Ellie and Jared: Views as low as Ellie's Iron PART 42

[FakingIt_MakingIt]

She said that her “dr” told her if she was feeling anxious to take it early. So if it’s 5 and she’s feeling anxious to go ahead and take it instead of waiting until 9.
Still not the correct way to use progesterone but she didn’t say he said to take it anytime she’s feeling anxious.

[HelloSweetie]

What happens when Ellie takes it at 5, but is then anxious again at 10pm? My bet is she’ll continue to ask for a dosage increase, just as she did last time. When she made the comment about almost taking it earlier, it was in response to thinking she would have to re-film a video. That is situational anxiety, and not something low Progesterone is causing due to a hormonal balance. To think taking Progesterone is the answer is just ignorant. She’s thinking Progesterone will be like taking a sedative before a scary fight.

She needs to educate herself on why Progesterone deficiency can contribute to anxiety, and learn how to increase her Progesterone naturally, like with vitamin C, Selenium (also food for fertility and thyroid issues), spices, etc. Unless she is pregnant, she really should not be supplementing with it all month long in the first place, and definitely not if she’s actively trying to TTC in the near future.

Her doctor is a hack, and if Ellie actually feels better 4 months from now, I’ll be surprised. For someone with so much extra energy now, she still seems to take a lot of naps.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[gopedjane]

What happens when Ellie takes it at 5, but is then anxious again at 10pm? My bet is she’ll continue to ask for a dosage increase, just as she did last time. When she made the comment about almost taking it earlier, it was in response to thinking she would have to re-film a video. That is situational anxiety, and not something low Progesterone is causing due to a hormonal balance. To think taking Progesterone is the answer is just ignorant. She’s thinking Progesterone will be like taking a sedative before a scary fight.

She needs to educate herself on why Progesterone deficiency can contribute to anxiety, and learn how to increase her Progesterone naturally, like with vitamin C, Selenium (also food for fertility and thyroid issues), spices, etc. Unless she is pregnant, she really should not be supplementing with it all month long in the first place, and definitely not if she’s actively trying to TTC in the near future.

Her doctor is a hack, and if Ellie actually feels better 4 months from now, I’ll be surprised. For someone with so much extra energy now, she still seems to take a lot of naps.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Does Jared take care of Tommy while she is napping?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[PirateWench8]

The hickey talk was SO over the top, it made me cringe to watch.

My reaction was like really how old are we 17? They are really stunted when it comes to what is socially acceptable at their ages.

[endof]

......and Ellie let it slip she uses the corner too very telling how she never vlogs it to save her image! Where is their dog is she off to camp again?

[endof]

Jared’s hair looks awful makes his head look long and elongated like a bean, can’t imagine acting like they do about sexual matters after three children, they are so puritan it’s painful!

[HelloSweetie]

......and Ellie let it slip she uses the corner too very telling how she never vlogs it to save her image! Where is their dog is she off to camp again?

Both Jared and Ellie had separate insta stories Wed or Thurs about Penny. It seemed designed to show she was around. Maybe because she had just returned from boarding again?




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[endof]

......and Ellie let it slip she uses the corner too very telling how she never vlogs it to save her image! Where is their dog is she off to camp again?

Both Jared and Ellie had separate insta stories Wed or Thurs about Penny. It seemed designed to show she was around. Maybe because she had just returned from boarding again?




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Thanks don’t watch their insta yes boarding or beaten/electro zapped into submission so she can sit still on her living room mat! I don’t know why they even ever bought a dog, she seems like an accessory!

[131618]

Lol youtube has disabled comments on their videos... not sure how widespread but they're obviously worried. Not like it matters since it was all filmed a week ago

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

[HelloSweetie]

Lol youtube has disabled comments on their videos... not sure how widespread but they're obviously worried. Not like it matters since it was all filmed a week ago

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

They can’t be too worried. Ellie was talking about ordering books yesterday and Jared mentioned ordering a surprise for Ellie and Philly D hair products a couple days ago when this all started.

Spend, spend, spend.

On Twitter he says he hopes it all is just an “overreaction” and temporary. I didn’t expect a man who thinks it’s ok to post video of himself rubbing a child’s butt on his face to ever understand.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[FakingIt_MakingIt]

They believe they’ve done nothing wrong. They’ve been told numerous times about who watches their videos, Bonnie was even demonetized for awhile. But they really don’t think they’re one of the “bad” ones so of course they’re not worried.

[HelloSweetie]

I agree, none of them think it applies to their videos.

To use Jessica Ballinger as an example because she was the first to be hit and started the “victim shaming” argument. No one is telling her that her son shouldn’t wear leotards. No one is saying he can’t do gymnastics. It isn’t victim shaming him to point out that predators have taken an interest in his gymnastic videos. She should be shocked and disgusted. He can still do the sport he loves, but she doesn’t need to film and post it. He can do it in the safety of the gymnastics club, where creepy men can’t just walk in from the street, sit and watch. That’s not victim shaming, it’s protecting the safety of a child.

Colleen Ballinger went so far as to argue that YT’s decision was only going to make it easier for these creeps to watch child videos because they no longer had to wait through an ad. They are missing the point entirely. If videos exploiting the kids no longer bring in big dollars, creators will need to start being more selective about how and what they film of their kids. It isn’t a loss as far as I’m concerned.

If there is a creep outside on the street, I bring my kids inside. It doesn’t matter if they are just playing innocently in their own yard and aren’t doing anything wrong. I err on the side of caution and protect them. As bad as most of these parents are, I’m sure they would too. Money is involved (lots of money!) and that is taking precedence over the safety of kids, and has for far too long.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[monstermonkey]

It's really sad that these YouTubers don't seem to understand or care why the comments are being turned off. They just see it as an inconvenience to them or another "attack" on creators and all they care about is getting a paycheck.

[FakingIt_MakingIt]

It's really sad that these YouTubers don't seem to understand or care why the comments are being turned off. They just see it as an inconvenience to them or another "attack" on creators and all they care about is getting a paycheck.

Exactly.

Would these families put their kids on display in front of pedophiles? Would they sell tickets to known abusers, sit them in a theatre and let them watch their kids play? Would they get it then? Would they understand that putting their kids lives on YouTube is NO different? There’s no safety. Their addresses are easily found, their daily routines known.

It’s sad when money comes before your children’s safety. It’s sad that parents are actually mad they’re losing their income that they “earn” from letting all kinds of creeps (and sure, not all their viewers are creeps, but ONE creep would be enough for me!) watch, fantasize, and do who knows what kinds of crap to videos of their children. It’s disgusting.

It’s not an “over correction” Jared. Your videos are just as awesome to pedophiles as the next families. And you know this, you’ve been told this before.

[Catface2]

None of them care about anything but the money. Shameful. Their mentality is like ...perverts and paychecks..who cares? Disgusting.

[letstalkboutsomefin]

I agree, none of them think it applies to their videos.

To use Jessica Ballinger as an example because she was the first to be hit and started the “victim shaming” argument. No one is telling her that her son shouldn’t wear leotards. No one is saying he can’t do gymnastics. It isn’t victim shaming him to point out that predators have taken an interest in his gymnastic videos. She should be shocked and disgusted. He can still do the sport he loves, but she doesn’t need to film and post it. He can do it in the safety of the gymnastics club, where creepy men can’t just walk in from the street, sit and watch. That’s not victim shaming, it’s protecting the safety of a child.

Colleen Ballinger went so far as to argue that YT’s decision was only going to make it easier for these creeps to watch child videos because they no longer had to wait through an ad. They are missing the point entirely. If videos exploiting the kids no longer bring in big dollars, creators will need to start being more selective about how and what they film of their kids. It isn’t a loss as far as I’m concerned.

If there is a creep outside on the street, I bring my kids inside. It doesn’t matter if they are just playing innocently in their own yard and aren’t doing anything wrong. I err on the side of caution and protect them. As bad as most of these parents are, I’m sure they would too. Money is involved (lots of money!) and that is taking precedence over the safety of kids, and has for far too long.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I couldn't agree with you more!! These YTers just don't get it. Their children are potential victims of predators, but they just think about the money or how it's so unfair they can't just show their kids in vulnerable states. News flash, it isn't a video you are showing to only your friends and family. It is available to literally anyone with internet access. People from all sorts of backgrounds and with varying motives. There's no way to predict who your viewers will be or dictate who they are. What they can do is sensor what they publish to the internet to protect their child, but that's asking too much, apparently.

Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk

[onbreak]

With all the words and phrases this channel has blocked in the comments I'm surprised they got hit.

Now they'll all migrate to twitch and fuck that platform up

Sent from my LG-M257 using Tapatalk

[staceymj]

I agree, none of them think it applies to their videos.

To use Jessica Ballinger as an example because she was the first to be hit and started the “victim shaming” argument. No one is telling her that her son shouldn’t wear leotards. No one is saying he can’t do gymnastics. It isn’t victim shaming him to point out that predators have taken an interest in his gymnastic videos. She should be shocked and disgusted. He can still do the sport he loves, but she doesn’t need to film and post it. He can do it in the safety of the gymnastics club, where creepy men can’t just walk in from the street, sit and watch. That’s not victim shaming, it’s protecting the safety of a child.

Colleen Ballinger went so far as to argue that YT’s decision was only going to make it easier for these creeps to watch child videos because they no longer had to wait through an ad. They are missing the point entirely. If videos exploiting the kids no longer bring in big dollars, creators will need to start being more selective about how and what they film of their kids. It isn’t a loss as far as I’m concerned.

If there is a creep outside on the street, I bring my kids inside. It doesn’t matter if they are just playing innocently in their own yard and aren’t doing anything wrong. I err on the side of caution and protect them. As bad as most of these parents are, I’m sure they would too. Money is involved (lots of money!) and that is taking precedence over the safety of kids, and has for far too long.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I couldn't agree with you more!! These YTers just don't get it. Their children are potential victims of predators, but they just think about the money or how it's so unfair they can't just show their kids in vulnerable states. News flash, it isn't a video you are showing to only your friends and family. It is available to literally anyone with internet access. People from all sorts of backgrounds and with varying motives. There's no way to predict who your viewers will be or dictate who they are. What they can do is sensor what they publish to the internet to protect their child, but that's asking too much, apparently.

Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk

Exactly! This is why I wouldn’t put my children on YouTube for all the money in the world, it isn’t worth it to me. I sleep easy at night knowing I am doing everything in my power to keep my kids safe from perverts and pedophiles and not serving them up on a silver platter.
It is so revolting to me that these youtubers can’t see that this is YouTube’s was of keeping other people’s children safe on the internet because these youtubers are too dumb, ignorant and selfish to do it themselves. Somewhere along the line the money becomes more important to these people than the health and safety of their children and instead of stepping back and taking a good hard look at the content they’re putting out there of their children they are having a fit because it affects their pay check. It’s disgusting and I feel so bad for all of these kids who are being exploited for a pay check and who have no privacy in their own homes and no say over what footage of them is put on the internet. If I found out that there was footage of me as a child in my underwear or on the toilet or whatever on the internet I would be furious at my parents, none of these youtubers are naive enough to think that only nice, innocent people with no ulterior motive are watching their vlogs they just choose to turn a blind eye to the creeps and creepy comments for that pay check.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[HelloSweetie]

Some of these You Tubers (like E&J) even KNOW their videos have been embedded in pedophilia websites, and they have somehow distanced themselves from it. This was brought to their attention back when they were still at the old apartment. Think of all the times they have vlogged the boys half naked since then.... they did so KNOWING their channel was on the radar of pedophiles.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[sheltiefan]

E and J aren't worried about loosing the ability to communicate with their audience-they are worried that's just the beginning. One person asked Jared on IG does this affect their income and he said not yet. Not having comments makes their job easier!