Rachelle and Justin, The long lost siblings. | Part 2.
- prettyll
- True Gossiper
- Posts: 1235
- Joined: Mon May 30, 2016 10:42 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Rachelle and Justin, The long lost siblings. | Part 2.
There is nothing wrong with being a stay at home mom, but there is no reason to not work before then. Especially when you spend so much money on unnecessary things. They must have financial help from someone their finances just don’t make sense.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: Rachelle and Justin, The long lost siblings. | Part 2.
Amanda876 wrote:I stay at home with my daughter but don't feel bad about it. Our daughter is taken care of, house is cleaned, dinner is made and we stay out of the house much of the day. If I was to pay someone to watch my daughter I would be sinking my whole check into daycare.. I would much rather be the one to raise my child vs anyone else.. I don't blame Rachelle for wanting to stay home once the baby is born but she should probably be working during her pregnancy.
This! Agree with every single word.
-
- Talker
- Posts: 104
- Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2018 5:57 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Rachelle and Justin, The long lost siblings. | Part 2.
She's been a stay at home mom without a child. It just seems incredibly lazy. All my pregnancies were HIGH RISK just like her. HIGH RISK not BED REST.
You can work during a high risk pregnancy. At least part time
You can work during a high risk pregnancy. At least part time
-
- Talker
- Posts: 104
- Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2018 5:57 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Rachelle and Justin, The long lost siblings. | Part 2.
I think there's going to be some resentment in a situation like that. She should do her part before the baby gets there.
What, does she just assume Justin wouldn't want to stay home with his daughter all day too? Who wouldn't want that? How is that fair, because he's a man?
What, does she just assume Justin wouldn't want to stay home with his daughter all day too? Who wouldn't want that? How is that fair, because he's a man?
-
- Talker
- Posts: 124
- Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2017 10:04 am
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Rachelle and Justin, The long lost siblings. | Part 2.
Is it just me or did anyone think it was weird she bought a pack n play way before Brynn?
Re: Rachelle and Justin, The long lost siblings. | Part 2.
I thought it was a little weird too. To an extent. Just shows how much she wants this baby down to really tie him downyeahwhatever wrote:Is it just me or did anyone think it was weird she bought a pack n play way before Brynn?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- here4thepopcorn
- Informer
- Posts: 254
- Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2017 10:07 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Rachelle and Justin, The long lost siblings. | Part 2.
I think almost everything she does is strange. I understand being excited to be pregnant, but I would not be buying big baby items until after the viability markers. Especially after Brynn's unexplained miscarriage at 19 weeks, I probably would have held off on buying so much stuff until way after the 19 week mark with this pregnancy. I think a baby to Rachelle is a new accessory and she clearly loves shopping so it is just an added excuse to blow through someone else's money. And I also believe, like said above, she wants to tie Justin down ASAP. Or at least make it more painful for him if he cheats and they divorce.
-
- Gossiper
- Posts: 733
- Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2017 5:50 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Rachelle and Justin, The long lost siblings. | Part 2.
I Mean, I Wasnt really able to say anything here because i bought two things (Just an outfit, but still) When i was engaged because even though we wherent TTC, We where going to start after we got married, But buying a large item when you have no use for it is...odd, To say the least.yeahwhatever wrote:Is it just me or did anyone think it was weird she bought a pack n play way before Brynn?
4/14/17
1/1/18
9/10/18
1/1/18
9/10/18
-
- Talker
- Posts: 201
- Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2018 7:04 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Rachelle and Justin, The long lost siblings. | Part 2.
Guessing that the amount she made from making her daily shopping at target videos is waaaaay more than a preschool job. Justin doesn't make that much, all her constant shit shopping is a result of YouTube.
- pitbullmommy
- Informer
- Posts: 263
- Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 1:11 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Rachelle and Justin, The long lost siblings. | Part 2.
mrsglittersparkles wrote:Honest question. What is your point of coming on this forum? To give everyone here a piece of your mind? For what reason? I’m just trying to figure out why you’d go out of your way to constantly give your two cents on everything discussed.bubblebeewonder1 wrote:...You guys act as if rehoming a dog is the WORST action possible. It's life and people do it all the time. As someone who volunteers at a humane society, I totally understand why people rehome their pets after having kids.
If she feels he'd be better off in another home, she should do that. Infants can be a handful and if the dog isn't getting enough attention, you should rehome him with a different family. He's a dog, he'll adapt.
And the allergies? If HER HUMAN CHILD is allergic she HAS TO re-home him hands down. Would you put a dogs needs over your human children?
When my daughter was 3 months we found out she was allergic to my cat. I got that cat back in high school but It was making my kid sick. If her child's allergic to dander, he/she could get very congested and stop breathing.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
-
- Talker
- Posts: 104
- Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2018 5:57 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Rachelle and Justin, The long lost siblings. | Part 2.
I understand buying a outfit or two, sometimes your in old navy and the outfit is just too cute not to. But big items? No way. Not normal. Unless someone gave them to you. For example: We received a family crib about 6 months before my first was conceived bc my sisters kids were in college now.yeahwhatever wrote:Is it just me or did anyone think it was weird she bought a pack n play way before Brynn?
Buying new big items before having kids is creepy. Makes me feel weird. Like she was planning on cutting some other ladies baby outta her stomach. Sorry, I watch too many lifetime movies.
-
- Talker
- Posts: 124
- Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2017 10:04 am
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Rachelle and Justin, The long lost siblings. | Part 2.
I was watching some of Rachelle's old videos and had a random thought...
Brynn was suppose to be born in September, while Justin was away on deployment. He didn't get home until February, so Brynn would have been 4ish months old. He would have missed her birth and those first months. Just a random late night thought while watching these videos.
Random question, but does anyone know how far in advance you can know about when you're getting deployed?
Brynn was suppose to be born in September, while Justin was away on deployment. He didn't get home until February, so Brynn would have been 4ish months old. He would have missed her birth and those first months. Just a random late night thought while watching these videos.
Random question, but does anyone know how far in advance you can know about when you're getting deployed?
-
- Talker
- Posts: 124
- Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2017 10:04 am
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Rachelle and Justin, The long lost siblings. | Part 2.
Update: she said in the "saying goodbye" video that they had been dreading him leaving for the past year. so they knew he would be gone for her birth?yeahwhatever wrote:I was watching some of Rachelle's old videos and had a random thought...
Brynn was suppose to be born in September, while Justin was away on deployment. He didn't get home until February, so Brynn would have been 4ish months old. He would have missed her birth and those first months. Just a random late night thought while watching these videos.
Random question, but does anyone know how far in advance you can know about when you're getting deployed?
-
- Talker
- Posts: 104
- Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2018 5:57 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Rachelle and Justin, The long lost siblings. | Part 2.
That seemed to be the plan. Because Rachelle is selfish swine and would willingly deny her husband the satisfaction of seeing his child born/the first few months of her life. It's all about her! Probably so she can make a "Navy dad meets baby girl for the first time" video.yeahwhatever wrote:Update: she said in the "saying goodbye" video that they had been dreading him leaving for the past year. so they knew he would be gone for her birth?yeahwhatever wrote:I was watching some of Rachelle's old videos and had a random thought...
Brynn was suppose to be born in September, while Justin was away on deployment. He didn't get home until February, so Brynn would have been 4ish months old. He would have missed her birth and those first months. Just a random late night thought while watching these videos.
Random question, but does anyone know how far in advance you can know about when you're getting deployed?
Re: Rachelle and Justin, The long lost siblings. | Part 2.
They knew but she don’t care. She just has to have the baby now before she gets older, ahe wouldn’t wanna give up her dream of having the “perfect” young family.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: Rachelle and Justin, The long lost siblings. | Part 2.
They knew but she doesn’t care. She just has to have the baby now before she gets older, she wouldn’t wanna give up her dream of having the “perfect” young family.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
- Amateur
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2018 10:14 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Rachelle and Justin, The long lost siblings. | Part 2.
My husband knew about a deployment once a year before it happened because they had to do stimulations before officially leaving. But his very first deployment he got news about it and left two days lateryeahwhatever wrote:I was watching some of Rachelle's old videos and had a random thought...
Brynn was suppose to be born in September, while Justin was away on deployment. He didn't get home until February, so Brynn would have been 4ish months old. He would have missed her birth and those first months. Just a random late night thought while watching these videos.
Random question, but does anyone know how far in advance you can know about when you're getting deployed?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: Rachelle and Justin, The long lost siblings. | Part 2.
Helped Rachelle with the old sex/pregnancy education again.
It doesn’t matter how big your bump is as to whether you get round ligament pain. It’s to do with ligaments, as the name suggests.
Seriously girl.
It doesn’t matter how big your bump is as to whether you get round ligament pain. It’s to do with ligaments, as the name suggests.
Seriously girl.
-
- Talker
- Posts: 104
- Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2018 5:57 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Rachelle and Justin, The long lost siblings. | Part 2.
How low your stomach is has no connection to the sex of your baby. Jesus fuckin christ. Everyone's body holds a pregnancy differently. My kids head was facing my spine. I looked like I was about 3 months until my 8th month. I had a boy and my stomach wasn't any lower. Why? Because every pregnancy is different and it has nothing to do with the sex.
-
- Talker
- Posts: 104
- Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2018 5:57 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Rachelle and Justin, The long lost siblings. | Part 2.
Also. She should watch having a "low stomach" especially in her case. In other cases it's normal but if I had a stillbirth anything "low" or heavy (like dead weight) would alarm me. You shouldn't feel any pull towards one direction at that stage. The baby should be floating right? Should only weigh so much, anything "heavy" that doesn't feel like bloating at that gestation is weird imo. You can "bloat" lower but I think it's weird she feels the baby lower at that stage.
At that stage I felt "bigger" but I didn't feel like my stomach was being weighed down to one direction. My kid was the side of a avocado at that stage but wasn't as dense as a avocado. None of my pregnancies were like that actually. Even later on when I did start showing and you could actually see where the baby was sitting.
Maybe I'm wrong. Like i mentioned before everyones different
At that stage I felt "bigger" but I didn't feel like my stomach was being weighed down to one direction. My kid was the side of a avocado at that stage but wasn't as dense as a avocado. None of my pregnancies were like that actually. Even later on when I did start showing and you could actually see where the baby was sitting.
Maybe I'm wrong. Like i mentioned before everyones different