Rachelle, Justin and Baby Shrek | Rachelle and Justin | Part 14

Locked
Tina9900
Informer
Informer
Posts: 498
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2018 9:03 pm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle, Justin and Baby Shrek | Rachelle and Justin | Part 14

Unread post by Tina9900 »

Rachelle is constantly squeezing her cheeks, drives me crazy! Why would you put your baby down on the ground at a dog park? Why are they so stupid?

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

staceyla
Informer
Informer
Posts: 388
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2018 4:08 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle, Justin and Baby Shrek | Rachelle and Justin | Part 14

Unread post by staceyla »

cupcakezzzzz wrote:
princessanp wrote:
staceyla wrote:I don't think people are defending them as much as they don't want to gossip about idiotic things. If you're going to gossip, then it should be interesting. Not something boring like using an Easter gift early.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk

Geez that’s rude it was interesting to me.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
'staceyla' shouldn't try to censor people just because they don't find the topic interesting. If you don't find it interesting don't respond? The original poster has every right to bring up the Easter topic as it relates to the topic of Rachelle and Justin? Which is... (wait for it)... the topic of the thread?

Staceyla, don't be rude to people... it's not cute

Sent from my SM-J337P using Tapatalk
I never censored anyone. I was defending people that don't agree and are NOT defending Rachelle. I thought the Easter basket thing was boring which is why I didn't respond to them or put my two cents. I used it as an example. I was not being rude to anyone. This is what I mean. Not everything on here is snarky. I would have said something to the people bringing it up if that was the case.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk

cupcakezzzzz
Informer
Informer
Posts: 357
Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2019 10:43 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle, Justin and Baby Shrek | Rachelle and Justin | Part 14

Unread post by cupcakezzzzz »

staceyla wrote:
cupcakezzzzz wrote:
princessanp wrote:
Geez that’s rude it was interesting to me.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
'staceyla' shouldn't try to censor people just because they don't find the topic interesting. If you don't find it interesting don't respond? The original poster has every right to bring up the Easter topic as it relates to the topic of Rachelle and Justin? Which is... (wait for it)... the topic of the thread?

Staceyla, don't be rude to people... it's not cute

Sent from my SM-J337P using Tapatalk
I never censored anyone. I was defending people that don't agree and are NOT defending Rachelle. I thought the Easter basket thing was boring which is why I didn't respond to them or put my two cents. I used it as an example. I was not being rude to anyone. This is what I mean. Not everything on here is snarky. I would have said something to the people bringing it up if that was the case.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
I think if you keep on being rude to the thread participants, you're going to find that no one will want to interact with you on the topics you DO want to talk about when those come up. People remember usernames and negative interactions. Have a nice night...

Sent from my SM-J337P using Tapatalk

cupcakezzzzz
Informer
Informer
Posts: 357
Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2019 10:43 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle, Justin and Baby Shrek | Rachelle and Justin | Part 14

Unread post by cupcakezzzzz »

Greenapples2 wrote:
cupcakezzzzz wrote:
princessanp wrote:
Geez that’s rude it was interesting to me.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
'staceyla' shouldn't try to censor people just because they don't find the topic interesting. If you don't find it interesting don't respond? The original poster has every right to bring up the Easter topic as it relates to the topic of Rachelle and Justin? Which is... (wait for it)... the topic of the thread?

Staceyla, don't be rude to people... it's not cute

Sent from my SM-J337P using Tapatalk


Lmao I have her blocked because she has done this same shit before. The mod Snark told her not to post rude things anymore and if she disagrees to keep it to herself or message the person. She is here to stir shit up. Has been since day one. Just block her so you can’t see her posts anymore. It helps keep the conversation moving. Lol


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Good tip! Definitely will be blocking ...

Sent from my SM-J337P using Tapatalk

Celia
Informer
Informer
Posts: 472
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 12:33 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle, Justin and Baby Shrek | Rachelle and Justin | Part 14

Unread post by Celia »

Ld5 wrote:
princessanp wrote:
staceyla wrote:I don't think people are defending them as much as they don't want to gossip about idiotic things. If you're going to gossip, then it should be interesting. Not something boring like using an Easter gift early.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk

Geez that’s rude it was interesting to me.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yeah, I actually thought that was a pretty good snark on her. Her Easter basket items were ridiculous. Not age appropriate at all. She just randomly threw in a bathing suit and outfit, just because. We all know she will be wearing that outfit too before Easter. And then feed her peas without a bib and ruin the “made in Europe” incredibly expensive outfit


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I agree. I mean she made a video about what is going to be in Emma’s basket (one thing being the outfit she would be wearing that day) so to take another thing out is kind of ridiculous. Why include it in the basket/video at all if you just planned to use it whenever you wanted to? I have things set aside of Easter for my daughter (small toys, a few books, puff snacks for her “treat”) all of which could be used today. But the point is they’re for Easter. I get Emma won’t remember... but again, she made a whole video of things she chose specifically for the basket. I thought it was a good observation. Especially because Rash is a known liar and buys things just for aesthetics.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
staceyla
Informer
Informer
Posts: 388
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2018 4:08 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle, Justin and Baby Shrek | Rachelle and Justin | Part 14

Unread post by staceyla »

Greenapples2 wrote:
cupcakezzzzz wrote:
princessanp wrote:
Geez that’s rude it was interesting to me.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
'staceyla' shouldn't try to censor people just because they don't find the topic interesting. If you don't find it interesting don't respond? The original poster has every right to bring up the Easter topic as it relates to the topic of Rachelle and Justin? Which is... (wait for it)... the topic of the thread?

Staceyla, don't be rude to people... it's not cute

Sent from my SM-J337P using Tapatalk


Lmao I have her blocked because she has done this same shit before. The mod Snark told her not to post rude things anymore and if she disagrees to keep it to herself or message the person. She is here to stir shit up. Has been since day one. Just block her so you can’t see her posts anymore. It helps keep the conversation moving. Lol


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I wasn't even being rude. I'm allowed to express my feelings like everyone else. I used the word BORING. I could have said something else. And I didn't even respond to them. I ignored them like all y'all say.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk

staceyla
Informer
Informer
Posts: 388
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2018 4:08 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle, Justin and Baby Shrek | Rachelle and Justin | Part 14

Unread post by staceyla »

cupcakezzzzz wrote:
staceyla wrote:
cupcakezzzzz wrote:'staceyla' shouldn't try to censor people just because they don't find the topic interesting. If you don't find it interesting don't respond? The original poster has every right to bring up the Easter topic as it relates to the topic of Rachelle and Justin? Which is... (wait for it)... the topic of the thread?

Staceyla, don't be rude to people... it's not cute

Sent from my SM-J337P using Tapatalk
I never censored anyone. I was defending people that don't agree and are NOT defending Rachelle. I thought the Easter basket thing was boring which is why I didn't respond to them or put my two cents. I used it as an example. I was not being rude to anyone. This is what I mean. Not everything on here is snarky. I would have said something to the people bringing it up if that was the case.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
I think if you keep on being rude to the thread participants, you're going to find that no one will want to interact with you on the topics you DO want to talk about when those come up. People remember usernames and negative interactions. Have a nice night...

Sent from my SM-J337P using Tapatalk
I wasn't even being rude though. Everyone here is trying to have fun gossiping. No one should be put down or accused of being idiot Rachelle just because they don't agree. I admit I've been rude before. But I said nothing rude right now.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk

staceyla
Informer
Informer
Posts: 388
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2018 4:08 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle, Justin and Baby Shrek | Rachelle and Justin | Part 14

Unread post by staceyla »

princessanp wrote:
staceyla wrote:
remre1017 wrote:I’m a little late but this is the third thread I’ve been on where someone is trying to defend the YouTuber. Wtf??? It’s a GOSSIP site people. We are allowed to say whatever we want. And especially for the people who are here saying “don’t complain about the little things” let people complain about whatever they want to?? If you’re not interested, skip over the comment and move on.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I don't think people are defending them as much as they don't want to gossip about idiotic things. If you're going to gossip, then it should be interesting. Not something boring like using an Easter gift early.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk

Geez that’s rude it was interesting to me.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That comment was NOT made towards you. It was made towards anyone who gets all bitchy anytime someone disagrees with something or makes a big deal about something so small. I would have said something to you if I was trying to be rude. Please don't read more into it.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk

staceyla
Informer
Informer
Posts: 388
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2018 4:08 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle, Justin and Baby Shrek | Rachelle and Justin | Part 14

Unread post by staceyla »

cupcakezzzzz wrote:
Greenapples2 wrote:
cupcakezzzzz wrote:'staceyla' shouldn't try to censor people just because they don't find the topic interesting. If you don't find it interesting don't respond? The original poster has every right to bring up the Easter topic as it relates to the topic of Rachelle and Justin? Which is... (wait for it)... the topic of the thread?

Staceyla, don't be rude to people... it's not cute

Sent from my SM-J337P using Tapatalk


Lmao I have her blocked because she has done this same shit before. The mod Snark told her not to post rude things anymore and if she disagrees to keep it to herself or message the person. She is here to stir shit up. Has been since day one. Just block her so you can’t see her posts anymore. It helps keep the conversation moving. Lol


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Good tip! Definitely will be blocking ...

Sent from my SM-J337P using Tapatalk
Btw, I stuck up for you at some point. You expressed your feelings and caught hell for it. My comment was literally defending people like you who disagree with something and everyone takes it personally or accuses you of being something or someone you aren't. But go ahead. Block me.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk

User avatar
Haulnarse
Guru Gossiper
Guru Gossiper
Posts: 6127
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2018 2:05 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: Rachelle, Justin and Baby Shrek | Rachelle and Justin | Part 14

Unread post by Haulnarse »

Blurry photo... but what the fuck is she wearing?? Jeans.. shorts... trash bags??

[IMG]//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201904 ... a249c1.jpg[/IMG]
User avatar
Haulnarse
Guru Gossiper
Guru Gossiper
Posts: 6127
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2018 2:05 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: Rachelle, Justin and Baby Shrek | Rachelle and Justin | Part 14

Unread post by Haulnarse »

A few minutes in and omg... the thousand faces of trashelle!

[IMG]//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201904 ... ef8982.jpg[/IMG]

[IMG]//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201904 ... 469fc4.jpg[/IMG]

User avatar
Haulnarse
Guru Gossiper
Guru Gossiper
Posts: 6127
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2018 2:05 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: Rachelle, Justin and Baby Shrek | Rachelle and Justin | Part 14

Unread post by Haulnarse »

User avatar
Haulnarse
Guru Gossiper
Guru Gossiper
Posts: 6127
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2018 2:05 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: Rachelle, Justin and Baby Shrek | Rachelle and Justin | Part 14

Unread post by Haulnarse »

Taptalk is having a hissy... Cant seem to upload the photos

HereForTheTeaaa
Informer
Informer
Posts: 325
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2018 4:19 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle, Justin and Baby Shrek | Rachelle and Justin | Part 14

Unread post by HereForTheTeaaa »

[quote=Haulnarse post_id=1368262 time=1554103394 user_id=32956]
[IMG]//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201904 ... b099d2.jpg[/IMG]
[/quote]

Okay but like that lighting would have been so nice if she wasn’t man handling her child and just did something like... I dunno a regular face? She could have looked kinda cute because that lighting is really pretty but like she’s gotta go and ruin literally everything lmfao.
User avatar
remre1017
Extreme Gossiper
Extreme Gossiper
Posts: 1522
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2018 10:27 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle, Justin and Baby Shrek | Rachelle and Justin | Part 14

Unread post by remre1017 »

staceyla wrote:
cupcakezzzzz wrote:
staceyla wrote:I never censored anyone. I was defending people that don't agree and are NOT defending Rachelle. I thought the Easter basket thing was boring which is why I didn't respond to them or put my two cents. I used it as an example. I was not being rude to anyone. This is what I mean. Not everything on here is snarky. I would have said something to the people bringing it up if that was the case.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
I think if you keep on being rude to the thread participants, you're going to find that no one will want to interact with you on the topics you DO want to talk about when those come up. People remember usernames and negative interactions. Have a nice night...

Sent from my SM-J337P using Tapatalk
I wasn't even being rude though. Everyone here is trying to have fun gossiping. No one should be put down or accused of being idiot Rachelle just because they don't agree. I admit I've been rude before. But I said nothing rude right now.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
Okay but my point was that if you don’t enjoy what we’re talking about on here then just move on? I’ve spent numerous times skipping over multiple comments on threads because I wasn’t interested. Do I go out and say “omg this is boring can we stop” no. Because it’s obviously not boring to other people. It’ll die down in a day or two and then we can talk about something new. If you are honestly that upset that we’re talking about “boring” stuff then get off of this site and go do something more entertaining. People are free to discuss what they want and nobody is going to listen when you tell them not to talk about it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
staceyla
Informer
Informer
Posts: 388
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2018 4:08 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle, Justin and Baby Shrek | Rachelle and Justin | Part 14

Unread post by staceyla »

remre1017 wrote:
staceyla wrote:
cupcakezzzzz wrote:I think if you keep on being rude to the thread participants, you're going to find that no one will want to interact with you on the topics you DO want to talk about when those come up. People remember usernames and negative interactions. Have a nice night...

Sent from my SM-J337P using Tapatalk
I wasn't even being rude though. Everyone here is trying to have fun gossiping. No one should be put down or accused of being idiot Rachelle just because they don't agree. I admit I've been rude before. But I said nothing rude right now.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
Okay but my point was that if you don’t enjoy what we’re talking about on here then just move on? I’ve spent numerous times skipping over multiple comments on threads because I wasn’t interested. Do I go out and say “omg this is boring can we stop” no. Because it’s obviously not boring to other people. It’ll die down in a day or two and then we can talk about something new. If you are honestly that upset that we’re talking about “boring” stuff then get off of this site and go do something more entertaining. People are free to discuss what they want and nobody is going to listen when you tell them not to talk about it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Not once did I say not to talk about it. In fact, I never said one word about it until you accused people of defending youtubers. Once again, it was an EXAMPLE. Once again, I NEVER said a word to those people that brought it up. I was simply defending the people that get shit for disagreeing on the gossip (which they have a right just like you) or agreewith VERY FEW things YouTubers have done. Simple. Y'all turned it into something it wasn't. Like always. Don't you dare tell me I'm doing or did something that I obviously have not.
Saying something is boring in no way means I am upset. And that is what is wrong with a few people here. They make things into something it's not like you just did in this post.
Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk




jaynshann
Informer
Informer
Posts: 354
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2016 11:54 am
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: Rachelle, Justin and Baby Shrek | Rachelle and Justin | Part 14

Unread post by jaynshann »

Ld5 wrote:
cupcakezzzzz wrote:
Ld5 wrote:Do they not see this?!
[IMG]//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201903 ... fa94bd.png[/IMG]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
What the fuck is that lol

Sent from my SM-J337P using Tapatalk
It’s a roof leak or water leaking behind the walls


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You have an AMAZING EYE! Yes that’s not GOOD! We had that in our ceiling and well long story short...when we kept having our landlord blow us off and say it’s risidual damage from previous issues. It’s not current moisture Blah blah blah...we took his word for it. Guess what l got sick....my 3 kids got sick! Like l was bedridden sick. My kids lost feeling in their limbs, had metallic taste in their mouth, pneumonia, bronchitis, issue after issue....OUR FRICKEN CEILING AND WALLS WERE FULL OF TOXIC MOLD! Stachybotrys to be more specific. Looked just like that wall! I can’t believe you noticed that! I am amazed!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
jaynshann
Informer
Informer
Posts: 354
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2016 11:54 am
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 3 times

Rachelle, Justin and Baby Shrek | Rachelle and Justin | Part 14

Unread post by jaynshann »

cupcakezzzzz wrote:
Tina9900 wrote:Child abuse doesn't show up for me[IMG]//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201903 ... c62eae.jpg[/IMG]

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
It showed up for me! That's strange... maybe the video is about to flagged and other people reported it for abuse as well?

Sent from my SM-J337P using Tapatalk
Yes! Bonnie Holleen (May have misspelled last name) got demonetized for quite awhile until she and husband pulled over 200 videos off YouTube. One of the issues YouTube listed when she questioned their reasons for demonetizing her was the use of children in vulnerable positions and the capitalizing on it. Examples given to her were using thumbnails with her children’s injuries or even in an evidentially emotionally upset state due to being punished etc.She had few other issues that only applied to a couple videos like her husband or other relatives shooting in the woods for sport with her children present etc (like small shotguns etc.) but main criticism she received from YouTube was for showing her children in vulnerable situations emotionally and physically (little bruises on their eyes etc). YouTube has only cracked down more since this happened to her and to a few others. BESIDES RACHELLE DESERVES TO GET IN TROUBLE after her snide little remark the other day about being literally one of the only family vlogs with her comment section still open. Bitch your not special! If you think pedafiles being able to leave their comments still on your channel makes you a special snowflake IT DOESN’T!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Ld5
Guru Gossiper
Guru Gossiper
Posts: 2228
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2018 10:38 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 7 times

Re: Rachelle, Justin and Baby Shrek | Rachelle and Justin | Part 14

Unread post by Ld5 »

jaynshann wrote:
Ld5 wrote:
cupcakezzzzz wrote:What the fuck is that lol

Sent from my SM-J337P using Tapatalk
It’s a roof leak or water leaking behind the walls


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You have an AMAZING EYE! Yes that’s not GOOD! We had that in our ceiling and well long story short...when we kept having our landlord blow us off and say it’s risidual damage from previous issues. It’s not current moisture Blah blah blah...we took his word for it. Guess what l got sick....my 3 kids got sick! Like l was bedridden sick. My kids lost feeling in their limbs, had metallic taste in their mouth, pneumonia, bronchitis, issue after issue....OUR FRICKEN CEILING AND WALLS WERE FULL OF TOXIC MOLD! Stachybotrys to be more specific. Looked just like that wall! I can’t believe you noticed that! I am amazed!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I’m in the midst of house hunting.. my eyes catch a lot lol!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
User avatar
SouthernGal
Informer
Informer
Posts: 433
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2019 5:23 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle, Justin and Baby Shrek | Rachelle and Justin | Part 14

Unread post by SouthernGal »

I tried to upload all of those same pictures and it wouldn't let me. Lol it said it was an "adult picture". It's the least attractive thing I've ever seen in my life, don't know how it is considered as such. Lol

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

Locked

Return to “Rachelle and Justin”