Ad blocker detected: Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker on our website.
How can we say that he cheated but loves Rachelle because she's better? I would assume that if he loved her in the first place he wouldn't have cheated just to be 'with a warm body'? He looks like he's no stranger to porn so I don't buy the theory that he was just horny but he loves his wife. That sounds like the excuse cheating bastards use to fool their wifes "yeah, I'm sleeping with someone else, but who is my wife?".
I can't believe that God/the universe gave her the chance to leave that douche and she still chose to pay money to carry his child. (All of these assuming that he did cheat on her)
Blinding1dne wrote:I used to love their channel but I'm curious, has anyone tried to get Rachelle or Justin to address this rumor about another lady?
I doubt it. Wouldn't be smart if someone confronted them about something like that because of course they'll deny it. YouTube viewers like happy couples or couples that look happy at least. If you take anything from Family vlogger scandals, once the cheating is announced its game over for the channel. He did log into his super inactive twitter account just to block the girl on twitter and Rachelle blocked anyone who was following that account.
There's gotta be some truth. I don't think princess petty would pass up the opportunity to confront haters and brag about how faithful her husband is on twitter.
Lailac23 wrote:How can we say that he cheated but loves Rachelle because she's better? I would assume that if he loved her in the first place he wouldn't have cheated just to be 'with a warm body'? He looks like he's no stranger to porn so I don't buy the theory that he was just horny but he loves his wife. That sounds like the excuse cheating bastards use to fool their wifes "yeah, I'm sleeping with someone else, but who is my wife?".
I can't believe that God/the universe gave her the chance to leave that douche and she still chose to pay money to carry his child. (All of these assuming that he did cheat on her)
Rachelle is way better. I will give her that. The girl he supposedly cheated with looks like a dog.
Lailac23 wrote:How can we say that he cheated but loves Rachelle because she's better? I would assume that if he loved her in the first place he wouldn't have cheated just to be 'with a warm body'? He looks like he's no stranger to porn so I don't buy the theory that he was just horny but he loves his wife. That sounds like the excuse cheating bastards use to fool their wifes "yeah, I'm sleeping with someone else, but who is my wife?".
I can't believe that God/the universe gave her the chance to leave that douche and she still chose to pay money to carry his child. (All of these assuming that he did cheat on her)
Rachelle is way better. I will give her that. The girl he supposedly cheated with looks like a dog.
Justin: Don't tell my wife
The girl: Woof
She looks like beaus cousin
Hey maybe if the homewrecker thing doesn't work out he can set her up with Beau. Double date with two dogs
Her feet aren’t gross but the shoes are horrendous. I saw the whole picture and I don’t remember her feet looking that big normally so I wonder if it is the sandals.
Her feet aren’t gross but the shoes are horrendous. I saw the whole picture and I don’t remember her feet looking that big normally so I wonder if it is the sandals.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Nah. She got big ugly ostrich feet. She’s got the same sandals Brit and Vanessa have. Always copying. Even with the photos that show her feet in the distance. At least paint them rest of your toes.
Her feet aren’t gross but the shoes are horrendous. I saw the whole picture and I don’t remember her feet looking that big normally so I wonder if it is the sandals.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Nah. She got big ugly ostrich feet. She’s got the same sandals Brit and Vanessa have. Always copying. Even with the photos that show her feet in the distance. At least paint them rest of your toes.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
In one episode she said she wore a 9 which isn't huge but she has wide feet and picks shoes like she doesn't... she needs to get a pair of Tom's, rainbows or Nikes and just suck it up because certain shoes are going to make it look like she has flippers.
MOD POST : please refrain from speaking about the affair situation. Can I also remind you that it is against site rules to post identifiable info for anyone other than the youtuber being discussed. The situation with the alleged affair has been beaten to death on this site and there has been no proof that anyone ever had an affair. I am NOT censoring your discussions, but anyone who has been a long time poster here knows what happens to the threads when this particular topic and twitter handle are brought up. Thank you.
