Quadchins he’s buying views again|Part 62

Post by Snarkmeister » Wed Oct 02, 2019 6:02 pm

4x4 year olds wrote:
alannah62 wrote:
Ireallydocare wrote: Kool Aid Drinker.

It is helpful when new members join the board to go back and read some of the previous threads to get caught up.
This board moves fast and generally we do not re-hash topics that have already been posted, unless of course, they happen again.
KAD has been explained many times in many of the topic threads.

Happy snarking!
Geez...she asked a simple question, no need to be bitching and lecturing. Are you the boss of the page? Yes, the word KAD has been mentioned many times, but the actual meaning has not and it would take her a long time to find it.

Sent from my SM-T580 using Tapatalk
In her defence, I’ve seen that same question replied to plenty of times on here, and I have to say that’s the politest way I’ve ever seen it written.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Agreed.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
User avatar
lmmomSD
Guru Gossiper
Guru Gossiper
Posts: 22765
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2015 12:08 pm
Location: San Diego, Ca
Has thanked: 35124 times
Been thanked: 26706 times

Re: GQS: Quadchins he’s buying views again|Part 62

Post by lmmomSD » Wed Oct 02, 2019 6:12 pm

Some forums that have been around a while have an FAQ thread. It's helpful. Do we have one for these losers? I would be willing to help. I see the same questions asked a lot too, and it's a relatively easy way to get that kind of thing taken care of. Just say "go to the FAQS".
Not trying to create more work for mods.

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

User avatar
SassySassenach
Support Moddie
Support Moddie
Posts: 1155
Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2017 4:20 pm
Has thanked: 3334 times
Been thanked: 5772 times

Re: GQS: Quadchins he’s buying views again|Part 62

Post by SassySassenach » Wed Oct 02, 2019 6:13 pm

*Rule Reminder*

rules

K. Respect is the name of the game, you must respect your fellow members

Name calling is not only uncalled for, but also violates the rules that everyone agreed to when creating an account.

I hope everyone will take a moment to go refresh themselves on the rules so that we are all on the same page.

Happy Snarking! :)
User avatar
SassySassenach
Support Moddie
Support Moddie
Posts: 1155
Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2017 4:20 pm
Has thanked: 3334 times
Been thanked: 5772 times

Re: GQS: Quadchins he’s buying views again|Part 62

Post by SassySassenach » Wed Oct 02, 2019 6:23 pm

lmmomSD wrote:Some forums that have been around a while have an FAQ thread. It's helpful. Do we have one for these losers? I would be willing to help. I see the same questions asked a lot too, and it's a relatively easy way to get that kind of thing taken care of. Just say "go to the FAQS".
Not trying to create more work for mods.

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
We can absolutely do that!
What stuff do we want there? I mean... these fools have a TON of baggage. Image you’re welcome to PM me if you want


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
User avatar
Snarkmeister
Informer
Informer
Posts: 447
Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2018 12:22 pm
Has thanked: 166 times
Been thanked: 1474 times

Re: GQS: Quadchins he’s buying views again|Part 62

Post by Snarkmeister » Wed Oct 02, 2019 6:24 pm

Image

Ummm...what 30 something mother of 4 wears 3 scrunches in her hair at the same time?
Scambuster
Amateur
Amateur
Posts: 45
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2018 11:14 pm
Has thanked: 370 times
Been thanked: 120 times

Re: GQS: Quadchins he’s buying views again|Part 62

Post by Scambuster » Wed Oct 02, 2019 6:52 pm

Yep exactly like that. Says one name and others and you can still click into it to see the names. And could count manually if you really wanted to. So we’ll still be able to see Tyson liking all the teen girl photos

I’m just hanging out for January to see how the YouTube changes will effect all these family vloggers. I’m guessing it won’t change much.



When you say blocking of likes, what does it look like? Does it just come up as one name and others? For example, Tyson Gardner and others....Oops, we know what kinda page that must be I wonder how that works, while you can’t see how many people like it, you click on others and you can see all the names anyway.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
User avatar
ears
True Gossiper
True Gossiper
Posts: 1220
Joined: Sat Jun 16, 2018 12:45 pm
Has thanked: 8097 times
Been thanked: 5252 times

Re: GQS: Quadchins he’s buying views again|Part 62

Post by ears » Wed Oct 02, 2019 7:32 pm

Look at Tyler resting his hands on huge belly like a 9 month pregnant women.

He's making a lifestyle change. That's why he has enough food for 2 people.

I think Ashley needs to start drinking more plexshit she's getting wider by the day.[IMG]//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201910 ... 2859e0.jpg[/IMG][IMG]//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201910 ... cb2c55.jpg[/IMG][IMG]//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201910 ... 7ccb9c.jpg[/IMG]

Sent from my SM-S907VL using Tapatalk

Harpersmama2
Amateur
Amateur
Posts: 70
Joined: Tue Oct 01, 2019 6:55 pm
Has thanked: 77 times
Been thanked: 348 times

Re: GQS: Quadchins he’s buying views again|Part 62

Post by Harpersmama2 » Wed Oct 02, 2019 7:36 pm

OMG! He’s such a fraud!!!! Doesn’t look like diet food to me! She’s spreading out because nanny Ash is the real mom.

Fraud Squad!
Donits
Informer
Informer
Posts: 350
Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2017 9:16 pm
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 1259 times

Re: GQS: Quadchins he’s buying views again|Part 62

Post by Donits » Wed Oct 02, 2019 9:25 pm

I have some time to kill so I visited the QTE facebook page.
183 posts on the page
7 are from tyliar.
That's 3.83% effort from him on his own scam business
User avatar
lmmomSD
Guru Gossiper
Guru Gossiper
Posts: 22765
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2015 12:08 pm
Location: San Diego, Ca
Has thanked: 35124 times
Been thanked: 26706 times

Re: GQS: Quadchins he’s buying views again|Part 62

Post by lmmomSD » Wed Oct 02, 2019 9:43 pm

Does he have TWO pizzas?

He is not eating "healthy". And doesn't "gut health" start with at least cutting out _some_ of the fat? If it's about starting with "gut health"
Those KAD really will swallow anything he says, won't they? No pun intended...
Found this. Interesting it doesn't say anything about pink drinks. I don't see any of these things crossing his lips. Just sugar, white carbs, sodium (and lots of it) and fat. Oh and Coke. Even if it's diet Coke, it's bad for you. Diet soda is not benign. It actually increases your cravings for sugar.
How can anyone believe he's really on some "health journey"?[IMG]//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201910 ... 8caea0.jpg[/IMG]

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

alannah62
Talker
Talker
Posts: 160
Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2017 10:24 am
Has thanked: 39 times
Been thanked: 92 times

Re: GQS: Quadchins he’s buying views again|Part 62

Post by alannah62 » Wed Oct 02, 2019 9:52 pm

Night lady wrote:
alannah62 wrote:
Ireallydocare wrote: Kool Aid Drinker.

It is helpful when new members join the board to go back and read some of the previous threads to get caught up.
This board moves fast and generally we do not re-hash topics that have already been posted, unless of course, they happen again.
KAD has been explained many times in many of the topic threads.

Happy snarking!
Geez...she asked a simple question, no need to be bitching and lecturing. Are you the boss of the page? Yes, the word KAD has been mentioned many times, but the actual meaning has not and it would take her a long time to find it.

Sent from my SM-T580 using Tapatalk
Alannah,
For one, she wasn't at all being bitchy. Next, Ireallydocare kind of is a boss of this page. Shes been here long enough to be the boss. Please don't associate a kind message to a new poster with being bitchy because that's not what it was. It was just letting her know that she can read up thread to get to know the lingo better.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
I've been on this page longer than either of you. I just don't comment much. Longevity does not make one a boss. Any wonder why this page has so much turnover? Why there isn't so much fun snarking like there used to be?
Lots of people don't come on here any longer. Maybe because a simple question has to be met with a bunch of unwritten rules however "kind" they seem to be written. Yes, KAD is mentioned often, and one can understand from the context that it easily means greedner fanatic etc. But not what the acronym stands for which was all she was asking. And does one have to go back through hundreds of posts to find a simple answer? When I first started on here there were a lot of the same people who had been on here and the previous snark site and said all kinds of lingo, backstory jokes and acronyms. I felt lost. I asked questions and actually what kad meant. And I was answered nicely. Not with a "go review hundreds of posts to get an answer for an acronym" FFS. Or don't dare ask about something that has been talked about before. That's a joke since many come on here and say the same old shit every post they make. Do I give a "rule" lecture? Nope, just scroll on by.
Granted since the greedners are boring and do the same shit week after week there is much redundancy on this page and also probably why many have left and/or stop commenting. But IMO refusing to just simply answer a simple quick question is not welcoming. And neither is immediately accusing one of being a spy. A spy most likely doesn't make any posts.


Sent from my SM-T580 using Tapatalk

User avatar
monkey_crazy
Gossiper
Gossiper
Posts: 560
Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2019 9:58 am
Has thanked: 5286 times
Been thanked: 3990 times

Re: GQS: Quadchins he’s buying views again|Part 62

Post by monkey_crazy » Thu Oct 03, 2019 2:56 am

alannah62 wrote:
Wed Oct 02, 2019 9:52 pm
Night lady wrote:
alannah62 wrote:Geez...she asked a simple question, no need to be bitching and lecturing. Are you the boss of the page? Yes, the word KAD has been mentioned many times, but the actual meaning has not and it would take her a long time to find it.

Sent from my SM-T580 using Tapatalk
Alannah,
For one, she wasn't at all being bitchy. Next, Ireallydocare kind of is a boss of this page. Shes been here long enough to be the boss. Please don't associate a kind message to a new poster with being bitchy because that's not what it was. It was just letting her know that she can read up thread to get to know the lingo better.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
I've been on this page longer than either of you. I just don't comment much. Longevity does not make one a boss. Any wonder why this page has so much turnover? Why there isn't so much fun snarking like there used to be?
Lots of people don't come on here any longer. Maybe because a simple question has to be met with a bunch of unwritten rules however "kind" they seem to be written. Yes, KAD is mentioned often, and one can understand from the context that it easily means greedner fanatic etc. But not what the acronym stands for which was all she was asking. And does one have to go back through hundreds of posts to find a simple answer? When I first started on here there were a lot of the same people who had been on here and the previous snark site and said all kinds of lingo, backstory jokes and acronyms. I felt lost. I asked questions and actually what kad meant. And I was answered nicely. Not with a "go review hundreds of posts to get an answer for an acronym" FFS. Or don't dare ask about something that has been talked about before. That's a joke since many come on here and say the same old shit every post they make. Do I give a "rule" lecture? Nope, just scroll on by.
Granted since the greedners are boring and do the same shit week after week there is much redundancy on this page and also probably why many have left and/or stop commenting. But IMO refusing to just simply answer a simple quick question is not welcoming. And neither is immediately accusing one of being a spy. A spy most likely doesn't make any posts.


Sent from my SM-T580 using Tapatalk
Alannah, I get your point but I still don't think Idoreallycare was bitchy at all. She answered the question and suggested to go back and read previous threads. I think KAD has been mentioned in this very thread at least once already. Before I joined the site I'd been reading for months and still didn't know what KAD meant but was kinda afraid to ask cause I thought I should know that. So when someone finally asked what it meant I was relieved. lol So I understand where you are coming from. Anyway, I just wanted to say there is nothing wrong with suggesting to read previous threads if it's done in a polite way.
User avatar
MervelllaB
True Gossiper
True Gossiper
Posts: 1008
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2019 11:01 am
Has thanked: 208 times
Been thanked: 1199 times

Re: GQS: Quadchins he’s buying views again|Part 62

Post by MervelllaB » Thu Oct 03, 2019 3:07 am

alannah62 wrote:
Night lady wrote:
alannah62 wrote:Geez...she asked a simple question, no need to be bitching and lecturing. Are you the boss of the page? Yes, the word KAD has been mentioned many times, but the actual meaning has not and it would take her a long time to find it.

Sent from my SM-T580 using Tapatalk
Alannah,
For one, she wasn't at all being bitchy. Next, Ireallydocare kind of is a boss of this page. Shes been here long enough to be the boss. Please don't associate a kind message to a new poster with being bitchy because that's not what it was. It was just letting her know that she can read up thread to get to know the lingo better.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
I've been on this page longer than either of you. I just don't comment much. Longevity does not make one a boss. Any wonder why this page has so much turnover? Why there isn't so much fun snarking like there used to be?
Lots of people don't come on here any longer. Maybe because a simple question has to be met with a bunch of unwritten rules however "kind" they seem to be written. Yes, KAD is mentioned often, and one can understand from the context that it easily means greedner fanatic etc. But not what the acronym stands for which was all she was asking. And does one have to go back through hundreds of posts to find a simple answer? When I first started on here there were a lot of the same people who had been on here and the previous snark site and said all kinds of lingo, backstory jokes and acronyms. I felt lost. I asked questions and actually what kad meant. And I was answered nicely. Not with a "go review hundreds of posts to get an answer for an acronym" FFS. Or don't dare ask about something that has been talked about before. That's a joke since many come on here and say the same old shit every post they make. Do I give a "rule" lecture? Nope, just scroll on by.
Granted since the greedners are boring and do the same shit week after week there is much redundancy on this page and also probably why many have left and/or stop commenting. But IMO refusing to just simply answer a simple quick question is not welcoming. And neither is immediately accusing one of being a spy. A spy most likely doesn't make any posts.


Sent from my SM-T580 using Tapatalk
I believe ireallydocare did answer the question of what KAD means. She followed it up with a perfectly reasonable suggestion of reading back to catch up. She categorically did not suggest anyone was a “spy”! Where on Earth would you get such an idea?
There are mods on this page but generally speaking they don’t have to step in often and play “boss”. Generally speaking, everyone is good natured and tolerant of others’ opinions. Occasionally someone like yourself comes along, who isn’t just as polite to others. Your attack on ireallydocare was quite unnecessary.
For what it’s worth...I have been here a relatively short time and I’ve seen the use of the word KAD explained many times.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
DisgustedbyGreedners
Informer
Informer
Posts: 373
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2018 6:27 pm
Has thanked: 743 times
Been thanked: 2614 times

Re: GQS: Quadchins he’s buying views again|Part 62

Post by DisgustedbyGreedners » Thu Oct 03, 2019 4:15 am

JD386 wrote:Also, she has zero original ideas. KE did this Jack O Lantern look 2 days ago.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk



She was totally looking at KE’s photo the entire time she was doing it. Her eyes kept flickering back and forth, it was so obvious she was copying something and as you stated it was KE. She copies practically everything Katie does.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
DisgustedbyGreedners
Informer
Informer
Posts: 373
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2018 6:27 pm
Has thanked: 743 times
Been thanked: 2614 times

Re: GQS: Quadchins he’s buying views again|Part 62

Post by DisgustedbyGreedners » Thu Oct 03, 2019 4:21 am

JD386 wrote:Oh sweet heavens. If you watch her IGtv application of the ridiculous Halloween makeup, right around the 7:30 mark where she’s showing makeup from the bag I’m fairly certain you can see her nipples through her shirt. Not going to screenshot it but she leans back a few times and they’re right there. Image


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk



When I watched it the nips made their appearance towards the end it said 1:41 seconds. Every time she kept putting her hands in her hair you could see them. You could also see her right boob is smaller than the left but boy those suckers are saggy and droopy. She really shouldn’t go braless in her videos. It’s not flattering at all.

What struck me as odd was seeing how sheer that turtleneck was, especially with her big boobs stretching it out making it more sheer. How could she not see that? Where is her Mormon modesty? This was tacky and gross, is she that clueless to expose herself like that?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
DownTheRabbitHole
Informer
Informer
Posts: 255
Joined: Fri Jul 05, 2019 3:45 am
Has thanked: 2291 times
Been thanked: 1972 times

Re: GQS: Quadchins he’s buying views again|Part 62

Post by DownTheRabbitHole » Thu Oct 03, 2019 4:40 am

nahthxx wrote:
Sun Sep 29, 2019 8:10 am
Alexandra4dreams wrote:I've been tryjng to find it, maybe one of you sisters will remember. When the Ferals started school last year, Dumbass said something in a vlog about how good the school is they are sending them to. I though she said that when kids leave that preschool, they are reading at a first grade level or maybe she said something about the writting being at that level also. I can't find it, but it was definitely said on a vlog. I think at the school in the parking lot. I'll keep investigating.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
You’re correct, and a quick look at the schools website (they’re not just that one school in Utah, they have franchises) they claim their students go to kindergarten reading above level.

As someone who works with this age, has a degree in child development I can tell you that pushing reading at 4 and 5 years old is developmentally inappropriate. Those kids don’t have basic social skills, they shouldn’t be worried about reading.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


I know I’m a little late to the party in responding but I just had to say that I remember that too and not only do I agree with you but if the programme is like many of these ‘learn to read in three easy steps’ or ‘learn to read in four short weeks’ it actually does more harm than good. I’ve had children start in my classroom having learnt to read by 4 years old. But whilst they may be able to read a book put in front of them when you ask them to retell the story they just read or answer questions about it they’re completely lost because they’re rote reading the words with absolutely no comprehension of what they’re reading. As a teacher it’s far harder to break the habit of rote reading and teach them to instead read with comprehension than it is to start from scratch with a child who can only recognise their name and some basic common sight words. The girls have enough challenges without them being taught in a manner that’s only going to require the relearning of a skill.
alannah62
Talker
Talker
Posts: 160
Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2017 10:24 am
Has thanked: 39 times
Been thanked: 92 times

Re: GQS: Quadchins he’s buying views again|Part 62

Post by alannah62 » Thu Oct 03, 2019 5:09 am

MervelllaB wrote:
alannah62 wrote:
Night lady wrote:Alannah,
For one, she wasn't at all being bitchy. Next, Ireallydocare kind of is a boss of this page. Shes been here long enough to be the boss. Please don't associate a kind message to a new poster with being bitchy because that's not what it was. It was just letting her know that she can read up thread to get to know the lingo better.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
I've been on this page longer than either of you. I just don't comment much. Longevity does not make one a boss. Any wonder why this page has so much turnover? Why there isn't so much fun snarking like there used to be?
Lots of people don't come on here any longer. Maybe because a simple question has to be met with a bunch of unwritten rules however "kind" they seem to be written. Yes, KAD is mentioned often, and one can understand from the context that it easily means greedner fanatic etc. But not what the acronym stands for which was all she was asking. And does one have to go back through hundreds of posts to find a simple answer? When I first started on here there were a lot of the same people who had been on here and the previous snark site and said all kinds of lingo, backstory jokes and acronyms. I felt lost. I asked questions and actually what kad meant. And I was answered nicely. Not with a "go review hundreds of posts to get an answer for an acronym" FFS. Or don't dare ask about something that has been talked about before. That's a joke since many come on here and say the same old shit every post they make. Do I give a "rule" lecture? Nope, just scroll on by.
Granted since the greedners are boring and do the same shit week after week there is much redundancy on this page and also probably why many have left and/or stop commenting. But IMO refusing to just simply answer a simple quick question is not welcoming. And neither is immediately accusing one of being a spy. A spy most likely doesn't make any posts.


Sent from my SM-T580 using Tapatalk
I believe ireallydocare did answer the question of what KAD means. She followed it up with a perfectly reasonable suggestion of reading back to catch up. She categorically did not suggest anyone was a “spy”! Where on Earth would you get such an idea?
There are mods on this page but generally speaking they don’t have to step in often and play “boss”. Generally speaking, everyone is good natured and tolerant of others’ opinions. Occasionally someone like yourself comes along, who isn’t just as polite to others. Your attack on ireallydocare was quite unnecessary.
For what it’s worth...I have been here a relatively short time and I’ve seen the use of the word KAD explained many times.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Disagree with almost everything you said. Kad is not explained many times. I never said ireallydocare said anything about a spy. Someone else brought that up but I wasn't going to waste my time quoting them.


Sent from my SM-T580 using Tapatalk

alannah62
Talker
Talker
Posts: 160
Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2017 10:24 am
Has thanked: 39 times
Been thanked: 92 times

Re: GQS: Quadchins he’s buying views again|Part 62

Post by alannah62 » Thu Oct 03, 2019 5:21 am

monkey_crazy wrote:
alannah62 wrote:
Wed Oct 02, 2019 9:52 pm
Night lady wrote:Alannah,
For one, she wasn't at all being bitchy. Next, Ireallydocare kind of is a boss of this page. Shes been here long enough to be the boss. Please don't associate a kind message to a new poster with being bitchy because that's not what it was. It was just letting her know that she can read up thread to get to know the lingo better.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
I've been on this page longer than either of you. I just don't comment much. Longevity does not make one a boss. Any wonder why this page has so much turnover? Why there isn't so much fun snarking like there used to be?
Lots of people don't come on here any longer. Maybe because a simple question has to be met with a bunch of unwritten rules however "kind" they seem to be written. Yes, KAD is mentioned often, and one can understand from the context that it easily means greedner fanatic etc. But not what the acronym stands for which was all she was asking. And does one have to go back through hundreds of posts to find a simple answer? When I first started on here there were a lot of the same people who had been on here and the previous snark site and said all kinds of lingo, backstory jokes and acronyms. I felt lost. I asked questions and actually what kad meant. And I was answered nicely. Not with a "go review hundreds of posts to get an answer for an acronym" FFS. Or don't dare ask about something that has been talked about before. That's a joke since many come on here and say the same old shit every post they make. Do I give a "rule" lecture? Nope, just scroll on by.
Granted since the greedners are boring and do the same shit week after week there is much redundancy on this page and also probably why many have left and/or stop commenting. But IMO refusing to just simply answer a simple quick question is not welcoming. And neither is immediately accusing one of being a spy. A spy most likely doesn't make any posts.


Sent from my SM-T580 using Tapatalk
Alannah, I get your point but I still don't think Idoreallycare was bitchy at all. She answered the question and suggested to go back and read previous threads. I think KAD has been mentioned in this very thread at least once already. Before I joined the site I'd been reading for months and still didn't know what KAD meant but was kinda afraid to ask cause I thought I should know that. So when someone finally asked what it meant I was relieved. lol So I understand where you are coming from. Anyway, I just wanted to say there is nothing wrong with suggesting to read previous threads if it's done in a polite way.
Monkey crazy. Thanks for your nice reply. You made my point though. You shouldn't have had to wonder for months what the kad acronym meant or been afraid to ask. But when you have someone like ireallydocare (who is not a mod) giving the "reread hundreds of posts" to get a simple answer, that's what happens. And it was not the first time it happened. Usually I scroll by, but this time I wanted to point out that someone was making up "nonofficial" rules.

Sent from my SM-T580 using Tapatalk

User avatar
MervelllaB
True Gossiper
True Gossiper
Posts: 1008
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2019 11:01 am
Has thanked: 208 times
Been thanked: 1199 times

Re: GQS: Quadchins he’s buying views again|Part 62

Post by MervelllaB » Thu Oct 03, 2019 5:51 am

alannah62 wrote:
MervelllaB wrote:
alannah62 wrote:I've been on this page longer than either of you. I just don't comment much. Longevity does not make one a boss. Any wonder why this page has so much turnover? Why there isn't so much fun snarking like there used to be?
Lots of people don't come on here any longer. Maybe because a simple question has to be met with a bunch of unwritten rules however "kind" they seem to be written. Yes, KAD is mentioned often, and one can understand from the context that it easily means greedner fanatic etc. But not what the acronym stands for which was all she was asking. And does one have to go back through hundreds of posts to find a simple answer? When I first started on here there were a lot of the same people who had been on here and the previous snark site and said all kinds of lingo, backstory jokes and acronyms. I felt lost. I asked questions and actually what kad meant. And I was answered nicely. Not with a "go review hundreds of posts to get an answer for an acronym" FFS. Or don't dare ask about something that has been talked about before. That's a joke since many come on here and say the same old shit every post they make. Do I give a "rule" lecture? Nope, just scroll on by.
Granted since the greedners are boring and do the same shit week after week there is much redundancy on this page and also probably why many have left and/or stop commenting. But IMO refusing to just simply answer a simple quick question is not welcoming. And neither is immediately accusing one of being a spy. A spy most likely doesn't make any posts.


Sent from my SM-T580 using Tapatalk
I believe ireallydocare did answer the question of what KAD means. She followed it up with a perfectly reasonable suggestion of reading back to catch up. She categorically did not suggest anyone was a “spy”! Where on Earth would you get such an idea?
There are mods on this page but generally speaking they don’t have to step in often and play “boss”. Generally speaking, everyone is good natured and tolerant of others’ opinions. Occasionally someone like yourself comes along, who isn’t just as polite to others. Your attack on ireallydocare was quite unnecessary.
For what it’s worth...I have been here a relatively short time and I’ve seen the use of the word KAD explained many times.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Disagree with almost everything you said. Kad is not explained many times. I never said ireallydocare said anything about a spy. Someone else brought that up but I wasn't going to waste my time quoting them.


Sent from my SM-T580 using Tapatalk
You have every right to disagree with me. That is your prerogative.
Just to be clear though. No one used the term spy. Someone mentioned pretend snarkers, but that doesn’t translate to spy?
Why would anyone accuse someone of being a spy? It’s an open forum. You don’t need to be a member to read. There’s no need for anyone to spy? Who would someone be spying for? The Gardners can and probably do read here any time they want. The term KAD has been explained so often that I’m sure even they know what it means. Image


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
User avatar
SassySassenach
Support Moddie
Support Moddie
Posts: 1155
Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2017 4:20 pm
Has thanked: 3334 times
Been thanked: 5772 times

Re: GQS: Quadchins he’s buying views again|Part 62

Post by SassySassenach » Thu Oct 03, 2019 6:04 am

Seriously y’all... I know the greedners are boring as hell, but we are better than this bickering amongst ourselves.

Tone is a very tricky thing to convey over the internet.

Just so everyone is clear, I post rule reminders when it looks like things are turning tense on the board. (Or sometimes I post it afterwards, because I’m not on here 24/7, because “rill life”) If I was calling anyone out directly, I have no qualms about doing so. Sometimes a simple “hey, here’s the rules” can make everyone pause, take a breath & see the board with calmer feelings.

For what it’s worth, I’ve had quite a few interactions with ireallydocare & I, personally, did not see her comment as unkind.

New members are great! The more the merrier. And this conversation has helped the idea of a FAQs board being born to help future newbies who might need a quick “catch up” on info/abbreviations. Especially helpful since our thread count is pretty high.

I know that Ive been kind of filling a spot for Snarkadoodle until she returns, but I really am trying to do the best by everyone on this board. So when I post rule reminders, it’s because I don’t want things to escalate to a point that the head moderators come in and put us in time out. We’ve been there, done that... I’d rather not have that again.

Obviously you are all entitled to your feelings and opinions, can we just remember that the topic at hand is the greedners? They, for all their shortcomings, are the ones that brought us here and in a way helped create this group that I consider friends.

So there’s my 2 cents... stay snarky, my friends.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
User avatar
JD386
Guru Gossiper
Guru Gossiper
Posts: 3406
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2018 5:22 pm
Has thanked: 2589 times
Been thanked: 13745 times

Re: GQS: Quadchins he’s buying views again|Part 62

Post by JD386 » Thu Oct 03, 2019 6:07 am

Dear lord can we move on from this discussion? Maybe she intended to sound bitchy. Maybe she didn’t. At this point, WHO CARES!?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
tg910
Gossiper
Gossiper
Posts: 501
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2018 10:56 am
Has thanked: 407 times
Been thanked: 2283 times

Re: GQS: Quadchins he’s buying views again|Part 62

Post by tg910 » Thu Oct 03, 2019 6:10 am

Image

Blog posts directing to videos. Yawn.
*sniff, sniff* Smell that?
Desperation is in the air. YouTube revenue must be hurting


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
User avatar
nahthxx
Gossiper
Gossiper
Posts: 563
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2018 8:03 pm
Has thanked: 1569 times
Been thanked: 2684 times

Re: GQS: Quadchins he’s buying views again|Part 62

Post by nahthxx » Thu Oct 03, 2019 6:18 am

He really thinks he’s invincible...fucking perv

ImageImage


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
User avatar
SassySassenach
Support Moddie
Support Moddie
Posts: 1155
Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2017 4:20 pm
Has thanked: 3334 times
Been thanked: 5772 times

Re: GQS: Quadchins he’s buying views again|Part 62

Post by SassySassenach » Thu Oct 03, 2019 6:32 am

tg910 wrote:Image

Blog posts directing to videos. Yawn.
*sniff, sniff* Smell that?
Desperation is in the air. YouTube revenue must be hurting


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
I totally read that as “a dog in the life” and thought poor bentley. He’s being pimped out for views ImageImage


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Locked

Return to “Gardner Quad Squad”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Happy+Charlie and 10 guests