Rachelle, Justin and the $20 Onesies | Part 6

Locked
NellieNovember
Talker
Talker
Posts: 179
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2017 12:19 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle, Justin and the $20 Onesies | Part 6

Unread post by NellieNovember »

NjH1 wrote:I mean we know for sure that she reads here from when Keren made that video about her thread that one time and read out texts from another person who read their thread all the time and it was so obvious it was about rachelle. She doesn’t even hide the fact she reads here, she thinks she’s being smart by not addressing it but almost everything she does and says is an indirect response to the things on here
Oh! What vlog was that? Do you have a link?
staceyla
Informer
Informer
Posts: 388
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2018 4:08 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle, Justin and the $20 Onesies | Part 6

Unread post by staceyla »

Lukie_73 wrote:
herebcofbritney wrote:
yeahwhatever wrote:It’s interesting to think about how different their lives would be if Brynn did make it to full term. None of us would probably know who they are and they wouldn’t be making all this extra money from YouTube. Just a thought.

Not sure they realized capitalizing on Brynn has benefited them.
I think she knew exactly what she was doing when she blasted the fact that she had a stillborn. I could never ever make a video so soon about how my daughter was born early and passed. Idc if it spread awareness on an abnormality or a syndrome or anything. I can’t even make basic YT videos. I guess I’m not narcissistic enough. Maybe it does break Rachelle that she lost a baby. But to me I feel like now that Emma is here she hardly mentions it and has forgotten why people watch her in the first place. I never knew these people until she posted herself crying about taking down the nursery. If Brynn was here I wouldn’t even know Justin and Rachelle existed so yes she is somewhat known due to her stillborn infant.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Without having to look back at their vlogs...can anyone tell me how many weeks she was when she lost Brynn? I don't want to sound callous because losing a baby at any gestation is hard, I have lost four. But I was just wondering about whether she really has a right to call it a stillborn loss. Here in my country the loss isn't a stillborn until after 24 weeks. Before then it's a miscarriage up to 14 weeks, or a late miscarriage from 14 to 24 weeks. The reason being, a baby isn't considered having the ability to survive until past 24 weeks. If the loss is before 24 weeks, you can't have a funeral or get a death certificate. As harsh as that sounds, it's all around that viability gestation number. We still had a little private service for our losses, and buried them with special plants etc, but we couldn't just have a proper funeral.

I just wonder how that would have changed things for them re YT.
They weren't pregnant when she started YouTube. They had just started sharing their infertility story. The only thing that would have changed was if Brynn had made it fullterm and was healthy. They didn't just make a YouTube because of Brynn.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
calliebaity77
Informer
Informer
Posts: 283
Joined: Mon May 14, 2018 7:18 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle, Justin and the $20 Onesies | Part 6

Unread post by calliebaity77 »

Lukie_73 wrote:
herebcofbritney wrote:
yeahwhatever wrote:It’s interesting to think about how different their lives would be if Brynn did make it to full term. None of us would probably know who they are and they wouldn’t be making all this extra money from YouTube. Just a thought.

Not sure they realized capitalizing on Brynn has benefited them.
I think she knew exactly what she was doing when she blasted the fact that she had a stillborn. I could never ever make a video so soon about how my daughter was born early and passed. Idc if it spread awareness on an abnormality or a syndrome or anything. I can’t even make basic YT videos. I guess I’m not narcissistic enough. Maybe it does break Rachelle that she lost a baby. But to me I feel like now that Emma is here she hardly mentions it and has forgotten why people watch her in the first place. I never knew these people until she posted herself crying about taking down the nursery. If Brynn was here I wouldn’t even know Justin and Rachelle existed so yes she is somewhat known due to her stillborn infant.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Without having to look back at their vlogs...can anyone tell me how many weeks she was when she lost Brynn? I don't want to sound callous because losing a baby at any gestation is hard, I have lost four. But I was just wondering about whether she really has a right to call it a stillborn loss. Here in my country the loss isn't a stillborn until after 24 weeks. Before then it's a miscarriage up to 14 weeks, or a late miscarriage from 14 to 24 weeks. The reason being, a baby isn't considered having the ability to survive until past 24 weeks. If the loss is before 24 weeks, you can't have a funeral or get a death certificate. As harsh as that sounds, it's all around that viability gestation number. We still had a little private service for our losses, and buried them with special plants etc, but we couldn't just have a proper funeral.

I just wonder how that would have changed things for them re YT.
She was 20 weeks, here in the states 20 weeks plus is a still birth and 12 to 19 is a late miscarriage.

Sent from my Pixel XL using Tapatalk
Lailac23
Talker
Talker
Posts: 108
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2018 12:05 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle, Justin and the $20 Onesies | Part 6

Unread post by Lailac23 »

It's terrible to be talking about this, but the way she acted about the two babies makes me think that the loss of Brynn was more about her frustrated dream of being a mother than about her daughter. That's why she kept stressing that she was a mother anyway, and mentioning Brynn and after Emma was born she stopped mentioning her altogether and describes herself as a first time mom. But I am still really sorry for her and wish that she never had to went through that terrible experience.Her or any other family.
NjH1
Talker
Talker
Posts: 105
Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2017 12:53 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle, Justin and the $20 Onesies | Part 6

Unread post by NjH1 »

NellieNovember wrote:
NjH1 wrote:I mean we know for sure that she reads here from when Keren made that video about her thread that one time and read out texts from another person who read their thread all the time and it was so obvious it was about rachelle. She doesn’t even hide the fact she reads here, she thinks she’s being smart by not addressing it but almost everything she does and says is an indirect response to the things on here
Oh! What vlog was that? Do you have a link?
It was a video on her personal channel but she deleted it after a while. I tried to look for it but it seems like she deleted it. It was before she was pregnant though
User avatar
prettyll
True Gossiper
True Gossiper
Posts: 1235
Joined: Mon May 30, 2016 10:42 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle, Justin and the $20 Onesies | Part 6

Unread post by prettyll »

Curious wrote:
Lukie_73 wrote:
herebcofbritney wrote: I think she knew exactly what she was doing when she blasted the fact that she had a stillborn. I could never ever make a video so soon about how my daughter was born early and passed. Idc if it spread awareness on an abnormality or a syndrome or anything. I can’t even make basic YT videos. I guess I’m not narcissistic enough. Maybe it does break Rachelle that she lost a baby. But to me I feel like now that Emma is here she hardly mentions it and has forgotten why people watch her in the first place. I never knew these people until she posted herself crying about taking down the nursery. If Brynn was here I wouldn’t even know Justin and Rachelle existed so yes she is somewhat known due to her stillborn infant.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Without having to look back at their vlogs...can anyone tell me how many weeks she was when she lost Brynn? I don't want to sound callous because losing a baby at any gestation is hard, I have lost four. But I was just wondering about whether she really has a right to call it a stillborn loss. Here in my country the loss isn't a stillborn until after 24 weeks. Before then it's a miscarriage up to 14 weeks, or a late miscarriage from 14 to 24 weeks. The reason being, a baby isn't considered having the ability to survive until past 24 weeks. If the loss is before 24 weeks, you can't have a funeral or get a death certificate. As harsh as that sounds, it's all around that viability gestation number. We still had a little private service for our losses, and buried them with special plants etc, but we couldn't just have a proper funeral.

I just wonder how that would have changed things for them re YT.
I think it was at 19 or 20 weeks they lost Brynn.

Sendt fra min EVA-L09 med Tapatalk
I’m pretty sure she passed away before 20 weeks, but she delivered her at what would of been 20 weeks.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
brendarae222
Amateur
Amateur
Posts: 47
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2018 8:03 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle, Justin and the $20 Onesies | Part 6

Unread post by brendarae222 »

staceyla wrote:
Lukie_73 wrote:
herebcofbritney wrote: I think she knew exactly what she was doing when she blasted the fact that she had a stillborn. I could never ever make a video so soon about how my daughter was born early and passed. Idc if it spread awareness on an abnormality or a syndrome or anything. I can’t even make basic YT videos. I guess I’m not narcissistic enough. Maybe it does break Rachelle that she lost a baby. But to me I feel like now that Emma is here she hardly mentions it and has forgotten why people watch her in the first place. I never knew these people until she posted herself crying about taking down the nursery. If Brynn was here I wouldn’t even know Justin and Rachelle existed so yes she is somewhat known due to her stillborn infant.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Without having to look back at their vlogs...can anyone tell me how many weeks she was when she lost Brynn? I don't want to sound callous because losing a baby at any gestation is hard, I have lost four. But I was just wondering about whether she really has a right to call it a stillborn loss. Here in my country the loss isn't a stillborn until after 24 weeks. Before then it's a miscarriage up to 14 weeks, or a late miscarriage from 14 to 24 weeks. The reason being, a baby isn't considered having the ability to survive until past 24 weeks. If the loss is before 24 weeks, you can't have a funeral or get a death certificate. As harsh as that sounds, it's all around that viability gestation number. We still had a little private service for our losses, and buried them with special plants etc, but we couldn't just have a proper funeral.

