Rachelle and Just-IN Case I Need More Money | Part 7

[judgeybuggie]

Does anyone else follow the twitter account on here? Let me know please, because when I requested to follow it to get to the bottom of this nonsense I immediately got blocked. I’m curious if anyone else apart from you actually does follow it?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I just read the terms of service and noticed I broke the rules by releasing the twitter handle in the last thread. You should find someone to pm it to you. I like using this thread and I'd like to respect the privacy of randoms not on this forum.

[Pineapples]

Does anyone else follow the twitter account on here? Let me know please, because when I requested to follow it to get to the bottom of this nonsense I immediately got blocked. I’m curious if anyone else apart from you actually does follow it?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I just read the terms of service and noticed I broke the rules by releasing the twitter handle in the last thread. You should find someone to pm it to you. I like using this thread and I'd like to respect the privacy of randoms not on this forum.

I don’t need anyone to pm it to me I know it as you’ve told us over and over again.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[judgeybuggie]

THEORY I WANT YOUR OPINIONS: y'all notice whenever Justin takes the camera there's barely any footage. I wonder if she makes him vlog in the store to make sure he's going where he says he is, even though she most likely won't use the footage.

I've noticed a trend here. I mean it IS a subtle way to keep track of him. Her saying "babe get some extra footage" I doubt he'd notice. I've just noticed him take the camera somewhere but us getting NO FOOTAGE. it would probably be boring anyways but why else would she tell him to take a vlog camera TO CVS


I MEAN IF SHE TELLS HIM TO VLOG AND HE COMES BACK WITH NO FOOTAGE, WOULD LOOK A LITTLE SUSPICIOUS SINCE SHE EDITS THE VLOGS.

Could be a possibility, knowing how controlling Rachelle is, I see her thinking about it.
But I mostly sew it as another display of her lazinnes: "oh, you are going out? Vlog then, it's a joint channel". Nevermind that she is the one spending all the money and the man already has one real job plus the Navy.
And as for the lack of footage, that is probably because he is boring AF. He takes an hour to make a point and has the verbal skills of a 13 year old boy trying to look ghetto.

I don't even know why its called "Rachelle and Justin" she rarely let's the man vlog. I wonder if they'll start using "The Swan Fam" now that they have Emma. Waaay better trademark imo

[staceyla]

Does anyone else follow the twitter account on here? Let me know please, because when I requested to follow it to get to the bottom of this nonsense I immediately got blocked. I’m curious if anyone else apart from you actually does follow it?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I follow it. (At least I think I still do). I honestly believe it's just a troll too.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk

[staceyla]

If I'm banned for speaking against the mods, that just goes to show everyone the tone of this thread and how it's ran.

You have caused problems though. You say something and if someone says anything against you you automatically act like a jerk and play the victim. (In some cases).

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk

[Snarkadoodle Doo]

That's debatable really... We don't talk about that on here. If you'd like to know what we *assume* you should PM me. It's just not a forum friendly topic. I can give you like 10 reasons why it's true and like 10 reasons why it's prob not true and let you decide lol. Mods say it's a troll but I love conspiracy and I'd let people decide for themselves

For what it's worth, we don't *think* it's a troll... We *KNOW* it's a troll. We've proven it over and over again, hence the reason it's not an allowable subject here anymore. Because this troll comes here and talks about it non stop, like they're insistent on making everyone else obsess about it too. The Twitter girl is made up. As is the troll who is posting here about her. We've blocked the troll dozens, if not hundreds, of times, but we know she has one of those things that give her access to fake up addresses all over the world now, so blocking and banning her is becoming more difficult, even though we know exactly who she is and have proof that she's posting here.

The reason we continue asking for this topic to not be discussed is because we know it's fake and it ALWAYS is the earliest sign of the troll getting ready to attack other forum users. TheY make up fake information about users and make false and defamatory threats to "expose" people when in reality every single thing the troll makes up is proven false.

What we don't know is WHY the troll wants to keep talking about this subject so much? It's really the only thing she focuses on. But we don't know why. To be honest, since I know the troll is reading this right now, I'd love to hear from you and get some clarification about it. We know you're here, we've just been watching you post this time, instead of blocking you. I'm sure it surprises you that you've been able to post this long without being banned this time. You probably thought we didn't know who you were, but we do.

Honestly, send me a dm. I'm a nice and reasonable person. If you want to use this forum. in the way it is intended, and follow the site rules, we have no reason to ban you. We are just really curious why you always want to talk about this subject. Do you think we've missed something that You know and you think we don't? Shoot me a dm. Let's chat. Because it would really make the lives of all our moderators easier if we didn't have to worry all the time that you were going to say something to hurt our users. We'd love for you to just be able to use this site responsibly and chat like everyone else. It must be just as stressful for you, to always be worried that the mods are going to figure out who you are and ban you again.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

No one is accusing you or any other mod of conspiracy my apologies if it comes off that way. I just think it's a gossip worthy topic and I bring it up. Sure beats talking about her sandals imo. You may enjoy policing the topics on here but as far as I'm concerned I have every right to discuss it with another user, am I wrong? Please correct me if I'm wrong. Personally I have reason to believe it's true and I'm allowed to share that with other users privately on DM. Myself and other users should be able to bring up topics we're interested in chatting about specifically in the PMs. I don't appreciate the accusatory tone, it sounds like you're accusing me of spreading lies when in reality I'm regurgitating information I've came across on twitter. I follow the twitter account just like a bunch of other users on here. I do my creepy research just like everyone else. Someone asked, I was interested in the topic and suggested that they chat privately with me because it's not a topic the thread is into at the moment. Are our private PMs surveillance as well? Am I not allowed to make connections on this site and privately chat with other users?

Well, in all honesty I didn't believe I was being accusatory at all. I never once said you were the troll, did I? If you wish to imply that you are, that was not my suggestion. I politely and respectfully told the members of this thread why the conversation is not allowed on the thread AND politely and respectfully invited the "troll" to message me privately because I'd love for her to stay on this site if she can follow site rules.

As for DM conversations, never once did I say that you can't talk about it over DM. DM's are PRIVATE and no one can read them, even moderators. If you want to have conversations about it in dm, you can go right ahead. But they need to stay in DM. My reply was to clarify why the subject is off limits on the thread. Since you mentioned we don't allow it, it only seemed right and fair for us to be able to explain why since it seemed you were accusing us of doing something wrong.

As for moderators "enjoying policing topics", I can assure you there is nothing a moderator dislikes more than enforcing site rules. But sadly that is what we are here to do.... To make sure that ALL conversations remain on track, respectful, and within the rules of the site.



Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[Lailac23]

About the Swan Fam, anyone else thought it was very bad taste to have the new merch (those that look like bathroom signs) with the two baby symbols like Brynn was still alive? They forgot all about her but not when it comes to making money out of the pity of the viewers.

[staceyla]

About the Swan Fam, anyone else thought it was very bad taste to have the new merch (those that look like bathroom signs) with the two baby symbols like Brynn was still alive? They forgot all about her but not when it comes to making money out of the pity of the viewers.

She had a Halo. And ripping off The Office is NOT cool.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk

[Andielina0984]

About the Swan Fam, anyone else thought it was very bad taste to have the new merch (those that look like bathroom signs) with the two baby symbols like Brynn was still alive? They forgot all about her but not when it comes to making money out of the pity of the viewers.

She had a Halo. And ripping off The Office is NOT cool.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk

Wouldn’t that be considered copyright infringement?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[judgeybuggie]

That's debatable really... We don't talk about that on here. If you'd like to know what we *assume* you should PM me. It's just not a forum friendly topic. I can give you like 10 reasons why it's true and like 10 reasons why it's prob not true and let you decide lol. Mods say it's a troll but I love conspiracy and I'd let people decide for themselves[/quote]

For what it's worth, we don't *think* it's a troll... We *KNOW* it's a troll. We've proven it over and over again, hence the reason it's not an allowable subject here anymore. Because this troll comes here and talks about it non stop, like they're insistent on making everyone else obsess about it too. The Twitter girl is made up. As is the troll who is posting here about her. We've blocked the troll dozens, if not hundreds, of times, but we know she has one of those things that give her access to fake up addresses all over the world now, so blocking and banning her is becoming more difficult, even though we know exactly who she is and have proof that she's posting here.

The reason we continue asking for this topic to not be discussed is because we know it's fake and it ALWAYS is the earliest sign of the troll getting ready to attack other forum users. TheY make up fake information about users and make false and defamatory threats to "expose" people when in reality every single thing the troll makes up is proven false.

What we don't know is WHY the troll wants to keep talking about this subject so much? It's really the only thing she focuses on. But we don't know why. To be honest, since I know the troll is reading this right now, I'd love to hear from you and get some clarification about it. We know you're here, we've just been watching you post this time, instead of blocking you. I'm sure it surprises you that you've been able to post this long without being banned this time. You probably thought we didn't know who you were, but we do.

Honestly, send me a dm. I'm a nice and reasonable person. If you want to use this forum. in the way it is intended, and follow the site rules, we have no reason to ban you. We are just really curious why you always want to talk about this subject. Do you think we've missed something that You know and you think we don't? Shoot me a dm. Let's chat. Because it would really make the lives of all our moderators easier if we didn't have to worry all the time that you were going to say something to hurt our users. We'd love for you to just be able to use this site responsibly and chat like everyone else. It must be just as stressful for you, to always be worried that the mods are going to figure out who you are and ban you again.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk[/quote]

No one is accusing you or any other mod of conspiracy my apologies if it comes off that way. I just think it's a gossip worthy topic and I bring it up. Sure beats talking about her sandals imo. You may enjoy policing the topics on here but as far as I'm concerned I have every right to discuss it with another user, am I wrong? Please correct me if I'm wrong. Personally I have reason to believe it's true and I'm allowed to share that with other users privately on DM. Myself and other users should be able to bring up topics we're interested in chatting about specifically in the PMs. I don't appreciate the accusatory tone, it sounds like you're accusing me of spreading lies when in reality I'm regurgitating information I've came across on twitter. I follow the twitter account just like a bunch of other users on here. I do my creepy research just like everyone else. Someone asked, I was interested in the topic and suggested that they chat privately with me because it's not a topic the thread is into at the moment. Are our private PMs surveillance as well? Am I not allowed to make connections on this site and privately chat with other users?[/quote]

Well, in all honesty I didn't believe I was being accusatory at all. I never once said you were the troll, did I? If you wish to imply that you are, that was not my suggestion. I politely and respectfully told the members of this thread why the conversation is not allowed on the thread AND politely and respectfully invited the "troll" to message me privately because I'd love for her to stay on this site if she can follow site rules.

As for DM conversations, never once did I say that you can't talk about it over DM. DM's are PRIVATE and no one can read them, even moderators. If you want to have conversations about it in dm, you can go right ahead. But they need to stay in DM. My reply was to clarify why the subject is off limits on the thread. Since you mentioned we don't allow it, it only seemed right and fair for us to be able to explain why since it seemed you were accusing us of doing something wrong.

As for moderators "enjoying policing topics", I can assure you there is nothing a moderator dislikes more than enforcing site rules. But sadly that is what we are here to do.... To make sure that ALL conversations remain on track, respectful, and within the rules of the site.



Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk[/quote]

It did sound a bit accusatory since you felt the need to attach it to my post specifically. There are other users that bring up the topic and have brought it up on previous threads. If that's not the case, I respect that and must of read into it wrong. Bottom line is: No one knows the truth but the girl and Justin. (If there is a girl) but that doesn't mean users can't enjoy discussing the topic and it certainly doesn't mean someone is spreading lies. This is a gossip site after all. I urge looking up the definition of gossip. This isn't a Rachelle and Justin fact page, it's a gossip page.

[staceyla]

About the Swan Fam, anyone else thought it was very bad taste to have the new merch (those that look like bathroom signs) with the two baby symbols like Brynn was still alive? They forgot all about her but not when it comes to making money out of the pity of the viewers.

She had a Halo. And ripping off The Office is NOT cool.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk

Wouldn’t that be considered copyright infringement?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I honestly have no idea. Maybe not? I'm sure something would have happened by now. Or maybe it did and that's why she doesn't bring it up anymore?

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk

[Lailac23]

About the Swan Fam, anyone else thought it was very bad taste to have the new merch (those that look like bathroom signs) with the two baby symbols like Brynn was still alive? They forgot all about her but not when it comes to making money out of the pity of the viewers.

She had a Halo. And ripping off The Office is NOT cool.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk

Haha, she had a halo, oh my god that is even worst.
Imagine the conversation with an innocent bystander: "What a fun shirt, but how come that baby has a halo? Yeah, that's my deceased daughter. Wanna buy one?"

[calliebaity77]

Why are we still arguing about Justin the whole girl vs no girl thing? The mods made it pretty clear. This is a forum site anyone can make a forum on. You can literally make your own on the topic of him cheating and discuss it with others who feel the same way instead of muddying up this thread with arguements!

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

[Snarkadoodle Doo]

I'm a nice person as well and you will probably ban me for not agreeing with you because that seems like the tone you use and how you approach your job on this site but I think you should follow your own advice. I try to ignore posts that I don't agree with as do other users, I think you should hold yourself to the same standards. It's only fair especially if you participate in the discussion. You shouldn't be able to police the discourse AND join the conversation publicly discrediting anything you don't agree with.

Again, just suggesting ideas and bringing up interesting discussion topics.

I don't ban people just because they disagree with me. In actuality, the ONLY person I have banned from this site it the troll who has harassed and stalked other users on and off site because that is explicitly against site rules and is grounds for an immediate ban.

If you would like to know more about my "tone", you're welcome to visit any of the threads I mod. I've never once had anyone say I was unkind, mean, rude, hurtful, etc. My "approach" to how I do my job on this site is to be kind to EVERYONE and that there is always a way to fix an issue. I don't even ban the troll unless I've talked to at least two other mods who also agree it needs to be done because I refuse to be accused of doing something not in accordance with my job description.

As for ignoring posts we dislike or disagree with, for the most part we do this. I don't really reply to anything unless I agree with it and ignore what I don't agree with. However, as a moderator, we are not allowed to just ignore posts that break rules, so those will be addressed. Now, I'm not saying your post broke a rule. I'm just saying I thought it was necessary to reply in this case because I thought YTMD site users deserve to know why a certain subject isn't allowed.

It isn't fair to anyone to knowingly let them post about things that could get them in trouble. Notice I didn't yell at you or even give you a warning. I was literally being friendly. As for our joining in conversations, we are allowed to do that. . It's fun, so why wouldn't we? LOL.

Anyhow, have a nice day all you R & J "fans" lol.... I'm not going to keep justifying this with public replies, but my inbox is ALWAYS open if people want to chat! Like I said, I'm a nice old lady so no need to be afraid of me, lol....


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[Snarkadoodle Doo]

It did sound a bit accusatory since you felt the need to attach it to my post specifically. There are other users that bring up the topic and have brought it up on previous threads. If that's not the case, I respect that and must of read into it wrong. Bottom line is: No one knows the truth but the girl and Justin. (If there is a girl) but that doesn't mean users can't enjoy discussing the topic and it certainly doesn't mean someone is spreading lies. This is a gossip site after all. I urge looking up the definition of gossip. This isn't a Rachelle and Justin fact page, it's a gossip page.

It was posted as a reply to your post PURELY because you were the once who made the post and brought it up. If I were the one that had made that post, the reply would have come from pineapples and would have been worded the same way. And you're welcome to ask any of our long time users, or go back and read old threads yourself, to confirm this subject gets the exact same reply every time it's brought up, no matter who says it.

Ok, now I'm done for real, lol... Let's change the subject!


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[HereForTheTeaaa]

There she goes editing her hair and mentioning how much of an amazing sleeper she is. But that is a cute picture of Emma though.

[Lailac23]

To be fair, considering how Rachelle deals with Emma (bottle fed too quickly, shaking her still not fused head, etc) it's pretty safe to asumme she has never seen a baby before. No wonder thinks Emma is amazing in everthing (except her looks, she ordered it in bleached blond or Merida red, the ivf people must have messed up)

[calliebaity77]

Why is gods name are they shoving that tiny ass top knot she came home in on her now even bigger noggin?

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

[Lailac23]

Why is gods name are they shoving that tiny ass top knot she came home in on her now even bigger noggin?

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Come on, who among us didn't squish our doll's head just to be able to put some hat on it for the picture...?
Oh, wait, that's her human baby.

[calliebaity77]

Why is gods name are they shoving that tiny ass top knot she came home in on her now even bigger noggin?

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Come on, who among us didn't squish our doll's head just to be able to put some hat on it for the picture...?
Oh, wait, that's her human baby.

I bet Emma screams bloody murder the whole time Rachelle is trying to shove her head in one of those baby sultan hats!

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk