Thank you for posting that. I had such problem doing that. Hope all can see! Thanks!
Oh shoot, couldn't repost the picture.
OldCountry wrote: ↑Sat Dec 07, 2019 4:05 pm
Thank you for posting that. I had such problem doing that. Hope all can see! Thanks!
Oh shoot, couldn't repost the picture.
I remember him sending peach and cherry emojis to them.Ham Fried Rice wrote: ↑Sat Dec 07, 2019 1:03 pm I really don’t know where this is going so bear with me. I remember when it came to light that he was having chats with young girls and he got called out. Didn’t the edit girls come to his defense and then suddenly they all went private in IG? Sounds like to me he probably suggested they go private so the haters couldn’t spy anymore. Chris Hansen needs to pose as an edit girl to catch him. I really hope for the quads sake that he is doing nothing wrong but jeez, what possible reason could a grown man ever have for a private conversation with a child that is not his? It just doesn’t smell right to me.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
MervelllaB wrote:I think you will find that most of us will agree that we don’t like to see children exploited. Did you see any of LGM’s videos? They really were quite fair - more fair than most would have been.2txsoccerkids wrote:Good to know about the guidelines- I’mMervelllaB wrote: ↑Tue Dec 03, 2019 8:26 am The new YouTube guidelines wouldn’t require LGM to change platforms. She doesn’t make content that is geared towards children. Her content is very much aimed at adult viewers.
She has made 2 videos about the Gardners, which were fair and completely within the guidelines. As far as I understand she looked at the Gardners because someone suggested it. She’s only a small YouTuber. She’s not a huge threat to them. Their actions are rather disproportionate, if you ask me.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Not completely familiar with all the changes. I was hoping that it was anything that involved children- maybe someday!
And I know we all have different levels of what we think is okay and what annoys us. People who make money off of kids on YouTube is one of my main issues- so I guess that’s why it bugs me. I just look at it as one more person sitting at home not working a real job and profiting off of these girls.
Maybe they won’t become her regulars- but I have an odd feeling that she just hit the YouTube jackpot and is seeing the dollar signs. Hopefully I am wrong- it does happen sometimes
She is not profiting from videos of the Gardner girls, although I can see why you might think they are. I think she was trying to give an honest opinion of whether Ashley and Tyson were profiting off their children. She really wasn’t as mean as she could have been.
She isn’t making money off the back of the Gardner girls. She is calling parents out for taking advantage if situations they shouldn’t take advantage of. I think that’s reasonable. She feels passionately enough to do so and that’s fine.
The problem is that the Gardners fail to acknowledge why they’re being called out - if they did they might get more support than they currently do.
I mean how refreshing would it be for a blog family to step forward and hold their hands up and say you know maybe we shouldn’t have filmed that whole mess about croup; we acknowledge some people may not respect some of the things we do and we’re going to
Listen? How much more would people like them for doing that?
Perhaps when the girls are older they will respect the fact that people like us or LGM were prepared to speak out for them. It’s mire than anyone else around is doing.
Perhaps it’s not about money, but conscience?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
And even though the whole family supposedly talked to the fan girls, they only ever thanked Tyson.Anne Jay wrote:I found it.
Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk
I also believe she’s competent in what she’s doingMervelllaB wrote:For anyone who was concerned about girls speaking to LGM on a live chat, she has posted in the comments below the last Gardner video, that identities will be concealed and parental consent to talk to anyone under 18 will have to be obtained.
I do think she knows what she needs to do, in order to do this properly.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
And correct me if I'm wrong, however, wasn't Bison always communicating from his personal account and not the GAS account?ears wrote:And even though the whole family supposedly talked to the fan girls, they only ever thanked Tyson.Anne Jay wrote:I found it.
Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-S907VL using Tapatalk
reefmango wrote:And correct me if I'm wrong, however, wasn't Bison always communicating from his personal account and not the GAS account?ears wrote:And even though the whole family supposedly talked to the fan girls, they only ever thanked Tyson.Anne Jay wrote:I found it.
Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-S907VL using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-T813 using Tapatalk
Yep. Sure was. I’m sure his heavenly Hod told him to though.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
reefmango wrote:And correct me if I'm wrong, however, wasn't Bison always communicating from his personal account and not the GAS account?ears wrote:And even though the whole family supposedly talked to the fan girls, they only ever thanked Tyson.Anne Jay wrote:I found it.
Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-S907VL using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-T813 using Tapatalk
Yep. Sure was. I’m sure his Heavenly Hod told him to though.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
If true, that is beyond disgusting that they are happy for their daughter to be married to him and for him to be around their grandchildren. By happy I mean not exhausting all possibilities to have the children removed from the house, which is exactly what I would be doing if I knew, hell even suspected my future grandchildren were living with a paedophile.