OR clerk here, a diastasis repair is essentially a tummy tuck. Both are scheduled and billed under abdominoplasty and the only difference is that a tummy tuck goes one step farther and usually involves far more lipo or excess skin removal. A diastasis recti is a gap in the muscles, it is not a hernia. An umbilical hernia, which I believe she has also said she has, is a completely different procedure.YTIG60 wrote:So she had her second surgery "stomach surgery/hernia repair" on Monday. Insurance may cover a hernia repair/diastasis repair, but once you say tummy tuck, it is plastic surgery that will not be covered. Plastic surgery is expensive, my guess higher in LA, so why wouldn't you try to have this procedure covered by having a diastasis repair procedure. I think it will be interesting to see her recovery that generally an overnight stay, short term narcotic pain medication before transitioning to ibuprofen/tylenol. YouTube income has changed since the first surgery so I question if this was taken into consideration with this second procedure.
Bonnie walked up many many steps in the cave, was noticeably short of breath and I think they already live or in a higher elevation area so it should be easier to adapt to this. Landon's knee taping provided a miraculous recovery.
But you are incorrect that an abdominoplasty won’t be covered. It’s all about the doctor’s dictated history and the diagnosis, and not about the procedure name itself. That is just medical terminology. It doesn’t mean the same thing in medical speak as it does to the average person.
Example: we do Rhinoplasties on men all the time. They aren’t nose jobs like you would think, though someone having their nose modified for cosmetic reasons would also be having a Rhinoplasty. The difference is in the doctor’s diagnosis and the perceived “need” for surgery.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk