Ad blocker detected: Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker on our website.
Playsinrain wrote:First i've watched of them in a minute, but is Kelly feeling the crunch from not vlogging for a week? I had 4 non skippable ads in one 14 min vlog. FOUR...
I did not have four ads. I had one at the beginning. I think YouTube just is a supplement. I do think she has a nice style of vlogging, maybe it’s because they don’t rely on it for their income. They had already moved to the house, Jay still works, and she has always been a sahm.
I had a ton of adds too
JKtoday always have 3-4 adds most of the time
just put both of them on again
JK have 3 in there Vlog (one right at the end too ) 1 every 5min which I find really annoying
C&K have none during but did have one before the Vlog today
3BoysandaLilMiss wrote:I had a ton of adds too
JKtoday always have 3-4 adds most of the time
just put both of them on again
JK have 3 in there Vlog (one right at the end too ) 1 every 5min which I find really annoying
C&K have none during but did have one before the Vlog today
I had zero ads on C&K's vlog, but yeah i had a ton on JK and always do. They might not "need" the YT money, but i'm sure kelly likes her pocket money.
japaluvr wrote:So, I guess I must have adblocker but I /never/ see ads in YT videos. Does that mean they're not making money from me?
Nope, i dont think so. I *think* the only revenue they get is from ads. (well other than sponsors, but i mean just from views alone if that makes sense)
askeptichere wrote:I’m the opposite. I always get ads on C&K, but not many on JK
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It's strange, bc i don't think ive seen more than 2-3 vlogs from C&K total with more than one ad, and normally a couple days a week i don't get any at all. I NEVER have that happen with JK, E&J or DB.. i always get ads, mostly more than one, every vlog. Is there some way that works??
MandaPanda74 wrote:I'm guessing you don't have a baby his age... I do. I guess I relate because mine acts similarly sometimes. They are little shits through the terrible twos. Some reach the terrible 2's early.
Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
And Katie did discipline him when he threw the food at Kelly, she told him NO in a stern voice and then made him wipe Kelly's face for her.
She did tell him no... AFTER she laughed.
She sends mixed messages because she laughs at him and THEN tells him no. It’s ridiculous.
Kelly's hair is just as bleached as Katie's, but it seems as though she takes better care of her hair than her sister. Katie needs to ditch the Herbal Essences and get some better quality hair care products, a few good coconut oil treatments a week and some heat protector.
Playsinrain wrote:Kelly's hair is just as bleached as Katie's, but it seems as though she takes better care of her hair than her sister. Katie needs to ditch the Herbal Essences and get some better quality hair care products, a few good coconut oil treatments a week and some heat protector.
I think Kelly takes better care of herself in general. She is a happier and more confident woman. Her kids seem like good kids as well. Her life success is not attached to YouTube either.
japaluvr wrote:So, I guess I must have adblocker but I /never/ see ads in YT videos. Does that mean they're not making money from me?
Nope, i dont think so. I *think* the only revenue they get is from ads. (well other than sponsors, but i mean just from views alone if that makes sense)
Yes they do earn a little bit of money from YT for the views. Katie told so in the classroom the other day.
askeptichere wrote:Anyone else think it was weird that they had Madelyne model her new bathing suit for the vlog?
Yes I though it was inappropriate. Why put emphasis on it, when she'll be on the beach anyway? I do not hope it was rebellion against a comment the vlog before that said to be careful with compromising filming angles because of perverts.
askeptichere wrote:Anyone else think it was weird that they had Madelyne model her new bathing suit for the vlog?
Yes I though it was inappropriate. Why put emphasis on it, when she'll be on the beach anyway? I do not hope it was rebellion against a comment the vlog before that said to be careful with compromising filming angles because of perverts.
I thought it was very inappropriate. My husband even looked over my shoulder while I was watching and said how creepy it was for a dad to be filming his daughter in a bikini and zooming in like he did on her back. That clip is a pedophiles dream.
askeptichere wrote:Anyone else think it was weird that they had Madelyne model her new bathing suit for the vlog?
Yes I though it was inappropriate. Why put emphasis on it, when she'll be on the beach anyway? I do not hope it was rebellion against a comment the vlog before that said to be careful with compromising filming angles because of perverts.
I thought it was very inappropriate. My husband even looked over my shoulder while I was watching and said how creepy it was for a dad to be filming his daughter in a bikini and zooming in like he did on her back. That clip is a pedophiles dream.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I wasn't surprised as they did the exact same last year before spring break!
I was just talking about this on C&K's thread, and i see K&J DID do it again this year. Showing her at the beach is fine, but the bikini fashion show for her father to record is fucking sick. I wonder when Emily's crotch shots will make their appearance!!
japaluvr wrote:So, I guess I must have adblocker but I /never/ see ads in YT videos. Does that mean they're not making money from me?
Nope, i dont think so. I *think* the only revenue they get is from ads. (well other than sponsors, but i mean just from views alone if that makes sense)
Yes they do earn a little bit of money from YT for the views. Katie told so in the classroom the other day.
But it's ad revenue right? Like if a vlog doesn't have ads on it, does YT still pay them if it gets x amount of views? I didn't think YT themselves paid people, i thought it was just from their advertisers. I'm dumb to this stuff though, so please correct me if i'm wrong. I just assumed no ads = no payment.