Oh! What vlog was that? Do you have a link?NjH1 wrote:I mean we know for sure that she reads here from when Keren made that video about her thread that one time and read out texts from another person who read their thread all the time and it was so obvious it was about rachelle. She doesn’t even hide the fact she reads here, she thinks she’s being smart by not addressing it but almost everything she does and says is an indirect response to the things on here
Rachelle, Justin and the $20 Onesies | Part 6
-
- Talker
- Posts: 179
- Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2017 12:19 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Rachelle, Justin and the $20 Onesies | Part 6
Re: Rachelle, Justin and the $20 Onesies | Part 6
They weren't pregnant when she started YouTube. They had just started sharing their infertility story. The only thing that would have changed was if Brynn had made it fullterm and was healthy. They didn't just make a YouTube because of Brynn.Lukie_73 wrote:Without having to look back at their vlogs...can anyone tell me how many weeks she was when she lost Brynn? I don't want to sound callous because losing a baby at any gestation is hard, I have lost four. But I was just wondering about whether she really has a right to call it a stillborn loss. Here in my country the loss isn't a stillborn until after 24 weeks. Before then it's a miscarriage up to 14 weeks, or a late miscarriage from 14 to 24 weeks. The reason being, a baby isn't considered having the ability to survive until past 24 weeks. If the loss is before 24 weeks, you can't have a funeral or get a death certificate. As harsh as that sounds, it's all around that viability gestation number. We still had a little private service for our losses, and buried them with special plants etc, but we couldn't just have a proper funeral.herebcofbritney wrote:I think she knew exactly what she was doing when she blasted the fact that she had a stillborn. I could never ever make a video so soon about how my daughter was born early and passed. Idc if it spread awareness on an abnormality or a syndrome or anything. I can’t even make basic YT videos. I guess I’m not narcissistic enough. Maybe it does break Rachelle that she lost a baby. But to me I feel like now that Emma is here she hardly mentions it and has forgotten why people watch her in the first place. I never knew these people until she posted herself crying about taking down the nursery. If Brynn was here I wouldn’t even know Justin and Rachelle existed so yes she is somewhat known due to her stillborn infant.yeahwhatever wrote:It’s interesting to think about how different their lives would be if Brynn did make it to full term. None of us would probably know who they are and they wouldn’t be making all this extra money from YouTube. Just a thought.
Not sure they realized capitalizing on Brynn has benefited them.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I just wonder how that would have changed things for them re YT.
Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
-
- Informer
- Posts: 283
- Joined: Mon May 14, 2018 7:18 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Rachelle, Justin and the $20 Onesies | Part 6
She was 20 weeks, here in the states 20 weeks plus is a still birth and 12 to 19 is a late miscarriage.Lukie_73 wrote:Without having to look back at their vlogs...can anyone tell me how many weeks she was when she lost Brynn? I don't want to sound callous because losing a baby at any gestation is hard, I have lost four. But I was just wondering about whether she really has a right to call it a stillborn loss. Here in my country the loss isn't a stillborn until after 24 weeks. Before then it's a miscarriage up to 14 weeks, or a late miscarriage from 14 to 24 weeks. The reason being, a baby isn't considered having the ability to survive until past 24 weeks. If the loss is before 24 weeks, you can't have a funeral or get a death certificate. As harsh as that sounds, it's all around that viability gestation number. We still had a little private service for our losses, and buried them with special plants etc, but we couldn't just have a proper funeral.herebcofbritney wrote:I think she knew exactly what she was doing when she blasted the fact that she had a stillborn. I could never ever make a video so soon about how my daughter was born early and passed. Idc if it spread awareness on an abnormality or a syndrome or anything. I can’t even make basic YT videos. I guess I’m not narcissistic enough. Maybe it does break Rachelle that she lost a baby. But to me I feel like now that Emma is here she hardly mentions it and has forgotten why people watch her in the first place. I never knew these people until she posted herself crying about taking down the nursery. If Brynn was here I wouldn’t even know Justin and Rachelle existed so yes she is somewhat known due to her stillborn infant.yeahwhatever wrote:It’s interesting to think about how different their lives would be if Brynn did make it to full term. None of us would probably know who they are and they wouldn’t be making all this extra money from YouTube. Just a thought.
Not sure they realized capitalizing on Brynn has benefited them.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I just wonder how that would have changed things for them re YT.
Sent from my Pixel XL using Tapatalk
Re: Rachelle, Justin and the $20 Onesies | Part 6
It's terrible to be talking about this, but the way she acted about the two babies makes me think that the loss of Brynn was more about her frustrated dream of being a mother than about her daughter. That's why she kept stressing that she was a mother anyway, and mentioning Brynn and after Emma was born she stopped mentioning her altogether and describes herself as a first time mom. But I am still really sorry for her and wish that she never had to went through that terrible experience.Her or any other family.
Re: Rachelle, Justin and the $20 Onesies | Part 6
It was a video on her personal channel but she deleted it after a while. I tried to look for it but it seems like she deleted it. It was before she was pregnant thoughNellieNovember wrote:Oh! What vlog was that? Do you have a link?NjH1 wrote:I mean we know for sure that she reads here from when Keren made that video about her thread that one time and read out texts from another person who read their thread all the time and it was so obvious it was about rachelle. She doesn’t even hide the fact she reads here, she thinks she’s being smart by not addressing it but almost everything she does and says is an indirect response to the things on here
Re: Rachelle, Justin and the $20 Onesies | Part 6
I’m pretty sure she passed away before 20 weeks, but she delivered her at what would of been 20 weeks.Curious wrote:I think it was at 19 or 20 weeks they lost Brynn.Lukie_73 wrote:Without having to look back at their vlogs...can anyone tell me how many weeks she was when she lost Brynn? I don't want to sound callous because losing a baby at any gestation is hard, I have lost four. But I was just wondering about whether she really has a right to call it a stillborn loss. Here in my country the loss isn't a stillborn until after 24 weeks. Before then it's a miscarriage up to 14 weeks, or a late miscarriage from 14 to 24 weeks. The reason being, a baby isn't considered having the ability to survive until past 24 weeks. If the loss is before 24 weeks, you can't have a funeral or get a death certificate. As harsh as that sounds, it's all around that viability gestation number. We still had a little private service for our losses, and buried them with special plants etc, but we couldn't just have a proper funeral.herebcofbritney wrote: I think she knew exactly what she was doing when she blasted the fact that she had a stillborn. I could never ever make a video so soon about how my daughter was born early and passed. Idc if it spread awareness on an abnormality or a syndrome or anything. I can’t even make basic YT videos. I guess I’m not narcissistic enough. Maybe it does break Rachelle that she lost a baby. But to me I feel like now that Emma is here she hardly mentions it and has forgotten why people watch her in the first place. I never knew these people until she posted herself crying about taking down the nursery. If Brynn was here I wouldn’t even know Justin and Rachelle existed so yes she is somewhat known due to her stillborn infant.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I just wonder how that would have changed things for them re YT.
Sendt fra min EVA-L09 med Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
- Amateur
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2018 8:03 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Rachelle, Justin and the $20 Onesies | Part 6
I think she just meant their channel wouldn’t have gotten traction without the loss of their daughter.staceyla wrote:They weren't pregnant when she started YouTube. They had just started sharing their infertility story. The only thing that would have changed was if Brynn had made it fullterm and was healthy. They didn't just make a YouTube because of Brynn.Lukie_73 wrote:Without having to look back at their vlogs...can anyone tell me how many weeks she was when she lost Brynn? I don't want to sound callous because losing a baby at any gestation is hard, I have lost four. But I was just wondering about whether she really has a right to call it a stillborn loss. Here in my country the loss isn't a stillborn until after 24 weeks. Before then it's a miscarriage up to 14 weeks, or a late miscarriage from 14 to 24 weeks. The reason being, a baby isn't considered having the ability to survive until past 24 weeks. If the loss is before 24 weeks, you can't have a funeral or get a death certificate. As harsh as that sounds, it's all around that viability gestation number. We still had a little private service for our losses, and buried them with special plants etc, but we couldn't just have a proper funeral.herebcofbritney wrote: I think she knew exactly what she was doing when she blasted the fact that she had a stillborn. I could never ever make a video so soon about how my daughter was born early and passed. Idc if it spread awareness on an abnormality or a syndrome or anything. I can’t even make basic YT videos. I guess I’m not narcissistic enough. Maybe it does break Rachelle that she lost a baby. But to me I feel like now that Emma is here she hardly mentions it and has forgotten why people watch her in the first place. I never knew these people until she posted herself crying about taking down the nursery. If Brynn was here I wouldn’t even know Justin and Rachelle existed so yes she is somewhat known due to her stillborn infant.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I just wonder how that would have changed things for them re YT.
Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Rachelle, Justin and the $20 Onesies | Part 6
Yes but they wouldn’t have the following they do now or the number of subscribers they do now. Her vlogs weren’t consistent. She barely was vlogging before she lost Brynn. She probably would of fallen off of YouTube if she hadn’t lost Brynn then her packing up the nursery vlog went viral and that’s probably what gave her a taste of wanting to be YouTube famous.staceyla wrote:They weren't pregnant when she started YouTube. They had just started sharing their infertility story. The only thing that would have changed was if Brynn had made it fullterm and was healthy. They didn't just make a YouTube because of Brynn.Lukie_73 wrote:Without having to look back at their vlogs...can anyone tell me how many weeks she was when she lost Brynn? I don't want to sound callous because losing a baby at any gestation is hard, I have lost four. But I was just wondering about whether she really has a right to call it a stillborn loss. Here in my country the loss isn't a stillborn until after 24 weeks. Before then it's a miscarriage up to 14 weeks, or a late miscarriage from 14 to 24 weeks. The reason being, a baby isn't considered having the ability to survive until past 24 weeks. If the loss is before 24 weeks, you can't have a funeral or get a death certificate. As harsh as that sounds, it's all around that viability gestation number. We still had a little private service for our losses, and buried them with special plants etc, but we couldn't just have a proper funeral.herebcofbritney wrote: I think she knew exactly what she was doing when she blasted the fact that she had a stillborn. I could never ever make a video so soon about how my daughter was born early and passed. Idc if it spread awareness on an abnormality or a syndrome or anything. I can’t even make basic YT videos. I guess I’m not narcissistic enough. Maybe it does break Rachelle that she lost a baby. But to me I feel like now that Emma is here she hardly mentions it and has forgotten why people watch her in the first place. I never knew these people until she posted herself crying about taking down the nursery. If Brynn was here I wouldn’t even know Justin and Rachelle existed so yes she is somewhat known due to her stillborn infant.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I just wonder how that would have changed things for them re YT.
Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Last edited by prettyll on Tue Sep 18, 2018 2:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Guru Gossiper
- Posts: 2065
- Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2018 7:43 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Rachelle, Justin and the $20 Onesies | Part 6
Yes that’s what I meant. I know she had a channel prior to even conceiving Brynn but I never heard of her or saw them until she passed. That’s when she blew up I think.brendarae222 wrote:I think she just meant their channel wouldn’t have gotten traction without the loss of their daughter.staceyla wrote:They weren't pregnant when she started YouTube. They had just started sharing their infertility story. The only thing that would have changed was if Brynn had made it fullterm and was healthy. They didn't just make a YouTube because of Brynn.Lukie_73 wrote: Without having to look back at their vlogs...can anyone tell me how many weeks she was when she lost Brynn? I don't want to sound callous because losing a baby at any gestation is hard, I have lost four. But I was just wondering about whether she really has a right to call it a stillborn loss. Here in my country the loss isn't a stillborn until after 24 weeks. Before then it's a miscarriage up to 14 weeks, or a late miscarriage from 14 to 24 weeks. The reason being, a baby isn't considered having the ability to survive until past 24 weeks. If the loss is before 24 weeks, you can't have a funeral or get a death certificate. As harsh as that sounds, it's all around that viability gestation number. We still had a little private service for our losses, and buried them with special plants etc, but we couldn't just have a proper funeral.
