Rachelle, Justin and Baby Shrek | Rachelle and Justin | Part 14

Unread post by **RottieMama** » Fri Mar 22, 2019 8:52 pm

THREAD TITLE: Rachelle, Justin and Baby Shrek | Part 14

TITLE CREDIT: dani_banana, hannahbanana98 & Staceyla

Previous
Rachelle and Justin | Part 13
https://r.tapatalk.com/shareLink?share_ ... are_type=t

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Unread post by **Haulnarse** » Fri Mar 22, 2019 9:04 pm

As per usual. Emma is in a onesie and rash is in jeans and a sweatshirt

Her tattoo is atrocious

Unread post by **rxysm** » Fri Mar 22, 2019 10:09 pm

The haul was stupid. She didn’t get enough for it to be an actual haul. And she said she wasn’t going to really buy anymore until August or September. We all know that is a lie.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Unread post by **mac531** » Fri Mar 22, 2019 10:47 pm

[IMG]//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201903 ... d469a9.jpg[/IMG] probably keren wedding will be a big YouTube meet up

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Unread post by **mac531** » Fri Mar 22, 2019 10:50 pm

[IMG]//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201903 ... 85a7c6.jpg[/IMG] Says the girl who can’t speak properly.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Fri Mar 22, 2019 10:58 pm

Not a fan of the title.
I believe making fun of children, especially their looks, should be off limits.
We can talk shit all we want about Rachelle and Justin, they're adults and they've chosen to be in the spotlight.
But Emma is a baby, and she didn't choose to be on YouTube/social media nor did she choose her parents.

Just my 2 cents, for what it's worth.

Fri Mar 22, 2019 11:00 pm

mac531 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 22, 2019 10:50 pm //uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201903 ... 85a7c6.jpg
Says the girl who can’t speak properly.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I saw that, too, and was just coming to comment!
She is so full of shit.

Unread post by **AliCat91** » Sat Mar 23, 2019 6:10 am

leeiacoccapuffs wrote:Not a fan of the title.
I believe making fun of children, especially their looks, should be off limits.
We can talk shit all we want about Rachelle and Justin, they're adults and they've chosen to be in the spotlight.
But Emma is a baby, and she didn't choose to be on YouTube/social media nor did she choose her parents.

Just my 2 cents, for what it's worth.

I fully agree, but prepare to be shot down. I think it’s abhorrent to call children ugly etc. I’ll happily bitch about R+J as they are supposedly adults and can make their own decisions. I don’t even comment on their looks, we can’t choose how big of a nose we get! I’ve commented in the past about the kid thing and no one cared.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Unread post by **cupcakezzzzz** » Sat Mar 23, 2019 6:14 am

leeiacoccapuffs wrote:Not a fan of the title.
I believe making fun of children, especially their looks, should be off limits.
We can talk shit all we want about Rachelle and Justin, they're adults and they've chosen to be in the spotlight.
But Emma is a baby, and she didn't choose to be on YouTube/social media nor did she choose her parents.

Just my 2 cents, for what it's worth.

The title is hilarious!!

Mainly because Rachelle swears up and down that she has the cutest baby on YouTube and that the world is BEGGING for her to produce another.

When in reality she needs to keep that nose to herself and stop trying to contribute to the human gene pool.

Unread post by **cupcakezzzzz** » Sat Mar 23, 2019 6:17 am

I don't want to make fun of someones infertility but I think in their case this was natural selection.

These two are fuckin idiots...

Please keep your nose and poor work ethic to yourself!

Unread post by **Ld5** » Sat Mar 23, 2019 6:56 am

I agree about keeping Emma from the title and/or making fun of her. Although the shrek baby reference is spot on, she didn’t choose her life or the desire to be filmed her every move and shirtless moments.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Unread post by **opangatay** » Sat Mar 23, 2019 7:17 am

I’m feeling real salty today and I’ll always be mad about Brynn being in Emma’s name so I just really hate how in the spring haul, Rachelle’s head is covering “Emma” on the sign most of the time and it just looks like it says “Brynn Grace Swannie”

Obviously she moves throughout the video and you can see it says Emma but still.. it’s just some subtle symbolism in my opinion lol.

[IMG]//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201903 ... 61d103.jpg[/IMG]

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Sat Mar 23, 2019 8:05 am

AliCat91 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 23, 2019 6:10 am
leeiacoccapuffs wrote:Not a fan of the title.
I believe making fun of children, especially their looks, should be off limits.
We can talk shit all we want about Rachelle and Justin, they're adults and they've chosen to be in the spotlight.
But Emma is a baby, and she didn't choose to be on YouTube/social media nor did she choose her parents.

Just my 2 cents, for what it's worth.
I fully agree, but prepare to be shot down. I think it’s abhorrent to call children ugly etc. I’ll happily bitch about R+J as they are supposedly adults and can make their own decisions. I don’t even comment on their looks, we can’t choose how big of a nose we get! I’ve commented in the past about the kid thing and no one cared.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

They can shoot me down, I have thick skin.

And you make a good point about even making fun of an adult and their physical features that they can't help. I try to not do that, but I know I have made at least a few comments about Rachelles physical features here, and I appreciate your reminder about how that shouldn't be acceptable either!

Sat Mar 23, 2019 8:07 am

cupcakezzzzz wrote: ↑Sat Mar 23, 2019 6:17 am I don't want to make fun of someones infertility but I think in their case this was natural selection.

These two are fuckin idiots...

Please keep your nose and poor work ethic to yourself!

One Million percent agree that they're idiots and have a looooot of growing up to do before having another baby.

Sat Mar 23, 2019 8:10 am

opangatay wrote: ↑Sat Mar 23, 2019 7:17 am I’m feeling real salty today and I’ll always be mad about Brynn being in Emma’s name so I just really hate how in the spring haul, Rachelle’s head is covering “Emma” on the sign most of the time and it just looks like it says “Brynn Grace Swannie” Obviously she moves throughout the video and you can see it says Emma but still.. it’s just some subtle symbolism in my opinion lol.

//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201903 ... 61d103.jpg
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I think the only reason Emma has Brynn as part of her name is because Rachelle is "obsessed" with that name, but she knew her crazy would show too much if she used the name again, so she stuck it in there as part of Emma's middle name.

Unread post by **Apm1993** » Sat Mar 23, 2019 8:26 am

leeiacoccapuffs wrote:Not a fan of the title.
I believe making fun of children, especially their looks, should be off limits.
We can talk shit all we want about Rachelle and Justin, they're adults and they've chosen to be in the spotlight.
But Emma is a baby, and she didn't choose to be on YouTube/social media nor did she choose her parents.

Just my 2 cents, for what it's worth.

I agree.
I was surprised by the title.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Sat Mar 23, 2019 9:09 am

Following

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Unread post by **cupcakezzzzz** » Sat Mar 23, 2019 9:12 am

Apm1993 wrote:
leeiacoccapuffs wrote:Not a fan of the title.
I believe making fun of children, especially their looks, should be off limits.
We can talk shit all we want about Rachelle and Justin, they're adults and they've chosen to be in the spotlight.
But Emma is a baby, and she didn't choose to be on YouTube/social media nor did she choose her parents.

Just my 2 cents, for what it's worth.

I agree.
I was surprised by the title.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It's Rachelles fault... The way I see it:

- She put her baby out there for the world to see and I'm not talking about a instagram post here and there, I'm talking about actual life footage. She invited strangers into her life and when you do that, you invite their opinions too. It's fair

- We're calling her ugly on a completely different site. It would be different if this happened on YT.

- Rachelle thinks she has superior genetics and the cutest baby alive, when that's not the case.

Unread post by **Jupiter** » Sat Mar 23, 2019 9:46 am

The whole title thing is a don't fuss about it...at least to me. We're in a snark forum and Lord knows we do it well. Not a single one of us would ever, in reality, hurt that little girl. As a point I submit that Baby Shrek is the least offensive thing on the title....its part of the humor. Rachelle is a damned clod and her husband needs to spin around really fast and locate his spine. That is pure snark and not much humor. I say you go girl, CabbagePatchBabyShrek!

Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk

Unread post by **RottieMama** » Sat Mar 23, 2019 9:49 am

I’m sorry about the title; if you guys would like me to change it, please let me know!

I have been on this site for a while so I have seen some pretty vile things posted about YTers and their kids but tbh I didn’t really think the Shrek thing was that bad. I mean, maybe Princess Fiona would have been a better reference?? It’s up to you all!

I can see both sides; yes it can be interpreted as being a bit harsh but Rash does throw that baby in everyone’s face proclaiming that she’s the most beautiful baby to have ever been born! Heck, she posted pics of her perfect little Emma in an infertility FB group. Now that’s fucked up! “People knees buckle when they see Saint Emma!” Give me a break! The title wasn’t about Emma at all, it was about Rash being her annoying self.

Anyway, I have no problem changing the title bc like I said I do see if both ways so just let me know what y’all want it changed to and if enough ppl agree, I’ll change it!!