Jamie Love wrote: ↑Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:18 pm
ghostboy wrote: ↑Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:33 am
sorry to be That Poster, but since i don't recognise a lot of the usernames on here lately, i'll beat the same dead horse i always do for everyone that missed it the first thousand times:
please stop condemning shari to a lifetime of being ruby and getting at her for showing signs of having grown up in an abusive environment. especially since she's still living in it. re the julie/bread thing: julie getting the brunt of the family's resentment has been discussed at length here and doesn't need to turn into a "lets rip shari to pieces" session.
do i condone shari's behaviour? of course not. but it's a lot more complicated than just "oMg ShArI sUcKz!!1" please give the girl a break.
most people on here are in agreement that these kids are having their privacy massively violated every single day, and that extends to this. idc if she has her own channel - shari isn't in a position to consent to having her behaviour analysed by thousands of strangers. she's still a kid - go easy on her publicly please.
i was an asshole at her age. i came from a shitty environment and had a lot to unlearn going into young adulthood. she has the right to do that privately. you can't complain about ruby abusing her kids rights and then subject shari to all this shit. she's sixteen - we have no reason to call her names here.
I don't see why we can't. Like previously stated no matter what situation you come from, parents you have etc. you know right from wrong, especially at 17. They put their lives (and therefore their views on the world) out there so its our right to criticize them. Younger people are held accountable for their actions everyday but because Shari is a YouTuber/Influencer she's automatically untouchable? Thats a BIG NO for me. This enabling behavior is exactly why people like Shane Dawson, Jeffree Star, Tana, Trisha etc. still have huge platforms even though they're DISGUSTING racist/pedophiles/sexual predator. Ya'll so quick to give these people a free pass and have the nerve to be surprised when something more reprehensible comes out about your faves. Am I comparing Shari Franke to a pedophile/racist/toxic/problematic person? NO, however, the younger we hold these "social media Influencers" for their behavior the more likely they're going to change it. There isn't any "going easy on her" because its the truth, the minute she goes out into the real world she's not going to know what to do with herself because she's so sheltered. These are the people that our youth are watching, ITS OKAY TO HOLD THEM ACCOUNTABLE. There's literally youth that think RACISM/PEDOPHILLA /SEXUAL DEVIANCY is normal and do it on the regular for clout, which in turn makes those three things normalized in our society which it shouldn't be. Tbh, you're apart of the problem
facepalm lmao
this has gotten blown up in a completely different direction to my actual point
idk whether it's my fault for not being clearer or whether people just get riled up easily lol
what i am NOT trying to say:
- we can't ever comment on a child or young person's behaviour, even if it's bad
- we can't say how that child or young person's behaviour is going to affect the people around them
- we can't acknowledge that their behaviour has negative consequences
- we can't say that a child or young person displays certain traits that are concerning
- a magic switch turns on when someone reaches 18 and suddenly they're an adult now and can be held accountable for their behaviour
what i AM trying to say:
- it's not cool to start getting super personal about a child or young person just bc they did something shitty
- since we're the grown ups here, we have a responsibility to these kids (who are already being exploited) to try and be as objective as possible when we acknowledge this stuff
- understand that adults literally tell kids who they are and are responsible for shaping their identity - we are no exception here - if the kids read here one day and they have their futures predicted for them like it's a fact, they're just gonna have the idea that they're "broken" reinforced, which is something abuse victims struggle with enough as it is
tl;dr
cool with me = "wow shari was really mean to julie about the bread, poor julie, i just want her to get away from all that toxicity asap. i really hope shari doesn't carry that over to her own parenting because then the cycle will continue."
not cool with me = "shari is rude and bossy and a know it all and a mini ruby and she's just gonna end up abusing her own children and drop out of BYU and have a million kids like ruby did. she needs to be punished!"
see the difference now?
if not then i really don't think there's much point in me saying a lot more