GQS: Disney Trip, Butthole Lip, Sinking Ship | Part 44
- Night lady
- Guru Gossiper
- Posts: 3567
- Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2017 5:33 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: GQS: Disney Trip, Butthole Lip, Sinking Ship | Part 44
I was thinking, lol uh oh .. can you smell the smoke coming from my ears, ha ha... anyway, even wholesome family vloggers comments have been disabled. It's a Buzz World and Five Two Love among others. If anyone has info on this, please fill us in. I can absolutely and totally agree with YouTube protecting children but how does disabling comments do this? And the wholesome family vloggers who are genuine shouldn't have to suffer because of other careless vloggers.
Or maybe, YouTube is just at the very early stages of this and more is to come?
Instagram should do the same especially with those creepy fan pages, Instagram should delete fan pages as most of them are stealing pictures from the family and editing them without consent.
This whole thing is strange yet good at the same time.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Or maybe, YouTube is just at the very early stages of this and more is to come?
Instagram should do the same especially with those creepy fan pages, Instagram should delete fan pages as most of them are stealing pictures from the family and editing them without consent.
This whole thing is strange yet good at the same time.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
- Night lady
- Guru Gossiper
- Posts: 3567
- Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2017 5:33 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: GQS: Disney Trip, Butthole Lip, Sinking Ship | Part 44
Thank you for explaining that.SqueakyWheel wrote:I read somewhere that the pedophiles have developed a system using the comments to tell each other about the parts of vlogs that they might want to see. Something about a few words and the time in the video. So it might say how cute 8:42 but mean hey look at the child’s legs spread at 8:42. So that’s the reason to disable the comments. My hope is that they are reviewing these videos and will not only demonetize bunches of them but also remove those that clearly have inappropriate things. Protecting the kids should be priority one.Night lady wrote:Wow, you're right! What is going on? Is this about the sick fucks out there preying on children? What will disabling comments do to protect these kids though? From my understanding, pedophiles take the videos and screenshots, I didn't know it was about the comments. Odd. But if this is a start to wake up these youtubers, then hopefully it won't stop at this and vlogs will be deleted.AthenaA wrote:I have just checked around half a dozen YouTube channels that feature their kids-all comments disabled.
There are going to be an awful lot of narcissists imploding. What a time to be alive.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
- Night lady
- Guru Gossiper
- Posts: 3567
- Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2017 5:33 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: GQS: Disney Trip, Butthole Lip, Sinking Ship | Part 44
Heres an article from the Washington Post I found and read. Its about time YouTube!
https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&source= ... 3864966582
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&source= ... 3864966582
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Re: GQS: Disney Trip, Butthole Lip, Sinking Ship | Part 44
Hi guys, long time stalker on this site but first time poster... I’m from Australia and just had my first child 3 months ago and never could imagine putting them on YouTube for a living.
Started watching from when they were on Ellen- enjoyed their vlogs for awhile while the kids were young and they seemed to do it for memories but now the kids are just money making machines.
All the parents see is dollar signs. The Disney vlog was way over the top. Ashley’s screaming is horrendous and tyson just ignores the kids to talk to the camera.
Also why did the girls need one huge churro each, why couldn’t they just buy 2 and split it. Seems these two just like to waste money.
I looked up the boutique and those dresses to look at the cost. I’m assuming the money wasters host the most expensive package at like 200-400 dollars and they dresses were between 500-800 dollars each. They are nuts to spend that much money on something the girls will not even remember and prob won’t wear again...
How funny was it when the princess asked what the special occasion was and Ashley made up some crap story about friendship or princesses.
The girls don’t even look like they enjoy themselves, they never have any real conversations with the girls or even let them
Answer.
Anyway that’s all I needed to say.
Started watching from when they were on Ellen- enjoyed their vlogs for awhile while the kids were young and they seemed to do it for memories but now the kids are just money making machines.
All the parents see is dollar signs. The Disney vlog was way over the top. Ashley’s screaming is horrendous and tyson just ignores the kids to talk to the camera.
Also why did the girls need one huge churro each, why couldn’t they just buy 2 and split it. Seems these two just like to waste money.
I looked up the boutique and those dresses to look at the cost. I’m assuming the money wasters host the most expensive package at like 200-400 dollars and they dresses were between 500-800 dollars each. They are nuts to spend that much money on something the girls will not even remember and prob won’t wear again...
How funny was it when the princess asked what the special occasion was and Ashley made up some crap story about friendship or princesses.
The girls don’t even look like they enjoy themselves, they never have any real conversations with the girls or even let them
Answer.
Anyway that’s all I needed to say.
- GA Peach70
- Guru Gossiper
- Posts: 3284
- Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2017 11:50 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: GQS: Disney Trip, Butthole Lip, Sinking Ship | Part 44
The reply asking if this little girl believes in real Disney princesses is from a man. Why? Why is a man replying to 12 year old little girl? Taking after fatboy I guess.
Also what does fatboy’s shirt say in the vlog today? I stopped it after 1 second so I couldn’t read it. Does it say Most Expensive Day Ever? Why does it matter to him how expensive it is? It’s not like he worked for the money paying for it anyway.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Also what does fatboy’s shirt say in the vlog today? I stopped it after 1 second so I couldn’t read it. Does it say Most Expensive Day Ever? Why does it matter to him how expensive it is? It’s not like he worked for the money paying for it anyway.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- lmmomSD
- Super Moddie
- Posts: 25258
- Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2015 12:08 pm
- Location: San Diego, Ca
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 18 times
Re: GQS: Disney Trip, Butthole Lip, Sinking Ship | Part 44
It won't stop. They demonetized a bunch of videos last year. So the vloggers changed some titles and thumbnails, and a few months later, changed them back, and it all went back to business as usual.Night lady wrote:Wow, you're right! What is going on? Is this about the sick fucks out there preying on children? What will disabling comments do to protect these kids though? From my understanding, pedophiles take the videos and screenshots, I didn't know it was about the comments. Odd. But if this is a start to wake up these youtubers, then hopefully it won't stop at this and vlogs will be deleted.AthenaA wrote:I have just checked around half a dozen YouTube channels that feature their kids-all comments disabled.
There are going to be an awful lot of narcissists imploding. What a time to be alive.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
What pisses me off is that the parents don't seem to care about anything but the money. They're all over Twitter whining about "victim blaming" when they were the ones who put the videos on YouTube in the first place. It's pathetic that advertisers were the ones who had to step up.
Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
-
- Extreme Gossiper
- Posts: 1712
- Joined: Mon May 21, 2018 6:08 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: GQS: Disney Trip, Butthole Lip, Sinking Ship | Part 44
I thought this reply odd too. If you look at his account and see what his favourites are, he doesn't seem the sort to watch family vlogsGA Peach70 wrote: ↑Sat Feb 23, 2019 8:11 am The reply asking if this little girl believes in real Disney princesses is from a man. Why? Why is a man replying to 12 year old little girl? Taking after fatboy I guess.
Also what does fatboy’s shirt say in the vlog today? I stopped it after 1 second so I couldn’t read it. Does it say Most Expensive Day Ever? Why does it matter to him how expensive it is? It’s not like he worked for the money paying for it anyway.
IMG_0856.jpg
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
- Amateur
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2017 7:14 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 8 times
Re: GQS: Disney Trip, Butthole Lip, Sinking Ship | Part 44
I don't think the quads know how to express themselves, they never look happy or excited, it's really sad to watch.
[/quote]
I remember a vlog back in the summer (2018) where the group was on their way to Hazy's tea party. As they walked up the sidewalk, one of the bigger twins saw an insect on the ground and quite clearly pointed it out & asked Tyson if she could kill it. She sounded normal speech-wise. While I didn't appreciate him allowing her to squash a bug, hearing her speak normally gave me hope that the girls CAN speak better than what is shown on videos. But those opportunities are so rare when being recorded, because it's all about A$$ley talking baby talk to them, not allowing responses, and of course screeching to bring the attention to herself.
[/quote]
I remember a vlog back in the summer (2018) where the group was on their way to Hazy's tea party. As they walked up the sidewalk, one of the bigger twins saw an insect on the ground and quite clearly pointed it out & asked Tyson if she could kill it. She sounded normal speech-wise. While I didn't appreciate him allowing her to squash a bug, hearing her speak normally gave me hope that the girls CAN speak better than what is shown on videos. But those opportunities are so rare when being recorded, because it's all about A$$ley talking baby talk to them, not allowing responses, and of course screeching to bring the attention to herself.
Re: GQS: Disney Trip, Butthole Lip, Sinking Ship | Part 44
Yes, I mentioned a few days ago that NPR did a report on this issue and that’s what an expert was saying. They use seemingly innocuous comments to alert other pedos to the videoSqueakyWheel wrote:I read somewhere that the pedophiles have developed a system using the comments to tell each other about the parts of vlogs that they might want to see. Something about a few words and the time in the video. So it might say how cute 8:42 but mean hey look at the child’s legs spread at 8:42. So that’s the reason to disable the comments. My hope is that they are reviewing these videos and will not only demonetize bunches of them but also remove those that clearly have inappropriate things. Protecting the kids should be priority one.Night lady wrote:Wow, you're right! What is going on? Is this about the sick fucks out there preying on children? What will disabling comments do to protect these kids though? From my understanding, pedophiles take the videos and screenshots, I didn't know it was about the comments. Odd. But if this is a start to wake up these youtubers, then hopefully it won't stop at this and vlogs will be deleted.AthenaA wrote:I have just checked around half a dozen YouTube channels that feature their kids-all comments disabled.
There are going to be an awful lot of narcissists imploding. What a time to be alive.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: GQS: Disney Trip, Butthole Lip, Sinking Ship | Part 44
The NPR story I heard said they’re doing it to ANY videos of kidsNight lady wrote:I was thinking, lol uh oh .. can you smell the smoke coming from my ears, ha ha... anyway, even wholesome family vloggers comments have been disabled. It's a Buzz World and Five Two Love among others. If anyone has info on this, please fill us in. I can absolutely and totally agree with YouTube protecting children but how does disabling comments do this? And the wholesome family vloggers who are genuine shouldn't have to suffer because of other careless vloggers.
Or maybe, YouTube is just at the very early stages of this and more is to come?
Instagram should do the same especially with those creepy fan pages, Instagram should delete fan pages as most of them are stealing pictures from the family and editing them without consent.
This whole thing is strange yet good at the same time.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- lmmomSD
- Super Moddie
- Posts: 25258
- Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2015 12:08 pm
- Location: San Diego, Ca
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 18 times
Re: GQS: Disney Trip, Butthole Lip, Sinking Ship | Part 44
And the thing is, people are TOLD to be careful. But they keep uploading videos of their kids shirtless (cough, Binghams, cough) and the Ballingers have videos of their son Parker's gymnastics where he's jumping around in unitards. It's awful that there are perverts, but you don't need to offer your children up to them on a platter. And then you have Tyass encouraging his girls to stick their tongues out, and take pictures with their mouths open.Harkette wrote:The NPR story I heard said they’re doing it to ANY videos of kidsNight lady wrote:I was thinking, lol uh oh .. can you smell the smoke coming from my ears, ha ha... anyway, even wholesome family vloggers comments have been disabled. It's a Buzz World and Five Two Love among others. If anyone has info on this, please fill us in. I can absolutely and totally agree with YouTube protecting children but how does disabling comments do this? And the wholesome family vloggers who are genuine shouldn't have to suffer because of other careless vloggers.
Or maybe, YouTube is just at the very early stages of this and more is to come?
Instagram should do the same especially with those creepy fan pages, Instagram should delete fan pages as most of them are stealing pictures from the family and editing them without consent.
This whole thing is strange yet good at the same time.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Greed. That's all it is. Greed and sloth.
Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
Re: GQS: Disney Trip, Butthole Lip, Sinking Ship | Part 44
I just went and checked several post from each of a couple of my fav. Family vlogs some with way more followers, and people that are actually well known, none have comments disabled, so it’s not every vlog featuring kids. Maybe only the ones reported. I have no idea, just odd.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
- DoodleBop2
- Guru Gossiper
- Posts: 4516
- Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2017 7:15 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 4 times
Re: GQS: Disney Trip, Butthole Lip, Sinking Ship | Part 44
The gymnastics vids often have a small child with crotch completely on display doing the splits in the thumbnail. A lot of the bikini try on videos show a child usually like 12-15 in the thumbnail.
The internet is public. It should be common sense things that you don't show in public. Children toileting. Children half naked. Children in the bath even if you can't see anything. Children doing suggestive things even if they aren't aware or may be seen as innocent [the crotch display splits, open mouth, or that time Tyson got shots of the girls mouths open with white food in their mouth. Really?!].
I do get that YouTube is damned either way because oif the sheer amount of video posted, the scope of the problem and that computers aren't perfect and there just isn't enough human eyes to judge this content. I also understand creators being confused because if bad comments get a vid demonitized by the computer - people will use that against creators they don't like.
The internet is public. It should be common sense things that you don't show in public. Children toileting. Children half naked. Children in the bath even if you can't see anything. Children doing suggestive things even if they aren't aware or may be seen as innocent [the crotch display splits, open mouth, or that time Tyson got shots of the girls mouths open with white food in their mouth. Really?!].
I do get that YouTube is damned either way because oif the sheer amount of video posted, the scope of the problem and that computers aren't perfect and there just isn't enough human eyes to judge this content. I also understand creators being confused because if bad comments get a vid demonitized by the computer - people will use that against creators they don't like.
- lmmomSD
- Super Moddie
- Posts: 25258
- Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2015 12:08 pm
- Location: San Diego, Ca
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 18 times
Re: GQS: Disney Trip, Butthole Lip, Sinking Ship | Part 44
Exactly. The parents say they're victims but they know exactly what they're doing. They may tell themselves they're not, but deep down they know what gets views. And where those views are coming from. One of Ellie and Jared's videos of their baby's checkup has millions of views. And the baby is wearing nothing but a diaper in the thumbnail. It's not hard to figure out that not that many people are interested in a baby's two week checkup.DoodleBop2 wrote:The gymnastics vids often have a small child with crotch completely on display doing the splits in the thumbnail. A lot of the bikini try on videos show a child usually like 12-15 in the thumbnail.
The internet is public. It should be common sense things that you don't show in public. Children toileting. Children half naked. Children in the bath even if you can't see anything. Children doing suggestive things even if they aren't aware or may be seen as innocent [the crotch display splits, open mouth, or that time Tyson got shots of the girls mouths open with white food in their mouth. Really?!].
I do get that YouTube is damned either way because oif the sheer amount of video posted, the scope of the problem and that computers aren't perfect and there just isn't enough human eyes to judge this content. I also understand creators being confused because if bad comments get a vid demonitized by the computer - people will use that against creators they don't like.
Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
- Night lady
- Guru Gossiper
- Posts: 3567
- Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2017 5:33 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: GQS: Disney Trip, Butthole Lip, Sinking Ship | Part 44
Yes, exactly. And IF, just IF these vloggers don't know about sickos on the internet, then damn are they truly naive, dumb and shouldn't be parents. This stuff happens folks, and most likely is happening right under your noses with YOUR children from YOUR vlogs YOU posted. Victims my butt, those innocent children are victims to their own parents idiocy and naivete.lmmomSD wrote:Exactly. The parents say they're victims but they know exactly what they're doing. They may tell themselves they're not, but deep down they know what gets views. And where those views are coming from. One of Ellie and Jared's videos of their baby's checkup has millions of views. And the baby is wearing nothing but a diaper in the thumbnail. It's not hard to figure out that not that many people are interested in a baby's two week checkup.DoodleBop2 wrote:The gymnastics vids often have a small child with crotch completely on display doing the splits in the thumbnail. A lot of the bikini try on videos show a child usually like 12-15 in the thumbnail.
The internet is public. It should be common sense things that you don't show in public. Children toileting. Children half naked. Children in the bath even if you can't see anything. Children doing suggestive things even if they aren't aware or may be seen as innocent [the crotch display splits, open mouth, or that time Tyson got shots of the girls mouths open with white food in their mouth. Really?!].
I do get that YouTube is damned either way because oif the sheer amount of video posted, the scope of the problem and that computers aren't perfect and there just isn't enough human eyes to judge this content. I also understand creators being confused because if bad comments get a vid demonitized by the computer - people will use that against creators they don't like.
Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Re: GQS: Disney Trip, Butthole Lip, Sinking Ship | Part 44
I am totally disappointed with the Scotts. In the midst of pedo scandal they show their babies having a bath. I think they are excellent parents, but naive as hell. The fact they are good people doesn't mean everyone is good.Night lady wrote: ↑Sat Feb 23, 2019 10:26 amYes, exactly. And IF, just IF these vloggers don't know about sickos on the internet, then damn are they truly naive, dumb and shouldn't be parents. This stuff happens folks, and most likely is happening right under your noses with YOUR children from YOUR vlogs YOU posted. Victims my butt, those innocent children are victims to their own parents idiocy and naivete.lmmomSD wrote:Exactly. The parents say they're victims but they know exactly what they're doing. They may tell themselves they're not, but deep down they know what gets views. And where those views are coming from. One of Ellie and Jared's videos of their baby's checkup has millions of views. And the baby is wearing nothing but a diaper in the thumbnail. It's not hard to figure out that not that many people are interested in a baby's two week checkup.DoodleBop2 wrote:The gymnastics vids often have a small child with crotch completely on display doing the splits in the thumbnail. A lot of the bikini try on videos show a child usually like 12-15 in the thumbnail.
The internet is public. It should be common sense things that you don't show in public. Children toileting. Children half naked. Children in the bath even if you can't see anything. Children doing suggestive things even if they aren't aware or may be seen as innocent [the crotch display splits, open mouth, or that time Tyson got shots of the girls mouths open with white food in their mouth. Really?!].
I do get that YouTube is damned either way because oif the sheer amount of video posted, the scope of the problem and that computers aren't perfect and there just isn't enough human eyes to judge this content. I also understand creators being confused because if bad comments get a vid demonitized by the computer - people will use that against creators they don't like.
Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
- DoodleBop2
- Guru Gossiper
- Posts: 4516
- Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2017 7:15 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 4 times
Re: GQS: Disney Trip, Butthole Lip, Sinking Ship | Part 44
The Scotts are great as far as family vloggers but I think they need to be more aware and maybe they missed it with several vomiting children and just getting over the flu. In the past, they've seemed willing to take criticism. They usually edit diaper changes so hopefully they'll either edit that video or not do it again in the future etc.
Re: GQS: Disney Trip, Butthole Lip, Sinking Ship | Part 44
I’m sure I’ll get flamed for this but I think it’s all an act. They know what’s going to get views. So they’re a “perfect” wholesome family. She’s beautiful, the kids are cute so they know they’re going to get followers.Predikat wrote:I am totally disappointed with the Scotts. In the midst of pedo scandal they show their babies having a bath. I think they are excellent parents, but naive as hell. The fact they are good people doesn't mean everyone is good.Night lady wrote: ↑Sat Feb 23, 2019 10:26 amYes, exactly. And IF, just IF these vloggers don't know about sickos on the internet, then damn are they truly naive, dumb and shouldn't be parents. This stuff happens folks, and most likely is happening right under your noses with YOUR children from YOUR vlogs YOU posted. Victims my butt, those innocent children are victims to their own parents idiocy and naivete.lmmomSD wrote:Exactly. The parents say they're victims but they know exactly what they're doing. They may tell themselves they're not, but deep down they know what gets views. And where those views are coming from. One of Ellie and Jared's videos of their baby's checkup has millions of views. And the baby is wearing nothing but a diaper in the thumbnail. It's not hard to figure out that not that many people are interested in a baby's two week checkup.
Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- GA Peach70
- Guru Gossiper
- Posts: 3284
- Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2017 11:50 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
GQS: Disney Trip, Butthole Lip, Sinking Ship | Part 44
105 comments deleted so far on their latest vlog. I wonder why. Wish I would have seen them. I’m sure it was KADs attacking someone who had a difference of opinion as usual.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- JD386
- Guru Gossiper
- Posts: 3895
- Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2018 5:22 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 8 times
Re: GQS: Disney Trip, Butthole Lip, Sinking Ship | Part 44
I imagine part of it is by them not getting paid as much it’ll be a deterrent of sorts for these families to do less videos.Night lady wrote:Wow, you're right! What is going on? Is this about the sick fucks out there preying on children? What will disabling comments do to protect these kids though? From my understanding, pedophiles take the videos and screenshots, I didn't know it was about the comments. Odd. But if this is a start to wake up these youtubers, then hopefully it won't stop at this and vlogs will be deleted.AthenaA wrote:I have just checked around half a dozen YouTube channels that feature their kids-all comments disabled.
There are going to be an awful lot of narcissists imploding. What a time to be alive.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk