Is she at his house and somebody sent her that.pic? Or maybe more supervised visits? I'm curiousLexiRae wrote:I saw this and I can’t help but wonder WTF is going on. Maybe Maddie thinks he’s stupid enough to nut in her twicePhoenixAsh wrote:
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Oh dear god... They would wind up with another sick/delayed baby because they are too young.Scooby-dooby-doo wrote:He's only 16. He COULD be stupid enough to.
Her daughter is 19 months and barely speaks, just started walking a month ago, looks like she has Down syndromenotyomama wrote:How is her daughter delayed? I just started watching, how old is she?
Eh, she doesn't look like she has DS imo. My best friends son has DS, most states have testing done at birth I'd think it'd have come to light at this point. Walking is also one of those things that can vary, 2 of my kids walked at 8.5 months, 1 walked at 14, and one is over a year and isn't close to it yet. All neurotypical. I think the mom is super strange and wish she had better guidance but I don't think its cool to speculate her kid has a genetic disorder
You must be new here lol. Nobody thinks it’s cool that her kid has a genetic disorder, but another user has proven that Everly has 16 markers for downsnotyomama wrote:Eh, she doesn't look like she has DS imo. My best friends son has DS, most states have testing done at birth I'd think it'd have come to light at this point. Walking is also one of those things that can vary, 2 of my kids walked at 8.5 months, 1 walked at 14, and one is over a year and isn't close to it yet. All neurotypical. I think the mom is super strange and wish she had better guidance but I don't think its cool to speculate her kid has a genetic disorder
16 markers such as? Is this person a genetic counselor? Because I don't think all the youtubes in the world could provide enough information to say that without interacting, and having tests drawn.LexiRae wrote: ↑Wed Jul 10, 2019 10:27 pmYou must be new here lol. Nobody thinks it’s cool that her kid has a genetic disorder, but another user has proven that Everly has 16 markers for downsnotyomama wrote:Eh, she doesn't look like she has DS imo. My best friends son has DS, most states have testing done at birth I'd think it'd have come to light at this point. Walking is also one of those things that can vary, 2 of my kids walked at 8.5 months, 1 walked at 14, and one is over a year and isn't close to it yet. All neurotypical. I think the mom is super strange and wish she had better guidance but I don't think its cool to speculate her kid has a genetic disorder
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
How about you actually read a bit of this thread?notyomama wrote:16 markers such as? Is this person a genetic counselor? Because I don't think all the youtubes in the world could provide enough information to say that without interacting, and having tests drawn.LexiRae wrote: ↑Wed Jul 10, 2019 10:27 pmYou must be new here lol. Nobody thinks it’s cool that her kid has a genetic disorder, but another user has proven that Everly has 16 markers for downsnotyomama wrote: Eh, she doesn't look like she has DS imo. My best friends son has DS, most states have testing done at birth I'd think it'd have come to light at this point. Walking is also one of those things that can vary, 2 of my kids walked at 8.5 months, 1 walked at 14, and one is over a year and isn't close to it yet. All neurotypical. I think the mom is super strange and wish she had better guidance but I don't think its cool to speculate her kid has a genetic disorder
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
LexiRae wrote:Oh dear god... They would wind up with another sick/delayed baby because they are too young.
I can’t believe Maddie even wants another one when there’s already 6 kids in her house
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Actually the person IS a specialist. If you would take the time to read the fucking thread, you might answer your own questions.notyomama wrote: ↑Wed Jul 10, 2019 10:33 pm16 markers such as? Is this person a genetic counselor? Because I don't think all the youtubes in the world could provide enough information to say that without interacting, and having tests drawn.LexiRae wrote: ↑Wed Jul 10, 2019 10:27 pmYou must be new here lol. Nobody thinks it’s cool that her kid has a genetic disorder, but another user has proven that Everly has 16 markers for downsnotyomama wrote:
Eh, she doesn't look like she has DS imo. My best friends son has DS, most states have testing done at birth I'd think it'd have come to light at this point. Walking is also one of those things that can vary, 2 of my kids walked at 8.5 months, 1 walked at 14, and one is over a year and isn't close to it yet. All neurotypical. I think the mom is super strange and wish she had better guidance but I don't think its cool to speculate her kid has a genetic disorder
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Well babies of teen moms are more likely to have health issues so yes I have said it multiple times. Whether it’s because of her genes or her shitty parenting is up for debate. Don’t act like a 14 year old is usually going to give birth to a healthy baby though because it’s just not the casesezzajaydee wrote:LexiRae wrote:Oh dear god... They would wind up with another sick/delayed baby because they are too young.Scooby-dooby-doo wrote: He's only 16. He COULD be stupid enough to.
I can’t believe Maddie even wants another one when there’s already 6 kids in her house
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Her age is not a determining factor in Everly’s issues. At least not genetically or with her alleged DS.
I’ve seen you say her age is why Everly is delayed multiple times. If she does have DS, it’s most definitely not because of her age.
Other risks are there, but they are mostly because of ignorance about prenatal care and once again, not specifically age.
The risks Everly has because of Maddie’s are more to do with her immature and dumbass decisions now. Like throwing an iPad at her instead of reading a book.
If you’re going to say don’t act like....then don’t act like Maddie being 14 is the cause of Everly’s issues. Especially when people are claiming it’s due to Down’s syndrome. That’s genetic and more of a risk for older mothers.LexiRae wrote:Well babies of teen moms are more likely to have health issues so yes I have said it multiple times. Whether it’s because of her genes or her shitty parenting is up for debate. Don’t act like a 14 year old is usually going to give birth to a healthy baby though because it’s just not the casesezzajaydee wrote:LexiRae wrote:
Oh dear god... They would wind up with another sick/delayed baby because they are too young.
I can’t believe Maddie even wants another one when there’s already 6 kids in her house
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Her age is not a determining factor in Everly’s issues. At least not genetically or with her alleged DS.
I’ve seen you say her age is why Everly is delayed multiple times. If she does have DS, it’s most definitely not because of her age.
Other risks are there, but they are mostly because of ignorance about prenatal care and once again, not specifically age.
The risks Everly has because of Maddie’s are more to do with her immature and dumbass decisions now. Like throwing an iPad at her instead of reading a book.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
sezzajaydee wrote:If you’re going to say don’t act like....then don’t act like Maddie being 14 is the cause of Everly’s issues. Especially when people are claiming it’s due to Down’s syndrome. That’s genetic and more of a risk for older mothers.LexiRae wrote:Well babies of teen moms are more likely to have health issues so yes I have said it multiple times. Whether it’s because of her genes or her shitty parenting is up for debate. Don’t act like a 14 year old is usually going to give birth to a healthy baby though because it’s just not the casesezzajaydee wrote:
Her age is not a determining factor in Everly’s issues. At least not genetically or with her alleged DS.
I’ve seen you say her age is why Everly is delayed multiple times. If she does have DS, it’s most definitely not because of her age.
Other risks are there, but they are mostly because of ignorance about prenatal care and once again, not specifically age.
The risks Everly has because of Maddie’s are more to do with her immature and dumbass decisions now. Like throwing an iPad at her instead of reading a book.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The health risks associated with having a child that young are mostly for the mother’s health. No matter how much you dislike Maddie, it doesn’t change science and fact.
14 year olds have and do give birth to healthy children every day. You’re carrying on like every teen is doomed to have a sick or delayed baby.
*not condoning having a baby when you’re not even old enough to rent a go kart by yourself.
