Pinky34 wrote:I'm confused. Two stay at home parents are getting a nanny? Isn't that a little ridiculous?
Hey Pinky, you’re back. I haven’t read on here in awhile...I didn’t hear about the nanny...
Pinky34 wrote:I'm confused. Two stay at home parents are getting a nanny? Isn't that a little ridiculous?
Today’s fake BS , cry fest vlog has brought out some of our oldest snarkers here! I’m loving it, cmon sisters we need to be heard come out of hibernation, we need everyone especially the Greedners to read the real truth for the big whine fest today!lovethispage wrote:Pinky34 wrote:I'm confused. Two stay at home parents are getting a nanny? Isn't that a little ridiculous?
Hey Pinky, you’re back. I haven’t read on here in awhile...I didn’t hear about the nanny...
It really is a tough age, and I can believe it takes an hour to get them all ready to go. It seemed to take forever with my two, many years ago. It is extremely time-consuming, because it is the age kids are sort-of doing things for themselves, often slowly and badly, and of course they don't necessarily want to get ready when Mum and Dad want them to.Jane wrote:Yes! It seems they have made so much money from all their "followers" interest in their children's well being that they now don't have time for the very children that everyone supported? Their tastes and needs have grown very expensive (according to what they have shown in the vlogs).Pinky34 wrote:I'm confused. Two stay at home parents are getting a nanny? Isn't that a little ridiculous?
Three IS a tough age! Most parents feel it's harder than the "twos." I would think it would be especially tough with 4 of them given they seem to have been raised in a "have whatever you want/do whatever you want/you're only young once" parenting style.
I'm curious how ONE nanny can handle 4 girls when TWO of them couldn't? Ashley is rarely alone with them (if ever), but she's going to pay one person to be? A decent nanny for 4 children that age would not be cheap. It will run them at least $20 an hour for someone qualified. I hope they don't scrimp. This must a SUPERNANNY! Maybe Jo is coming? New show opportunity?
Excellent post! I just wonder what the nanny will think about quiet time in caged cribs ?nebulae116 wrote:I see another big problem with these idiots hiring a nanny ...
They're just going to hire some college aged girl who can come by and watch them play. Are they going to hire a professional nanny? No way. I live in Utah and our nanny pool is full of amazing college aged kids who do a great job keeping your kids alive and well. But they don't potty train or teach caged children how to function outside of the cage.
What they need is a nanny for themselves. They need someone to go in that mess of a house and show them how to wake up before 9am, get ready, have a routine, and follow-through on key tasks. It's called being an adult. These girls will never thrive without adult parents who know how to run bedtime, morning routines, and have clear and immediate consequences. A "nanny" isn't going to help that. You're wasting your money Trash and Bison, think again.
I’ve thought for quite some time a nanny was not far away. I could be way off base here but I’m wondering if Trashley has more work trips coming up and if the family have finally put their foot down. We know they’re nothing but liars so there has to be an ulterior motiveeskayem wrote:Ok. Can someone tell me why they need a nanny? They are two stay at home individuals. They could enroll them in day care and have two go two days a week and the other two go the other two days. Withh two home, one parent could take each remaining girl on a special day. Even if it's to the park or library (free things to do).
What telling us you're getting a nanny shows is: you'd rather put on make up than be a parent. You should be ashamed of yourselves.
Because if she was all dolled up she wouldn't look quite as pitiful.Wgchick22 wrote:How come Ashley can get all dolled up for her promo videos but she can’t for her “poor me” video?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk