Brianna K | Part 2

[QueenMaleficent]

The story on Instagram that the butter picture was screenshot from made me laugh bc she said something about a leprechaun putting sprinkles on their waffles & Landon says “no you did” all bratty with an attitude. He’s so over his own mother. You can tell he gets annoyed by her already, but I would stop that tone of voice in the moment or it will just continue.

It was crappy on two counts though. One, he ruined it for his little sister, who probably still believes in the magical element of it all. Second, she should have reprimanded him for speaking rudely back to his mother. An apology to his sister might be a start for him to learn some respect but we know that's not going to happen if Mama continues to laugh at his smart mouth.
My biggest pet peeve with kids is disrespect. I wouldn't tolerate it at all with my children and I won't with them as teens now and the key is to start early so they know boundaries and how to be a decent human.

[ds1158]

Ok wow super behind on the thread but I did want to defend that if you have an actual work from home job (not YT), then you should NOT have your children at home with you. There is no way you can give your full attention to your job 40+ hours a week at home with toddlers running around and not be neglecting them or neglecting your work.
Most legitimate work from home jobs would be pissed if they found out you did not have childcare during work hours.

I agree - that was my point. Bri has been shown to be SUPER GREEDY trying to do 3 things at once - claim to be a stay at home mom (a full time job), a career woman (a full time job), and a YouTube star (a full time job). You can do 2 if you work 16 hours a day at it, but if you try to do all 3 you are really stealing time from one or both of the other two. Moms like Myka and Tiff are only trying to do 2 (SAHM & YTS).

I am not knocking any other woman and her choices, but when I had our two girls my husband's income allowed us to live modestly so I took off about 8 years to be a SAHM until both of our girls had entered kindergarten. At that point I went back to work to help our family out with upcoming financial obstacles like college tuition. For a single mom who is struggling to make ends meet with no husband to share the burden, I completely understand having to work during the day and arrange some type of care for the kids. But I DO NO UNDERSTAND why when both parents individually make a good income, one of them does not decide to stay home during the crucial years of 0 to 5. Is it more important to have a 5000+ sf house, 2+ high end cars, multiple $$$ vacations a year, ... than to have one of the parents raise the young child full time? What is more important to these parents - more stuff??? Why do they have children in the first place - is it one more "thing" to check off a list? This is what irritates me with people like Bri - Adam appears to make a decent salary where they could live comfortably on his paycheck alone, why can't she just take a few years off and enjoy the kids? She will have the rest of her life to pursue other interests. Your children are only young once for a relatively short amount of time. In the end her GG will have spent more time with the kids than she has (maybe that was her case with her own mother and GG???). Bri and Adam will get what they deserve when L and P become teenagers (and maybe a few other kids if they are stupid enough to have more).

[ActualWorkingMom]

So now we have to have magical shit happening on St Patrick’s Day too? Easter, Christmas, birthdays, etc... and now this one too?

Brianna is the woman that flirts with her friends’ husbands. She needs to constantly feel desired. She doesn’t give two flying farts about the one she married, apparently, but gets a narcissistic high off of male attention. I’m sure she’s lost friends because of it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[ActualWorkingMom]

Ok wow super behind on the thread but I did want to defend that if you have an actual work from home job (not YT), then you should NOT have your children at home with you. There is no way you can give your full attention to your job 40+ hours a week at home with toddlers running around and not be neglecting them or neglecting your work.
Most legitimate work from home jobs would be pissed if they found out you did not have childcare during work hours.

I agree - that was my point. Bri has been shown to be SUPER GREEDY trying to do 3 things at once - claim to be a stay at home mom (a full time job), a career woman (a full time job), and a YouTube star (a full time job). You can do 2 if you work 16 hours a day at it, but if you try to do all 3 you are really stealing time from one or both of the other two. Moms like Myka and Tiff are only trying to do 2 (SAHM & YTS).

I am not knocking any other woman and her choices, but when I had our two girls my husband's income allowed us to live modestly so I took off about 8 years to be a SAHM until both of our girls had entered kindergarten. At that point I went back to work to help our family out with upcoming financial obstacles like college tuition. For a single mom who is struggling to make ends meet with no husband to share the burden, I completely understand having to work during the day and arrange some type of care for the kids. But I DO NO UNDERSTAND why when both parents individually make a good income, one of them does not decide to stay home during the crucial years of 0 to 5. Is it more important to have a 5000+ sf house, 2+ high end cars, multiple $$$ vacations a year, ... than to have one of the parents raise the young child full time? What is more important to these parents - more stuff??? Why do they have children in the first place - is it one more "thing" to check off a list? This is what irritates me with people like Bri - Adam appears to make a decent salary where they could live comfortably on his paycheck alone, why can't she just take a few years off and enjoy the kids? She will have the rest of her life to pursue other interests. Your children are only young once for a relatively short amount of time. In the end her GG will have spent more time with the kids than she has (maybe that was her case with her own mother and GG???). Bri and Adam will get what they deserve when L and P become teenagers (and maybe a few other kids if they are stupid enough to have more).

DS, you say you’re not knocking other women for their choices, then proceed to go on line after line, knocking us for our choices. You may have dressed as a Mommy for career day, but I did not. I provide for my family... because of my job, we have health, dental and vision insurance. We take family vacations. My child has shelves of books and can participate in enrichment programs that cost money. Yes, we could have a smaller house and drive cheaper cars if I stayed home with him, but keeping him home with me until kindergarten will only stunt his social and emotional development.

Many women feel it is important for our children to see us work, have a professional identity, and provide for our family. My son does not suffer one ounce by going to preschool, and he benefited from the sitter he had before that. Your way is not the only right way. Save your judgment for your Facebook moms group.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[username44]

So now we have to have magical shit happening on St Patrick’s Day too? Easter, Christmas, birthdays, etc... and now this one too?

Brianna is the woman that flirts with her friends’ husbands. She needs to constantly feel desired. She doesn’t give two flying farts about the one she married, apparently, but gets a narcissistic high off of male attention. I’m sure she’s lost friends because of it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It’s clear she flirts becuase her marriage is seriously dead. I think it’s past the point of resurrection. Boss mama is probably desperate for a males touch.. I mean, you kind of have to be to flirt with JSJ. He’s a good dad, but not attractive, IMO. Brianna is the type of woman to test the waters just to see if she’s still got it, regardless of any consequences. Whenever her and Adam split she will have a new dick within a few months.

[Influencer]

Anyone else get weird vibes between Bri and Jonathan? She seemed overly friendly and just looked stupid.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

She looked and acted like she could get into his pants tbh.

[Influencer]

So now we have to have magical shit happening on St Patrick’s Day too? Easter, Christmas, birthdays, etc... and now this one too?

Brianna is the woman that flirts with her friends’ husbands. She needs to constantly feel desired. She doesn’t give two flying farts about the one she married, apparently, but gets a narcissistic high off of male attention. I’m sure she’s lost friends because of it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

agree that’s what I see to!

[formerctfxcer]

Ok wow super behind on the thread but I did want to defend that if you have an actual work from home job (not YT), then you should NOT have your children at home with you. There is no way you can give your full attention to your job 40+ hours a week at home with toddlers running around and not be neglecting them or neglecting your work.
Most legitimate work from home jobs would be pissed if they found out you did not have childcare during work hours.

I agree - that was my point. Bri has been shown to be SUPER GREEDY trying to do 3 things at once - claim to be a stay at home mom (a full time job), a career woman (a full time job), and a YouTube star (a full time job). You can do 2 if you work 16 hours a day at it, but if you try to do all 3 you are really stealing time from one or both of the other two. Moms like Myka and Tiff are only trying to do 2 (SAHM & YTS).

I am not knocking any other woman and her choices, but when I had our two girls my husband's income allowed us to live modestly so I took off about 8 years to be a SAHM until both of our girls had entered kindergarten. At that point I went back to work to help our family out with upcoming financial obstacles like college tuition. For a single mom who is struggling to make ends meet with no husband to share the burden, I completely understand having to work during the day and arrange some type of care for the kids. But I DO NO UNDERSTAND why when both parents individually make a good income, one of them does not decide to stay home during the crucial years of 0 to 5. Is it more important to have a 5000+ sf house, 2+ high end cars, multiple $$$ vacations a year, ... than to have one of the parents raise the young child full time? What is more important to these parents - more stuff??? Why do they have children in the first place - is it one more "thing" to check off a list? This is what irritates me with people like Bri - Adam appears to make a decent salary where they could live comfortably on his paycheck alone, why can't she just take a few years off and enjoy the kids? She will have the rest of her life to pursue other interests. Your children are only young once for a relatively short amount of time. In the end her GG will have spent more time with the kids than she has (maybe that was her case with her own mother and GG???). Bri and Adam will get what they deserve when L and P become teenagers (and maybe a few other kids if they are stupid enough to have more).

Holy shit I can’t with this. There’s absolutely nothing wrong with having two parents that work. I’m a working mom and it’s not so I can have a 5000 sq ft house (ours is under 2000), to have expensive cars (I’m a Dave Ramsey follower and we buy used with cash) or have expensive vacations (our last vacation was in 2016 before we had kids).

I work because my income is higher than my husband’s. I am also the health insurance carrier. Add to that that I want to ensure my kids don’t have to take out tons of student loans if they choose to go to college. And I don’t want them to have to pay for me in my old age. I want all of that to be financially taken care of.

You are 100% allowed to choose to be a SAHM but do NOT shame two working parents for their choices.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[QueenMaleficent]

I agree - that was my point. Bri has been shown to be SUPER GREEDY trying to do 3 things at once - claim to be a stay at home mom (a full time job), a career woman (a full time job), and a YouTube star (a full time job). You can do 2 if you work 16 hours a day at it, but if you try to do all 3 you are really stealing time from one or both of the other two. Moms like Myka and Tiff are only trying to do 2 (SAHM & YTS).

I am not knocking any other woman and her choices, but when I had our two girls my husband's income allowed us to live modestly so I took off about 8 years to be a SAHM until both of our girls had entered kindergarten. At that point I went back to work to help our family out with upcoming financial obstacles like college tuition. For a single mom who is struggling to make ends meet with no husband to share the burden, I completely understand having to work during the day and arrange some type of care for the kids. But I DO NO UNDERSTAND why when both parents individually make a good income, one of them does not decide to stay home during the crucial years of 0 to 5. Is it more important to have a 5000+ sf house, 2+ high end cars, multiple $$$ vacations a year, ... than to have one of the parents raise the young child full time? What is more important to these parents - more stuff??? Why do they have children in the first place - is it one more "thing" to check off a list? This is what irritates me with people like Bri - Adam appears to make a decent salary where they could live comfortably on his paycheck alone, why can't she just take a few years off and enjoy the kids? She will have the rest of her life to pursue other interests. Your children are only young once for a relatively short amount of time. In the end her GG will have spent more time with the kids than she has (maybe that was her case with her own mother and GG???). Bri and Adam will get what they deserve when L and P become teenagers (and maybe a few other kids if they are stupid enough to have more).

Holy shit I can’t with this. There’s absolutely nothing wrong with having two parents that work. I’m a working mom and it’s not so I can have a 5000 sq ft house (ours is under 2000), to have expensive cars (I’m a Dave Ramsey follower and we buy used with cash) or have expensive vacations (our last vacation was in 2016 before we had kids).

I work because my income is higher than my husband’s. I am also the health insurance carrier. Add to that that I want to ensure my kids don’t have to take out tons of student loans if they choose to go to college. And I don’t want them to have to pay for me in my old age. I want all of that to be financially taken care of.

You are 100% allowed to choose to be a SAHM but do NOT shame two working parents for their choices.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Why is there any shaming going on with EITHER side? To each their own, you do what works best, do your very best for your family and you'll never have to explain yourself. End of story.

[formerctfxcer]

I am not knocking any other woman and her choices, but when I had our two girls my husband's income allowed us to live modestly so I took off about 8 years to be a SAHM until both of our girls had entered kindergarten. At that point I went back to work to help our family out with upcoming financial obstacles like college tuition. For a single mom who is struggling to make ends meet with no husband to share the burden, I completely understand having to work during the day and arrange some type of care for the kids. But I DO NO UNDERSTAND why when both parents individually make a good income, one of them does not decide to stay home during the crucial years of 0 to 5. Is it more important to have a 5000+ sf house, 2+ high end cars, multiple $$$ vacations a year, ... than to have one of the parents raise the young child full time? What is more important to these parents - more stuff??? Why do they have children in the first place - is it one more "thing" to check off a list? This is what irritates me with people like Bri - Adam appears to make a decent salary where they could live comfortably on his paycheck alone, why can't she just take a few years off and enjoy the kids? She will have the rest of her life to pursue other interests. Your children are only young once for a relatively short amount of time. In the end her GG will have spent more time with the kids than she has (maybe that was her case with her own mother and GG???). Bri and Adam will get what they deserve when L and P become teenagers (and maybe a few other kids if they are stupid enough to have more).

Holy shit I can’t with this. There’s absolutely nothing wrong with having two parents that work. I’m a working mom and it’s not so I can have a 5000 sq ft house (ours is under 2000), to have expensive cars (I’m a Dave Ramsey follower and we buy used with cash) or have expensive vacations (our last vacation was in 2016 before we had kids).

I work because my income is higher than my husband’s. I am also the health insurance carrier. Add to that that I want to ensure my kids don’t have to take out tons of student loans if they choose to go to college. And I don’t want them to have to pay for me in my old age. I want all of that to be financially taken care of.

You are 100% allowed to choose to be a SAHM but do NOT shame two working parents for their choices.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Why is there any shaming going on with EITHER side? To each their own, you do what works best, do your very best for your family and you'll never have to explain yourself. End of story.

Agreed! One of my dreams was to be a SAHM so there’s absolutely no shaming coming from my end. I haven’t seen anyone shaming SAHM’s either but maybe I missed it?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[kristieanne87]

Tea time?

I once really admired Brianna too. I think by making social media her career, it isn’t that she changed... it’s that she showed her true colors.

She was always a self-centered and petty bitch. She just hid it and put her best foot forward. Now she can’t filter it 24/7... and people are catching on. Her behavior in London was classless, immature, trashy, and idiotic.

I wonder how many of her former TFA coworkers are lurking here?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Made an account just to admit.. I am a former Baltimore TFA coworker lurker.

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

[NLB]

I am truly amazed at what the internet can share. I just went to look up Brianna’s last name because I was curious as to what TFA was (I'm Canadian ) and her linked in popped up, her and Adams address popped up. It's insane!

I would not want that information to be just out there.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[ChampionshipVinyl1]

Anyone catch her pronunciation of "Trafalgar" in the London vlog?
Butchered it

[blahbladdyblah]

It must be sad to be such a spiteful bitch. Brianna seemed like the entire trip to London was an effort to get back at Tara and Aaryn, truly sad. From tea at the Ritz to commenting on the salt on the fucking sandwich.

Your life is so sad Bri. Anna used you for American followers and hopefully uses your Boss Mom shirt to wipe her proper ass.

I don't care for any of the YT moms but Bri is truly the saddest of them all. You win Bri!

[blahbladdyblah]

It must be sad to be such a spiteful bitch. Brianna seemed like the entire trip to London was an effort to get back at Tara and Aaryn, truly sad. From tea at the Ritz to commenting on the salt on the fucking sandwich.
Your life is so sad Bri. Anna used you for American followers and hopefully uses your Boss Mom shirt to wipe her proper ass.
I don't care for any of the YT moms but Bri is truly the saddest of them all. You win Bri!

[catmom89]

Lol at her insta story today. Girl, stop comparing yourself to Michelle Obama. You're not her.

[Anastasia2468]

omg no she didn’t lol Michelle Obama? Lol da fuk?lol


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Danielsgirl]

[IMG]//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201903 ... d5999d.jpg[/IMG]


What is going on here. The frizzy roots, the fried textured hair.
Whyyyy are her brows so dark?
The make up. The lip liner.
She is so full of herself, when she needs to be working herself out. Seriously get off the internet and actually work on yourself from the inside out.

Also no one is ever going to put Bri and Michelle Obama in the same sentence, stop trying to make it happen. You are a fucking disgrace.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Anastasia2468]

I never even look at any of her social media but this I had to see!!! She relates to
Michelle Obama? Lol!!!!!

She reminds me of an older mom (she looks old like mid forties almost 50) that embarrassed you because she tries to dress and talk like a teenager lol she’s gonna embarrass those kids sooo much!!! Lol mom stop!!! She’s probly the laughing stock of moms in her kids school lol she’s sooo ridiculous!!! Lol

I can’t with this shit show with these moms! Lol I’m living for it though!!!!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[formerctfxcer]

[IMG]//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201903 ... d5999d.jpg[/IMG]


What is going on here. The frizzy roots, the fried textured hair.
Whyyyy are her brows so dark?
The make up. The lip liner.
She is so full of herself, when she needs to be working herself out. Seriously get off the internet and actually work on yourself from the inside out.

Also no one is ever going to put Bri and Michelle Obama in the same sentence, stop trying to make it happen. You are a fucking disgrace.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Tbh her hair looks like she’s trying to channel Airhead’s big hair she sometimes does


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk