GQS - Screech, Sloth and The Caged 4 | Part 20
Re: GQS - Screech, Sloth and The Caged 4 | Part 20
[All I could think of when watching this clip is “oh look, a bobble head”
Right before that was a clip of Costa Vida Lunch.. “do you love your lunch? What is your favorite.. beans or tomatoes?”.... garbled attempt at what sounds like tomato... immediate response “you love beans AND tomatoes! <obnoxious chuckle>”
Just another blatant example of them not listening. I wish they would stop shoving words in their mouths. I bet the girls speech would grow if they knew they were actually being listened to.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]
Bison is so disgusting in that pic. Some one photoshop a dick in his damn mouth.
Right before that was a clip of Costa Vida Lunch.. “do you love your lunch? What is your favorite.. beans or tomatoes?”.... garbled attempt at what sounds like tomato... immediate response “you love beans AND tomatoes! <obnoxious chuckle>”
Just another blatant example of them not listening. I wish they would stop shoving words in their mouths. I bet the girls speech would grow if they knew they were actually being listened to.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]
Bison is so disgusting in that pic. Some one photoshop a dick in his damn mouth.
- OldCountry
- Guru Gossiper
- Posts: 2476
- Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2017 1:55 pm
- Has thanked: 22 times
- Been thanked: 6 times
Re: GQS - Screech, Sloth and The Caged 4 | Part 20
lmmomSD wrote:That just looks cluttered and kind of a hodgepodge of looks. I get eclectic, but that's overkill
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It's disguesting.. It has no meaning at all. The girls will be tearing things apart in no time They, Rodwork, know these two and it is showing that they know they can get rid of stuff that wasn't selling. Remember when we all thought the builders were showing their leftovers/outdated stuff, trying to get rid of them and these two fell for it...Same thing..
The scammers are getting scammed.. Love it
- OldCountry
- Guru Gossiper
- Posts: 2476
- Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2017 1:55 pm
- Has thanked: 22 times
- Been thanked: 6 times
Re: GQS - Screech, Sloth and The Caged 4 | Part 20
OldCountry wrote:lmmomSD wrote:That just looks cluttered and kind of a hodgepodge of looks. I get eclectic, but that's overkill
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It's disguesting.. It has no meaning at all. The girls will be tearing things apart in no time They, Rodwork, know these two and it is showing that they know they can get rid of stuff that wasn't selling. Remember when we all thought the builders were showing their leftovers/outdated stuff, trying to get rid of them and these two fell for it...Same thing..
The scammers are getting scammed.. Love it
oopsy *disgusting*
- Abbiedownunder
- True Gossiper
- Posts: 1006
- Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2017 3:06 am
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 36 times
Re: GQS - Screech, Sloth and The Caged 4 | Part 20
So much to comment on. As someone who has worked with landscapers, albeit in Australia, usually the landscaper does a design of the layout and will buy the plants themselves as they get them wholesale. I've even seen digital designs with all the plants in place so you can see what they look like. So, what's happening here? Who knows.
I was also wondering about the beds. Most other multiple families have their kids in beds by, at the latest, 3 years old. So the bed is not the major worry, it's the cage that concerns me. Haven't there been cases of people being prosecuted for keeping their kids locked in rooms and even tied to beds. So what is the difference? This is a serious question. What if there was a fire? How would they honestly get all four of them out in the panic seeing as they are not just zipped in but also locked in with a large pin the in the zipper. We've all seen scenarios where in a fire visibility is reduced to zero and with thick heavy smoke they may not even get to their rooms. It is tantamount to abuse and it doesn't matter how pretty the room is or how pretty mum is, it is outright abuse. I showed it to my niece who is a child protection worker here in Australia and she said they would be in big trouble. I also showed her the bench standing, the balancing on Tyler's shoulders without being held on to, the food shit and a few other bits and pieces. I asked her what would happen here. She said they would implement mandatory parenting classes with a warning that if there was no proof things had changed, they would consider removing the children. So there you have it, from the horses mouth. She was flabbergasted by the basement and said how dangerous it was that the fibres from the insulation could be really damaging to their young lungs.
So there you go mimi, it's not just us, a professional also agrees that no matter how cute the girls are, or how much money mum and dad have, they are actually in danger. Abuse isn't just from lower status people. In fact, my niece said it is right across the board, it's just more hidden in the well to do.
I was also wondering about the beds. Most other multiple families have their kids in beds by, at the latest, 3 years old. So the bed is not the major worry, it's the cage that concerns me. Haven't there been cases of people being prosecuted for keeping their kids locked in rooms and even tied to beds. So what is the difference? This is a serious question. What if there was a fire? How would they honestly get all four of them out in the panic seeing as they are not just zipped in but also locked in with a large pin the in the zipper. We've all seen scenarios where in a fire visibility is reduced to zero and with thick heavy smoke they may not even get to their rooms. It is tantamount to abuse and it doesn't matter how pretty the room is or how pretty mum is, it is outright abuse. I showed it to my niece who is a child protection worker here in Australia and she said they would be in big trouble. I also showed her the bench standing, the balancing on Tyler's shoulders without being held on to, the food shit and a few other bits and pieces. I asked her what would happen here. She said they would implement mandatory parenting classes with a warning that if there was no proof things had changed, they would consider removing the children. So there you have it, from the horses mouth. She was flabbergasted by the basement and said how dangerous it was that the fibres from the insulation could be really damaging to their young lungs.
So there you go mimi, it's not just us, a professional also agrees that no matter how cute the girls are, or how much money mum and dad have, they are actually in danger. Abuse isn't just from lower status people. In fact, my niece said it is right across the board, it's just more hidden in the well to do.
Re: GQS - Screech, Sloth and The Caged 4 | Part 20
I can't wait to see how they do their garden. I've always wanted a mac & cheese tree or a pizza tree. I'll bet french fries grow under the ground just like potatoes.AuntieEm wrote:Cavmom20 wrote:Lardass is so excited to plant a garden outside to teach the kids about growing the foods they like. Last time I checked lollipops, chips and licorice don't grow in a garden.
Re: GQS - Screech, Sloth and The Caged 4 | Part 20
She's lying. The girls didn't let him out. She let him out without going with him or watching him or putting him on a leash like us law abiding people do.utahmom wrote:Well, I'm just a hating stupid ignorant trailer trash person without a McMansion with an extremely expensive security system but isn't the whole point of the security system is to sound an alarm when a door or window is opened? Help this poor miserable old lady understand, please?lisajohnson120 wrote:Ok I have one more!! A$$ said that Bentley got out and ran off!! Took her over an hour to find him! She said that the girl open the door and let him out without them knowing!! HELLO? if you don’t know they let him out how in the world are you going to know when they open the door walk out themselves!! Ugh!!!! Stupid stupid people
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
- Gossiper
- Posts: 858
- Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2018 8:34 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: GQS - Screech, Sloth and The Caged 4 | Part 20
Maybe someone should call children services there and report them... If nothing else have them watch their videos!! It says it all! Wouldn’t be hard to find their address... public information there.... just saying ...Abbiedownunder wrote:So much to comment on. As someone who has worked with landscapers, albeit in Australia, usually the landscaper does a design of the layout and will buy the plants themselves as they get them wholesale. I've even seen digital designs with all the plants in place so you can see what they look like. So, what's happening here? Who knows.
I was also wondering about the beds. Most other multiple families have their kids in beds by, at the latest, 3 years old. So the bed is not the major worry, it's the cage that concerns me. Haven't there been cases of people being prosecuted for keeping their kids locked in rooms and even tied to beds. So what is the difference? This is a serious question. What if there was a fire? How would they honestly get all four of them out in the panic seeing as they are not just zipped in but also locked in with a large pin the in the zipper. We've all seen scenarios where in a fire visibility is reduced to zero and with thick heavy smoke they may not even get to their rooms. It is tantamount to abuse and it doesn't matter how pretty the room is or how pretty mum is, it is outright abuse. I showed it to my niece who is a child protection worker here in Australia and she said they would be in big trouble. I also showed her the bench standing, the balancing on Tyler's shoulders without being held on to, the food shit and a few other bits and pieces. I asked her what would happen here. She said they would implement mandatory parenting classes with a warning that if there was no proof things had changed, they would consider removing the children. So there you have it, from the horses mouth. She was flabbergasted by the basement and said how dangerous it was that the fibres from the insulation could be really damaging to their young lungs.
So there you go mimi, it's not just us, a professional also agrees that no matter how cute the girls are, or how much money mum and dad have, they are actually in danger. Abuse isn't just from lower status people. In fact, my niece said it is right across the board, it's just more hidden in the well to do.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
- Gossiper
- Posts: 858
- Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2018 8:34 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: GQS - Screech, Sloth and The Caged 4 | Part 20
lisajohnson120 wrote:Maybe someone should call children services there and report them... If nothing else have them watch their videos!! It says it all! Wouldn’t be hard to find their address... public information there.... just saying ... Found it in less than 2 minutes...... Now that’s scary in itself!Abbiedownunder wrote:So much to comment on. As someone who has worked with landscapers, albeit in Australia, usually the landscaper does a design of the layout and will buy the plants themselves as they get them wholesale. I've even seen digital designs with all the plants in place so you can see what they look like. So, what's happening here? Who knows.
I was also wondering about the beds. Most other multiple families have their kids in beds by, at the latest, 3 years old. So the bed is not the major worry, it's the cage that concerns me. Haven't there been cases of people being prosecuted for keeping their kids locked in rooms and even tied to beds. So what is the difference? This is a serious question. What if there was a fire? How would they honestly get all four of them out in the panic seeing as they are not just zipped in but also locked in with a large pin the in the zipper. We've all seen scenarios where in a fire visibility is reduced to zero and with thick heavy smoke they may not even get to their rooms. It is tantamount to abuse and it doesn't matter how pretty the room is or how pretty mum is, it is outright abuse. I showed it to my niece who is a child protection worker here in Australia and she said they would be in big trouble. I also showed her the bench standing, the balancing on Tyler's shoulders without being held on to, the food shit and a few other bits and pieces. I asked her what would happen here. She said they would implement mandatory parenting classes with a warning that if there was no proof things had changed, they would consider removing the children. So there you have it, from the horses mouth. She was flabbergasted by the basement and said how dangerous it was that the fibres from the insulation could be really damaging to their young lungs.
So there you go mimi, it's not just us, a professional also agrees that no matter how cute the girls are, or how much money mum and dad have, they are actually in danger. Abuse isn't just from lower status people. In fact, my niece said it is right across the board, it's just more hidden in the well to do.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
- Informer
- Posts: 410
- Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2017 8:39 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: GQS - Screech, Sloth and The Caged 4 | Part 20
But it’s expensive and we all know that’s the most important thing for PrincAss. It doesn’t matter if it looks like shit. Look at all the ridiculous upgrades they put into that place.lmmomSD wrote:That just looks cluttered and kind of a hodgepodge of looks. I get eclectic, but that's overkill
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It doesn’t matter what they do really because they live like slobs. In the one vlog recently there were shoes laying all over the place in the kitchen/ dining/ living room area.
Money doesn’t last forever and they are in for a rude awakening.
- Snarkadoodle Doo
- Guru Gossiper
- Posts: 3002
- Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2017 3:42 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 5 times
Re: GQS - Screech, Sloth and The Caged 4 | Part 20
Hell, they don't even bother to shut their freaking doors! They just walk in and out of the barn all day with the doors hanging wide open! Heavenly Father provided screen doors for a reason, Dumbo. Just wait until spring and summer when it's hot and all the rodents and bugs from the field next door find their way inside along with anything that flies. Ugh, nasty. Puke.utahmom wrote:Maybe it's not too wise to tell the world (including the stalker pedophiles) you don't arm the security system and any one can waltz up and take the girls at any time?
But what do I know? I'm just a jealous hater.
RIP Mom 3/16/2019 - Cancer Sucks
- Snarkadoodle Doo
- Guru Gossiper
- Posts: 3002
- Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2017 3:42 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 5 times
Re: GQS - Screech, Sloth and The Caged 4 | Part 20
Just as your friendly reminder... Please take the time to read the original post from YTMD regarding contacting CPS below!lisajohnson120 wrote:Maybe someone should call children services there and report them... If nothing else have them watch their videos!! It says it all! Wouldn’t be hard to find their address... public information there.... just saying ...Abbiedownunder wrote:So much to comment on. As someone who has worked with landscapers, albeit in Australia, usually the landscaper does a design of the layout and will buy the plants themselves as they get them wholesale. I've even seen digital designs with all the plants in place so you can see what they look like. So, what's happening here? Who knows.
I was also wondering about the beds. Most other multiple families have their kids in beds by, at the latest, 3 years old. So the bed is not the major worry, it's the cage that concerns me. Haven't there been cases of people being prosecuted for keeping their kids locked in rooms and even tied to beds. So what is the difference? This is a serious question. What if there was a fire? How would they honestly get all four of them out in the panic seeing as they are not just zipped in but also locked in with a large pin the in the zipper. We've all seen scenarios where in a fire visibility is reduced to zero and with thick heavy smoke they may not even get to their rooms. It is tantamount to abuse and it doesn't matter how pretty the room is or how pretty mum is, it is outright abuse. I showed it to my niece who is a child protection worker here in Australia and she said they would be in big trouble. I also showed her the bench standing, the balancing on Tyler's shoulders without being held on to, the food shit and a few other bits and pieces. I asked her what would happen here. She said they would implement mandatory parenting classes with a warning that if there was no proof things had changed, they would consider removing the children. So there you have it, from the horses mouth. She was flabbergasted by the basement and said how dangerous it was that the fibres from the insulation could be really damaging to their young lungs.
So there you go mimi, it's not just us, a professional also agrees that no matter how cute the girls are, or how much money mum and dad have, they are actually in danger. Abuse isn't just from lower status people. In fact, my niece said it is right across the board, it's just more hidden in the well to do.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The short and sweet version is simple: Do not waste CPS case workers' time unless there is a real issue. Also, if it is found that someone has made a false report they will be banned permanently from accessing YTMD.
Post Link: http://ytmommadrama.com/viewtopic.php?f=139&t=9915
If your call doesn't fall under those guidelines, CPS will NOT get involved.Hi all,
First of all, thank you for coming to check this out. It is important to us that you all read this.
We have a serious problem on one particular thread here. However, I wanted to make sure that everyone sees this so we can avoid this issue in the future.
Unfortunately, some users have taken it upon themselves to decide that it is perfectly acceptable to contact Child Protective Services and then proceed to post about it, encouraging others to do the same. This has caused the moderators an influx of concerned messages. Due to this issue, we have a new rule:
CPS is NOT to be contacted under any circumstances UNLESS you see obvious signs of abuse or neglect.
Now, in addition to this new rule there is some more information that you need to be aware of...
* If you do think CPS should be contacted, please take the time to read this link: CPS Criteria If you have legitimate claims, you should contact CPS but do it privately. If you care enough about this situation, you will have no reason to post about it.
* You are not to contact a YouTuber on personal social media, via email, etc. I do understand why some of you did contact this particular YouTuber, but please do not continue to do so.
* The moment you mention you're going to call Child Protective Services and you do not have legitimate proof that there is a reason to contact CPS, you will be permanently banned. No questions asked.
* Child Protective Services has thousands of cases to deal with daily. Please do not waste their time. They will not even consider your claims if you call and tell them that you saw something on a YouTube video unless you have screencaptures of (again) obvious signs of abuse or neglect.
I do not care how much you dislike a YouTuber. There is no reason for this. If you truly care about the well-being of a child then you need to consider that if your plan does come to fruition that this child will be taken from their home, their parents, etc. and potentially placed in a foster care system where bad things can also happen. Is that your ideal outcome? You need to think twice, and think very seriously about this before you contact CPS.
We want this site to continue to be a place where you can (pretty much) freely discuss YouTube. That will not happen if this keeps up. In order to keep this site alive and well, we need to have some serious consequences.
If this behavior continues and you think that it is “okay” to contact CPS without any legitimate proof of abuse or neglect the following will happen:
1. users will be banned and boards will be censored until we're sure that you're capable of using these threads for their intended use.
2. If it STILL continues, threads will be locked permanently in addition to users being banned.
The purpose of this site is not to put YouTubers in jail, remove their children from their homes, etc. It is to discuss the content that is uploaded by these YouTube moms. We will not pat you on the back for contacting CPS so please do not even think about bringing that idea over here.
We appreciate those of you who follow the rules and alert us when someone is breaking them!
Thank you for your cooperation!
RIP Mom 3/16/2019 - Cancer Sucks
-
- Gossiper
- Posts: 858
- Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2018 8:34 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: GQS - Screech, Sloth and The Caged 4 | Part 20
I apologize.. I had no intention of contacting CPS... No one has contacted me about anything..... And I wouldn’t give out sensitive information.. just said I found it...Snarkadoodle Doo wrote:Just as your friendly reminder... Please take the time to read the original post from YTMD regarding contacting CPS below!lisajohnson120 wrote:Maybe someone should call children services there and report them... If nothing else have them watch their videos!! It says it all! Wouldn’t be hard to find their address... public information there.... just saying ...Abbiedownunder wrote:So much to comment on. As someone who has worked with landscapers, albeit in Australia, usually the landscaper does a design of the layout and will buy the plants themselves as they get them wholesale. I've even seen digital designs with all the plants in place so you can see what they look like. So, what's happening here? Who knows.
I was also wondering about the beds. Most other multiple families have their kids in beds by, at the latest, 3 years old. So the bed is not the major worry, it's the cage that concerns me. Haven't there been cases of people being prosecuted for keeping their kids locked in rooms and even tied to beds. So what is the difference? This is a serious question. What if there was a fire? How would they honestly get all four of them out in the panic seeing as they are not just zipped in but also locked in with a large pin the in the zipper. We've all seen scenarios where in a fire visibility is reduced to zero and with thick heavy smoke they may not even get to their rooms. It is tantamount to abuse and it doesn't matter how pretty the room is or how pretty mum is, it is outright abuse. I showed it to my niece who is a child protection worker here in Australia and she said they would be in big trouble. I also showed her the bench standing, the balancing on Tyler's shoulders without being held on to, the food shit and a few other bits and pieces. I asked her what would happen here. She said they would implement mandatory parenting classes with a warning that if there was no proof things had changed, they would consider removing the children. So there you have it, from the horses mouth. She was flabbergasted by the basement and said how dangerous it was that the fibres from the insulation could be really damaging to their young lungs.
So there you go mimi, it's not just us, a professional also agrees that no matter how cute the girls are, or how much money mum and dad have, they are actually in danger. Abuse isn't just from lower status people. In fact, my niece said it is right across the board, it's just more hidden in the well to do.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The short and sweet version is simple: Do not waste CPS case workers' time unless there is a real issue. Also, if it is found that someone has made a false report they will be banned permanently from accessing YTMD.
Post Link: http://ytmommadrama.com/viewtopic.php?f=139&t=9915
If your call doesn't fall under those guidelines, CPS will NOT get involved.Hi all,
First of all, thank you for coming to check this out. It is important to us that you all read this.
We have a serious problem on one particular thread here. However, I wanted to make sure that everyone sees this so we can avoid this issue in the future.
Unfortunately, some users have taken it upon themselves to decide that it is perfectly acceptable to contact Child Protective Services and then proceed to post about it, encouraging others to do the same. This has caused the moderators an influx of concerned messages. Due to this issue, we have a new rule:
CPS is NOT to be contacted under any circumstances UNLESS you see obvious signs of abuse or neglect.
Now, in addition to this new rule there is some more information that you need to be aware of...
* If you do think CPS should be contacted, please take the time to read this link: CPS Criteria If you have legitimate claims, you should contact CPS but do it privately. If you care enough about this situation, you will have no reason to post about it.
* You are not to contact a YouTuber on personal social media, via email, etc. I do understand why some of you did contact this particular YouTuber, but please do not continue to do so.
* The moment you mention you're going to call Child Protective Services and you do not have legitimate proof that there is a reason to contact CPS, you will be permanently banned. No questions asked.
* Child Protective Services has thousands of cases to deal with daily. Please do not waste their time. They will not even consider your claims if you call and tell them that you saw something on a YouTube video unless you have screencaptures of (again) obvious signs of abuse or neglect.
I do not care how much you dislike a YouTuber. There is no reason for this. If you truly care about the well-being of a child then you need to consider that if your plan does come to fruition that this child will be taken from their home, their parents, etc. and potentially placed in a foster care system where bad things can also happen. Is that your ideal outcome? You need to think twice, and think very seriously about this before you contact CPS.
We want this site to continue to be a place where you can (pretty much) freely discuss YouTube. That will not happen if this keeps up. In order to keep this site alive and well, we need to have some serious consequences.
If this behavior continues and you think that it is “okay” to contact CPS without any legitimate proof of abuse or neglect the following will happen:
1. users will be banned and boards will be censored until we're sure that you're capable of using these threads for their intended use.
2. If it STILL continues, threads will be locked permanently in addition to users being banned.
The purpose of this site is not to put YouTubers in jail, remove their children from their homes, etc. It is to discuss the content that is uploaded by these YouTube moms. We will not pat you on the back for contacting CPS so please do not even think about bringing that idea over here.
We appreciate those of you who follow the rules and alert us when someone is breaking them!
Thank you for your cooperation!
Again I’m sorry if I did something wrong as I am new here...
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- lmmomSD
- Super Moddie
- Posts: 25258
- Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2015 12:08 pm
- Location: San Diego, Ca
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 18 times
GQS - Screech, Sloth and The Caged 4 | Part 20
Yep. It's been mentioned several times here that if there was a fire (were a fire?), the girls would likely die a terrible death. There's no way they could get all four out safely with those safety pins holding the zippers.Abbiedownunder wrote:So much to comment on. As someone who has worked with landscapers, albeit in Australia, usually the landscaper does a design of the layout and will buy the plants themselves as they get them wholesale. I've even seen digital designs with all the plants in place so you can see what they look like. So, what's happening here? Who knows.
I was also wondering about the beds. Most other multiple families have their kids in beds by, at the latest, 3 years old. So the bed is not the major worry, it's the cage that concerns me. Haven't there been cases of people being prosecuted for keeping their kids locked in rooms and even tied to beds. So what is the difference? This is a serious question. What if there was a fire? How would they honestly get all four of them out in the panic seeing as they are not just zipped in but also locked in with a large pin the in the zipper. We've all seen scenarios where in a fire visibility is reduced to zero and with thick heavy smoke they may not even get to their rooms. It is tantamount to abuse and it doesn't matter how pretty the room is or how pretty mum is, it is outright abuse. I showed it to my niece who is a child protection worker here in Australia and she said they would be in big trouble. I also showed her the bench standing, the balancing on Tyler's shoulders without being held on to, the food shit and a few other bits and pieces. I asked her what would happen here. She said they would implement mandatory parenting classes with a warning that if there was no proof things had changed, they would consider removing the children. So there you have it, from the horses mouth. She was flabbergasted by the basement and said how dangerous it was that the fibres from the insulation could be really damaging to their young lungs.
So there you go mimi, it's not just us, a professional also agrees that no matter how cute the girls are, or how much money mum and dad have, they are actually in danger. Abuse isn't just from lower status people. In fact, my niece said it is right across the board, it's just more hidden in the well to do.
Although I am sure some posters here would love to call CPS, it's against the rules of the site to do so and mention it here, or encourage people to do so. And as horrific as things look there, there are kids much worse off. One of my friends works with homeless kids- just got a little girl adopted by a wonderful family. She had to remove her from a tent in a homeless camp. Knowing that there are kids that are worse off doesn't make what the Greedners do ok, but it just adds a little perspective.
Edit-- Snarkadoodle was on it! Guess my warning about calling CPS was unnecessary!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- Snarkadoodle Doo
- Guru Gossiper
- Posts: 3002
- Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2017 3:42 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 5 times
Re: GQS - Screech, Sloth and The Caged 4 | Part 20
Hi lisajohnson120, no need to apologize at all! It's not the first time it's come up on this thread (or YTMD as a whole) and I'm sure it won't be the last. It's just something that needs to be reminded about anytime conversation starts heading in that general direction. Unfortunately it has been a big issue on other threads in the past so YTMD is pretty strict about that rule. As a general rule of thumb, we here in the GQS thread at least, try to just avoid talking about it at all just to be safe. I'm not really sure if they just avoid the subject in all the other threads or not as it's never actually come up in any of the other threads I tend to frequent. But, like you said, being new you wouldn't necessarily know all the "rules" here yet. Welcome to our little group. I think you'll find a really friendly and welcoming community of people here. We have fun, so I hope you'll continue to participate!lisajohnson120 wrote:
I apologize.. I had no intention of contacting CPS... No one has contacted me about anything..... And I wouldn’t give out sensitive information.. just said I found it...
Again I’m sorry if I did something wrong as I am new here...
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
RIP Mom 3/16/2019 - Cancer Sucks
Re: GQS - Screech, Sloth and The Caged 4 | Part 20
CPS wouldn't touch these kids, not there, not here in Australia. If the US is anything like here, resources are stretched and there aren't enough foster families for kids that are already in the system.
They are shitty parents, but there is no evidence of physical or emotional abuse. You could build a case for neglect but on the surface those kids are fed, clothed, do have experiences to extend them (not frequently enough but they do) and are loved. Could they do a lot more as parents? Yes. Are they being negligent in not getting them assessed? Yes. Are they oblivious about safety? Yes.
But none of those things are urgent enough at this stage to warrant intervention.
They are shitty parents, but there is no evidence of physical or emotional abuse. You could build a case for neglect but on the surface those kids are fed, clothed, do have experiences to extend them (not frequently enough but they do) and are loved. Could they do a lot more as parents? Yes. Are they being negligent in not getting them assessed? Yes. Are they oblivious about safety? Yes.
But none of those things are urgent enough at this stage to warrant intervention.
Re: GQS - Screech, Sloth and The Caged 4 | Part 20
I'm a bit intrigued to $ee what RodWork$ i$ going to $ell the Greedner$ to fill in that u$ele$$ top cabinet $pace in the kitchen that ha$ the light$ and the gla$$ pane$ over the front.
Re: GQS - Screech, Sloth and The Caged 4 | Part 20
Thank you so much for taking the time to show this to some person that has knowledge about child abuse even though it's Australia. They definitely need parenting classes. And classes on morals, nutrition, and marriage.Abbiedownunder wrote:So much to comment on. As someone who has worked with landscapers, albeit in Australia, usually the landscaper does a design of the layout and will buy the plants themselves as they get them wholesale. I've even seen digital designs with all the plants in place so you can see what they look like. So, what's happening here? Who knows.
I was also wondering about the beds. Most other multiple families have their kids in beds by, at the latest, 3 years old. So the bed is not the major worry, it's the cage that concerns me. Haven't there been cases of people being prosecuted for keeping their kids locked in rooms and even tied to beds. So what is the difference? This is a serious question. What if there was a fire? How would they honestly get all four of them out in the panic seeing as they are not just zipped in but also locked in with a large pin the in the zipper. We've all seen scenarios where in a fire visibility is reduced to zero and with thick heavy smoke they may not even get to their rooms. It is tantamount to abuse and it doesn't matter how pretty the room is or how pretty mum is, it is outright abuse. I showed it to my niece who is a child protection worker here in Australia and she said they would be in big trouble. I also showed her the bench standing, the balancing on Tyler's shoulders without being held on to, the food shit and a few other bits and pieces. I asked her what would happen here. She said they would implement mandatory parenting classes with a warning that if there was no proof things had changed, they would consider removing the children. So there you have it, from the horses mouth. She was flabbergasted by the basement and said how dangerous it was that the fibres from the insulation could be really damaging to their young lungs.
So there you go mimi, it's not just us, a professional also agrees that no matter how cute the girls are, or how much money mum and dad have, they are actually in danger. Abuse isn't just from lower status people. In fact, my niece said it is right across the board, it's just more hidden in the well to do.
Sent from my SM-T350 using Tapatalk
Re: GQS - Screech, Sloth and The Caged 4 | Part 20
I can't wait to see it crammed full of overpriced shit that has absolutely no meaning to thenPollyKrome wrote:I'm a bit intrigued to $ee what RodWork$ i$ going to $ell the Greedner$ to fill in that u$ele$$ top cabinet $pace in the kitchen that ha$ the light$ and the gla$$ pane$ over the front.
- Snarkadoodle Doo
- Guru Gossiper
- Posts: 3002
- Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2017 3:42 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 5 times
Re: GQS - Screech, Sloth and The Caged 4 | Part 20
Me too! He wants China in at least some of them he said on IG. These people don't own anything other than paper plates so that could get very interesting! I think those big gaudy X's in the doors will block most of anything the put up there anyway. Such a bad choice for that space.PollyKrome wrote:I'm a bit intrigued to $ee what RodWork$ i$ going to $ell the Greedner$ to fill in that u$ele$$ top cabinet $pace in the kitchen that ha$ the light$ and the gla$$ pane$ over the front.
RIP Mom 3/16/2019 - Cancer Sucks