Rachelle, Justin and Baby Shrek | Rachelle and Justin | Part 14
Re: Rachelle, Justin and Baby Shrek | Rachelle and Justin | Part 14
Did anyone notice she said they’re buying a drone for their summer trips? Where the hell do they get this money and/or how the hell are they saving for a house? Are they just finally deciding/admitting that they’d rather have a second baby first and generate YT income from it to save for a house that way? Gross.
I vote to change the title to Rashrek, Crustin, and Emma Brynn Grace Jamie Kay.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I vote to change the title to Rashrek, Crustin, and Emma Brynn Grace Jamie Kay.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
- Informer
- Posts: 325
- Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2018 4:19 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Rachelle, Justin and Baby Shrek | Rachelle and Justin | Part 14
Illiterate, Spinless, and emma BRYNN grace.
- TrainwreckTottie
- Amateur
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2019 12:24 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Rachelle, Justin and Baby Shrek | Rachelle and Justin | Part 14
I thought it was a spring/summer haul? The colors are basically fall vibes and who wears sweaters in the summer especially in California?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: Rachelle, Justin and Baby Shrek | Rachelle and Justin | Part 14
There is no way they make enough money to do all the things they do and all the shopping, eating out, etc. They are definitely getting money from something other than YouTube and reserves. My guess is that one of their parents gives them money monthly.
- leeiacoccapuffs
- Gossiper
- Posts: 720
- Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2018 9:36 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Rachelle, Justin and Baby Shrek | Rachelle and Justin | Part 14
Every IG story lately is an ad, so that's where some of the money is coming from.opangatay wrote: ↑Sat Mar 23, 2019 10:02 am Did anyone notice she said they’re buying a drone for their summer trips? Where the hell do they get this money and/or how the hell are they saving for a house? Are they just finally deciding/admitting that they’d rather have a second baby first and generate YT income from it to save for a house that way? Gross.
I vote to change the title to Rashrek, Crustin, and Emma Brynn Grace Jamie Kay.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
- Guru Gossiper
- Posts: 2228
- Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2018 10:38 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 7 times
Re: Rachelle, Justin and Baby Shrek | Rachelle and Justin | Part 14
If they’re buying a drone I sure hope they look into places where it’s prohibited. I’m not sure if Ireland is on that list but I know parts of Hawaii are. Can you imagine they buy this expensive drone and travel with it to just be told they can’t use it LOL! That would be awesome!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
- Informer
- Posts: 262
- Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2018 8:24 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Rachelle, Justin and Baby Shrek | Rachelle and Justin | Part 14
[IMG]//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201903 ... 7ec949.jpg[/IMG]
Don’t break your finger trashelle
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Don’t break your finger trashelle
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
- Informer
- Posts: 357
- Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2019 10:43 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Rachelle, Justin and Baby Shrek | Rachelle and Justin | Part 14
Hey guys,
I think we should leave the title to be fair and validate everyone title ideas. You don't have to agree with it but unless the title against site rules, why not? I have a feeling we'll be onto a new thread in a few weeks anyways.
Some of us have 'edgier' humor and that should totally be represented every once in a while. I've definitely seen a lot worse on YTMD.
Some of you that are against the title 'thanked' some of the shrek comments
Anyways just my 2 cents....
Re: Rachelle, Justin and Baby Shrek | Rachelle and Justin | Part 14
I agree. Honestly the title really isn’t that bad. And I don’t think anyone would be picking on Emma if it wasn’t for Rachelle constantly droning on and on about how she’s the cutest baby in the world, so it’s really more a slight to her. Remember when she said someone got weak in the knees over seeing Emma?cupcakezzzzz wrote:Hey guys,
I think we should leave the title to be fair and validate everyone title ideas. You don't have to agree with it but unless the title against site rules, why not? I have a feeling we'll be onto a new thread in a few weeks anyways.
Some of us have 'edgier' humor and that should totally be represented every once in a while. I've definitely seen a lot worse on YTMD.
Some of you that are against the title 'thanked' some of the shrek comments
Anyways just my 2 cents....
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Re: Rachelle, Justin and Baby Shrek | Rachelle and Justin | Part 14
I agree that the title says far more about Rachelle than the baby.
And regarding the drone, she said they’ve been wanting one but haven’t needed one yet so will be getting one for their trips this Summer... sounds like they could have scrambled for a freebie???
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
And regarding the drone, she said they’ve been wanting one but haven’t needed one yet so will be getting one for their trips this Summer... sounds like they could have scrambled for a freebie???
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: Rachelle, Justin and Baby Shrek | Rachelle and Justin | Part 14
I think it’s Rash’s fault for taking the WORST photos of that kid, like seriously, who takes a pic of a baby at an angle where you can see up her nostrils to basically her damn brain?! Emma would be cuter if someone with any sense of design or photography was taking her pics instead of a (mentally) 12 year old with an expensive camera LOL
- leeiacoccapuffs
- Gossiper
- Posts: 720
- Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2018 9:36 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Rachelle, Justin and Baby Shrek | Rachelle and Justin | Part 14
Why do you keep bringing it up and rehashing? You've replied multiple times about the title and are taking it personally even though the conversation has moved on to something else.cupcakezzzzz wrote: ↑Sat Mar 23, 2019 1:56 pm Hey guys,
I think we should leave the title to be fair and validate everyone title ideas. You don't have to agree with it but unless the title against site rules, why not? I have a feeling we'll be onto a new thread in a few weeks anyways.
Some of us have 'edgier' humor and that should totally be represented every once in a while. I've definitely seen a lot worse on YTMD.
Some of you that are against the title 'thanked' some of the shrek comments
Anyways just my 2 cents....
We get it, you like the title. Let it go.
- leeiacoccapuffs
- Gossiper
- Posts: 720
- Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2018 9:36 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Rachelle, Justin and Baby Shrek | Rachelle and Justin | Part 14
And depending on the drone and its capabilities, most places require a license to fly them. But Rash and Butt Crack Boy are too dumb to realize you can't just go fly drones willy nilly.Ld5 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 23, 2019 12:25 pm If they’re buying a drone I sure hope they look into places where it’s prohibited. I’m not sure if Ireland is on that list but I know parts of Hawaii are. Can you imagine they buy this expensive drone and travel with it to just be told they can’t use it LOL! That would be awesome!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: Rachelle, Justin and Baby Shrek | Rachelle and Justin | Part 14
I looked at that video where he shows his butt crack and there were tons of comments about it lol. Not sure if they are still there.
Re: Rachelle, Justin and Baby Shrek | Rachelle and Justin | Part 14
Yes! Hahaha. Whoever pointed that out is the best/worst because I totally missed it and then of course had to go back and see for myself if it was an exaggeration. It was not.Jaylla wrote:I looked at that video where he shows his butt crack and there were tons of comments about it lol. Not sure if they are still there.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Re: Rachelle, Justin and Baby Shrek | Rachelle and Justin | Part 14
YouTube has that feature where you can cut parts out of the video without having to take it down and reupload it (though I think edits have to be made before it gets too many views, something to do with the ads) I don’t get why Rachelle didn’t quickly cut it...Jaylla wrote:I looked at that video where he shows his butt crack and there were tons of comments about it lol. Not sure if they are still there.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
- Informer
- Posts: 357
- Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2019 10:43 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Rachelle, Justin and Baby Shrek | Rachelle and Justin | Part 14
I'm not taking it personally at all. I'm just sick of all the policing. I think a lot of people get silenced and it's probably the reason this thread gets thousands of views but only 15ish people feeling safe enough to contribute to the conversation... if you read my post, I was respectful the entire time.leeiacoccapuffs wrote:Why do you keep bringing it up and rehashing? You've replied multiple times about the title and are taking it personally even though the conversation has moved on to something else.cupcakezzzzz wrote: ↑Sat Mar 23, 2019 1:56 pm Hey guys,
I think we should leave the title to be fair and validate everyone title ideas. You don't have to agree with it but unless the title against site rules, why not? I have a feeling we'll be onto a new thread in a few weeks anyways.
Some of us have 'edgier' humor and that should totally be represented every once in a while. I've definitely seen a lot worse on YTMD.
Some of you that are against the title 'thanked' some of the shrek comments
Anyways just my 2 cents....
We get it, you like the title. Let it go.
You retaliating right now proves it...
- LilaVictoria
- Talker
- Posts: 120
- Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2018 5:02 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Rachelle, Justin and Baby Shrek | Rachelle and Justin | Part 14
You guys what’s the fuss about the title?? Shrek babies are actually cute as heck (in my opinion)
- leeiacoccapuffs
- Gossiper
- Posts: 720
- Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2018 9:36 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Rachelle, Justin and Baby Shrek | Rachelle and Justin | Part 14
You are a brand new member here, how can you speak on any "policing" that may or may not happen? Is this a new username?cupcakezzzzz wrote: ↑Sat Mar 23, 2019 6:11 pmI'm not taking it personally at all. I'm just sick of all the policing. I think a lot of people get silenced and it's probably the reason this thread gets thousands of views but only 15ish people feeling safe enough to contribute to the conversation... if you read my post, I was respectful the entire time.leeiacoccapuffs wrote:Why do you keep bringing it up and rehashing? You've replied multiple times about the title and are taking it personally even though the conversation has moved on to something else.cupcakezzzzz wrote: ↑Sat Mar 23, 2019 1:56 pm Hey guys,
I think we should leave the title to be fair and validate everyone title ideas. You don't have to agree with it but unless the title against site rules, why not? I have a feeling we'll be onto a new thread in a few weeks anyways.
Some of us have 'edgier' humor and that should totally be represented every once in a while. I've definitely seen a lot worse on YTMD.
Some of you that are against the title 'thanked' some of the shrek comments
Anyways just my 2 cents....
We get it, you like the title. Let it go.
You retaliating right now proves it...
We have a very different view of what policing and retaliation are than I. We will have to agreee to disagree. C'est la vie.
This forum may get a lot of views but not as many comments because Rachelle and Justin are booooooring as fuck and there isn't much to talk about.
Re: Rachelle, Justin and Baby Shrek | Rachelle and Justin | Part 14
I’m not sure how it’s Rachelle’s fault that people are calling her baby ugly? Is she telling them to?
I’m not defending her in the slightest. I’m probably taking it personally as I have two young children and I would be devastated if people started criticising their looks. Everyone bangs on about how beautiful their children are, myself included. You can’t help it, lol.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I’m not defending her in the slightest. I’m probably taking it personally as I have two young children and I would be devastated if people started criticising their looks. Everyone bangs on about how beautiful their children are, myself included. You can’t help it, lol.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk