It looks like maybe a lion.mv13 wrote:Has anyone figured out what Emma’s Halloween costume is gonna be?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Rachelle and Rachelle's Baby | Part 8
-
- Gossiper
- Posts: 736
- Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2018 8:13 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Rachelle and Rachelle's Baby | Part 8
Re: Rachelle and Rachelle's Baby | Part 8
Or even invite them to stay for a meal.. or take a meal to them.Haulnarse wrote:Can we talk about the booty shorts she had on when his elderly grandparents visited??
[img]//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201810 ... 23943a.jpg[/img]
And the fact he didn’t even walk them to the car or help lift the walker in the car for them....
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: Rachelle and Rachelle's Baby | Part 8
I really hope they research and buy Emma her own seat on the plane. I doubt it though. They don’t seem to be the type to care about safety.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
- Guru Gossiper
- Posts: 2065
- Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2018 7:43 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Rachelle and Rachelle's Baby | Part 8
They won’t. If the maxi cosi infant carrier is AA approved then they should be able to buy her a seat and put her rear facing like in a car no issue. But they are dumb. Just because the child can be a lap infant doesn’t mean it’s the safest. If cars go max 140 mph and you need a car seat for that when you only go a fraction of that speed on a daily basis then yes you need a car seat when you go 500-600 mph 30k feet in the air. They need a car seat to get around where they are going anyways right? Why not just take it along for her safety. It’s not hard. It’s easier when you have an infant. Try doing it with a convertible car seat with a 12 month old.Pyro1309 wrote:I really hope they research and buy Emma her own seat on the plane. I doubt it though. They don’t seem to be the type to care about safety.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
- Gossiper
- Posts: 802
- Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2018 10:57 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Rachelle and Rachelle's Baby | Part 8
They won't because they're not as rich as she portrays. Buying a seat for a baby isn't cheap. And they're cheap.
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
-
- Guru Gossiper
- Posts: 2065
- Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2018 7:43 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Rachelle and Rachelle's Baby | Part 8
That’s a sad excuse. If you can’t afford for your infant to have a seat then you can’t afford the vacation. My husband and I live off of one income and it isn’t as much as they make together I’m sure and I still paid the extra money for my son to have a seat. On two separate round trip flights. About to do it again for a wedding. There’s no excuse. Thankfully plane crashes don’t happen often but turbulence is enough to throw you out of your seat. And I don’t think she would be able to protect Emma like a car seat would.lavenderlove wrote:They won't because they're not as rich as she portrays. Buying a seat for a baby isn't cheap. And they're cheap.
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: Rachelle and Rachelle's Baby | Part 8
She’s snapping back in the comment of her recent vlog about “not using clickbait”. She can’t even own up to what she does to make her target vlogs “interesting”.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Re: Rachelle and Rachelle's Baby | Part 8
How is her title NOT clickbait?? Lmao I mean I haven’t watched the vlog yet but her thumbnail is literally an arrow pointing to her tattoo of a her Rose and Brynn’s handprint & full name; two tattoos we all ALREADY knew she has. Soooo... tell me how that’s not clickbait again?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: Rachelle and Rachelle's Baby | Part 8
So I didn’t watch the vlog but read the comments and it’s basically about a tattoo she got 2 years ago and she talks about it for all of 5 seconds. Yet she’s going ham in the comments like someone stated above and lashing back lmfaoooooo
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: Rachelle and Rachelle's Baby | Part 8
The best part is she just keeps saying it isn’t clickbait. Girl, it is. You look dumb. Someone said that she only ever comments on negative comments, and never to the positive ones. Yeah, that’s because Rachelle isn’t as nice as she pretends to be.Britxo wrote:So I didn’t watch the vlog but read the comments and it’s basically about a tattoo she got 2 years ago and she talks about it for all of 5 seconds. Yet she’s going ham in the comments like someone stated above and lashing back lmfaoooooo
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
-
- Talker
- Posts: 178
- Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2018 8:14 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Rachelle and Rachelle's Baby | Part 8
[img]//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201810 ... 0d0bb5.jpg[/img] lmao.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
- Talker
- Posts: 159
- Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2018 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Rachelle and Rachelle's Baby | Part 8
Aww she gets so incredibly butthurt whenever people call her out on her shit, I love it.Celia wrote:She’s snapping back in the comment of her recent vlog about “not using clickbait”. She can’t even own up to what she does to make her target vlogs “interesting”.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Re: Rachelle and Rachelle's Baby | Part 8
Um, disturbing! [img]//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201810 ... 5cac7a.jpg[/img]
Sendt fra min EVA-L09 med Tapatalk
Sendt fra min EVA-L09 med Tapatalk
Re: Rachelle and Rachelle's Baby | Part 8
Looks like she deleted it. Jeez, stop complaining about your subscribers, Rash!Bluberries23 wrote:[img]//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201810 ... 0d0bb5.jpg[/img] lmao.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sendt fra min EVA-L09 med Tapatalk
Re: Rachelle and Rachelle's Baby | Part 8
She’s so rude to her followers. They pay your bills Rachelle!Curious wrote:Looks like she deleted it. Jeez, stop complaining about your subscribers, Rash!Bluberries23 wrote:[img]//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201810 ... 0d0bb5.jpg[/img] lmao.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sendt fra min EVA-L09 med Tapatalk
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Re: Rachelle and Rachelle's Baby | Part 8
I am not one to defend Rachelle but I think buying a 3 month old her own plane seat is ridiculous. Emma would be just as protected if Rachelle baby wore her the entire time. It also isn’t good for a 3 month old to be in a car seat for that stretch of time either so Rachelle or Justin would need to take her out and hold her. That would defeat the purpose of the seat. If Emma were older I would say it is warranted to purchase another seat but not while she is still small enough to be in a wrap/sling/carried.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
- Gossiper
- Posts: 727
- Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2018 3:16 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Rachelle and Rachelle's Baby | Part 8
Has the girl never seen a Jenna Marbles video? Her titles are pure, simple and fact. No unnecessary punctuation. But then again, Jenna Marbles is actually entertaining and interesting. Rachelle is just a train wreck.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: Rachelle and Rachelle's Baby | Part 8
Wearing her makes Emma rachelles personal airbag. If she gets thrown forward Emma is going to be hurt. The only times she would need to be in her seat is during take off, landing, and whenever the seatbelt sign is on. They literally strap down peanuts. Why wouldn’t your restrain your baby properly?rxysm wrote:I am not one to defend Rachelle but I think buying a 3 month old her own plane seat is ridiculous. Emma would be just as protected if Rachelle baby wore her the entire time. It also isn’t good for a 3 month old to be in a car seat for that stretch of time either so Rachelle or Justin would need to take her out and hold her. That would defeat the purpose of the seat. If Emma were older I would say it is warranted to purchase another seat but not while she is still small enough to be in a wrap/sling/carried.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Also they often make you take the baby carrier off during takeoff and landing. So there would be just her arms holding Emma. In the event of s runway accident (which are typically survivable!) Rachelle wouldn’t be able to hold onto her and she would go flying.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
- Amateur
- Posts: 94
- Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 1:57 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Rachelle and Rachelle's Baby | Part 8
justin kinda puts off that creeper vibe...he just always seems so shady and secretive about something. does anyone else see it? also i cant help but wonder if they go to target and vlog so much because thats what keren does.. i mean we all know she wants to be just like her but i dont think filming the same daily target and starbucks run will up their views or subs any. nobody can even get through a full vlog anymore without clicking away. they're in for a rude awakening when they find out that Youtube wont pay for their dream house or their target runs. you gotta actually have good content and people viewing your vids and etc.
and yes rachelle , your vlog titles are clickbait ...
and yes rachelle , your vlog titles are clickbait ...