kid on the way. Getting creative about job searching would be a lot more useful. And a lot more age appropriate for that bearded man face of yours. Haha his Crossfit Brag never ceases to make me laugh!jmoysa wrote: ↑Sat Oct 26, 2019 10:36 am Had to laugh how Corbin filmed the ultrasound from so far away...no one could see the date. He thinks he’s soooo clever!
The whole talk about CrossFit is just ridiculous! Too bad he doesn’t put as much effort into finding a job. He really doesn’t look like he’s in great shape.
They acted like the didn’t remember the whole 3D ultrasound because it was the whole thing that Missy paid for.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
He needs a refund. He’s built like a chicken.minniemouse99 wrote:Haha his Crossfit Brag never ceases to make me laugh!jmoysa wrote: ↑Sat Oct 26, 2019 10:36 am Had to laugh how Corbin filmed the ultrasound from so far away...no one could see the date. He thinks he’s soooo clever!
The whole talk about CrossFit is just ridiculous! Too bad he doesn’t put as much effort into finding a job. He really doesn’t look like he’s in great shape.
They acted like the didn’t remember the whole 3D ultrasound because it was the whole thing that Missy paid for.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Poor child. He’s so skinny! I personal don’t see the “9 months” and his “I workout 6 days a week” rant paying off whatsoever.
If only he bragged that much about looking for a decent paying job and getting his family out of the nasty home-now we would all be impressed!
Well that makes three of them, because lord knows that the Douche Canoe and his Ditzy Bride are weird as can be.
I have a teaching degree and I don’t Home School my kids. Though I was planning on home schooling my youngest two this year. Life in the form of my Dad having bypass surgery in August had other plans.Groovynik wrote:They really need to give that poor Baby another name, his future ass-kickings have already been scheduled and even if they homeschool their kids, which i hope to god they don't, it's a horrible name for a kid
Especially if he inherits his dad's douchey demeanor.Groovynik wrote:They really need to give that poor Baby another name, his future ass-kickings have already been scheduled and even if they homeschool their kids, which i hope to god they don't, it's a horrible name for a kid
HashtagBlessed wrote: ↑Sat Oct 26, 2019 3:47 pm Why are they convinced that June wasn't on the "correct" side of Kelsey and that's why she felt that she had a difficult labor? I'm not an expert, but I've read that as long as baby is in the occiput anterior position (head first, face down facing the mother's back, the most common birth position) then it doesn't really matter if baby is angling towards the mother's left or right side. This doesn't generally lead to problems or additional pain. It's when the baby is in a transverse or a posterior position (whether left or right) that labor may be more painful or slower to progress. The thought process behind the various positions and the progress of labor is that the baby's skull fits better through the pelvis when it's in the occiput anterior position. I don't understand why they think left or right matters. From the way they describe it and the way they act it out, it's like they think the baby travels from right to left and then descends? The uterus is only so big. That just doesn't sound anatomically correct and I'm trying to figure out where they got such an idea. And even if such a thing did exist, I doubt they knew what position June was in because they never mentioned it during the birth vlogs or in the birth story video.
And I wouldn't expect to see much at a 38 or 39 week ultrasound. It's far too crowded in there, and baby is likely facing the mother's back (anterior) if he's in the "ideal" birth position. Even if the machine had been available, they likely wouldn't have been able to see his face. You're supposed to come in around 28-32 weeks for an elective ultrasound to see the face in 3D. I don't know where Kelsey and Corbin got the idea that a 3D ultrasound would be performed, but if their midwife told them they could see the face at this point, that's super weird. I'm thinking it's just an idea they got to create a clickbait title.
“What?? Who told you that?” 
My aunt has a youtube channel and she said the same exact thing. She said when she’s lazy to reply, she shuts them offrosie_dalia wrote: ↑Sun Oct 27, 2019 6:05 am They are so full of Sh*T in regard to comments. I was just watching JHouse vlog and the dad said he was going to "turn on the comments today." These family YTers CAN turn their comments on, many are just choosing not to because it's more work now.
Yes, Corny, you CAN turn the comments on...you just don't want to. Lazy, SOB!
I was reading up on the YouTube changes last week. Apparently YouTube is only demonetizing videos that do not fit the “13 and older” guidelines. For instance, channels who play with toys or unbox toys will get demonetized. Or, family channels that are full of acting and skits. If a video is targeted to children 12 and under it will get demonetized and set over to YouTube kids. I was really hoping these family vloggers would get demonetized and be forced to keep their child’s private life private but it doesn’t look like that will happen.Parktown wrote:Came here to say the way they vlog June lately is so creepy like out of a thriller, the back of her head etc or her tummy while talking to her! And the hypocrisy is not lost on me on how he pastes her face all over insta stories!
So it is basically just the money all this rubbish about memories has blown its cover finally with all you-tubers! The cash cow will be milked till it drops!
Just wait till C&K found about this detail! You bet next vlog will be a thumbnail will be June’s face and whole entire vlog they will be shoving the camera in her poor innocent faceTellAll wrote: ↑Sun Oct 27, 2019 4:52 pmI was reading up on the YouTube changes last week. Apparently YouTube is only demonetizing videos that do not fit the “13 and older” guidelines. For instance, channels who play with toys or unbox toys will get demonetized. Or, family channels that are full of acting and skits. If a video is targeted to children 12 and under it will get demonetized and set over to YouTube kids. I was really hoping these family vloggers would get demonetized and be forced to keep their child’s private life private but it doesn’t look like that will happen.Parktown wrote:Came here to say the way they vlog June lately is so creepy like out of a thriller, the back of her head etc or her tummy while talking to her! And the hypocrisy is not lost on me on how he pastes her face all over insta stories!
So it is basically just the money all this rubbish about memories has blown its cover finally with all you-tubers! The cash cow will be milked till it drops!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yeah, unfortunately the new rules are aimed at "protecting" the kids watching, not the kids whose parents are making money off their first words, first zits, and other embarrassing moments. There are rules in place to protect the kids of family vloggers, but nobody enforces them.TellAll wrote:I was reading up on the YouTube changes last week. Apparently YouTube is only demonetizing videos that do not fit the “13 and older” guidelines. For instance, channels who play with toys or unbox toys will get demonetized. Or, family channels that are full of acting and skits. If a video is targeted to children 12 and under it will get demonetized and set over to YouTube kids. I was really hoping these family vloggers would get demonetized and be forced to keep their child’s private life private but it doesn’t look like that will happen.Parktown wrote:Came here to say the way they vlog June lately is so creepy like out of a thriller, the back of her head etc or her tummy while talking to her! And the hypocrisy is not lost on me on how he pastes her face all over insta stories!
So it is basically just the money all this rubbish about memories has blown its cover finally with all you-tubers! The cash cow will be milked till it drops!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Which, is really sad. Sucks that huge companies like YouTube care more about their wallets then the well being of their viewers or employeeslmmomSD wrote:Yeah, unfortunately the new rules are aimed at "protecting" the kids watching, not the kids whose parents are making money off their first words, first zits, and other embarrassing moments. There are rules in place to protect the kids of family vloggers, but nobody enforces them.TellAll wrote:I was reading up on the YouTube changes last week. Apparently YouTube is only demonetizing videos that do not fit the “13 and older” guidelines. For instance, channels who play with toys or unbox toys will get demonetized. Or, family channels that are full of acting and skits. If a video is targeted to children 12 and under it will get demonetized and set over to YouTube kids. I was really hoping these family vloggers would get demonetized and be forced to keep their child’s private life private but it doesn’t look like that will happen.Parktown wrote:Came here to say the way they vlog June lately is so creepy like out of a thriller, the back of her head etc or her tummy while talking to her! And the hypocrisy is not lost on me on how he pastes her face all over insta stories!
So it is basically just the money all this rubbish about memories has blown its cover finally with all you-tubers! The cash cow will be milked till it drops!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
And the ONLY reason the coming changes are happening is because YouTube got fined by the FTC. It's the only way anything will change- if people get hit in their wallets.
Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
