OldCountry wrote:SassySassenach wrote: ↑Sun Apr 07, 2019 8:00 am
WheredoIbegin wrote:I am behind in commenting...
Ok, this might just be me but did the photographer edit out a stool on this photo?
I noticed in several of the photos said photographer had MaeMae placed where I would have used one of the bigger twins. Especially the photo with Manny Ash. I know this photographer has said previously that MaeMae was just as tall as bigger twins, she is obviously not. I think her editing skills need some work.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Maybe I’m missing something... why even have a stool there to begin with? Let the kid sit and have her feet dangle naturally.
The more I see of Loni’s photos, the more I don’t like them. I prefer to see my children natural and with as little editing as possible. I don’t understand this glitzy photography. I’m sure some love it, but it’s not for me.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
This may sound mean to some, but what the hell. I did go to Loni's Facebook page and looked at who went to her for photos and who would want those type of photos taken of them. First I have to say, I do not judge people for how they look, it's all about who they are on the inside, how they treat other people etc., is how I form my opinion about people...With that said, aside from the tiny babies she takes photos of, most of the people and the older children are mostly 'homely' to me. Just for the record, I am 'homely' also because I am in according to the 'eyes of the world of beauties'. Thankfully because of the way I was brought up or should I say NURTURED!, (think about it Greeds) I never cared about that point of view about looks. Oh sure a twinge or two in my teens, but I outgrew that quickly. So here's my point. I am wondering if all of these people are having their photos taken by her because she offers some much staged 'fluff and fantasy' they think it will make for a better photo of themselves with all of the distractions going on in the photos and not so much directly about themselves. Just a thought.
While I was over there, I found this from last November Santa photo shoot.
"I just realized that I never posted this one on this page. A follower on Instagram ------- asked me if any of my Santa pictures of the Gardner girls were composites. I replied that I did have to switch Evie out in the very first edit because Evie was partially hidden behind Scarlett, and I wanted to make sure we could see her whole face.
And then I realized that the picture I was talking about was never posted on my social media. Oops. So here it is!"
So Evie's head had to be 'plopped' down onto her shoulders to complete the photo. I didn't really know how to get Loni's name out of there, wasn't even sure if I had to,, but I did the best I could.
Loni had said somewhere earlier over there " These girls are pros and so much fun to work with" I can taste the pink medicine as she speaks.
47217121_1904011106335112_4936944587538169856_o1.jpg
Yeah, nah. When you start doing shit like that it’s not a real
Photo, it’s made up. She could just as easily do a photo shoot, I mean photo shop any photos that the gardeners have. A head here, a hand there, put Indues head on Evie’s body ya know, because she is tallest
they wouldn’t even have to go to the studio. That could work for whatever is easiest. I would never be happy with photos like that, I want to see/remember the imperfections. I guess having said that, the Gardner’s do take a lot of their own photos so they still have that I guess. Just a shame that those pics aren’t good enough to Grace the walls of their house. To me, it’s a senseless waste of money, oh wait, that’s the other thing they live by
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
it reminds me when brides dress their bridesmaids in unflattering outfits..
I think it's because mommy dearest is always putting them in extravagant outfits for pictures. Here its just natural. 
