GQS: Chronicles of Narn: The Bison, The Bitch and The Endless Chores| Part 69

[lmmomSD]

And that scarf and jacket can't hide chubster's flab.
But at least it looks like he's finally got a dress shirt that fits. He appears to have the top button buttoned for once.

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

[kopela]

What is that along her hairline? It looks like an old bruise. Like maybe she slept in a way too tight headband?

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

I think it’s baby hair across the top but there seems to be a lot of it, probably hair that has been snapped off due to those hair ties they always used.

[GA Peach70]

What is that along her hairline? It looks like an old bruise. Like maybe she slept in a way too tight headband?

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

If she was my child I’d be concerned about how pale she always looks and the dark circles that are always under eyes. Her and her carbon copy always look so sick and unhealthy. I’m already going to hell so I’ll also add that she, and the other three, are so unfortunately looking. Poor things don’t have a chance with their family genes.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[CherryBaby]

They really are homely kids. I don’t like to comment on kids’ looks either, but these girls are shoved in to people’s faces over and over again with expectations of constant praise. Aren’t they beautiful? Aren’t they cute? Aren’t they just the most special girls to have lived? Quite frankly, no they are not. They are definitely below average and actually bordering on looking special needs. I’m really sorry to be forced to say it, but these are not good looking children.

[lmmomSD]

They really are homely kids. I don’t like to comment on kids’ looks either, but these girls are shoved in to people’s faces over and over again with expectations of constant praise. Aren’t they beautiful? Aren’t they cute? Aren’t they just the most special girls to have lived? Quite frankly, no they are not. They are definitely below average and actually bordering on looking special needs. I’m really sorry to be forced to say it, but these are not good looking children.

I get what you're saying, but I have to object to the term looking "special needs".
You're definitely right about them being homely though.
And the way they sometimes stuff Evie and Scarlett into clothes like sausages (again with sausages!) while Indie and Esme are generally swimming in their clothes, doesn't help!
I don't know how the edit girls can repost pictures of them with captions about how adorable they are...
Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

[DownTheRabbitHole]

Well well well. Now we have an Insta story of “Scripture study”. Sorry that I can’t remember which of our SISsies it was but somebody recently commented along the lines that they never show themselves studying scripture or the like. They sure are grasping at straws to try and repair their image, make themselves appear relevant or relatable, attempt to put a halt to their falling followers and to try and paper over the cracks in their walls. Let me give you a word of advice big boy. You can read every single word of your scriptures but it’s actions that truly count. And boy do you fail big time in that respect. When it comes time for you to face the consequences of your actions, and that time is coming, knowing the scriptures isn’t going to be enough.

[DoodleBop2]

They really are homely kids. I don’t like to comment on kids’ looks either, but these girls are shoved in to people’s faces over and over again with expectations of constant praise. Aren’t they beautiful? Aren’t they cute? Aren’t they just the most special girls to have lived? Quite frankly, no they are not. They are definitely below average and actually bordering on looking special needs. I’m really sorry to be forced to say it, but these are not good looking children.

Excuse you. Looking special needs!

[hollydolly123]

They really are homely kids. I don’t like to comment on kids’ looks either, but these girls are shoved in to people’s faces over and over again with expectations of constant praise. Aren’t they beautiful? Aren’t they cute? Aren’t they just the most special girls to have lived? Quite frankly, no they are not. They are definitely below average and actually bordering on looking special needs. I’m really sorry to be forced to say it, but these are not good looking children.

You know I would usually say it’s Mean to say that about the special needs..but it’s true it’s the way they make those eyes that makes them look like that..and it doesn’t help that ass face calls Scarlett bar bar binks like what an idiot and yes I agree they are very homely..she doesn’t know how to dress them so that’s probably why

[lmmomSD]

They really are homely kids. I don’t like to comment on kids’ looks either, but these girls are shoved in to people’s faces over and over again with expectations of constant praise. Aren’t they beautiful? Aren’t they cute? Aren’t they just the most special girls to have lived? Quite frankly, no they are not. They are definitely below average and actually bordering on looking special needs. I’m really sorry to be forced to say it, but these are not good looking children.

You know I would usually say it’s Mean to say that about the special needs..but it’s true it’s the way they make those eyes that makes them look like that..and it doesn’t help that ass face calls Scarlett bar bar binks like what an idiot and yes I agree they are very homely..she doesn’t know how to dress them so that’s probably why

We're not objecting because it's mean to the girls. It's mean, ableist and ignorant to special needs kids, many of whom don't "look special needs". There are some syndromes that have physical characteristics. If the girls look like one of them, be specific. But don't say that all special needs kids are homely. Because that's untrue.

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

[Ham Fried Rice]

They really are homely kids. I don’t like to comment on kids’ looks either, but these girls are shoved in to people’s faces over and over again with expectations of constant praise. Aren’t they beautiful? Aren’t they cute? Aren’t they just the most special girls to have lived? Quite frankly, no they are not. They are definitely below average and actually bordering on looking special needs. I’m really sorry to be forced to say it, but these are not good looking children.

You know I would usually say it’s Mean to say that about the special needs..but it’s true it’s the way they make those eyes that makes them look like that..and it doesn’t help that ass face calls Scarlett bar bar binks like what an idiot and yes I agree they are very homely..she doesn’t know how to dress them so that’s probably why

I’ve always thought that the heavies appear to have Down syndrome, more so when they were younger but I still do see a resemblance. Just my humble opinion.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[hollydolly123]

They really are homely kids. I don’t like to comment on kids’ looks either, but these girls are shoved in to people’s faces over and over again with expectations of constant praise. Aren’t they beautiful? Aren’t they cute? Aren’t they just the most special girls to have lived? Quite frankly, no they are not. They are definitely below average and actually bordering on looking special needs. I’m really sorry to be forced to say it, but these are not good looking children.

Yes totally or something like that...they can barely carry on a sentence or talk..
You know I would usually say it’s Mean to say that about the special needs..but it’s true it’s the way they make those eyes that makes them look like that..and it doesn’t help that ass face calls Scarlett bar bar binks like what an idiot and yes I agree they are very homely..she doesn’t know how to dress them so that’s probably why

I’ve always thought that the heavies appear to have Down syndrome, more so when they were younger but I still do see a resemblance. Just my humble opinion.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[DoodleBop2]

Some of y'all time traveled from the 1960s comparing people you don't like negatively to a person with a disability is ableist. It says more about you than it ever does about the person you are trying to insult.

Saying the girls look anemic - yeah pale circles under their eyes. Fine. Saying they look special needs and thus mocking children\people with physical characteristics of their condition is just gross and disgusting. Y'all should know better you're damn old enough.

Saying just my opinion after something doesn't make it better or remove you from negative reactions to your opinion.

[Tigress95]

Schools encourage students to go after what they want as long as it's good for them. For example let's say Scarlett finds she loves to play soccer and Esme loves art and drawing. The school would encourage the girls to go after these things. If the parents tried to fight this they would sit down and explain how this is in the best interest of the girls to go after different things. Now, the parents have the final say but the school will be behind the girls (that is if they have a good teacher). There is scientific evidence that twins that grow up doing everything together have a difficult time learning to do things separate. Now there are different scenarios much like you mentioned they are encouraged to pursue their own dreams so it's easier for them. But see Ashley and Tyson have babied these girls to where they cant do anything on their own so yea it will be difficult for them and I hope the school encourages them to grow in their own ways.

Some people are just annoying. For example, you. Now, I know you have been told this. For example, your 1st post on this thread. Now, the mods here have the final say. For example, when you continually break the TOS. Now, most of us have been posting here together for quite a while. And, most have followed the Greeds from the beginning. For example, even before their brief time on Rattled. Now, there have been members joining here after the original group. For example, there was another site before this one. Some were together on that site. For example, I joined here after the “original” sissies. Now, most of the time, we are delighted for new members to join.....sisters in snark. For example, ones who have “seen the light” and seek out like minded snarkers. Now, what we really don’t like is someone like you who comes here to lecture and demand to be included. For example, praising the fat pervert and his psycho sidekick. Now, in your most recent insulting reply, you stupidly instruct me about how Perv & Screech have raised their feral four. For example, treating them as babies. WTF?? You think?? Now, that’s just pathetic that you feel the need to explain to me....us.....that tidbit. Are you a teacher? For example, declaring what the duties of a teacher require? Now, there are teachers on this thread. For example, the one who handed you your ignorant ass on a platter. Now, you came busting in here demanding to be accepted by instructing us what we could & couldn’t say. For example, declaring that Perv is a good father & Seneshit Whore is a fine mother. Now, in your world, maybe stalker dad giving daughters an occasional bath is delightful. Or, Munchausen mom is lovely for pretending to like her spawn by randomly making banana bread. If so, you are in the wrong place. Now, it seems that you may be declaring yourself a victim of misunderstanding and not being able to articulate well enough for us meanies to understand. My prediction....you will end up laughing your ass off with the KADS about how clever you were. Now, that’s just fine. I think that behavior fits just perfectly. But, now, I must say it’s getting tiresome dealing with you. For example, I feel VERY passionate about the fine ladies, here. I truly care deeply for them. Their humor, their wisdom, their compassion, their humanity. Now, when someone comes here & is disruptive, I get stabby. For example, you ignoring TOS is a threat to getting this place shut down. A common KAD tactic. Now, that causes me to throw caution to the wind and tell you to fuck off. Go kiss the ample asses of the child abusers. I considered making you a foe....but, instead, I plan to confront you every time you attempt disrupting this thread or disrespecting the very, very special sissies on here. Take your “for example” and “now” & shove it!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I don't even know what a KAD is.

That, in and of itself,proves the point!
Nothing further needs to be said, don’t let the door hit ya’ where the good Lord split ya’!
Bye Felicia


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[2txsoccerkids]

Wow just wow!
I don’t care if I get blasted or hated on for this.
But coming from a parent of a kid with a disability and special needs I am seriously blown away from some of these comments.
It’s not OKAY to say someone looks like the have special needs
It’s rude, condescending, and totally inappropriate.
And so freaking what if someone looks like they have Down syndrome??? Are people with DS second class citizens- I think not!

[MervelllaB]

Good grief! They look like they have special needs? They look like they have Down Syndrome? Some people on this board seem to have lost all sense of reason?
Don’t you understand that you just cannot go around saying things like that? Do you look at a child with special needs and think they all look the same? Do you look at individuals with Down Syndrome and think they all look the same? Yes, some conditions - including Down Syndrome - have associated facial characteristics which may be present to one degree or another. However, if you take the time to look at every individual child, you will notice that as well as the characteristics of the medical condition they have, they will also have their own individual facial features, just like the rest of us! Some may resemble their mother or some may resemble their father. They are not and should never be defined by the characteristics of the condition they have.
Now let me point out one other thing, for those who appear to be poorly educated about “special needs”. There is no general condition called “special needs”. Special needs, for want of a better term, is a symptom of other medical conditions and it does not always include learning difficulties. Children, for example, with Down’s Syndrome may have as part of their condition associated learning difficulties giving rise to special needs. Some may have severe learning difficulties with a very low IQ; others may have a near average IQ and their special needs may be due to speech difficulties or low muscle tone or social difficulties.
My eldest daughter had a statement of special educational needs due to Asperger’s Syndrome. She had special needs but no associated learning difficulty. Her IQ was on the 91st percentile - so she had an IQ that was in the top 9% of her peer group. However she had special needs because her Asperger Syndrome impacted severely on her ability to access the curriculum without support. This was due to difficulties with social interaction, organisation, concentration etc, etc, etc.
Did she look like a child who had special needs? I’m guessing not...but then I’m not really sure what in heaven’s name you mean when you’re thinking about how a child with special needs looks! She goes to university with a young man with cerebral palsy - quite marked cerebral palsy. He has an assistant because he is a wheelchair user. Perhaps he looks like he has special needs? Well, maybe he does because he’s in a wheelchair and he has contractures of his upper limbs. However, he too is of above average intelligence.
So no, you can’t tell to look at a child whether they have special needs or not. To say otherwise is grossly unfair. Not because it’s unfair to say a child looks like they have special needs. There is nothing wrong with having special needs. No, it’s unfair to let a child’s special needs define who or what they are and not see the individual beyond that.
Would you use terms using race, culture or sexuality to describe how a child looks? If the answer to that is no, as it should be, then you shouldn’t use terms relations to disabilities either.
Oh and just to inform you a little more about Downs Syndrome. You do know you can’t be a little bit Down’s Syndrome. You either have the extra chromosome or you don’t! In rare cases, you may not have it on every chromosome leading to mosaic Down Syndrome. The girls show no features of this. Children with Down Syndrome are beautiful. Every child is beautiful.
The Gardner girls may not always look the best but that is down to the idiotic way their parents dress them and their ridiculous hairstyles. We are here to snark on their parents and not run kids down on their looks. It feels a little at the moment as if people are deliberately trying to say provocative things.
...oh and Hollydolly. Didn’t you say somewhere before that you grew up having special needs? Maybe I’m just mixing you up with someone else.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[2txsoccerkids]

MervellaB- thank you for writing that.
I wanted to say so much more- but I needed to just put the phone down and walk away for a bit

[lmmomSD]

MervellaB- thank you for writing that.
I wanted to say so much more- but I needed to just put the phone down and walk away for a bit

Yes. Often others express what I am thinking more eloquently, and you just did. Thank you.

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

[SassySassenach]

***MOD POST***

Seriously.... I try to be gentle in my responses, but sit down and listen up. Saying someone “looks special needs” is disgusting, and I will not tolerate it. Period.

Not that I should even need a rule to back this up, but since I keep my word...
Reference Rule Q: Please refrain from mocking or diagnosing mental and physical illnesses. You are not the personal doctor to anyone here, and thus should not suggest what anyone has, be it a member, YouTuber or a YouTuber's child.

This topic stops here. Point blank. If it continues, you will find me in your inbox and a formal warning pinging your account. Not sure what a warning does? Well, multiple warnings (or serious offenses) result in temporary and sometimes permanent bans. Let’s not reach that point.

I’ve noticed some new names on the board. Great! welcome! We’re glad you’ve found us. However, if you have come here to just stir up drama and be contrary, stop. This is a snark board. We are not here to blow rainbows & sunshine up anyone’s butts. You may think that you’re getting away with drama, but take note that i am watching the board and will step in when necessary. Like now.

With that being said, polite discussion is absolutely a part of this forum. You can say why you don’t agree with someone else. What you can NOT do is come in & try to tell everyone what they are not allowed to say. It doesn’t work like that.

EVERYONE needs to go read the rules and make yourselves very familiar with them. No more of this “I didn’t realize” or “I’m new here, sorry”. Just no. I’m holding you all accountable and holding you to the standard of being a responsible adult whom I don’t have to babysit to ensure you behave.

-Sassy

[ears]

NARN made the girls "mountins", kiwi, bananas for breakfast "straight off the vine". She seems to have blown her own mind with this combination. She's asking people to share their kiwi and banana recipes and maybe she'll make a kiwi banana smoothie today.

The longer she's their nanny the stranger she seems to become.[IMG]//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202003 ... c76fd3.jpg[/IMG]

Sent from my SM-S907VL using Tapatalk

[ClairBear]

Was watching the Bigs IG and it's snowing. Brought a smile to my face knowing Assface is going to be upset about this. Probably will see a bunch if complaining on IG from her today. Such a bitch she is.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

If it’s snowing Assley will not only be upset she may take to her bed and fake an illness or something because she hates snow, winter and everything else she complains about. For the amount of privilege this woman has she sure complains a lot.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

If she’s lucky one of the ferals will develop a wheeze, cough, ‘strider’ sic, or croup...yay.
Hopefully it’s Favie, she thinks the ER is fun, & she can ride in the wagon!