Rachelle and Justin: Poisoned pets, debt and child neglect | Part 24

Locked
Oookarrr
Talker
Talker
Posts: 188
Joined: Fri Sep 27, 2019 1:48 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle and Justin: Poisoned pets, debt and child neglect | Part 24

Unread post by Oookarrr »

Haulnarse wrote:
mikanai wrote:Lol another clickbait title: I didn't watch but it's 100% practice contractions.Image

Sent from my SM-G960W using Tapatalk
Save your ears. She shrieks and shrieks when they had a couple of friends over for a “party”. They did the glad wrap ball challenge and her laugh is like nails on a chalk board.

She has “contractions” after being on her feet for a long time that night. You’d think she’d take her health more seriously. She lost a baby at this point. Instead she was getting up to help justina clean up. Ffs, stay in bed you dumb bitch. Is she really wanting the clickbait of a twin pregnancy loss?? At this point I really wouldn’t put that past her.
Orrrrrrrr she’s getting contractions because she’s not drinking freaking water man. We all know how essential water is to a pregnant woman you can literally go into labor from dehydration damn.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
User avatar
LisaLulu22
Informer
Informer
Posts: 400
Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2019 2:51 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle and Justin: Poisoned pets, debt and child neglect | Part 24

Unread post by LisaLulu22 »

Dani_465 wrote: Mon Dec 16, 2019 3:45 pm
LisaLulu22 wrote: Mon Dec 16, 2019 1:17 pm Oh god we've gone from ugly gingerbread dress to ugly santa dress. I am so, so sorry Emma

LOL and two sizes too big lol. Trashy has the WORST taste in clothes. Fugggggggly!! I wonder if Emma would be actually cutr if Trashy dressed her in nice clothes??
My daughter looks similar to Emma. We dress her cute and she's absolutely adorable with her red hair. I am sure Emma would look similar if they put even half way decent clothes on her
NigheanDonn
Talker
Talker
Posts: 190
Joined: Sat Nov 02, 2019 5:18 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Rachelle and Justin: Poisoned pets, debt and child neglect | Part 24

Unread post by NigheanDonn »

Oookarrr wrote: Mon Dec 16, 2019 6:26 pm
Haulnarse wrote:
mikanai wrote:Lol another clickbait title: I didn't watch but it's 100% practice contractions.Image

Sent from my SM-G960W using Tapatalk
Save your ears. She shrieks and shrieks when they had a couple of friends over for a “party”. They did the glad wrap ball challenge and her laugh is like nails on a chalk board.

She has “contractions” after being on her feet for a long time that night. You’d think she’d take her health more seriously. She lost a baby at this point. Instead she was getting up to help justina clean up. Ffs, stay in bed you dumb bitch. Is she really wanting the clickbait of a twin pregnancy loss?? At this point I really wouldn’t put that past her.
Orrrrrrrr she’s getting contractions because she’s not drinking freaking water man. We all know how essential water is to a pregnant woman you can literally go into labor from dehydration damn.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Knowing her it's very likely that it could be dehydration. But even if she is just having normal Braxton Hicks contractions, she's acting like it's such an unusual thing. It's not. My doctor said they actually start at 6 weeks but you don't feel them then. And everyone's body and each pregnancy is different. It's not worth the clickbait title for something that's normal but making it seem abnormal. And maybe drink some water, Trashy, and while you're at it, give your kid some in a sippy cup.
User avatar
dessywessy
Talker
Talker
Posts: 182
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2019 8:06 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle and Justin: Poisoned pets, debt and child neglect | Part 24

Unread post by dessywessy »

Couldn’t she have at least tied her hair back while preparing the ham? Did she wash her hands? Why is she always slamming shit around and tossing shit around so frantically? Around the 7:20 mark in the new vlog, when they’re playing that saran wrap game, the guy in the red shirt (not sure who he is) damn near tosses that newborn baby. Calm the fuck down dude.

Trash, just trash.
don’t sweat the petty things, and don’t pet the sweaty things
User avatar
mikanai
Informer
Informer
Posts: 405
Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2019 7:12 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle and Justin: Poisoned pets, debt and child neglect | Part 24

Unread post by mikanai »

Just thinking about the fact that she had to lay down with that fake suffering look on her mug and open her fatty bump to lure the viewers in makes me
I watched the video and she didn't film contractions - just told about them the next morning - she is perfectly fine in that thumbnail.

Plus I find it odd that the adults were enjoying games while the kids were just watching them or the TV. They look like a bunch of teenagers who had kids too soon. Organize games for the kids, you idiot! And hire a sitter to watch over them and to encourage their play instead of just TV.

Sent from my SM-G960W using Tapatalk

User avatar
Haulnarse
Guru Gossiper
Guru Gossiper
Posts: 6127
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2018 2:05 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: Rachelle and Justin: Poisoned pets, debt and child neglect | Part 24

Unread post by Haulnarse »

mikanai wrote:Just thinking about the fact that she had to lay down with that fake suffering look on her mug and open her fatty bump to lure the viewers in makes me Image
I watched the video and she didn't film contractions - just told about them the next morning - she is perfectly fine in that thumbnail.

Plus I find it odd that the adults were enjoying games while the kids were just watching them or the TV. They look like a bunch of teenagers who had kids too soon. Organize games for the kids, you idiot! And hire a sitter to watch over them and to encourage their play instead of just TV.

Sent from my SM-G960W using Tapatalk
I found it hilarious that they purchased all this liquor for cocktails and yet they had all left at 9-930pm ImageImageImageImage yet she was soooo tired.

It was them, two couples (who appeared to have 1&2 kids) and some rando single lady.

So 7 adults and 4 kids Image P-A-R-T-Y!
HereForTheTeaaa
Informer
Informer
Posts: 325
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2018 4:19 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle and Justin: Poisoned pets, debt and child neglect | Part 24

Unread post by HereForTheTeaaa »

I know I called this from the start but if this is the beginning of her click baiting premature babies I’m DONE. My son was a micro-preemie and as much as I hate saying I’m triggered it’s so fucking traumatic and for her to make light of it all for clickbait disgusts me. You’d think someone who went through an incredibly traumatic experience would be a little more sensitive to things like this. She’s baiting the possibility of premature babies, miscarriage or even still born by saying she’s having “contractions”. She knows who her audience is and she’s despicable.
dani_banana
Talker
Talker
Posts: 213
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2019 8:50 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle and Justin: Poisoned pets, debt and child neglect | Part 24

Unread post by dani_banana »

Haulnarse wrote:
mikanai wrote:Just thinking about the fact that she had to lay down with that fake suffering look on her mug and open her fatty bump to lure the viewers in makes me Image
I watched the video and she didn't film contractions - just told about them the next morning - she is perfectly fine in that thumbnail.

Plus I find it odd that the adults were enjoying games while the kids were just watching them or the TV. They look like a bunch of teenagers who had kids too soon. Organize games for the kids, you idiot! And hire a sitter to watch over them and to encourage their play instead of just TV.

Sent from my SM-G960W using Tapatalk
I found it hilarious that they purchased all this liquor for cocktails and yet they had all left at 9-930pm ImageImageImageImage yet she was soooo tired.

It was them, two couples (who appeared to have 1&2 kids) and some rando single lady.

So 7 adults and 4 kids Image P-A-R-T-Y!
Lmao their lives are so sad. I’ve mentioned it before, but has Rash ever gone out? Girls night? Bar hopping? Dancing? Vegas? (most people around here can easily drive over for a weekend) You don’t need to go crazy, drink excessively, or be a fool to do those things (I feel like that’s what she thinks about those type of activities). She hasn’t experienced so many things and instead rushed into kids.

Her and Justin need to do something with their social lives and have some FUN. Wineries, breweries, Pechanga (local casino), concerts, visit downtown San Diego. And also fun things with Emma like park trips, beach days, the zoo or aquarium. No wonder they seem so miserable. They do NOTHING nor make time for themselves as a couple. Maybe doing things would help them get out of this weird unhappy funk they’re in? She was somewhat enjoyable 2-3 years ago. I feel like staying at home and doing YouTube was the worst thing for them.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
User avatar
Haulnarse
Guru Gossiper
Guru Gossiper
Posts: 6127
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2018 2:05 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: Rachelle and Justin: Poisoned pets, debt and child neglect | Part 24

Unread post by Haulnarse »

dani_banana wrote:
Haulnarse wrote:
mikanai wrote:Just thinking about the fact that she had to lay down with that fake suffering look on her mug and open her fatty bump to lure the viewers in makes me Image
I watched the video and she didn't film contractions - just told about them the next morning - she is perfectly fine in that thumbnail.

Plus I find it odd that the adults were enjoying games while the kids were just watching them or the TV. They look like a bunch of teenagers who had kids too soon. Organize games for the kids, you idiot! And hire a sitter to watch over them and to encourage their play instead of just TV.

Sent from my SM-G960W using Tapatalk
I found it hilarious that they purchased all this liquor for cocktails and yet they had all left at 9-930pm ImageImageImageImage yet she was soooo tired.

It was them, two couples (who appeared to have 1&2 kids) and some rando single lady.

So 7 adults and 4 kids Image P-A-R-T-Y!
Lmao their lives are so sad. I’ve mentioned it before, but has Rash ever gone out? Girls night? Bar hopping? Dancing? Vegas? (most people around here can easily drive over for a weekend) You don’t need to go crazy, drink excessively, or be a fool to do those things (I feel like that’s what she thinks about those type of activities). She hasn’t experienced so many things and instead rushed into kids.

Her and Justin need to do something with their social lives and have some FUN. Wineries, breweries, Pechanga (local casino), concerts, visit downtown San Diego. And also fun things with Emma like park trips, beach days, the zoo or aquarium. No wonder they seem so miserable. They do NOTHING nor make time for themselves as a couple. Maybe doing things would help them get out of this weird unhappy funk they’re in? She was somewhat enjoyable 2-3 years ago. I feel like staying at home and doing YouTube was the worst thing for them.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Easy money has enabled them to be lazy shits. Lazy in education, lazy in life, lazy in employment, lazy in their relationships, lazy in parenting, lazy in everything, lazy lazy lazy.
islasmumma
Informer
Informer
Posts: 381
Joined: Fri May 11, 2018 9:15 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle and Justin: Poisoned pets, debt and child neglect | Part 24

Unread post by islasmumma »

HereForTheTeaaa wrote:I know I called this from the start but if this is the beginning of her click baiting premature babies I’m DONE. My son was a micro-preemie and as much as I hate saying I’m triggered it’s so fucking traumatic and for her to make light of it all for clickbait disgusts me. You’d think someone who went through an incredibly traumatic experience would be a little more sensitive to things like this. She’s baiting the possibility of premature babies, miscarriage or even still born by saying she’s having “contractions”. She knows who her audience is and she’s despicable.
I cannot even begin to imagine how hard that would have been! And it infuriates me to my bones that she would even stoop so low especially considering she is coming up to the gestation when she lost Brynn. What an absolute piece of shit. She doesn’t deserve these babies.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
SJW-19
Amateur
Amateur
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2019 9:13 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle and Justin: Poisoned pets, debt and child neglect | Part 24

Unread post by SJW-19 »

She was sad to wash the makeup off that her friend put on her for the party, she said because she knows she’ll presumably be too busy to wear any for the next three years.. she says that, yet this is the game girl who one month ago was trying to get a conspiracy pallet? Any was upset when they sold out?? Just so entitled and just so inconsistent..
NigheanDonn
Talker
Talker
Posts: 190
Joined: Sat Nov 02, 2019 5:18 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Rachelle and Justin: Poisoned pets, debt and child neglect | Part 24

Unread post by NigheanDonn »

islasmumma wrote: Tue Dec 17, 2019 1:55 am
HereForTheTeaaa wrote:I know I called this from the start but if this is the beginning of her click baiting premature babies I’m DONE. My son was a micro-preemie and as much as I hate saying I’m triggered it’s so fucking traumatic and for her to make light of it all for clickbait disgusts me. You’d think someone who went through an incredibly traumatic experience would be a little more sensitive to things like this. She’s baiting the possibility of premature babies, miscarriage or even still born by saying she’s having “contractions”. She knows who her audience is and she’s despicable.
I cannot even begin to imagine how hard that would have been! And it infuriates me to my bones that she would even stoop so low especially considering she is coming up to the gestation when she lost Brynn. What an absolute piece of shit. She doesn’t deserve these babies.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I also had a micro-preemie and yes, the majority of her audience came to her channel because they were struggling with similar things. I'm still extremely careful what I say around other people who've been through this or just pregnant women in general. She doesn't care. If she hadn't been using dumb clickbait titles for a while now I would've immediately felt scared for her or concerned. But I wasn't fooled by this. Why can't she just put "Braxton Hicks/practice" before the word contractions in the damn title?! Also I feel like when someone mentioned Brynn in the Q&A she seemed more dismissive than anything else. Maybe now that she has her rainbow baby and two more on the way she doesn't care. Or maybe it's just her way of coping, who knows.
User avatar
mikanai
Informer
Informer
Posts: 405
Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2019 7:12 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle and Justin: Poisoned pets, debt and child neglect | Part 24

Unread post by mikanai »

NigheanDonn wrote:
islasmumma wrote: Tue Dec 17, 2019 1:55 am
HereForTheTeaaa wrote:I know I called this from the start but if this is the beginning of her click baiting premature babies I’m DONE. My son was a micro-preemie and as much as I hate saying I’m triggered it’s so fucking traumatic and for her to make light of it all for clickbait disgusts me. You’d think someone who went through an incredibly traumatic experience would be a little more sensitive to things like this. She’s baiting the possibility of premature babies, miscarriage or even still born by saying she’s having “contractions”. She knows who her audience is and she’s despicable.
I cannot even begin to imagine how hard that would have been! And it infuriates me to my bones that she would even stoop so low especially considering she is coming up to the gestation when she lost Brynn. What an absolute piece of shit. She doesn’t deserve these babies.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I also had a micro-preemie and yes, the majority of her audience came to her channel because they were struggling with similar things. I'm still extremely careful what I say around other people who've been through this or just pregnant women in general. She doesn't care. If she hadn't been using dumb clickbait titles for a while now I would've immediately felt scared for her or concerned. But I wasn't fooled by this. Why can't she just put "Braxton Hicks/practice" before the word contractions in the damn title?! Also I feel like when someone mentioned Brynn in the Q&A she seemed more dismissive than anything else. Maybe now that she has her rainbow baby and two more on the way she doesn't care. Or maybe it's just her way of coping, who knows.
I don't think she was dismissive. She said smth like "if you watch us, then you know" (why she isn't in the intro). Tbh I think the question was dumb: why does Brynn have to be in the intro? It has nothing to do with anything. I think Rash was annoyed and still emotional about Brynn - she really seems mentally unstable right now. It's been more than 2 years now and she still can't talk calmly about it? The social media scrutiny is killing Rash, she can't handle it.

Sent from my SM-G960W using Tapatalk

NigheanDonn
Talker
Talker
Posts: 190
Joined: Sat Nov 02, 2019 5:18 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Rachelle and Justin: Poisoned pets, debt and child neglect | Part 24

Unread post by NigheanDonn »

mikanai wrote: Tue Dec 17, 2019 9:17 am
NigheanDonn wrote:
islasmumma wrote: Tue Dec 17, 2019 1:55 am

I cannot even begin to imagine how hard that would have been! And it infuriates me to my bones that she would even stoop so low especially considering she is coming up to the gestation when she lost Brynn. What an absolute piece of shit. She doesn’t deserve these babies.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I also had a micro-preemie and yes, the majority of her audience came to her channel because they were struggling with similar things. I'm still extremely careful what I say around other people who've been through this or just pregnant women in general. She doesn't care. If she hadn't been using dumb clickbait titles for a while now I would've immediately felt scared for her or concerned. But I wasn't fooled by this. Why can't she just put "Braxton Hicks/practice" before the word contractions in the damn title?! Also I feel like when someone mentioned Brynn in the Q&A she seemed more dismissive than anything else. Maybe now that she has her rainbow baby and two more on the way she doesn't care. Or maybe it's just her way of coping, who knows.
I don't think she was dismissive. She said smth like "if you watch us, then you know" (why she isn't in the intro). Tbh I think the question was dumb: why does Brynn have to be in the intro? It has nothing to do with anything. I think Rash was annoyed and still emotional about Brynn - she really seems mentally unstable right now. It's been more than 2 years now and she still can't talk calmly about it? The social media scrutiny is killing Rash, she can't handle it.

