JesssFam: Breaking Rules and Twerking Fools (Part 134)

Locked
SillyElephants
Informer
Informer
Posts: 295
Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2017 6:16 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: JesssFam: Breaking Rules and Twerking Fools (Part 134)

Unread post by SillyElephants »

luci417 wrote:
CottonCandySky wrote: Tue Oct 29, 2019 11:43 am
cjl123 wrote:The school probably has a long drop off line in the front of the school and Jessica runs on Jess time (late) or she doesn’t want to wait in that line so she drops them off in the back of the school along the gate. The school doesn’t want that because of liability reasons so they probably asked the sheriffs office or whatever to send someone out to put an end to it. It’s really not that hard to understand. Drop your crotch goblins off at the designated drop spot. Simple.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The real question is why she drops them of by car since it’s a five minute walk.
It seems like way more of a chore to get 4 older kids dressed, ready, load the car up, get a cranky toddler into their car seat, then drive, wait in like, park, make sure theyre organized again etc. I'd just put addie in a stroller and walk them every morning, it probably takes half the time.
Right especially since the weather is AlWaYs LiTeRaLlY pErFeCt in cali

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

[halloweendarlin]
Talker
Talker
Posts: 116
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2018 6:15 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: JesssFam: Breaking Rules and Twerking Fools (Part 134)

Unread post by [halloweendarlin] »

“I just want to follow the rules” but she’s going to complain about it for 10 minutes. But she just wants to follow the rules, guys!
User avatar
NarcoelpsyMom
True Gossiper
True Gossiper
Posts: 1261
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2019 8:44 am
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 11 times

Re: JesssFam: Breaking Rules and Twerking Fools (Part 134)

Unread post by NarcoelpsyMom »

Nekonekonee wrote: Tue Oct 29, 2019 2:15 pm
SpippinThatTea wrote: Mon Oct 28, 2019 11:19 pm
angelfire89 wrote: Mon Oct 28, 2019 8:26 pm
Just looked on Zillow. There are currently 5 houses in my close vicinity fitting those parameters. Between 685-775k. *shakes fist at living in LA*

Yes I know it’s my choice but my family is all near by so Image
I hear you. Almost 700k for one bed and bath 700 square foot condo on the outskirts of Boston. New York City is bad too. I think real estate on either coast is crazy expensive.
So glad Michigan's cost of living is so low. 180k got 3br2ba 2000 square feet. Hell yea mitten life
Heck yeah! We got ours at the start of the Michigan recession in 2008 for $98k- the people who bought it before us spent $275k in 2000.
MiloandMax1
Super Moddie
Super Moddie
Posts: 8219
Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2019 12:47 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 14 times

Re: JesssFam: Breaking Rules and Twerking Fools (Part 134)

Unread post by MiloandMax1 »

If you look at videos of her dropping the kids off the trees are tall and not against the fence like the signs in her vlog. So did she just pull those off the internet to try and back her story that you couldn't see the signs?
User avatar
NarcoelpsyMom
True Gossiper
True Gossiper
Posts: 1261
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2019 8:44 am
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 11 times

Re: JesssFam: Breaking Rules and Twerking Fools (Part 134)

Unread post by NarcoelpsyMom »

How many days until we start seeing the stains all over that white bedding?
wendigo
Amateur
Amateur
Posts: 63
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2017 11:42 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: JesssFam: Breaking Rules and Twerking Fools (Part 134)

Unread post by wendigo »

Three things. 1. I know the drone has been discussed before re: the fact that you could figure out where they live via footage, but does anyone else think drones are super sketchy anyway? Every time she shows drone footage I think about how uncomfortable I would be if I were to be filmed just hanging out in my yard Like vlogging is creepy enough in public, but filming people’s houses like that? I legitimately don’t think it should be legal.

Also 2. those souvenirs?? They’re so impersonal and you could get them at any Walgreens (except maybe the keychain) what’s the point of even getting them?

And 3. The way Addie looked at the camera when she thanked Jess instead of at Jess? Yikes.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
CooperFairbanks
Amateur
Amateur
Posts: 84
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2017 7:08 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: JesssFam: Breaking Rules and Twerking Fools (Part 134)

Unread post by CooperFairbanks »

Lilia’s skin is terrible for a 10 year old. It’s flat and dry looking, sallow in tone and she has pimples and blackheads already. Their shitty diet and lack of hygiene is starting to show already.
chelsieross7
Guru Gossiper
Guru Gossiper
Posts: 2339
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 12:48 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: JesssFam: Breaking Rules and Twerking Fools (Part 134)

Unread post by chelsieross7 »

Jessica is so annoying. She literally cant function when shes told no, its pathetic to see her throwing all of these fits lately.
She loves to be ms. Positivity all of the time but shes been focusing on sooo many pretty, pointless negatives lately. The airport delay, the ticket man in disney, this cop, the random woman yelling at the airport. It's really annoying and boring.
sondraK
Guru Gossiper
Guru Gossiper
Posts: 2832
Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2018 10:07 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 9 times

Re: JesssFam: Breaking Rules and Twerking Fools (Part 134)

Unread post by sondraK »

cjl123 wrote: Tue Oct 29, 2019 11:14 am The school probably has a long drop off line in the front of the school and Jessica runs on Jess time (late) or she doesn’t want to wait in that line so she drops them off in the back of the school along the gate. The school doesn’t want that because of liability reasons so they probably asked the sheriffs office or whatever to send someone out to put an end to it. It’s really not that hard to understand. Drop your crotch goblins off at the designated drop spot. Simple.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That's what I think.They didn't just randomly decide to police that area all at once
SillyElephants
Informer
Informer
Posts: 295
Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2017 6:16 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: JesssFam: Breaking Rules and Twerking Fools (Part 134)

Unread post by SillyElephants »

Anyone else think about how awkard it is that she sets up getting her thumbnails. All her dramatic looks.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

melaniieee333
Talker
Talker
Posts: 180
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2018 12:38 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: JesssFam: Breaking Rules and Twerking Fools (Part 134)

Unread post by melaniieee333 »

SillyElephants wrote: Tue Oct 29, 2019 9:44 am
jellybean wrote:What I've heard is that the changes in January will not affect family vloggers. It's only for content made for children to watch, such as cartoons and things like that. It's just because there's tougher regulations about the ads you can show on content made for children, so youtube doesn't wanna deal with that. It's not about the kids who are being filmed, it's about the kids who are at home watching youtube and getting unfiltered ads on their cartoons.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yes that's the other thing going around that people are mixing up with family vloggers. The channels targeting kids with toys are going to be demonetized. But they're also cracking down on pedos and it might affect Jess' videos recommendations and engagement (comments for example)

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk
Some family vloggers make content for children though- for example the SacconeJoly's did a video where they turned their backyard into a 'waterpark' (filled it with all the kiddy pools they could find)- thats the kind of content kids watch. And things like disney vlogs which Jess has many of kids watch. If youtube thinks the content is aimed at children and will be watched by children then it risks being demonetised come january- so that includes things like toy opening channels and some family vlogging channels. This is why I believe Jess started her Just Jess channel so that if worst comes to worst she can make money that way. I don't think she's not worried about it- I'd say off camera she's thinking about it alot. Things like the JessKids channel as well has a video 'lilia gives a park tour' that kind of thing could be percieved as 'aimed at children'.
User avatar
sezzajaydee
Guru Gossiper
Guru Gossiper
Posts: 2184
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2015 5:51 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 1 time

JesssFam: Breaking Rules and Twerking Fools (Part 134)

Unread post by sezzajaydee »

melaniieee333 wrote:
SillyElephants wrote: Tue Oct 29, 2019 9:44 am
jellybean wrote:What I've heard is that the changes in January will not affect family vloggers. It's only for content made for children to watch, such as cartoons and things like that. It's just because there's tougher regulations about the ads you can show on content made for children, so youtube doesn't wanna deal with that. It's not about the kids who are being filmed, it's about the kids who are at home watching youtube and getting unfiltered ads on their cartoons.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yes that's the other thing going around that people are mixing up with family vloggers. The channels targeting kids with toys are going to be demonetized. But they're also cracking down on pedos and it might affect Jess' videos recommendations and engagement (comments for example)

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk
Some family vloggers make content for children though- for example the SacconeJoly's did a video where they turned their backyard into a 'waterpark' (filled it with all the kiddy pools they could find)- thats the kind of content kids watch. And things like disney vlogs which Jess has many of kids watch. If youtube thinks the content is aimed at children and will be watched by children then it risks being demonetised come january- so that includes things like toy opening channels and some family vlogging channels. This is why I believe Jess started her Just Jess channel so that if worst comes to worst she can make money that way. I don't think she's not worried about it- I'd say off camera she's thinking about it alot. Things like the JessKids channel as well has a video 'lilia gives a park tour' that kind of thing could be percieved as 'aimed at children'.

The LaBrant family is another. You can’t argue their “slime challenge” videos and all the other juvenile stuff they post is aimed at adults.

There’s a few that I think will definitely be on the chopping block that aren’t cartoons or toy reviews.

Edited to add - Messss even says she keeps stuff geared towards kids because knows a lot of her viewers are from the kids school.
Like when she shows Santa stuff, or doesn’t show moving the elf. Which I will give her points for. Not many actually think of who may see what.
User avatar
prettyll
True Gossiper
True Gossiper
Posts: 1235
Joined: Mon May 30, 2016 10:42 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: JesssFam: Breaking Rules and Twerking Fools (Part 134)

Unread post by prettyll »

SillyElephants wrote:
luci417 wrote:
CottonCandySky wrote: Tue Oct 29, 2019 11:43 am The real question is why she drops them of by car since it’s a five minute walk.
It seems like way more of a chore to get 4 older kids dressed, ready, load the car up, get a cranky toddler into their car seat, then drive, wait in like, park, make sure theyre organized again etc. I'd just put addie in a stroller and walk them every morning, it probably takes half the time.
Right especially since the weather is AlWaYs LiTeRaLlY pErFeCt in cali

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk
Because they’re probably always late.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
SillyElephants
Informer
Informer
Posts: 295
Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2017 6:16 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: JesssFam: Breaking Rules and Twerking Fools (Part 134)

Unread post by SillyElephants »

sezzajaydee wrote:
melaniieee333 wrote:
SillyElephants wrote: Tue Oct 29, 2019 9:44 am Yes that's the other thing going around that people are mixing up with family vloggers. The channels targeting kids with toys are going to be demonetized. But they're also cracking down on pedos and it might affect Jess' videos recommendations and engagement (comments for example)

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk
Some family vloggers make content for children though- for example the SacconeJoly's did a video where they turned their backyard into a 'waterpark' (filled it with all the kiddy pools they could find)- thats the kind of content kids watch. And things like disney vlogs which Jess has many of kids watch. If youtube thinks the content is aimed at children and will be watched by children then it risks being demonetised come january- so that includes things like toy opening channels and some family vlogging channels. This is why I believe Jess started her Just Jess channel so that if worst comes to worst she can make money that way. I don't think she's not worried about it- I'd say off camera she's thinking about it alot. Things like the JessKids channel as well has a video 'lilia gives a park tour' that kind of thing could be percieved as 'aimed at children'.

The LaBrant family is another. You can’t argue their “slime challenge” videos and all the other juvenile stuff they post is aimed at adults.

There’s a few that I think will definitely be on the chopping block that aren’t cartoons or toy reviews.

Edited to add - Messss even says she keeps stuff geared towards kids because knows a lot of her viewers are from the kids school.
Like when she shows Santa stuff, or doesn’t show moving the elf. Which I will give her points for. Not many actually think of who may see what.
Yeah I guess she considers her viewers then... but not when she's telling the camera that tommy and cadens mom cheated on his dad. Or telling everyone that she had sex while pregnant with the twins. Or putting them nearly naked online or everyone to see. At one point she posted a video when lilia was 7 and shirtless...

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

User avatar
Nekonekonee
Talker
Talker
Posts: 124
Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2019 1:58 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: JesssFam: Breaking Rules and Twerking Fools (Part 134)

Unread post by Nekonekonee »

Man I hate the intro music so much.
foreverbowie
Amateur
Amateur
Posts: 30
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2019 4:11 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: JesssFam: Breaking Rules and Twerking Fools (Part 134)

Unread post by foreverbowie »

Jess saying that she has been cuddling the kids individually each night, and then says the night before it was Kyson and Kaden’s turn. I guess twins don’t deserve to be counted as individuals.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
User avatar
jellybean
Informer
Informer
Posts: 461
Joined: Mon May 02, 2016 3:48 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

JesssFam: Breaking Rules and Twerking Fools (Part 134)

Unread post by jellybean »

melaniieee333 wrote:
SillyElephants wrote: Tue Oct 29, 2019 9:44 am
jellybean wrote:What I've heard is that the changes in January will not affect family vloggers. It's only for content made for children to watch, such as cartoons and things like that. It's just because there's tougher regulations about the ads you can show on content made for children, so youtube doesn't wanna deal with that. It's not about the kids who are being filmed, it's about the kids who are at home watching youtube and getting unfiltered ads on their cartoons.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yes that's the other thing going around that people are mixing up with family vloggers. The channels targeting kids with toys are going to be demonetized. But they're also cracking down on pedos and it might affect Jess' videos recommendations and engagement (comments for example)

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk
Some family vloggers make content for children though- for example the SacconeJoly's did a video where they turned their backyard into a 'waterpark' (filled it with all the kiddy pools they could find)- thats the kind of content kids watch. And things like disney vlogs which Jess has many of kids watch. If youtube thinks the content is aimed at children and will be watched by children then it risks being demonetised come january- so that includes things like toy opening channels and some family vlogging channels. This is why I believe Jess started her Just Jess channel so that if worst comes to worst she can make money that way. I don't think she's not worried about it- I'd say off camera she's thinking about it alot. Things like the JessKids channel as well has a video 'lilia gives a park tour' that kind of thing could be percieved as 'aimed at children'.
Yeah that's true that there's definitely some who make videos aimed towards kids or at least try to make them kid friendly. The JesssKids channel is for sure aimed at kids but I thought it was more a hobby for her kids than something Jess was banking on to make money. They don't use it often. She probably did make Just Jesss partly as a back up in case her main channel gets demonetized. Jessica Ballinger read up on it and said her (Ballinger Family) channel shouldn't be affected at this point but things could always turn.

Edit: I guess it's a question of whether family friendly = aimed towards kids and not ok to advertise on, or more just aimed towards moms being able to watch with their kids around.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
strikeaposie
True Gossiper
True Gossiper
Posts: 1457
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 7:12 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: JesssFam: Breaking Rules and Twerking Fools (Part 134)

Unread post by strikeaposie »

So, Jesss is "deathly allergic to horses" and Addy rode a horse, then later Jesss was holding her hands while doing the barrel roll thing, then suddenly her allergies are out of control. She then goes home and spends the rest of the night complaining about her allergies, snuggles the kids in her bed. But at no point did she think to shower or at the very least change her clothes?!?!
cjl123
True Gossiper
True Gossiper
Posts: 1013
Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2013 6:12 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: JesssFam: Breaking Rules and Twerking Fools (Part 134)

Unread post by cjl123 »

foreverbowie wrote:Jess saying that she has been cuddling the kids individually each night, and then says the night before it was Kyson and Kaden’s turn. I guess twins don’t deserve to be counted as individuals.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
And the thing is you know on Kyson and Kadens night she only cuddles the one who looks like her and her family. Not the one who looks like drake (Kyson?). Even though that poor boy is desperate for her attention and approval.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
CurlyQ121
Gossiper
Gossiper
Posts: 591
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2015 11:00 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: JesssFam: Breaking Rules and Twerking Fools (Part 134)

Unread post by CurlyQ121 »

jellybean wrote:
melaniieee333 wrote:
SillyElephants wrote: Tue Oct 29, 2019 9:44 am Yes that's the other thing going around that people are mixing up with family vloggers. The channels targeting kids with toys are going to be demonetized. But they're also cracking down on pedos and it might affect Jess' videos recommendations and engagement (comments for example)

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk
Some family vloggers make content for children though- for example the SacconeJoly's did a video where they turned their backyard into a 'waterpark' (filled it with all the kiddy pools they could find)- thats the kind of content kids watch. And things like disney vlogs which Jess has many of kids watch. If youtube thinks the content is aimed at children and will be watched by children then it risks being demonetised come january- so that includes things like toy opening channels and some family vlogging channels. This is why I believe Jess started her Just Jess channel so that if worst comes to worst she can make money that way. I don't think she's not worried about it- I'd say off camera she's thinking about it alot. Things like the JessKids channel as well has a video 'lilia gives a park tour' that kind of thing could be percieved as 'aimed at children'.
Yeah that's true that there's definitely some who make videos aimed towards kids or at least try to make them kid friendly. The JesssKids channel is for sure aimed at kids but I thought it was more a hobby for her kids than something Jess was banking on to make money. They don't use it often. She probably did make Just Jesss partly as a back up in case her main channel gets demonetized. Jessica Ballinger read up on it and said her (Ballinger Family) channel shouldn't be affected at this point but things could always turn.

Edit: I guess it's a question of whether family friendly = aimed towards kids and not ok to advertise on, or more just aimed towards moms being able to watch with their kids around.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I watch another family vlogger who vlogged the conversation with their manager regarding the upcoming changes. Their manager said the creators will have to go in themselves and designate whether each video is made for kids or not. They said it's a new regulation called COPPA that's going into effect. They made it sound like if its not specifically made for kids it's fine.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Locked

Return to “JesssFam”