I just wonder how that would have changed things for them re YT.
Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
- Talker
- Posts: 139
- Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2018 11:28 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Rachelle, Justin and the $20 Onesies | Part 6
I'm a longtime lurker. I saw the video and the posts on here about it. Basically it was in the mix of all this cheating drama. Some girl said she cheated with Justin, he logged onto his twitter account (that he rarely used) just to block the girl. People on here saw it and started talking and she found out, basically went to Keren for comfort and advice and Keren made a rant video talking about another YouTube mom dealing with drama, breach of privacy and being criticized. We all knew right away who she was talking about. Then Keren deleted the video. I assume Rachelle asked her toNellieNovember wrote:Oh! What vlog was that? Do you have a link?NjH1 wrote:I mean we know for sure that she reads here from when Keren made that video about her thread that one time and read out texts from another person who read their thread all the time and it was so obvious it was about rachelle. She doesn’t even hide the fact she reads here, she thinks she’s being smart by not addressing it but almost everything she does and says is an indirect response to the things on here
Re: Rachelle, Justin and the $20 Onesies | Part 6
She needs to find a job,she's too immature or fragile to live of sharing her private life. On a funnier note, watching yesterday's vlog she says she waits to feed Emma at home because it's more convenient. Why does she have issues about breastfeeding in public and then she leaves her nipples on display in the vlog, which is edited? Not to mention that every time she lowers the camera we get a full view of her butt in those shorts. Is she modest or not? Maybe the subscribers get the full view as they are paying customers? This chick baffles me.
-
- Amateur
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2018 8:03 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Rachelle, Justin and the $20 Onesies | Part 6
He’s super fake and it sounds awkward when he gives compliments which is very strange when its your own wife....Andielina0984 wrote:Yep. Spoken like someone who is constantly walking around eggshells. Idk but she gives me the bipolar vibe.judgeybuggie wrote:I NEED TO KNOW: does anyone else find something super fake about Justin? Like everytime he talks or compliments her, it almost sounds too fake, like he's mocking her or something. Like sarcasm...
Also, did anyone else think he looked a little tipsy coming home like two vlogs ago?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: Rachelle, Justin and the $20 Onesies | Part 6
She gave birth to her at 20 weeks. Technically that is not a stillbirth but she had to be induced and give birth to. Fully formed baby that had distinguishable fingers/toes/features so by most people’s informal definition that is a still birth rather then a miscarriageLukie_73 wrote:Without having to look back at their vlogs...can anyone tell me how many weeks she was when she lost Brynn? I don't want to sound callous because losing a baby at any gestation is hard, I have lost four. But I was just wondering about whether she really has a right to call it a stillborn loss. Here in my country the loss isn't a stillborn until after 24 weeks. Before then it's a miscarriage up to 14 weeks, or a late miscarriage from 14 to 24 weeks. The reason being, a baby isn't considered having the ability to survive until past 24 weeks. If the loss is before 24 weeks, you can't have a funeral or get a death certificate. As harsh as that sounds, it's all around that viability gestation number. We still had a little private service for our losses, and buried them with special plants etc, but we couldn't just have a proper funeral.herebcofbritney wrote:I think she knew exactly what she was doing when she blasted the fact that she had a stillborn. I could never ever make a video so soon about how my daughter was born early and passed. Idc if it spread awareness on an abnormality or a syndrome or anything. I can’t even make basic YT videos. I guess I’m not narcissistic enough. Maybe it does break Rachelle that she lost a baby. But to me I feel like now that Emma is here she hardly mentions it and has forgotten why people watch her in the first place. I never knew these people until she posted herself crying about taking down the nursery. If Brynn was here I wouldn’t even know Justin and Rachelle existed so yes she is somewhat known due to her stillborn infant.yeahwhatever wrote:It’s interesting to think about how different their lives would be if Brynn did make it to full term. None of us would probably know who they are and they wouldn’t be making all this extra money from YouTube. Just a thought.
Not sure they realized capitalizing on Brynn has benefited them.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I just wonder how that would have changed things for them re YT.
Re: Rachelle, Justin and the $20 Onesies | Part 6
I’m new to this board so I’m not sure if this has been talked about or not but has anyone clicked the #emmys52 on Rachelles IG?!!!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- bobloblawslawblog
- Amateur
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Thu May 17, 2018 2:16 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Rachelle, Justin and the $20 Onesies | Part 6
I saw that! So weird.Jhollar20 wrote:I’m new to this board so I’m not sure if this has been talked about or not but has anyone clicked the #emmys52 on Rachelles IG?!!!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my moto x4 using Tapatalk
Re: Rachelle, Justin and the $20 Onesies | Part 6
I don’t think I’d be adding that to pictures of my baby anymore!bobloblawslawblog wrote:I saw that! So weird.Jhollar20 wrote:I’m new to this board so I’m not sure if this has been talked about or not but has anyone clicked the #emmys52 on Rachelles IG?!!!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my moto x4 using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- Andielina0984
- Gossiper
- Posts: 615
- Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2018 12:59 pm
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Rachelle, Justin and the $20 Onesies | Part 6
Or why the hell does she not give her a bottle.Lailac23 wrote:She needs to find a job,she's too immature or fragile to live of sharing her private life. On a funnier note, watching yesterday's vlog she says she waits to feed Emma at home because it's more convenient. Why does she have issues about breastfeeding in public and then she leaves her nipples on display in the vlog, which is edited? Not to mention that every time she lowers the camera we get a full view of her butt in those shorts. Is she modest or not? Maybe the subscribers get the full view as they are paying customers? This chick baffles me.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
- Guru Gossiper
- Posts: 2065
- Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2018 7:43 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Rachelle, Justin and the $20 Onesies | Part 6
I saw it and it’s 5 pics of Emma and 1 pic of someone posting a picture of their house or something lol.Jhollar20 wrote:I don’t think I’d be adding that to pictures of my baby anymore!bobloblawslawblog wrote:I saw that! So weird.Jhollar20 wrote:I’m new to this board so I’m not sure if this has been talked about or not but has anyone clicked the #emmys52 on Rachelles IG?!!!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my moto x4 using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- bobloblawslawblog
- Amateur
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Thu May 17, 2018 2:16 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Rachelle, Justin and the $20 Onesies | Part 6
She keeps changing it! People are trolling her so she can't have a seamless tag just for her baby lol. They change it to whatever new tag she makes. Looks like she just gave upJhollar20 wrote:I don’t think I’d be adding that to pictures of my baby anymore!bobloblawslawblog wrote:I saw that! So weird.Jhollar20 wrote:I’m new to this board so I’m not sure if this has been talked about or not but has anyone clicked the #emmys52 on Rachelles IG?!!!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my moto x4 using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my moto x4 using Tapatalk
- Andielina0984
- Gossiper
- Posts: 615
- Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2018 12:59 pm
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Rachelle, Justin and the $20 Onesies | Part 6
No but someone is trying to find a way to sabotage it lolJhollar20 wrote:I’m new to this board so I’m not sure if this has been talked about or not but has anyone clicked the #emmys52 on Rachelles IG?!!!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk