Rachelle and Rachelle's Baby | Part 8

Locked
User avatar
Andielina0984
Gossiper
Gossiper
Posts: 615
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2018 12:59 pm
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Rachelle and Rachelle's Baby | Part 8

Unread post by Andielina0984 »

Baz1_ wrote:Looks like the life has been sucked out of them. Sky is gone and they look grey and grainy. I wouldn’t use these even if they were free
Bestie? She’s like 16


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
13Cindersmella
Talker
Talker
Posts: 201
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2018 7:04 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle and Rachelle's Baby | Part 8

Unread post by 13Cindersmella »

I don’t use filters and have no idea what Lightroom is, but her before and after are not cute. One girl gave her a photo standing in leaves and now it looks like snow. All the beautiful colors are gone instead of enhanced, which is what I would have expected. I guess this goes with her all things gray style.

I think doing something like this was a decent idea, since she enjoys photography, but her results are nothing I would ever want. Maybe it is an Instagram style I haven’t noticed. The only pictures that looked better were one of a baby with all white background and the one with the girl making the heart with her hands. All the rest were worse and colorless and weird. Just no. She needs classes and a lot more skill before trying to label anything as professional or for sale.
goodygoody769
Amateur
Amateur
Posts: 51
Joined: Wed May 16, 2018 12:32 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle and Rachelle's Baby | Part 8

Unread post by goodygoody769 »

As a photographer, those presets are awful!

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
User avatar
fingusername
Extreme Gossiper
Extreme Gossiper
Posts: 1854
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2017 6:50 pm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Re: Rachelle and Rachelle's Baby | Part 8

Unread post by fingusername »

Not one of those "after" pics look better than before. OMG, did she even try? So gross but the lighting looks like it has a shrimp coloured filter on them....could this be a joke? She's trying to punk everyone into having a shrimp dick tone to their lives????

I even tried on my mac, then iphone, then my husbands surface pro....hoping it was just my screen but those filter are just JUNK!!!!!!! Is she kidding with this?
User avatar
fingusername
Extreme Gossiper
Extreme Gossiper
Posts: 1854
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2017 6:50 pm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Re: Rachelle and Rachelle's Baby | Part 8

Unread post by fingusername »

goodygoody769 wrote:As a photographer, those presets are awful! Image

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

LOL As a person with eyes, those presets are awful! :)
carolinecat16
Talker
Talker
Posts: 159
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2018 5:31 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle and Rachelle's Baby | Part 8

Unread post by carolinecat16 »

God Rachelle is literally disgusting. She knows that at least 10-20, if not more, (probably around 50-100), people will buy those fugly presets, which means thousands of dollars for her to go blow at Target, Starbucks and on $30 onesies.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
User avatar
Haulnarse
Guru Gossiper
Guru Gossiper
Posts: 6127
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2018 2:05 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: Rachelle and Rachelle's Baby | Part 8

Unread post by Haulnarse »

carolinecat16 wrote:God Rachelle is literally disgusting. She knows that at least 10-20, if not more, (probably around 50-100), people will buy those fugly presets, which means thousands of dollars for her to go blow at Target, Starbucks and on $30 onesies.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Pity buys. I bet no one posts to social media their filtered photos. Id alter one photo and be all “helllll no”. Is there a money back guarantee if your not happy? Contact bank and say you didnt get what was advertised??
User avatar
Haulnarse
Guru Gossiper
Guru Gossiper
Posts: 6127
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2018 2:05 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: Rachelle and Rachelle's Baby | Part 8

Unread post by Haulnarse »

[img]//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201810 ... 6a0217.png[/img]

I’m sorry but making the sky purple isn’t acceptable. A filter over a whole picture clearly doesn’t work for “every photo” like she claims.
User avatar
LilaVictoria
Talker
Talker
Posts: 120
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2018 5:02 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle and Rachelle's Baby | Part 8

Unread post by LilaVictoria »

Hey guys stupid question, but don’t our phone have filters already? And instagram also has filters??? Why would anyone buy extra presers when lots of filers are already available????
hannah2318
Amateur
Amateur
Posts: 41
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2018 7:28 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle and Rachelle's Baby | Part 8

Unread post by hannah2318 »

Sweetiebee wrote:
hannah2318 wrote:Anyone else think Emmas belly looks uncomfortably large?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yes! On more than one occasion. Once I even audibly gasped without even thinking. I couldn't believe it was swollen SIDEWAYS.
She looks so uncomfortable!! I feel so bad. My breastfed baby never had a stomach that looked so swollen


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Punkincookie
Talker
Talker
Posts: 236
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2015 10:00 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle and Rachelle's Baby | Part 8

Unread post by Punkincookie »

How Ironic the vlog title today is A Big Waste of Money on the day her presets go on sale lol.

Sent from my PH-1 using Tapatalk
User avatar
aniraKKarina
Gossiper
Gossiper
Posts: 628
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2018 12:16 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle and Rachelle's Baby | Part 8

Unread post by aniraKKarina »

I’ve never watched one of her vlogs this soon after upload. I’m a little embarrassed lol

Today’s clickbait title is “ A big waste of money”

And you are clever aren’t you Rachelle. You know a lot of us commented on your stupid preset being a waste of money. And *gasp* are you gonna talk about that today?

No. Of course not. Because that would have meant you having to express yourself intelligently. You would have had to talk about why a Rachelle preset is the best idea ever and why people should spend money on a filter.
Instead you talk about things that don’t require that you actually have to articulate an opinion - lawnmowers and poop. Now that’s some quality content Rachelle.
Tina9900
Informer
Informer
Posts: 498
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2018 9:03 pm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle and Rachelle's Baby | Part 8

Unread post by Tina9900 »

Ugh she is constantly shoving her pacifier in Emma's mouth all the time. Waste of money? Yeah how about your 25 dollar presets?
Tina9900
Informer
Informer
Posts: 498
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2018 9:03 pm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle and Rachelle's Baby | Part 8

Unread post by Tina9900 »

She obviously didn't want the pacifier but she's trying to shove it in anyway. I wonder if she ever took her band aids off?
Tallipia
Amateur
Amateur
Posts: 86
Joined: Sun Aug 20, 2017 3:41 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle and Rachelle's Baby | Part 8

Unread post by Tallipia »

hannah2318 wrote:
Sweetiebee wrote:
hannah2318 wrote:Anyone else think Emmas belly looks uncomfortably large?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yes! On more than one occasion. Once I even audibly gasped without even thinking. I couldn't believe it was swollen SIDEWAYS.
She looks so uncomfortable!! I feel so bad. My breastfed baby never had a stomach that looked so swollen


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I was gonna ask the same thing. Her belly is really big, I haven't seen a baby who would have a belly like that...
hannah2318
Amateur
Amateur
Posts: 41
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2018 7:28 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle and Rachelle's Baby | Part 8

Unread post by hannah2318 »

Tallipia wrote:
hannah2318 wrote:
Sweetiebee wrote: Yes! On more than one occasion. Once I even audibly gasped without even thinking. I couldn't believe it was swollen SIDEWAYS.
She looks so uncomfortable!! I feel so bad. My breastfed baby never had a stomach that looked so swollen


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I was gonna ask the same thing. Her belly is really big, I haven't seen a baby who would have a belly like that...

It’s a little concerning


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
herebcofbritney
Guru Gossiper
Guru Gossiper
Posts: 2065
Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2018 7:43 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle and Rachelle's Baby | Part 8

Unread post by herebcofbritney »

hannah2318 wrote:
Tallipia wrote:
hannah2318 wrote: She looks so uncomfortable!! I feel so bad. My breastfed baby never had a stomach that looked so swollen


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I was gonna ask the same thing. Her belly is really big, I haven't seen a baby who would have a belly like that...

It’s a little concerning


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Almost 18 months of breastfeeding and my sons tummy never got like that. Even when I supplemented once with formula. There is something going on. I assume she is maybe over feeding her? But then again they say you can’t over feed a breastfed baby but then why is her tummy so wide and distended looking? She hasn’t mentioned it for click bait or views so idk maybe the doctor isn’t concerned. It’s been like that since the last thread. Maybe she is just gaining most of her weight there until she grows more? I don’t even know. Just trying to think of every possible reason her 2 month old look like a pot bellied pig.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Tina9900
Informer
Informer
Posts: 498
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2018 9:03 pm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle and Rachelle's Baby | Part 8

Unread post by Tina9900 »

hannah2318 wrote:
Sweetiebee wrote:
hannah2318 wrote:Anyone else think Emmas belly looks uncomfortably large?
Yes! I feel so bad l just want to reach through the screen and help Emma out!

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yes! On more than one occasion. Once I even audibly gasped without even thinking. I couldn't believe it was swollen SIDEWAYS.
She looks so uncomfortable!! I feel so bad. My breastfed baby never had a stomach that looked so swollen


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
User avatar
Curious
Informer
Informer
Posts: 488
Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2018 10:08 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle and Rachelle's Baby | Part 8

Unread post by Curious »

THEY did the animal shelter? Um, no it was donations from your subscribers.[img]//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201810 ... 192da7.jpg[/img]

Sendt fra min EVA-L09 med Tapatalk
Faith06
Talker
Talker
Posts: 187
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2018 2:10 pm
Has thanked: 15 times
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle and Rachelle's Baby | Part 8

Unread post by Faith06 »

JustWannaGossip wrote:
Bluberries23 wrote:
HereForTheTeaaa wrote:Lol okay? Hope you have the money for another 20k kid, not saying they shouldn’t be able to have another kid but she’s always complaining and she only has one. Toddler and baby? Princess Rash you couldn’t handle it.
I hate how her baby’s just always dangles off her arm like she’s holding a chihuahua lmao.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I carry my Chihuahua better than she carries her child. Which is sad.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
i don’t know if anyone else has noticed but keren and khoa carry Sutton the same way


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Locked

Return to “Rachelle and Justin”