Rash&Justin: Paychecks A & B are here at last, maybe now we can afford some grass | Part 28
-
- Informer
- Posts: 498
- Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2019 12:29 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Rash&Justin: Paychecks A & B are here at last, maybe now we can afford some grass | Part 28
Yeah that pencil drawing isn't good. I am an illustrator as part of my job and I get paid to do realistic portraits so this is right up my alley.. I do feel like a bit of a dick insulting another person's artwork BUT they need more practice before doing work like this. Drawing IRL people is risky business but especially without permission/commission and ESPECIALLY someone's kids. A deceased child too. This artist definitely has some talent but they do need to practice getting likeness right when making portraits for others. And if you can't tell if you've got the likeliness right, just don't go there till you have practiced more.
Drawing people's kids is so personal, and one of these babies is literally dead, respect should be #1 priority. It's a nice thought, but it is kinda disrespectful to draw them with messed up faces, despite the good intention. Sorry. I know I'm being super critical and maybe this is just pretentious but there are just things that are frowned upon in the art world and this is one of them. They obviously put in lots of effort and they show promise as an artist, this is just kinda.. misguided.
Also.. anybody else find it kinda weird they drew Brynn like that? I know that's *basically* how she looked but she was an undeveloped, deceased fetus who looked like she'd been severely deformed, from the birthing process perhaps? I don't know but she did look deformed and was probably quite alarming to look at, at least at first. I'm not to say how Rachelle should grieve (nobody is) but if I was her, I think I'd prefer to think of her in a better state? More developed/not deformed? You can't change reality of course but I think a lot of people prefer to think of dead loved ones in a healthy/happy/peaceful/idyllic sense. Maybe that's just me? If I'm going to immortalize them like that I wouldn't want to focus too much on how they looked precisely at after death, especially if their appearance is altered by the death.
That's the one scenario where you might want to steer away from realism.
Actually that's a question I had for you guys. Can anyone explain why Brynn looked like that? Her head shape looked very deformed and I was wondering if that was a result of her being born long before she was properly formed?
Drawing people's kids is so personal, and one of these babies is literally dead, respect should be #1 priority. It's a nice thought, but it is kinda disrespectful to draw them with messed up faces, despite the good intention. Sorry. I know I'm being super critical and maybe this is just pretentious but there are just things that are frowned upon in the art world and this is one of them. They obviously put in lots of effort and they show promise as an artist, this is just kinda.. misguided.
Also.. anybody else find it kinda weird they drew Brynn like that? I know that's *basically* how she looked but she was an undeveloped, deceased fetus who looked like she'd been severely deformed, from the birthing process perhaps? I don't know but she did look deformed and was probably quite alarming to look at, at least at first. I'm not to say how Rachelle should grieve (nobody is) but if I was her, I think I'd prefer to think of her in a better state? More developed/not deformed? You can't change reality of course but I think a lot of people prefer to think of dead loved ones in a healthy/happy/peaceful/idyllic sense. Maybe that's just me? If I'm going to immortalize them like that I wouldn't want to focus too much on how they looked precisely at after death, especially if their appearance is altered by the death.
That's the one scenario where you might want to steer away from realism.
Actually that's a question I had for you guys. Can anyone explain why Brynn looked like that? Her head shape looked very deformed and I was wondering if that was a result of her being born long before she was properly formed?
Re: Rash&Justin: Paychecks A & B are here at last, maybe now we can afford some grass | Part 28
My son was 5 weeks early and was poorly, so spent a few weeks in the NICU. At his gestation, he was just small and skinny, but otherwise normal to look at. However, there were some other babies on the unit who were extremely premature and they had very different appearances. As they got older, they changed and most looked pretty normal by the time they went home, but the mega premature ones (22 and 23 weekers) looked very strange.spicy_dreams wrote:Yeah that pencil drawing isn't good. I am an illustrator as part of my job and I get paid to do realistic portraits so this is right up my alley.. I do feel like a bit of a dick insulting another person's artwork BUT they need more practice before doing work like this. Drawing IRL people is risky business but especially without permission/commission and ESPECIALLY someone's kids. A deceased child too. This artist definitely has some talent but they do need to practice getting likeness right when making portraits for others. And if you can't tell if you've got the likeliness right, just don't go there till you have practiced more.
Drawing people's kids is so personal, and one of these babies is literally dead, respect should be #1 priority. It's a nice thought, but it is kinda disrespectful to draw them with messed up faces, despite the good intention. Sorry. I know I'm being super critical and maybe this is just pretentious but there are just things that are frowned upon in the art world and this is one of them. They obviously put in lots of effort and they show promise as an artist, this is just kinda.. misguided.
Also.. anybody else find it kinda weird they drew Brynn like that? I know that's *basically* how she looked but she was an undeveloped, deceased fetus who looked like she'd been severely deformed, from the birthing process perhaps? I don't know but she did look deformed and was probably quite alarming to look at, at least at first. I'm not to say how Rachelle should grieve (nobody is) but if I was her, I think I'd prefer to think of her in a better state? More developed/not deformed? You can't change reality of course but I think a lot of people prefer to think of dead loved ones in a healthy/happy/peaceful/idyllic sense. Maybe that's just me? If I'm going to immortalize them like that I wouldn't want to focus too much on how they looked precisely at after death, especially if their appearance is altered by the death.
That's the one scenario where you might want to steer away from realism.
Actually that's a question I had for you guys. Can anyone explain why Brynn looked like that? Her head shape looked very deformed and I was wondering if that was a result of her being born long before she was properly formed?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- Haulnarse
- Guru Gossiper
- Posts: 6127
- Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2018 2:05 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 4 times
Re: Rash&Justin: Paychecks A & B are here at last, maybe now we can afford some grass | Part 28
I question if she had died far earlier than realised, her weight and size was far smaller than a 19/20 week baby. A baby her gestation should have weighed about 11.7 oz to 1lb (she was 8.5oz). She shouldn’t have deteriorated that much in a couple of days until delivery.spicy_dreams wrote:Yeah that pencil drawing isn't good. I am an illustrator as part of my job and I get paid to do realistic portraits so this is right up my alley.. I do feel like a bit of a dick insulting another person's artwork BUT they need more practice before doing work like this. Drawing IRL people is risky business but especially without permission/commission and ESPECIALLY someone's kids. A deceased child too. This artist definitely has some talent but they do need to practice getting likeness right when making portraits for others. And if you can't tell if you've got the likeliness right, just don't go there till you have practiced more.
Drawing people's kids is so personal, and one of these babies is literally dead, respect should be #1 priority. It's a nice thought, but it is kinda disrespectful to draw them with messed up faces, despite the good intention. Sorry. I know I'm being super critical and maybe this is just pretentious but there are just things that are frowned upon in the art world and this is one of them. They obviously put in lots of effort and they show promise as an artist, this is just kinda.. misguided.
Also.. anybody else find it kinda weird they drew Brynn like that? I know that's *basically* how she looked but she was an undeveloped, deceased fetus who looked like she'd been severely deformed, from the birthing process perhaps? I don't know but she did look deformed and was probably quite alarming to look at, at least at first. I'm not to say how Rachelle should grieve (nobody is) but if I was her, I think I'd prefer to think of her in a better state? More developed/not deformed? You can't change reality of course but I think a lot of people prefer to think of dead loved ones in a healthy/happy/peaceful/idyllic sense. Maybe that's just me? If I'm going to immortalize them like that I wouldn't want to focus too much on how they looked precisely at after death, especially if their appearance is altered by the death.
That's the one scenario where you might want to steer away from realism.
Actually that's a question I had for you guys. Can anyone explain why Brynn looked like that? Her head shape looked very deformed and I was wondering if that was a result of her being born long before she was properly formed?
And yes there was most probably genetic abnormalities as well which wouldnt have helped.
- LisaLulu22
- Informer
- Posts: 400
- Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2019 2:51 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Rash&Justin: Paychecks A & B are here at last, maybe now we can afford some grass | Part 28
He said the video he watched before bed was 80 coins. My guess is he's buying personal videos on chaturbate for his own enjoyment.
-
- Informer
- Posts: 294
- Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2020 2:02 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 11 times
Re: Rash&Justin: Paychecks A & B are here at last, maybe now we can afford some grass | Part 28
I thought the same thing!!!LisaLulu22 wrote: ↑Mon May 04, 2020 5:04 amHe said the video he watched before bed was 80 coins. My guess is he's buying personal videos on chaturbate for his own enjoyment.
-
- Amateur
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2020 7:09 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Rash&Justin: Paychecks A & B are here at last, maybe now we can afford some grass | Part 28
I remember when she was either pregnant with Emma or just had her that they got SO MUCH stuff from subscribers and we didn’t see Emma use even half of the stuff! Where did it all go?! She also stated she closed their p.o. box cuz they didn’t want us to send them stuff but now they have this new house and i’m 48 and still renting and she’s pretty much begging for subscribers to send them crap by posting it all over social media. So frustrating! They have changed a lot imo (I also wish they would dress those kids in some color)! Geezmahamilton wrote: ↑Thu Apr 30, 2020 2:25 pmBack when I liked them more and couldn't see any of their bs yet, I was going to send this cute gender neutral onesie set I found at target....then I realized it's suckers like me that SEE she barely has anything for the boys, feels bad, then sends stuff. It's all intentional. She wants her P.O. box to fill up with stuff from brands and loyal subscribers. I'm so glad I got annoyed with them as quickly as I did and ended up not sending anything.MamaTweet wrote: ↑Thu Apr 30, 2020 1:35 pm Do the Boys never wear clothes? They are always just in a blanket...did she seriously not buy even 1 set of preemie or even nb outfits? I was told my son was gonna be huge and to skip right to 3months clothes i still bought plenty of newborn and even a preemie outfit or 2 just in case and i was glad because he fit perfect in nb
I guess rash is just gonna wait until they grow into the 3 huge outfits she has for them.
With the covid stuff going on i understand not wanting to go out to a store but stores do have pick up...get those boys some clothes (preferably something blue or green or heck anything besides white brown or that ugly burnt orange or whatever its called). I was surprised one of their blankets actually had color it
Sent from my LM-V350 using Tapatalk
Plus, she swore the boys wouldn't need newborn/preemie which is why they barely have outfits.
- Andielina0984
- Gossiper
- Posts: 615
- Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2018 12:59 pm
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Rash&Justin: Paychecks A & B are here at last, maybe now we can afford some grass | Part 28
Veggie straws for breakfast. What a nutritious breakfast for Emma
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: Rash&Justin: Paychecks A & B are here at last, maybe now we can afford some grass | Part 28
You put this so well, I agree 100%. I’m not an artist, but like photographing a stranger, I would ask first before doing a realistic portrait like this. Definitely when it involves someone’s kids. Drawing Brynn was crossing the line, unless the parents had requested it.spicy_dreams wrote:Yeah that pencil drawing isn't good. I am an illustrator as part of my job and I get paid to do realistic portraits so this is right up my alley.. I do feel like a bit of a dick insulting another person's artwork BUT they need more practice before doing work like this. Drawing IRL people is risky business but especially without permission/commission and ESPECIALLY someone's kids. A deceased child too. This artist definitely has some talent but they do need to practice getting likeness right when making portraits for others. And if you can't tell if you've got the likeliness right, just don't go there till you have practiced more.
Drawing people's kids is so personal, and one of these babies is literally dead, respect should be #1 priority. It's a nice thought, but it is kinda disrespectful to draw them with messed up faces, despite the good intention. Sorry. I know I'm being super critical and maybe this is just pretentious but there are just things that are frowned upon in the art world and this is one of them. They obviously put in lots of effort and they show promise as an artist, this is just kinda.. misguided.
Also.. anybody else find it kinda weird they drew Brynn like that? I know that's *basically* how she looked but she was an undeveloped, deceased fetus who looked like she'd been severely deformed, from the birthing process perhaps? I don't know but she did look deformed and was probably quite alarming to look at, at least at first. I'm not to say how Rachelle should grieve (nobody is) but if I was her, I think I'd prefer to think of her in a better state? More developed/not deformed? You can't change reality of course but I think a lot of people prefer to think of dead loved ones in a healthy/happy/peaceful/idyllic sense. Maybe that's just me? If I'm going to immortalize them like that I wouldn't want to focus too much on how they looked precisely at after death, especially if their appearance is altered by the death.
That's the one scenario where you might want to steer away from realism.
Actually that's a question I had for you guys. Can anyone explain why Brynn looked like that? Her head shape looked very deformed and I was wondering if that was a result of her being born long before she was properly formed?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
- Talker
- Posts: 184
- Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2019 9:51 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 7 times
Re: Rash&Justin: Paychecks A & B are here at last, maybe now we can afford some grass | Part 28
Hard agree. I'm a hobby artist, but I've spent enough time doing realism to be able to see all the flaws in that piece of art. Drawing Brynn from her stillbirth photos is crossing one hell of a line regardless of skill level due to the sensitive nature of the subject, and this person clearly doesn't have the technical skill to be doing realistic portraits of children. Children are squishy and weirdly shaped and very hard to get accurate without making them look terrible. Emma's mouth is the stuff of nightmares and the boys look strangely bony.Tweedles3 wrote: ↑Mon May 04, 2020 9:57 amYou put this so well, I agree 100%. I’m not an artist, but like photographing a stranger, I would ask first before doing a realistic portrait like this. Definitely when it involves someone’s kids. Drawing Brynn was crossing the line, unless the parents had requested it.spicy_dreams wrote:Yeah that pencil drawing isn't good. I am an illustrator as part of my job and I get paid to do realistic portraits so this is right up my alley.. I do feel like a bit of a dick insulting another person's artwork BUT they need more practice before doing work like this. Drawing IRL people is risky business but especially without permission/commission and ESPECIALLY someone's kids. A deceased child too. This artist definitely has some talent but they do need to practice getting likeness right when making portraits for others. And if you can't tell if you've got the likeliness right, just don't go there till you have practiced more.
Drawing people's kids is so personal, and one of these babies is literally dead, respect should be #1 priority. It's a nice thought, but it is kinda disrespectful to draw them with messed up faces, despite the good intention. Sorry. I know I'm being super critical and maybe this is just pretentious but there are just things that are frowned upon in the art world and this is one of them. They obviously put in lots of effort and they show promise as an artist, this is just kinda.. misguided.
Also.. anybody else find it kinda weird they drew Brynn like that? I know that's *basically* how she looked but she was an undeveloped, deceased fetus who looked like she'd been severely deformed, from the birthing process perhaps? I don't know but she did look deformed and was probably quite alarming to look at, at least at first. I'm not to say how Rachelle should grieve (nobody is) but if I was her, I think I'd prefer to think of her in a better state? More developed/not deformed? You can't change reality of course but I think a lot of people prefer to think of dead loved ones in a healthy/happy/peaceful/idyllic sense. Maybe that's just me? If I'm going to immortalize them like that I wouldn't want to focus too much on how they looked precisely at after death, especially if their appearance is altered by the death.
That's the one scenario where you might want to steer away from realism.
Actually that's a question I had for you guys. Can anyone explain why Brynn looked like that? Her head shape looked very deformed and I was wondering if that was a result of her being born long before she was properly formed?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'm also weird about making any kind of memorial featuring someone at the time of death, even if those are the only photos and memories you have of them. Brynn doesn't look sweet or precious, she looks malformed and alien. I wouldn't feel comfortable displaying that in my house where my other children might see it. If I was going to make a tribute for Rachelle (and I am most certainly not), I'd take artistic liberties and sketch Brynn as Rachelle chooses to believe she would've looked, with chunky cheeks and a toothy smile and wispy blonde curls, or draw her in an abstract way, like her birth flower. Not the half-gestated, broken little thing she was when she was born.
According to Rachelle, the tests done on Brynn postmortem showed she was genetically normal, but I'd argue all that means is that she didn't have any big chromosomal abnormalities like trisomy or monosomy making her incompatible with life. The most likely answer is that Brynn had some other genetic abnormality that isn't picked up on a standard screening, since it wasn't an umbilical cord or placental issue. No one is going to scan an entire human genome to figure out why someone miscarried late unless this is a recurring issue for Rachelle, and by the 3 healthy babies she's birthed since, it's clearly not.
Re: Rash&Justin: Paychecks A & B are here at last, maybe now we can afford some grass | Part 28
Lololol Trashy probably has no clue! She thinks he's playing gamesSomeoneActually wrote:I thought the same thing!!!LisaLulu22 wrote: ↑Mon May 04, 2020 5:04 amHe said the video he watched before bed was 80 coins. My guess is he's buying personal videos on chaturbate for his own enjoyment.
I didn't know about this site, I thought he was buying game artifacts for coins
Sent from my SM-G960W using Tapatalk
-
- Guru Gossiper
- Posts: 2228
- Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2018 10:38 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 7 times
Re: Rash&Justin: Paychecks A & B are here at last, maybe now we can afford some grass | Part 28
mikanai wrote:Lololol Trashy probably has no clue! She thinks he's playing gamesSomeoneActually wrote:I thought the same thing!!!LisaLulu22 wrote: ↑Mon May 04, 2020 5:04 am He said the video he watched before bed was 80 coins. My guess is he's buying personal videos on chaturbate for his own enjoyment.
I didn't know about this site, I thought he was buying game artifacts for coins
Sent from my SM-G960W using Tapatalk
I think we can all agree that his needs haven’t been met in quite some time! Lol Doesn’t excuse buying videos or whatever it is but Rachelle has to realize that her husband wasn’t the one pregnant and still has feelings/desires.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
- Amateur
- Posts: 73
- Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2019 2:00 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Rash&Justin: Paychecks A & B are here at last, maybe now we can afford some grass | Part 28
Same and I don't understand the appeal of having your children look like pilgrims in those ugly bonnets. Those turban hats (sorry, dunno what they are actually called) she had Emma in as a baby were equally hideousdaisiesemmy wrote: ↑Mon May 04, 2020 10:11 pm ill just never understand why they get blue swaddles but weve never seen emma in anything other than white and orange?
- Andielina0984
- Gossiper
- Posts: 615
- Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2018 12:59 pm
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Rash&Justin: Paychecks A & B are here at last, maybe now we can afford some grass | Part 28
Of course she’s looking at her precious Asher meanwhile the Arby’s sandwich looks like he’s one inch from falling off her armsdaisiesemmy wrote:ill just never understand why they get blue swaddles but weve never seen emma in anything other than white and orange?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- Veruca_Salt
- Informer
- Posts: 427
- Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2018 12:45 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Rash&Justin: Paychecks A & B are here at last, maybe now we can afford some grass | Part 28
Is anyone else interested in knowing how these two lazy dingbats are making ends meet?
I’m a public health nurse and have been redeployed to work in covid testing full time. I’m working my butt off and have a few complaints about the whole situation, but my heart aches for those who’ve lost their jobs or businesses due to the pandemic.
I guess I’m a little perplexed that it’s possible for people to be completely lazy and unemployed, yet still be able to afford several IVF treatments, a house and Rachelle’s expensive shopping habits. I’ve been saying it for years but I would really like to see the YouTube cash cow dry up and have these yuppies have to navigate through real life with actual jobs.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I’m a public health nurse and have been redeployed to work in covid testing full time. I’m working my butt off and have a few complaints about the whole situation, but my heart aches for those who’ve lost their jobs or businesses due to the pandemic.
I guess I’m a little perplexed that it’s possible for people to be completely lazy and unemployed, yet still be able to afford several IVF treatments, a house and Rachelle’s expensive shopping habits. I’ve been saying it for years but I would really like to see the YouTube cash cow dry up and have these yuppies have to navigate through real life with actual jobs.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
- Informer
- Posts: 294
- Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2020 2:02 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 11 times
Re: Rash&Justin: Paychecks A & B are here at last, maybe now we can afford some grass | Part 28
We know Justine makes $2200 a month from the GI Bill and trashy's grandparents had an education fund set aside for her which she used for IVF.Veruca_Salt wrote: ↑Tue May 05, 2020 12:00 am Is anyone else interested in knowing how these two lazy dingbats are making ends meet?
I’m a public health nurse and have been redeployed to work in covid testing full time. I’m working my butt off and have a few complaints about the whole situation, but my heart aches for those who’ve lost their jobs or businesses due to the pandemic.
I guess I’m a little perplexed that it’s possible for people to be completely lazy and unemployed, yet still be able to afford several IVF treatments, a house and Rachelle’s expensive shopping habits. I’ve been saying it for years but I would really like to see the YouTube cash cow dry up and have these yuppies have to navigate through real life with actual jobs.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: Rash&Justin: Paychecks A & B are here at last, maybe now we can afford some grass | Part 28
Based on their Social Blade statistics, where the estimate is 13k-210k a year and the actual amount is usually somewhere in the middle, I’m guessing they’re making anywhere fromSomeoneActually wrote:We know Justine makes $2200 a month from the GI Bill and trashy's grandparents had an education fund set aside for her which she used for IVF.Veruca_Salt wrote: ↑Tue May 05, 2020 12:00 am Is anyone else interested in knowing how these two lazy dingbats are making ends meet?
I’m a public health nurse and have been redeployed to work in covid testing full time. I’m working my butt off and have a few complaints about the whole situation, but my heart aches for those who’ve lost their jobs or businesses due to the pandemic.
I guess I’m a little perplexed that it’s possible for people to be completely lazy and unemployed, yet still be able to afford several IVF treatments, a house and Rachelle’s expensive shopping habits. I’ve been saying it for years but I would really like to see the YouTube cash cow dry up and have these yuppies have to navigate through real life with actual jobs.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
8-12k a month (including Justin’s money). There are probably months where it’s higher (it will be this upcoming month from higher views from the birth and the videos following).
And yet, even with that amount of money MONTHLY, I still think their house was an absolutely stupid decision and is truly a money pit with their 3k mortgage lol. They probably don’t “feel” the mortgage payment much with Justin’s 2k a month but he can’t be in school forever!! I’ll shit bricks if he ever gets an actual job after college.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
- Guru Gossiper
- Posts: 2228
- Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2018 10:38 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 7 times
Re: Rash&Justin: Paychecks A & B are here at last, maybe now we can afford some grass | Part 28
Here’s my thought...daisiesemmy wrote:ill just never understand why they get blue swaddles but weve never seen emma in anything other than white and orange?
Brynn was her frilly pink girl princess. She had all the pink clothes for her and Brynn didn’t live.
When she was pregnant with Emma, everyone sent her pink frilly stuff but Rachelle couldn’t let Emma have it. Emma was the test baby to see if she could have a live birth. She had to rush into ivf to get another baby quick.
I think she WANTED boys this whole time because her girl was Brynn. She’s going to buy all the boy colors and dress them up nice because in her mind she hasn’t had a boy yet. Poor Emma is like Cinderella and gets all the drabby clothes because her precious, princess Brynn was her girl.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: Rash&Justin: Paychecks A & B are here at last, maybe now we can afford some grass | Part 28
I agree and will write this again
justin on the latest vlogs is super annoying!!!!!!
Also curious as why we have not seen her mum at all on the vlogs but only on IG
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
justin on the latest vlogs is super annoying!!!!!!
Also curious as why we have not seen her mum at all on the vlogs but only on IG
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: Rash&Justin: Paychecks A & B are here at last, maybe now we can afford some grass | Part 28
Indeed you have a point but personally I dont fully agree, she only knows the reasonLd5 wrote:Here’s my thought...daisiesemmy wrote:ill just never understand why they get blue swaddles but weve never seen emma in anything other than white and orange?
Brynn was her frilly pink girl princess. She had all the pink clothes for her and Brynn didn’t live.
When she was pregnant with Emma, everyone sent her pink frilly stuff but Rachelle couldn’t let Emma have it. Emma was the test baby to see if she could have a live birth. She had to rush into ivf to get another baby quick.
I think she WANTED boys this whole time because her girl was Brynn. She’s going to buy all the boy colors and dress them up nice because in her mind she hasn’t had a boy yet. Poor Emma is like Cinderella and gets all the drabby clothes because her precious, princess Brynn was her girl.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
At least Rachelle gave it a few months ( I think 7 ) after losing Brynn, to have IVF which is an unsure procedure does not guarantee you will get pregnant in comparison to Brittany Leach (still shocked this woman is pregnant) its not even 6 months from when Crew died
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
- Informer
- Posts: 294
- Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2020 2:02 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 11 times
Re: Rash&Justin: Paychecks A & B are here at last, maybe now we can afford some grass | Part 28
Trashy's IVF clinic required 6 months in between pregnancies and they were waiting for her cycle to start. She had to wait.Maite5 wrote: ↑Tue May 05, 2020 1:34 pmIndeed you have a point but personally I dont fully agree, she only knows the reasonLd5 wrote:Here’s my thought...daisiesemmy wrote:ill just never understand why they get blue swaddles but weve never seen emma in anything other than white and orange?
Brynn was her frilly pink girl princess. She had all the pink clothes for her and Brynn didn’t live.
When she was pregnant with Emma, everyone sent her pink frilly stuff but Rachelle couldn’t let Emma have it. Emma was the test baby to see if she could have a live birth. She had to rush into ivf to get another baby quick.
I think she WANTED boys this whole time because her girl was Brynn. She’s going to buy all the boy colors and dress them up nice because in her mind she hasn’t had a boy yet. Poor Emma is like Cinderella and gets all the drabby clothes because her precious, princess Brynn was her girl.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
At least Rachelle gave it a few months ( I think 7 ) after losing Brynn, to have IVF which is an unsure procedure does not guarantee you will get pregnant in comparison to Brittany Leach (still shocked this woman is pregnant) its not even 6 months from when Crew died
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk