Rachelle and Rachelle's Baby | Part 8

Locked
herebcofbritney
Guru Gossiper
Guru Gossiper
Posts: 2065
Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2018 7:43 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle and Rachelle's Baby | Part 8

Unread post by herebcofbritney »

Snarkadoodle Doo wrote:Has she shared the COOL filter yet? I wonder if it includes fake snowfall? Thats the only thing tbat could make something look more cool that her WARM filter.
herebcofbritney wrote:I mean the sky isn’t even blue...or white. It’s freaking purplish pink? Idk haha. I’m bad with colors but I know that looks terrible.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my LGL84VL using Tapatalk
Give me a second I’ll go back and look.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
herebcofbritney
Guru Gossiper
Guru Gossiper
Posts: 2065
Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2018 7:43 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle and Rachelle's Baby | Part 8

Unread post by herebcofbritney »

herebcofbritney wrote:
Snarkadoodle Doo wrote:Has she shared the COOL filter yet? I wonder if it includes fake snowfall? Thats the only thing tbat could make something look more cool that her WARM filter.
herebcofbritney wrote:I mean the sky isn’t even blue...or white. It’s freaking purplish pink? Idk haha. I’m bad with colors but I know that looks terrible.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my LGL84VL using Tapatalk
Give me a second I’ll go back and look.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
[img]//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201810 ... 4024b5.png[/img]

[img]//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201810 ... d4af0d.png[/img]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Bluberries23
Talker
Talker
Posts: 178
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2018 8:14 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle and Rachelle's Baby | Part 8

Unread post by Bluberries23 »

herebcofbritney wrote:
herebcofbritney wrote:
Snarkadoodle Doo wrote:Has she shared the COOL filter yet? I wonder if it includes fake snowfall? Thats the only thing tbat could make something look more cool that her WARM filter. Sent from my LGL84VL using Tapatalk
Give me a second I’ll go back and look.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
[img]//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201810 ... 4024b5.png[/img]

[img]//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201810 ... d4af0d.png[/img]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Literally no difference. Cool looks like it has slight purple tint.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
herebcofbritney
Guru Gossiper
Guru Gossiper
Posts: 2065
Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2018 7:43 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle and Rachelle's Baby | Part 8

Unread post by herebcofbritney »

Bluberries23 wrote:
herebcofbritney wrote:
herebcofbritney wrote: Give me a second I’ll go back and look.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
[img]//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201810 ... 4024b5.png[/img]

[img]//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201810 ... d4af0d.png[/img]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Literally no difference. Cool looks like it has slight purple tint.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Is it just me or is all of the “life” getting edited out of the pictures? Lol. Presets are supposed to give pictures life and make them look better, but these presets make them look worse.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
User avatar
aniraKKarina
Gossiper
Gossiper
Posts: 628
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2018 12:16 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle and Rachelle's Baby | Part 8

Unread post by aniraKKarina »

herebcofbritney wrote:
Bluberries23 wrote:
herebcofbritney wrote: [img]//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201810 ... 4024b5.png[/img]

[img]//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201810 ... d4af0d.png[/img]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Literally no difference. Cool looks like it has slight purple tint.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Is it just me or is all of the “life” getting edited out of the pictures? Lol. Presets are supposed to give pictures life and make them look better, but these presets make them look worse.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It’s for Instagram where your photos don’t have to have life, as long as they make it look like you have A life.
JustWannaGossip
Gossiper
Gossiper
Posts: 727
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2018 3:16 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle and Rachelle's Baby | Part 8

Unread post by JustWannaGossip »

Sorry. I’m not impressed. If I wanted to use presets on anything, I’d get Aspyn Ovard’s. At least someone would know who I was talking about if they asked.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
User avatar
Snarkadoodle Doo
Guru Gossiper
Guru Gossiper
Posts: 3002
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2017 3:42 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 5 times

Re: Rachelle and Rachelle's Baby | Part 8

Unread post by Snarkadoodle Doo »

Those filters look exactly the same to me lol

Sent from my LGL84VL using Tapatalk
:angel: RIP Mom 3/16/2019 - Cancer Sucks :angel:
herebcofbritney
Guru Gossiper
Guru Gossiper
Posts: 2065
Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2018 7:43 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle and Rachelle's Baby | Part 8

Unread post by herebcofbritney »

JustWannaGossip wrote:Sorry. I’m not impressed. If I wanted to use presets on anything, I’d get Aspyn Ovard’s. At least someone would know who I was talking about if they asked.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Or Alexa Jean Brown’s. At least hers look better.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Dani_now
Talker
Talker
Posts: 169
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2018 1:49 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle and Rachelle's Baby | Part 8

Unread post by Dani_now »

aniraKKarina wrote:
herebcofbritney wrote:
Bluberries23 wrote:
Literally no difference. Cool looks like it has slight purple tint.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Is it just me or is all of the “life” getting edited out of the pictures? Lol. Presets are supposed to give pictures life and make them look better, but these presets make them look worse.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It’s for Instagram where your photos don’t have to have life, as long as they make it look like you have A life.
I don't understand why people would buy this.
As an amateur photographer, this hurts my eyes. One thing I hate about filters is that not every photo has the same lighting so slapping on a filter doesn't always look good.
I edit all my photos in Lightroom. They always come put natural and beautiful.


Here's an example of my niece that I took.
I'm a little rusty. So sorry Image[img]//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201810 ... 0ea30e.jpg[/img]

Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk
herebcofbritney
Guru Gossiper
Guru Gossiper
Posts: 2065
Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2018 7:43 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle and Rachelle's Baby | Part 8

Unread post by herebcofbritney »

Dani_now wrote:
aniraKKarina wrote:
herebcofbritney wrote: Is it just me or is all of the “life” getting edited out of the pictures? Lol. Presets are supposed to give pictures life and make them look better, but these presets make them look worse.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It’s for Instagram where your photos don’t have to have life, as long as they make it look like you have A life.
I don't understand why people would buy this.
As an amateur photographer, this hurts my eyes. One thing I hate about filters is that not every photo has the same lighting so slapping on a filter doesn't always look good.
I edit all my photos in Lightroom. They always come put natural and beautiful.


Here's an example of my niece that I took.
I'm a little rusty. So sorry Image[img]//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201810 ... 0ea30e.jpg[/img]

Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk
That looks better than my son’s newborn photo shoot that cost me $400 haha. It sucks how bad someone can be at photography and yet still charge outrageous amounts. Your photo editing looks way better than a lot of people’s. People that have claimed to be doing that for 5 or more years. No way in the world Rachelle could do better work. She hasn’t taken any classes has she?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
User avatar
aniraKKarina
Gossiper
Gossiper
Posts: 628
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2018 12:16 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle and Rachelle's Baby | Part 8

Unread post by aniraKKarina »

Dani_now wrote:
aniraKKarina wrote:
herebcofbritney wrote: Is it just me or is all of the “life” getting edited out of the pictures? Lol. Presets are supposed to give pictures life and make them look better, but these presets make them look worse.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It’s for Instagram where your photos don’t have to have life, as long as they make it look like you have A life.
I don't understand why people would buy this.
As an amateur photographer, this hurts my eyes. One thing I hate about filters is that not every photo has the same lighting so slapping on a filter doesn't always look good.
I edit all my photos in Lightroom. They always come put natural and beautiful.


Here's an example of my niece that I took.
I'm a little rusty. So sorry Image[img]//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201810 ... 0ea30e.jpg[/img]

Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk
That looks really good. At first it looked a little weird but when you click on the photo and zoom in you can tell that the quality is excellent. And what a cutie Image
Dani_now
Talker
Talker
Posts: 169
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2018 1:49 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle and Rachelle's Baby | Part 8

Unread post by Dani_now »

herebcofbritney wrote:
Dani_now wrote:
aniraKKarina wrote: It’s for Instagram where your photos don’t have to have life, as long as they make it look like you have A life.
I don't understand why people would buy this.
As an amateur photographer, this hurts my eyes. One thing I hate about filters is that not every photo has the same lighting so slapping on a filter doesn't always look good.
I edit all my photos in Lightroom. They always come put natural and beautiful.


Here's an example of my niece that I took.
I'm a little rusty. So sorry Image[img]//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201810 ... 0ea30e.jpg[/img]

Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk
That looks better than my son’s newborn photo shoot that cost me $400 haha. It sucks how bad someone can be at photography and yet still charge outrageous amounts. Your photo editing looks way better than a lot of people’s. People that have claimed to be doing that for 5 or more years. No way in the world Rachelle could do better work. She hasn’t taken any classes has she?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I only took a class in highschool. But I have a nerdy friend that taught me everything.
I don't even change people, I do this all for fun. It takes alot of practice obviously.
I do believe people out there try to make a living out of it, but sadly have no talent.
There are amazing photographers out there. You just have to look




Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk
Dani_now
Talker
Talker
Posts: 169
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2018 1:49 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle and Rachelle's Baby | Part 8

Unread post by Dani_now »

aniraKKarina wrote:
Dani_now wrote:
aniraKKarina wrote: It’s for Instagram where your photos don’t have to have life, as long as they make it look like you have A life.
I don't understand why people would buy this.
As an amateur photographer, this hurts my eyes. One thing I hate about filters is that not every photo has the same lighting so slapping on a filter doesn't always look good.
I edit all my photos in Lightroom. They always come put natural and beautiful.


Here's an example of my niece that I took.
I'm a little rusty. So sorry Image[img]//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201810 ... 0ea30e.jpg[/img]

Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk
That looks really good. At first it looked a little weird but when you click on the photo and zoom in you can tell that the quality is excellent. And what a cutie Image
The lighting wasn't the best, but I worked with it.

Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk
User avatar
Britxo
Gossiper
Gossiper
Posts: 930
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2014 1:17 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle and Rachelle's Baby | Part 8

Unread post by Britxo »

What a stupid fucking announcement


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Baz1_
Informer
Informer
Posts: 311
Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2018 8:32 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle and Rachelle's Baby | Part 8

Unread post by Baz1_ »

Wow, those presets are dreadful. Idk how she thinks the “warm” one looks warm at all. She’s always following the crowd, yet nothing she does is impressive in the slightest...
HereForTheTeaaa
Informer
Informer
Posts: 325
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2018 4:19 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle and Rachelle's Baby | Part 8

Unread post by HereForTheTeaaa »

The photos look whitewashed, grainy, and dull. She was bragging about using the Emmy Lowe presents for awhile and she literally just went in there and made the worst basic ass filters. Like it looks like she didn’t even try? “For weeks” my ass. She thinks because she was a “photographer” she can make a presents? Nah girl, that’s why I pay the additional 10.99 a month for Photoshop. You don’t have to follow the crowd it’s okay to not realease basic ass bad filters and I feel sorry for anyone willing to pay for those when there are BEAUTIFUL filters out there worth the price.
Baz1_
Informer
Informer
Posts: 311
Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2018 8:32 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle and Rachelle's Baby | Part 8

Unread post by Baz1_ »

Looks like the life has been sucked out of them. Sky is gone and they look grey and grainy. I wouldn’t use these even if they were free
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
lavenderlove
Gossiper
Gossiper
Posts: 802
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2018 10:57 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle and Rachelle's Baby | Part 8

Unread post by lavenderlove »

This is worse than I thought! And I was one that was saying it was going to be a lame announcement. I should have known it would be WORSE than lame! And those filters are complete crap. And I'm not even just saying that because I don't like her. This shows what at overly inflated ego she has. All the "baby you're amazing! Baby you're so beautiful! Baby you're so incredible! Baby! Baby! Baby!" has gone to her head. She now thinks that's how the whole world views her.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
princessanp
Informer
Informer
Posts: 320
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2016 10:20 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle and Rachelle's Baby | Part 8

Unread post by princessanp »

[img]//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201810 ... fda79f.png[/img]

Aside from completely making the picture bland and dull, why in the world does it make them so grainy and such bad quality?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
herebcofbritney
Guru Gossiper
Guru Gossiper
Posts: 2065
Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2018 7:43 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle and Rachelle's Baby | Part 8

Unread post by herebcofbritney »

It’s absolutely terrible

[img]//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201810 ... 2818e3.png[/img]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Locked

Return to “Rachelle and Justin”