Kish wrote:Public call out to the respective users in the currently active BritneyAndBaby thread who felt like it was acceptable to post the direct link to a woman’s private Facebook and Instagram profile, shared screenshots of status updates and photos of her, her son, and her former partner (a woman who has nothing to do with Britney at all, aside from B.’s ex-boyfriend liking her pictures), and who apparently did not have the foresight to realise that they were crossing a line
Okay, there was a spammer, the spammer has been banned – now what about this? The screenshots and reposted photos are still in the forum, and one user can report one single post only once (which I have done) …
I’m dwelling on this subject because some users on this website claim (and mostly rightfully so, I believe) that YouTubers are critically discussed on here because these YouTubers themselves immediately delete and block anything and anyone who doesn’t fawn all over them in their comments.
Sure, it occasionally spirals into speculations and theories about other things like romantical and family relationships and the possible troubles, but
this doesn’t justify sharing pictures (among others bikini photos, and photos of the toddler son) of a third party whose photos have been Facebook-liked by the ex-partner of a vlogger – nothing more, nothing less.