Pineapples wrote:MOD POST : please refrain from speaking about the affair situation. Can I also remind you that it is against site rules to post identifiable info for anyone other than the youtuber being discussed. The situation with the alleged affair has been beaten to death on this site and there has been no proof that anyone ever had an affair. I am NOT censoring your discussions, but anyone who has been a long time poster here knows what happens to the threads when this particular topic and twitter handle are brought up. Thank you.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Hopefully I'm not banned for saying this but I would consider this censoring the discussion though. I'd also consider it a civil conversation so far, those interested talked about it while those who weren't carried out alternative discussion topics. I understand the issue with discussing identifiable people not on the site but we should at least be able to talk about all topics relating to the YouTube family. Gossip is gossip, not fact. Isn't that what we're here to do... Gossip? NOTHING we say on here has proof because it's gossip. Lol. I appreciate the mods and their work but I don't agree with being censored. Especially if it's a civil discussion. Warnings should be issued when there's actual conflict.
Last edited by judgeybuggie on Sun Sep 23, 2018 7:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Pineapples wrote:MOD POST : please refrain from speaking about the affair situation. Can I also remind you that it is against site rules to post identifiable info for anyone other than the youtuber being discussed. The situation with the alleged affair has been beaten to death on this site and there has been no proof that anyone ever had an affair. I am NOT censoring your discussions, but anyone who has been a long time poster here knows what happens to the threads when this particular topic and twitter handle are brought up. Thank you.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Hopefully I'm not banned for saying this but I would consider this censoring the discussion though. I'd also consider it a civil conversation so far, those interested talked about it while those who weren't carried out alternative discussion topics. I understand the issue with discussing identifiable people not on the site but we should at least be able to talk about all topics relating to the YouTube family. Gossip is gossip, not fact. Isn't that what we're here to do... Gossip? NOTHING we say on here has proof because it's gossip. Lol. I appreciate the mods and their work but I don't agree with being censored. Especially if it's a civil discussion. Warnings should be issued when there's actual conflict.
Go back a few threads, its been beaten to death already.
Pineapples wrote:MOD POST : please refrain from speaking about the affair situation. Can I also remind you that it is against site rules to post identifiable info for anyone other than the youtuber being discussed. The situation with the alleged affair has been beaten to death on this site and there has been no proof that anyone ever had an affair. I am NOT censoring your discussions, but anyone who has been a long time poster here knows what happens to the threads when this particular topic and twitter handle are brought up. Thank you.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Just curious is there a way we can make a separate thread like have for title suggestions, that links certain threads that might answer questions about them w/o having to rehash it? Just curious because we are eventually going to get in the double digits in threads.
legobaby wrote:Wow that was really mean. Would you say that to her face? Probably not why attack someone like that
I mean yea. I'd tell her as she's running up to me waiting for me to throw her Frisbee
Okay come on. This is when this forum gets annoying. You're just saying petty and mean things for no good reason. That's not gossip and has nothing to do with anything. That's just straight up fucked up.
legobaby wrote:Wow that was really mean. Would you say that to her face? Probably not why attack someone like that
I mean yea. I'd tell her as she's running up to me waiting for me to throw her Frisbee
Okay come on. This is when this forum gets annoying. You're just saying petty and mean things for no good reason. That's not gossip and has nothing to do with anything. That's just straight up fucked up.
Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
Who gives a fuck though. This site is about gossip, so it’s not going to be fans of her. It brings her haters, ‘petty and mean things’ are going to be said, so if you don’t like it, ignore it.
judgeybuggie wrote:
I mean yea. I'd tell her as she's running up to me waiting for me to throw her Frisbee
Okay come on. This is when this forum gets annoying. You're just saying petty and mean things for no good reason. That's not gossip and has nothing to do with anything. That's just straight up fucked up.
Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
Who gives a fuck though. This site is about gossip, so it’s not going to be fans of her. It brings her haters, ‘petty and mean things’ are going to be said, so if you don’t like it, ignore it.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That's not gossip. She wasn't even talking about Rachelle. There is a difference between gossip and straight up talking shit. Don't respond if you don't even know what you're talking about.
staceyla wrote:Okay come on. This is when this forum gets annoying. You're just saying petty and mean things for no good reason. That's not gossip and has nothing to do with anything. That's just straight up fucked up.
Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
Who gives a fuck though. This site is about gossip, so it’s not going to be fans of her. It brings her haters, ‘petty and mean things’ are going to be said, so if you don’t like it, ignore it.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That's not gossip. She wasn't even talking about Rachelle. There is a difference between gossip and straight up talking shit. Don't respond if you don't even know what you're talking about.
Why is it the same person always the one stirring the shit pot? One day she hates Rachelle the other she’s defending her or complaining about what we say.