Sent from my SM-G960W using Tapatalk
I just felt like she was trying to rush the answer and go on to the next question. I understand how hard it is to heal from something like that. But she could have just said yes, there is a clip in the intro that relates to Brynn because I can see how it would confuse new viewers. if anyone's wondering, it's the clip where she's throwing a bottle into the ocean. There's a video about it (I think it was for Brynn's due date). I guess she and I have handled our losses differently and I suppose that's normal. And I disagree; Brynn can be in the intro because it's part of their journey.
User avatar
mikanai
Informer
Informer
Posts: 405
Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2019 7:12 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle and Justin: Poisoned pets, debt and child neglect | Part 24

Unread post by mikanai »

NigheanDonn wrote:
mikanai wrote: Tue Dec 17, 2019 9:17 am
NigheanDonn wrote: I also had a micro-preemie and yes, the majority of her audience came to her channel because they were struggling with similar things. I'm still extremely careful what I say around other people who've been through this or just pregnant women in general. She doesn't care. If she hadn't been using dumb clickbait titles for a while now I would've immediately felt scared for her or concerned. But I wasn't fooled by this. Why can't she just put "Braxton Hicks/practice" before the word contractions in the damn title?! Also I feel like when someone mentioned Brynn in the Q&A she seemed more dismissive than anything else. Maybe now that she has her rainbow baby and two more on the way she doesn't care. Or maybe it's just her way of coping, who knows.
I don't think she was dismissive. She said smth like "if you watch us, then you know" (why she isn't in the intro). Tbh I think the question was dumb: why does Brynn have to be in the intro? It has nothing to do with anything. I think Rash was annoyed and still emotional about Brynn - she really seems mentally unstable right now. It's been more than 2 years now and she still can't talk calmly about it? The social media scrutiny is killing Rash, she can't handle it.

Sent from my SM-G960W using Tapatalk
I just felt like she was trying to rush the answer and go on to the next question. I understand how hard it is to heal from something like that. But she could have just said yes, there is a clip in the intro that relates to Brynn because I can see how it would confuse new viewers. if anyone's wondering, it's the clip where she's throwing a bottle into the ocean. There's a video about it (I think it was for Brynn's due date). I guess she and I have handled our losses differently and I suppose that's normal. And I disagree; Brynn can be in the intro because it's part of their journey.
Oh she definitely CAN be in the intro. But she doesn't HAVE to be, and the question kind of implied that. So maybe that's why Rash rushed through it. She could've explained that she is in the intro, like you did here Image
If she's going to be making another intro she needs to relax and be able to explain her choices - whether Brynn is or is not in the new video, just explain why and move on, no need to get all defensive/annoyed about it like she did.

Sent from my SM-G960W using Tapatalk


mac531
Talker
Talker
Posts: 199
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2019 7:35 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle and Justin: Poisoned pets, debt and child neglect | Part 24

Unread post by mac531 »

mikanai wrote:Lol another clickbait title: I didn't watch but it's 100% practice contractions.Image

Sent from my SM-G960W using Tapatalk
Her belly in the thumbnail vs in the video... she loves to push that thing out to make it look bigger when we all know it’s just fat right now. [IMG]//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201912 ... b4c4e3.png[/IMG]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
NigheanDonn
Talker
Talker
Posts: 190
Joined: Sat Nov 02, 2019 5:18 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Rachelle and Justin: Poisoned pets, debt and child neglect | Part 24

Unread post by NigheanDonn »

mikanai wrote: Tue Dec 17, 2019 10:03 am
NigheanDonn wrote:
mikanai wrote: Tue Dec 17, 2019 9:17 am I don't think she was dismissive. She said smth like "if you watch us, then you know" (why she isn't in the intro). Tbh I think the question was dumb: why does Brynn have to be in the intro? It has nothing to do with anything. I think Rash was annoyed and still emotional about Brynn - she really seems mentally unstable right now. It's been more than 2 years now and she still can't talk calmly about it? The social media scrutiny is killing Rash, she can't handle it.

Sent from my SM-G960W using Tapatalk
I just felt like she was trying to rush the answer and go on to the next question. I understand how hard it is to heal from something like that. But she could have just said yes, there is a clip in the intro that relates to Brynn because I can see how it would confuse new viewers. if anyone's wondering, it's the clip where she's throwing a bottle into the ocean. There's a video about it (I think it was for Brynn's due date). I guess she and I have handled our losses differently and I suppose that's normal. And I disagree; Brynn can be in the intro because it's part of their journey.
Oh she definitely CAN be in the intro. But she doesn't HAVE to be, and the question kind of implied that. So maybe that's why Rash rushed through it. She could've explained that she is in the intro, like you did here Image
If she's going to be making another intro she needs to relax and be able to explain her choices - whether Brynn is or is not in the new video, just explain why and move on, no need to get all defensive/annoyed about it like she did.

Sent from my SM-G960W using Tapatalk
I do wonder what her new intro will look like since she said she's not artistic like that and would have to get someone to make one. I'd make one for her but in between clips I'd put title slides like "clickbait titles, twins for views, and more!" 😂
Tweedles3
Gossiper
Gossiper
Posts: 544
Joined: Mon May 13, 2019 11:19 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Rachelle and Justin: Poisoned pets, debt and child neglect | Part 24

Unread post by Tweedles3 »

HereForTheTeaaa wrote:I know I called this from the start but if this is the beginning of her click baiting premature babies I’m DONE. My son was a micro-preemie and as much as I hate saying I’m triggered it’s so fucking traumatic and for her to make light of it all for clickbait disgusts me. You’d think someone who went through an incredibly traumatic experience would be a little more sensitive to things like this. She’s baiting the possibility of premature babies, miscarriage or even still born by saying she’s having “contractions”. She knows who her audience is and she’s despicable.
I would “Like” this x10, but the system won’t let me do it once. My twins were preemies at 34-5, which is lucky. Taking my daughter home after a week in the NICU and leaving my son behind was so hard, I hadn’t cried that much since I lost my first pregnancy. It’s not something to wish for, I would have dealt with the physical discomfort another couple weeks if I could have.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Tweedles3
Gossiper
Gossiper
Posts: 544
Joined: Mon May 13, 2019 11:19 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Rachelle and Justin: Poisoned pets, debt and child neglect | Part 24

Unread post by Tweedles3 »

mikanai wrote:
NigheanDonn wrote:
mikanai wrote: Tue Dec 17, 2019 9:17 am I don't think she was dismissive. She said smth like "if you watch us, then you know" (why she isn't in the intro). Tbh I think the question was dumb: why does Brynn have to be in the intro? It has nothing to do with anything. I think Rash was annoyed and still emotional about Brynn - she really seems mentally unstable right now. It's been more than 2 years now and she still can't talk calmly about it? The social media scrutiny is killing Rash, she can't handle it.

Sent from my SM-G960W using Tapatalk
I just felt like she was trying to rush the answer and go on to the next question. I understand how hard it is to heal from something like that. But she could have just said yes, there is a clip in the intro that relates to Brynn because I can see how it would confuse new viewers. if anyone's wondering, it's the clip where she's throwing a bottle into the ocean. There's a video about it (I think it was for Brynn's due date). I guess she and I have handled our losses differently and I suppose that's normal. And I disagree; Brynn can be in the intro because it's part of their journey.
Oh she definitely CAN be in the intro. But she doesn't HAVE to be, and the question kind of implied that. So maybe that's why Rash rushed through it. She could've explained that she is in the intro, like you did here Image
If she's going to be making another intro she needs to relax and be able to explain her choices - whether Brynn is or is not in the new video, just explain why and move on, no need to get all defensive/annoyed about it like she did.

Sent from my SM-G960W using Tapatalk
I think for someone sharing their life and their loss with social media, Rash needs to be prepared to answer questions about it. Or you just never mention Brynn again in any way, shape or form, if it’s that difficult. She’s always going to have new viewers that don’t know, that wasn’t a polite way to answer the question.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Chambermaid69
Gossiper
Gossiper
Posts: 731
Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2019 8:39 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle and Justin: Poisoned pets, debt and child neglect | Part 24

Unread post by Chambermaid69 »

If she’s still struggling this hard with her mental health she really should go to therapy or look into meds. There are some safe for pregnancy/breastfeeding. I know there’s a stigma but she doesn’t seem to be in her right mind a lot lately.
Locked

Return to “Rachelle and Justin”