I just wonder how that would have changed things for them re YT.
They weren't pregnant when she started YouTube. They had just started sharing their infertility story. The only thing that would have changed was if Brynn had made it fullterm and was healthy. They didn't just make a YouTube because of Brynn.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
I think she just meant their channel wouldn’t have gotten traction without the loss of their daughter.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
User avatar
prettyll
True Gossiper
True Gossiper
Posts: 1235
Joined: Mon May 30, 2016 10:42 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Rachelle, Justin and the $20 Onesies | Part 6

Unread post by prettyll »

staceyla wrote:
Lukie_73 wrote:
herebcofbritney wrote: I think she knew exactly what she was doing when she blasted the fact that she had a stillborn. I could never ever make a video so soon about how my daughter was born early and passed. Idc if it spread awareness on an abnormality or a syndrome or anything. I can’t even make basic YT videos. I guess I’m not narcissistic enough. Maybe it does break Rachelle that she lost a baby. But to me I feel like now that Emma is here she hardly mentions it and has forgotten why people watch her in the first place. I never knew these people until she posted herself crying about taking down the nursery. If Brynn was here I wouldn’t even know Justin and Rachelle existed so yes she is somewhat known due to her stillborn infant.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Without having to look back at their vlogs...can anyone tell me how many weeks she was when she lost Brynn? I don't want to sound callous because losing a baby at any gestation is hard, I have lost four. But I was just wondering about whether she really has a right to call it a stillborn loss. Here in my country the loss isn't a stillborn until after 24 weeks. Before then it's a miscarriage up to 14 weeks, or a late miscarriage from 14 to 24 weeks. The reason being, a baby isn't considered having the ability to survive until past 24 weeks. If the loss is before 24 weeks, you can't have a funeral or get a death certificate. As harsh as that sounds, it's all around that viability gestation number. We still had a little private service for our losses, and buried them with special plants etc, but we couldn't just have a proper funeral.

I just wonder how that would have changed things for them re YT.
They weren't pregnant when she started YouTube. They had just started sharing their infertility story. The only thing that would have changed was if Brynn had made it fullterm and was healthy. They didn't just make a YouTube because of Brynn.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
Yes but they wouldn’t have the following they do now or the number of subscribers they do now. Her vlogs weren’t consistent. She barely was vlogging before she lost Brynn. She probably would of fallen off of YouTube if she hadn’t lost Brynn then her packing up the nursery vlog went viral and that’s probably what gave her a taste of wanting to be YouTube famous.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Last edited by prettyll on Tue Sep 18, 2018 2:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
herebcofbritney
Guru Gossiper
Guru Gossiper
Posts: 2065
Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2018 7:43 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle, Justin and the $20 Onesies | Part 6

Unread post by herebcofbritney »

brendarae222 wrote:
staceyla wrote:
Lukie_73 wrote: Without having to look back at their vlogs...can anyone tell me how many weeks she was when she lost Brynn? I don't want to sound callous because losing a baby at any gestation is hard, I have lost four. But I was just wondering about whether she really has a right to call it a stillborn loss. Here in my country the loss isn't a stillborn until after 24 weeks. Before then it's a miscarriage up to 14 weeks, or a late miscarriage from 14 to 24 weeks. The reason being, a baby isn't considered having the ability to survive until past 24 weeks. If the loss is before 24 weeks, you can't have a funeral or get a death certificate. As harsh as that sounds, it's all around that viability gestation number. We still had a little private service for our losses, and buried them with special plants etc, but we couldn't just have a proper funeral.

I just wonder how that would have changed things for them re YT.
They weren't pregnant when she started YouTube. They had just started sharing their infertility story. The only thing that would have changed was if Brynn had made it fullterm and was healthy. They didn't just make a YouTube because of Brynn.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
I think she just meant their channel wouldn’t have gotten traction without the loss of their daughter.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yes that’s what I meant. I know she had a channel prior to even conceiving Brynn but I never heard of her or saw them until she passed. That’s when she blew up I think.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
judgeybuggie
Talker
Talker
Posts: 139
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2018 11:28 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle, Justin and the $20 Onesies | Part 6

Unread post by judgeybuggie »

NellieNovember wrote:
NjH1 wrote:I mean we know for sure that she reads here from when Keren made that video about her thread that one time and read out texts from another person who read their thread all the time and it was so obvious it was about rachelle. She doesn’t even hide the fact she reads here, she thinks she’s being smart by not addressing it but almost everything she does and says is an indirect response to the things on here
Oh! What vlog was that? Do you have a link?
I'm a longtime lurker. I saw the video and the posts on here about it. Basically it was in the mix of all this cheating drama. Some girl said she cheated with Justin, he logged onto his twitter account (that he rarely used) just to block the girl. People on here saw it and started talking and she found out, basically went to Keren for comfort and advice and Keren made a rant video talking about another YouTube mom dealing with drama, breach of privacy and being criticized. We all knew right away who she was talking about. Then Keren deleted the video. I assume Rachelle asked her to
Lailac23
Talker
Talker
Posts: 108
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2018 12:05 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle, Justin and the $20 Onesies | Part 6

Unread post by Lailac23 »

She needs to find a job,she's too immature or fragile to live of sharing her private life. On a funnier note, watching yesterday's vlog she says she waits to feed Emma at home because it's more convenient. Why does she have issues about breastfeeding in public and then she leaves her nipples on display in the vlog, which is edited? Not to mention that every time she lowers the camera we get a full view of her butt in those shorts. Is she modest or not? Maybe the subscribers get the full view as they are paying customers? This chick baffles me.
brendarae222
Amateur
Amateur
Posts: 47
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2018 8:03 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle, Justin and the $20 Onesies | Part 6

Unread post by brendarae222 »

Andielina0984 wrote:
judgeybuggie wrote:I NEED TO KNOW: does anyone else find something super fake about Justin? Like everytime he talks or compliments her, it almost sounds too fake, like he's mocking her or something. Like sarcasm...

Also, did anyone else think he looked a little tipsy coming home like two vlogs ago?
Yep. Spoken like someone who is constantly walking around eggshells. Idk but she gives me the bipolar vibe.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
He’s super fake and it sounds awkward when he gives compliments which is very strange when its your own wife....


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
kalakala
Talker
Talker
Posts: 220
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2013 11:25 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle, Justin and the $20 Onesies | Part 6

Unread post by kalakala »

Lukie_73 wrote:
herebcofbritney wrote:
yeahwhatever wrote:It’s interesting to think about how different their lives would be if Brynn did make it to full term. None of us would probably know who they are and they wouldn’t be making all this extra money from YouTube. Just a thought.

Not sure they realized capitalizing on Brynn has benefited them.
I think she knew exactly what she was doing when she blasted the fact that she had a stillborn. I could never ever make a video so soon about how my daughter was born early and passed. Idc if it spread awareness on an abnormality or a syndrome or anything. I can’t even make basic YT videos. I guess I’m not narcissistic enough. Maybe it does break Rachelle that she lost a baby. But to me I feel like now that Emma is here she hardly mentions it and has forgotten why people watch her in the first place. I never knew these people until she posted herself crying about taking down the nursery. If Brynn was here I wouldn’t even know Justin and Rachelle existed so yes she is somewhat known due to her stillborn infant.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Without having to look back at their vlogs...can anyone tell me how many weeks she was when she lost Brynn? I don't want to sound callous because losing a baby at any gestation is hard, I have lost four. But I was just wondering about whether she really has a right to call it a stillborn loss. Here in my country the loss isn't a stillborn until after 24 weeks. Before then it's a miscarriage up to 14 weeks, or a late miscarriage from 14 to 24 weeks. The reason being, a baby isn't considered having the ability to survive until past 24 weeks. If the loss is before 24 weeks, you can't have a funeral or get a death certificate. As harsh as that sounds, it's all around that viability gestation number. We still had a little private service for our losses, and buried them with special plants etc, but we couldn't just have a proper funeral.

I just wonder how that would have changed things for them re YT.
She gave birth to her at 20 weeks. Technically that is not a stillbirth but she had to be induced and give birth to. Fully formed baby that had distinguishable fingers/toes/features so by most people’s informal definition that is a still birth rather then a miscarriage
User avatar
Jhollar20
Talker
Talker
Posts: 186
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2018 10:29 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle, Justin and the $20 Onesies | Part 6

Unread post by Jhollar20 »

I’m new to this board so I’m not sure if this has been talked about or not but has anyone clicked the #emmys52 on Rachelles IG?!!!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
User avatar
bobloblawslawblog
Amateur
Amateur
Posts: 39
Joined: Thu May 17, 2018 2:16 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle, Justin and the $20 Onesies | Part 6

Unread post by bobloblawslawblog »

Jhollar20 wrote:I’m new to this board so I’m not sure if this has been talked about or not but has anyone clicked the #emmys52 on Rachelles IG?!!! ImageImageImage


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I saw that! So weird.

Sent from my moto x4 using Tapatalk
User avatar
Jhollar20
Talker
Talker
Posts: 186
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2018 10:29 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle, Justin and the $20 Onesies | Part 6

Unread post by Jhollar20 »

bobloblawslawblog wrote:
Jhollar20 wrote:I’m new to this board so I’m not sure if this has been talked about or not but has anyone clicked the #emmys52 on Rachelles IG?!!! ImageImageImage


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I saw that! So weird.

Sent from my moto x4 using Tapatalk
I don’t think I’d be adding that to pictures of my baby anymore!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
User avatar
Andielina0984
Gossiper
Gossiper
Posts: 615
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2018 12:59 pm
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Rachelle, Justin and the $20 Onesies | Part 6

Unread post by Andielina0984 »

Lailac23 wrote:She needs to find a job,she's too immature or fragile to live of sharing her private life. On a funnier note, watching yesterday's vlog she says she waits to feed Emma at home because it's more convenient. Why does she have issues about breastfeeding in public and then she leaves her nipples on display in the vlog, which is edited? Not to mention that every time she lowers the camera we get a full view of her butt in those shorts. Is she modest or not? Maybe the subscribers get the full view as they are paying customers? This chick baffles me.
Or why the hell does she not give her a bottle.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
herebcofbritney
Guru Gossiper
Guru Gossiper
Posts: 2065
Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2018 7:43 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle, Justin and the $20 Onesies | Part 6

Unread post by herebcofbritney »

Jhollar20 wrote:
bobloblawslawblog wrote:
Jhollar20 wrote:I’m new to this board so I’m not sure if this has been talked about or not but has anyone clicked the #emmys52 on Rachelles IG?!!! ImageImageImage


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I saw that! So weird.

Sent from my moto x4 using Tapatalk
I don’t think I’d be adding that to pictures of my baby anymore!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I saw it and it’s 5 pics of Emma and 1 pic of someone posting a picture of their house or something lol.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
User avatar
bobloblawslawblog
Amateur
Amateur
Posts: 39
Joined: Thu May 17, 2018 2:16 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle, Justin and the $20 Onesies | Part 6

Unread post by bobloblawslawblog »

Jhollar20 wrote:
bobloblawslawblog wrote:
Jhollar20 wrote:I’m new to this board so I’m not sure if this has been talked about or not but has anyone clicked the #emmys52 on Rachelles IG?!!! ImageImageImage


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I saw that! So weird.

Sent from my moto x4 using Tapatalk
I don’t think I’d be adding that to pictures of my baby anymore!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
She keeps changing it! People are trolling her so she can't have a seamless tag just for her baby lol. They change it to whatever new tag she makes. Looks like she just gave up

Sent from my moto x4 using Tapatalk
User avatar
Andielina0984
Gossiper
Gossiper
Posts: 615
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2018 12:59 pm
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Rachelle, Justin and the $20 Onesies | Part 6

Unread post by Andielina0984 »

Jhollar20 wrote:I’m new to this board so I’m not sure if this has been talked about or not but has anyone clicked the #emmys52 on Rachelles IG?!!! ImageImageImage


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
No but someone is trying to find a way to sabotage it lol


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Locked

Return to “Rachelle and Justin”