• Advertisement
    

E+J: No Longer Infertile, Just Insensitive | Part 34

Re: E+J: No Longer Infertile, Just Insensitive | Part 34

Postby Amelia322 » Tue Dec 12, 2017 10:25 pm

Johnson fam, Ellie and Jared and 8 passengers has D- on socialblade lol!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
User avatar
Amelia322
Guru Gossiper
 
Posts: 3319
Joined: Wed Mar 13, 2013 11:49 pm
Has thanked: 3815 times
Been thanked: 10673 times

Advertisement

Re: E+J: No Longer Infertile, Just Insensitive | Part 34

Postby priestess » Wed Dec 13, 2017 12:20 am

I said this on another forum but I’ll say it again here

I just find it so strange when they take so many actions just to get a short shot. Like when Jared was at the hotel and he stepped into the new hotel room for the first time, it wasn’t the “first time.” He already went in there, turned on the light, set up his camera, hit record, turned off the light, went back outside of the room, closed the door, and THEN opened the door and turned on the light again just to get that shot. It’s so exhausting. Sam and nia pull that shit all the time, like they’ll place the camera on a shelf at the grocery store and then walk past it while pretending it’s not there, or they’ll set up a camera on their car after shopping and then walk to the car AGAIN alike ???
User avatar
priestess
Talker
 
Posts: 108
Joined: Wed May 24, 2017 3:36 pm
Has thanked: 30 times
Been thanked: 624 times

Re: E+J: No Longer Infertile, Just Insensitive | Part 34

Postby lmmomSD » Wed Dec 13, 2017 2:01 am

HelloSweetie wrote:Sorry, but no. This is not a normal or healthy conversation for an almost 4 year old to have with his mother. Poor Jackson is being groomed to be his mother's mental health support, and that just isn't ok. If he is truly thinking things like this, then he is being given too much information. As a mother of an anxious boy, I can see some serious signs in Jackson if he's really asking questions like this on a regular basis like Ellie says.

It's not cute... it's incredibly sad and is going to become inconvenient for Ellie as he gets older and starts to have problems with worrying.

[img]https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20171212/ef65c3dc625343b93c134d665adcc96e.jpg[/img]
Oh, that is not cute at all. Is that what they told him happened to the last baby? That Jesus took it? This is why you don't tell little ones so early, you daft cow!

That's so sad! And at four years old, asking every day if the baby is still there? He now knows what his mama wants-- she wants him to ask about the baby, and that will make her happy, and he wants to make mama happy, because she hasn't been happy for a while, especially with him. Poor little guy. My heart breaks for him. He's doomed. How will he ever have a healthy romantic relationship?

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
User avatar
lmmomSD
Guru Gossiper
 
Posts: 14817
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2015 12:08 pm
Location: San Diego, Ca
Has thanked: 79413 times
Been thanked: 70629 times

Re: E+J: No Longer Infertile, Just Insensitive | Part 34

Postby lmmomSD » Wed Dec 13, 2017 2:04 am

Amelia322 wrote:Johnson fam, Ellie and Jared and 8 passengers has D- on socialblade lol!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Oh, please tell me SlyFox Family is running close behind!
Johnson Family totally deserves it. They used their girls crying as clickbait constantly.

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
User avatar
lmmomSD
Guru Gossiper
 
Posts: 14817
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2015 12:08 pm
Location: San Diego, Ca
Has thanked: 79413 times
Been thanked: 70629 times

Re: E+J: No Longer Infertile, Just Insensitive | Part 34

Postby PBandJelly » Wed Dec 13, 2017 8:28 am

I have a theory about this year’s IVF grant… Are we absolutely certain that E&J are donating their own money to fund a grant? Based on Kateka’s Instagram post, they have four grants to give away and four donors: zack’s jerryrig, Utah fertility center, footsteps for fertility and the university of Utah. Maybe E&J are splitting the cost with one of the groups? If each of the four donors are donating in full and so are E & J then wouldn’t there be five grants? Maybe E&J are serving only as a platform for giving the grants… just a thought
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
PBandJelly
Amateur
 
Posts: 11
Joined: Mon May 08, 2017 12:34 pm
Has thanked: 81 times
Been thanked: 64 times

Re: E+J: No Longer Infertile, Just Insensitive | Part 34

Postby HelloSweetie » Wed Dec 13, 2017 8:54 am

Jared decided to leave the "Caught You Doing What In Your Bedroom" thumbnail the same. More than a few of us Bee thought it was suggesting that Cal was touching himself. By leaving it are we to assume that was unintentional?[img]https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20171213/8b3edf3cc4b39e8cf05a09840698d4a3.jpg[/img]
User avatar
HelloSweetie
Guru Gossiper
 
Posts: 11658
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2014 8:33 am
Has thanked: 12888 times
Been thanked: 53525 times

Re: E+J: No Longer Infertile, Just Insensitive | Part 34

Postby HelloSweetie » Wed Dec 13, 2017 8:58 am

PBandJelly wrote:I have a theory about this year’s IVF grant… Are we absolutely certain that E&J are donating their own money to fund a grant? Based on Kateka’s Instagram post, they have four grants to give away and four donors: zack’s jerryrig, Utah fertility center, footsteps for fertility and the university of Utah. Maybe E&J are splitting the cost with one of the groups? If each of the four donors are donating in full and so are E & J then wouldn’t there be five grants? Maybe E&J are serving only as a platform for giving the grants… just a thought


I find it hard to believe that the Utah Fertility centre is participating and planning on giving a non-UT resident a grant. That alone seems shady. Preference shouldn't be given based on where you live. Not to mention, they have their own current patients that could use help. Same for Footsteps For Fertility! They already have people submitting applications for help. This is all about advertising.... and it definitely stinks.
User avatar
HelloSweetie
Guru Gossiper
 
Posts: 11658
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2014 8:33 am
Has thanked: 12888 times
Been thanked: 53525 times

Re: E+J: No Longer Infertile, Just Insensitive | Part 34

Postby GymChick » Wed Dec 13, 2017 8:58 am

HelloSweetie wrote:Jared decided to leave the "Caught You Doing What In Your Bedroom" thumbnail the same. More than a few of us Bee thought it was suggesting that Cal was touching himself. By leaving it are we to assume that was unintentional?[img]https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20171213/8b3edf3cc4b39e8cf05a09840698d4a3.jpg[/img]


It will be now be changed in 24 hours I’m sure lol

You’re welcome Jared


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
User avatar
GymChick
Guru Gossiper
 
Posts: 2226
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2015 5:45 pm
Has thanked: 3062 times
Been thanked: 8032 times

Re: E+J: No Longer Infertile, Just Insensitive | Part 34

Postby HelloSweetie » Wed Dec 13, 2017 9:00 am

gymchick43 wrote:
HelloSweetie wrote:Jared decided to leave the "Caught You Doing What In Your Bedroom" thumbnail the same. More than a few of us Bee thought it was suggesting that Cal was touching himself. By leaving it are we to assume that was unintentional?[img]https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20171213/8b3edf3cc4b39e8cf05a09840698d4a3.jpg[/img]


It will be now be changed in 24 hours I’m sure lol

You’re welcome Jared


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Yep. Pretty much why I posted it
User avatar
HelloSweetie
Guru Gossiper
 
Posts: 11658
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2014 8:33 am
Has thanked: 12888 times
Been thanked: 53525 times

E+J: No Longer Infertile, Just Insensitive | Part 34

Postby GymChick » Wed Dec 13, 2017 9:21 am

Did anyone notice during bonnies vlog Lincoln was talking up a storm (like 4+ word sentences using pronouns properly) Anyways Bonnie said “Ellie is amazed at everything her says because he talks so much” I’m sure Ellie has to be kinda worried about Calvin’s speech after hearing Lincoln? But maybe too prideful to get an assessment? Unless they are doing it in secret which is could totally see her doing (physio and brace was secret for a while). I can tell Calvin understands everything he just doesn’t seem to be speaking much or clearly. Lincoln is def “advanced” he has hit the 30 month milestone already and he isn’t even 30 months. I actually had my daughters speech assessed today and my daughter is right on track,
WARNING PERSONAL skip if you’re annoyed...she’s a couple months older than Lincoln, 30 months exactly...but I would say they are the same level. The SLP said she has no delay and actually advanced with pronouncation but they gave my advice to encourage the sentence use during conversation (because that’s what I was concerned about)...basically because my daughters daycare has all younger and autistic kids right now with an older lazier daycare provider (no activities just parallel play and screen time) and my long working hours that my daughter just wasn’t being challenged enough to use longer sentences (she uses 3-4 word sentences but I felt like not enough). But even in the one session she told me that she can tell she learns fast and will be fine as long as when I’m at home with her I continue to encourage and challenge her to make up for her shitty daycare environment.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
User avatar
GymChick
Guru Gossiper
 
Posts: 2226
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2015 5:45 pm
Has thanked: 3062 times
Been thanked: 8032 times

Re: E+J: No Longer Infertile, Just Insensitive | Part 34

Postby kirsti13 » Wed Dec 13, 2017 9:32 am

Seriously how old is Jared? If Ellie wasn’t so young and their kids so young I’d say he was in his 50s. I know that he’s obviously not that old, but holy crap he ages more every vlog. Dealing with Ellie has sure aged him


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
User avatar
kirsti13
Amateur
 
Posts: 76
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2015 9:51 am
Has thanked: 2810 times
Been thanked: 382 times

Re: E+J: No Longer Infertile, Just Insensitive | Part 34

Postby callie73 » Wed Dec 13, 2017 10:32 am

Considering it's a sin in mormon to touch yourself, I can't believe they would have a thumbnail and suggest such a thing, unless they are intentionally attracting views from the pedophiles. Kids as young as 8 but for sure 12 years old are interviewed alone with the Bishop and asked if they are keeping the laws of chastity, and some a pressed for details and shamed if they admit it. This is required for worthiness for baptism and a temple recommend.
callie73
Talker
 
Posts: 103
Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2017 2:42 pm
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 343 times

Re: E+J: No Longer Infertile, Just Insensitive | Part 34

Postby HelloSweetie » Wed Dec 13, 2017 10:41 am

callie73 wrote:Considering it's a sin in mormon to touch yourself, I can't believe they would have a thumbnail and suggest such a thing, unless they are intentionally attracting views from the pedophiles. Kids as young as 8 but for sure 12 years old are interviewed alone with the Bishop and asked if they are keeping the laws of chastity, and some a pressed for details and shamed if they admit it. This is required for worthiness for baptism and a temple recommend.


I really hope you are wrong.
User avatar
HelloSweetie
Guru Gossiper
 
Posts: 11658
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2014 8:33 am
Has thanked: 12888 times
Been thanked: 53525 times

Re: E+J: No Longer Infertile, Just Insensitive | Part 34

Postby Pency » Wed Dec 13, 2017 11:35 am

I don't really know how YouTube works on a creator's end, but why did their VidIQ estimated monthly earnings go down by half? Is it due to deleting videos?
Pency
Gossiper
 
Posts: 793
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2016 11:29 am
Has thanked: 251 times
Been thanked: 6016 times

Re: E+J: No Longer Infertile, Just Insensitive | Part 34

Postby HelloSweetie » Wed Dec 13, 2017 11:38 am

Pency wrote:I don't really know how YouTube works on a creator's end, but why did their VidIQ estimated monthly earnings go down by half? Is it due to deleting videos?


Yep. They also had a boost after the pregnancy announcement, but views went down again shortly after.
User avatar
HelloSweetie
Guru Gossiper
 
Posts: 11658
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2014 8:33 am
Has thanked: 12888 times
Been thanked: 53525 times

Re: E+J: No Longer Infertile, Just Insensitive | Part 34

Postby Cali15 » Wed Dec 13, 2017 11:52 am

If the child is shamed by their bishop then that bishop is entirely in the wrong. The reason they are asked whether or not they are living according to what’s set forward by the church is so that if there is an issue, they can open up to and receive help by their bishop, not be shamed. In a lot of cases, teenagers would rather up to someone other than their parents.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Cali15
Amateur
 
Posts: 17
Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2017 2:34 pm
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 72 times

Re: E+J: No Longer Infertile, Just Insensitive | Part 34

Postby PinkFrog » Wed Dec 13, 2017 2:46 pm

Cali15 wrote:If the child is shamed by their bishop then that bishop is entirely in the wrong. The reason they are asked whether or not they are living according to what’s set forward by the church is so that if there is an issue, they can open up to and receive help by their bishop, not be shamed. In a lot of cases, teenagers would rather up to someone other than their parents.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


But they are being told they are doing something wrong that is actually perfectly natural. Sounds like shame to me :(
PinkFrog
Amateur
 
Posts: 34
Joined: Tue Dec 12, 2017 12:26 pm
Has thanked: 37 times
Been thanked: 156 times

Re: E+J: No Longer Infertile, Just Insensitive | Part 34

Postby littlebaby » Wed Dec 13, 2017 5:35 pm

I just sorted E+J’s videos by oldest to newest and it is AMAZING how many titles and thumbnails they’ve changed. If you’ve been watching them for a few years it’s SUPER obvious what has been changed. I’ve been through their old videos enough times to see what stands out as unfamiliar. Especially because a lot of the new titles aren’t in all caps or have weird capitalization in some places and not in others.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
User avatar
littlebaby
Gossiper
 
Posts: 908
Joined: Fri Aug 21, 2015 2:03 pm
Has thanked: 891 times
Been thanked: 4765 times

Re: E+J: No Longer Infertile, Just Insensitive | Part 34

Postby littlebaby » Wed Dec 13, 2017 5:36 pm

I just sorted E+J’s videos by oldest to newest and it is AMAZING how many titles and thumbnails they’ve changed. If you’ve been watching them for a few years it’s SUPER obvious what has been changed. I’ve been through their old videos enough times to see what stands out as unfamiliar. Especially because a lot of the new titles aren’t in all caps or have weird capitalization in some places and not in others.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
User avatar
littlebaby
Gossiper
 
Posts: 908
Joined: Fri Aug 21, 2015 2:03 pm
Has thanked: 891 times
Been thanked: 4765 times

Re: E+J: No Longer Infertile, Just Insensitive | Part 34

Postby KayCeeee » Wed Dec 13, 2017 8:13 pm

Completely random thought: I wish they'd let Calvin's hair grow out. His hair is definitely thicker and wavier than Jackson's and just looks scraggly and bizarre in the back the way they keep it so short. I think it'd fill him out a lot better. Kind of like how Bonnie let Lincoln's hair grow out and embraced its curliness. I feel like Ellie is too much of a control freak to allow that though. The boys' hair is her territory and thus an extension of herself.
KayCeeee
Amateur
 
Posts: 51
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2017 7:05 am
Has thanked: 29 times
Been thanked: 377 times

Re: E+J: No Longer Infertile, Just Insensitive | Part 34

Postby onbreak » Wed Dec 13, 2017 8:19 pm

Remember her plan for cutting her potential daughters hair.. Not even going to attempt to find the vlog

1980s hot mess is her inspiration until it grows out evenly

Sent from my LG-M257 using Tapatalk
User avatar
onbreak
Guru Gossiper
 
Posts: 2284
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2017 8:30 am
Has thanked: 7589 times
Been thanked: 11490 times

Re: E+J: No Longer Infertile, Just Insensitive | Part 34

Postby emilynicole1435 » Wed Dec 13, 2017 8:56 pm

PBandJelly wrote:I have a theory about this year’s IVF grant… Are we absolutely certain that E&J are donating their own money to fund a grant? Based on Kateka’s Instagram post, they have four grants to give away and four donors: zack’s jerryrig, Utah fertility center, footsteps for fertility and the university of Utah. Maybe E&J are splitting the cost with one of the groups? If each of the four donors are donating in full and so are E & J then wouldn’t there be five grants? Maybe E&J are serving only as a platform for giving the grants… just a thought


Kind of off topic, but Kateka seems like such a genuinely positive and sweet person despite all she's been through. I hope her next treatment works out.
emilynicole1435
Informer
 
Posts: 255
Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2016 6:49 pm
Has thanked: 49 times
Been thanked: 720 times

Re: E+J: No Longer Infertile, Just Insensitive | Part 34

Postby lmmomSD » Wed Dec 13, 2017 9:08 pm

Guess who just got a new Chrysler Pacifica?

Family Fun Pack.

But they got demonetized, so Ellie probably isn't too jealous. .


Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
User avatar
lmmomSD
Guru Gossiper
 
Posts: 14817
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2015 12:08 pm
Location: San Diego, Ca
Has thanked: 79413 times
Been thanked: 70629 times

Re: E+J: No Longer Infertile, Just Insensitive | Part 34

Postby onbreak » Wed Dec 13, 2017 9:10 pm

She's jealous! I bet they miss that van.


Sent from my LG-M257 using Tapatalk
User avatar
onbreak
Guru Gossiper
 
Posts: 2284
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2017 8:30 am
Has thanked: 7589 times
Been thanked: 11490 times

Re: E+J: No Longer Infertile, Just Insensitive | Part 34

Postby ewokfan11 » Thu Dec 14, 2017 6:44 am

I'm guessing it's a girl. In Bonnie's video they sort of hinted more toward girl and they were all overly happy - which I doubt would be the case if it was boy #3.
ewokfan11
Extreme Gossiper
 
Posts: 1724
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2016 11:00 am
Has thanked: 1179 times
Been thanked: 8221 times

PreviousNext


  • Advertisement

Return to Ellie and Jared

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

  • Advertisement