GQS: AlwaysExploiting-Count Porkulus, Pigaletto & Squealing Piglets| Part 61

[Abbiedownunder]

I doubt very much that the people driving those cars were saying 'OMG how cute". I'm sure it was probably 'get the fucking kids off the road'. My heart jumped a few times when cars got close and of course the girls have absolutely no road sense. It would have taken only one car to slide on the wet road and bang. Apart from the actual danger, yet again, a total sense of entitlement. All the traffic has to slow down so the girls can jump in puddles. They never cease to amaze me with their selfishness. But, what would I know, I'm just a hater.

[Rileysmomma]

The GQS hit 500k subs in May one week before the Bigs hit 600k. The Bs are now about 5,500 away from 700k and the Greeds are only at 531,600. I wonder if the Greeds will bring over balloons to celebrate? Hahaha. You know it's got to be killing them because Bison thinks they "made" the Bingalings.

Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk

[DownTheRabbitHole]

I doubt very much that the people driving those cars were saying 'OMG how cute". I'm sure it was probably 'get the fucking kids off the road'. My heart jumped a few times when cars got close and of course the girls have absolutely no road sense. It would have taken only one car to slide on the wet road and bang. Apart from the actual danger, yet again, a total sense of entitlement. All the traffic has to slow down so the girls can jump in puddles. They never cease to amaze me with their selfishness. But, what would I know, I'm just a hater.

Totally agree with you. I don’t follow the Waddling Windbag’s Instagram cause I know too much so the creep factor is more than I can deal with most days. You amazing people keep me informed on what’s going on there. But after all the puddle comments I had to go and check it out and I totally agree with everybody’s concerns. Dumb and Dumber have got their heads so far up their backsides that they think people were slowing down or stopping to laugh and admire when in fact people were slowing down or stopping because there were four little people running and jumping from the footpath to the road and back again on an overcast rainy day. And all without an adult right there in the road with them if for no other reason than an adult is much easier for a driver to see from a moving vehicle. If I was to catch pedestrian movement heading towards the road out of the corner of my eye you can bet my natural instinct would be to hit the brakes and take a proper check around before slowly driving off again.

[AthenaA]

Any one of those girls could have jumped further into the road. God they are stupid.

And they buy four of everything but have one umbrella.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[SassySassenach]

[IMG]//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201909 ... 6a4382.jpg[/IMG]

Hauling around Pull-ups??

Did not have sound up, have no clue what lies they are telling


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

I think she called it their “church bag”. She didn’t say what was in it, but I would assume all the iPads. And whatever else they bring to church for the ferals.

Genuine question: Do kids have “kids church” while the grown ups are in service? Or do they have to sit with the parents the whole time? I thought a long while back Bison made a big deal over some sunshine room thing, but we haven’t heard a peep since.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[RUKiddingMe]

Over on Mommy's World she has a vlog explaining what's happening on Jan. 1. She pretty much covers the whole topic.

Basically she says a lot of family youtuber's (is that a word) will have to live off of their savings for months if they continue vlogging after the 1st.

Warning it is long and hard to get through but informative.

[Haulnarse]

Over on Mommy's World she has a vlog explaining what's happening on Jan. 1. She pretty much covers the whole topic.

Basically she says a lot of family youtuber's (is that a word) will have to live off of their savings for months if they continue vlogging after the 1st.

Warning it is long and hard to get through but informative.

Shit shes hard to watch, not even five minutes in and im out, get to the point already. Shes banging on about grieving... wtf??

Youtube is trying to a safer place, for everyone. They arent setting out to punish people. Do these idiots not see the bigger picture?? Everyone is so quick to jump up and down and throw a tanty. If you are putting out quality content that isnt 20 minutes of your child then you should be good to carry on.

The greedners film their children in compromising situations, (indies head stapling, crutch shots, undie flashes, titty slips, grabbing at themselves, them crying and in distress, pounding food, mispronunciations of words) its all neglect and damaging. These families are the ones that YouTube need to crack down on. Just blanket ban all Utah Mormon vloggers and be done with it. Half the problem would be solved immediately.

[Haulnarse]

Basic run down from: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.thever ... -coppa-ads

* requiring creators to label content intended for younger audiences
* halting the data collection on videos clearly targeting minors.

It’s unclear how YouTube has defined content that targets minors, but it said in the blog that its algorithms will seek to label content that has “an emphasis on kids characters, themes, toys, or games.”

“Starting in four months, we will treat data from anyone watching children’s content on YouTube as coming from a child, regardless of the age of the user.”
It continued, “This means that we will limit data collection and use on videos made for kids only to what is needed to support the operation of the service.”

YouTube also noted that comments and notifications will no longer be available on children’s content like this as well.

The platform will also stop serving targeted ads on this kind of content.

———
No targeted ads = less money for creators
No comments = no interaction
If you dont label your content as for kids then im guessing creators (hate calling them that ) will get in trouble?

Now if IG roll out having the likes not visible worldwide (like it is for us in New Zealand), there goes other brand deals and sponsorships. Companies aren’t going to offer products to influencers if they can’t actually track the number of people their reach is.

The greedners should be worried, the way their teen kads attack each other in the IG comments sections should prove that their content for the most part is either being watched by pre-teens and old grannies... cos lets face it middle age parents can see right through their bullshit facade. They wont even be researching any of this for themselves, they dont come across as proactive.

They really don’t know how long seneshit and plexshit will keep them floating. They claim YouTube isnt their main income earner, but im sure they would miss it if it wasnt coming in. They still have nash, amandah and the cleaning crew to pay for.

[SassySassenach]

****END OF THREAD WARNING****

Hello lovely Snarkers! It’s that time again!

New thread will begin Tuesday around 8pm EST.

Don’t forget to get your title suggestions in & vote for your favorites!

GQS Title Suggestions
https://r.tapatalk.com/shareLink?share_ ... are_type=t




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[daktari15]

I think the Gardner’s will be ok with the new you tube rules. Their content is not aimed at children, yes some children do watch. They may have to drop the challenges and maybe reviewing of toys but I think they can argue that their vlogs are for an adult audience.

Some people’s interpretation of the rules is a bit skewed. But then no one knows how you tube will apply the rules. It’s going to be interesting that’s for sure.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[JD386]

Basic run down from: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.thever ... -coppa-ads

* requiring creators to label content intended for younger audiences
* halting the data collection on videos clearly targeting minors.

It’s unclear how YouTube has defined content that targets minors, but it said in the blog that its algorithms will seek to label content that has “an emphasis on kids characters, themes, toys, or games.”

“Starting in four months, we will treat data from anyone watching children’s content on YouTube as coming from a child, regardless of the age of the user.”
It continued, “This means that we will limit data collection and use on videos made for kids only to what is needed to support the operation of the service.”

YouTube also noted that comments and notifications will no longer be available on children’s content like this as well.

The platform will also stop serving targeted ads on this kind of content.

———
No targeted ads = less money for creators
No comments = no interaction
If you dont label your content as for kids then im guessing creators (hate calling them that ) will get in trouble?

Now if IG roll out having the likes not visible worldwide (like it is for us in New Zealand), there goes other brand deals and sponsorships. Companies aren’t going to offer products to influencers if they can’t actually track the number of people their reach is.

The greedners should be worried, the way their teen kads attack each other in the IG comments sections should prove that their content for the most part is either being watched by pre-teens and old grannies... cos lets face it middle age parents can see right through their bullshit facade. They wont even be researching any of this for themselves, they dont come across as proactive.

They really don’t know how long seneshit and plexshit will keep them floating. They claim YouTube isnt their main income earner, but im sure they would miss it if it wasnt coming in. They still have nash, amandah and the cleaning crew to pay for.

Guaranteed these Youtubers start changing things before this even starts. The titles will start changing and not be so kidcentric. They’ll for sure test the limits of what they can get away with.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Howlin17]

I think the Gardner’s will be ok with the new you tube rules. Their content is not aimed at children, yes some children do watch. They may have to drop the challenges and maybe reviewing of toys but I think they can argue that their vlogs are for an adult audience.

Some people’s interpretation of the rules is a bit skewed. But then no one knows how you tube will apply the rules. It’s going to be interesting that’s for sure.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

If their vlogs are for adult audiences, then that is even worse. They can leave the ferals out of it and just film themselves. Stop pimping out their kids to Blubber Butts pervy fans. All of these families need to stop exploiting their kids. Not sure why Mormons seem to be so proficient at it


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[NYB]

I've been lurking here for awhile and don't have anything to add, but I do have a question that has been bugging me for ages:

What does KAD stand for? I know it's a name for their rabid fans, but I can't figure out the acronym. THANKS!

[lmmomSD]

The thing is, that nobody (except us) seems to care about the kids being exploited. This is all only happening because YouTube got in trouble with the FTC for collecting information on children, and targeting ads towards them. It's all about protecting the kids watching. Which is important, don't get me wrong. But if the AI thinks that the Greedners and their ilk are producing content NOT aimed at kids, they will be ok. And that irritates me no end. It still doesn't help the kids whose parents are living off them.
The good news is that they can't "argue" that their content is aimed at adults. YouTube is developing AI to detect kids content, and even if it's not _aimed_ at kids, if the audience is primarily kids, they'll take the hit too. At least that's my understanding. And if they lie, which I can totally see the Greedners doing, they will get hit with a big fine. The involvement of the FTC means that they'll be watching. The last time it was just the advertisers who were "concerned about the children being exploited" and YouTube changed its rules saying that they couldn't show kids in vulnerable or embarrassing situations, or in distress. But they aren't enforcing those rules. Because the advertisers don't really care. But the FTC will make sure that they enforce these rules.
Sorry for the novella. This whole thing really chaps my hide.

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

[lmmomSD]

I've been lurking here for awhile and don't have anything to add, but I do have a question that has been bugging me for ages:

What does KAD stand for? I know it's a name for their rabid fans, but I can't figure out the acronym. THANKS!

KAD= Kool Aid Drinker: one who swallows any lie she's fed by the Greedners. Most are female and either a tween, or lacking in critical thinking skills.

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

[DollarsToDonuts_9]

I think the Gardner’s will be ok with the new you tube rules. Their content is not aimed at children, yes some children do watch. They may have to drop the challenges and maybe reviewing of toys but I think they can argue that their vlogs are for an adult audience.

Some people’s interpretation of the rules is a bit skewed. But then no one knows how you tube will apply the rules. It’s going to be interesting that’s for sure.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

They won’t be able to show endless minutes of their feral children acting like maniacs, climbing on counters, with dirty feet. And without their precious cash cows in the videos, they have no audience or followers. KAD’s don’t want to watch endless feeds of Cashley & Bison.

So why shouldn’t they be concerned?

Cashley, is that you?

[DollarsToDonuts_9]

I think the Gardner’s will be ok with the new you tube rules. Their content is not aimed at children, yes some children do watch. They may have to drop the challenges and maybe reviewing of toys but I think they can argue that their vlogs are for an adult audience.

Some people’s interpretation of the rules is a bit skewed. But then no one knows how you tube will apply the rules. It’s going to be interesting that’s for sure.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

If their vlogs are for adult audiences, then that is even worse. They can leave the ferals out of it and just film themselves. Stop pimping out their kids to Blubber Butts pervy fans. All of these families need to stop exploiting their kids. Not sure why Mormons seem to be so proficient at it


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Agree completely! But I don’t see a huge following for a sweaty middle aged man & his child bride. So it’s likely they will have to change a lot of content to stay relevant & continue to attract followers. WHICH THEY SHOULD HAVE TO DO. So I’m curious to see how much the exploiting will change, if at all.

[frenchiegirl]

Anyway, their money comes from elsewhere, lipshit mostly . Alas, they will continue to be these despicable trash human beings...

[Liz_444]

Anyway, their money comes from elsewhere, lipshit mostly . Alas, they will continue to be these despicable trash human beings...

Do you think they would be successful with Lipshit if their YT channel was shut down?? I doubt it, but what do I know. I think their "blanket business" and Lipshit will slowly fail when YT fails for them.

[JD386]

Anyway, their money comes from elsewhere, lipshit mostly . Alas, they will continue to be these despicable trash human beings...

Do you think they would be successful with Lipshit if their YT channel was shut down?? I doubt it, but what do I know. I think their "blanket business" and Lipshit will slowly fail when YT fails for them.

The thing though is people will still watch their shitty videos. That doesn’t stop the KADs from watching them. They just won’t get paid as much. Their YouTube won’t get shut down. They just likely won’t see incentive towards putting out videos.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk