lidialove29 wrote:Wth is a font
Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk
LSA talk for a board member.
Talking about the same proof because it was posted on LSA hardly makes us just as "guilty and ugly". It's all about deliverance and the way you speak.
lidialove29 wrote:Wth is a font
Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk
thats public view, admin/IT views complete historyKryptonite wrote:We need some sort of LSA dictionary! I cannot keep up.CanYouJustNot wrote:lidialove29 wrote:Wth is a font
Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk
LSA talk for a board member.
Talking about the same proof because it was posted on LSA hardly makes us just as "guilty and ugly". It's all about deliverance and the way you speak.
On another note, I find it interesting that Austin has been a member since 2013 and has twenty one posts. I can only see the most recent ones so I wonder if the others were deleted or if it is just me? I would question whether or not this is truly him but everything seems to check out on LSA.
I apologize if this has been discussed already. Tapa has been acting up.
What difference does it make if I'm a member there? It's a public message board. You can read the posts where they offered him advice just like I did. Most of them didn't even know who he was at the time. He took it upon himself to go there and argue with the members. I didn't know what LSA was until I saw his tweets about it. He's no one's victim. Unfortunately, he put his children at risk. He should do what he can to protect them now, but posting on LSA isn't the way to do it.marissalasel wrote:Are you one of them? Constructive criticism my ass. Constructive criticism comes from someone that actually cares about you. These people couldn't give a minuet shit about the nulls. They just want to drag him, literally drag him and his family by their ankles and watch. By family I not only mean Britt and Austin, I mean his 2 yr old, 3 yr old, and infant who will be the main ones to suffer from this whole thing. Just because you film your family, that doesn't mean that gives people the right to threaten their safety. That's like saying if you walk around half naked people should rape you. There's no justification for people driving by his house or making obscene statements about his children.Lovethesnark wrote:I would agree with you if he hadn't ignored constructive criticism so many of the LSA members offered him when he began to post on that message board. They were very clear about how his vlogs could put his children in danger. He ignored every bit of it. He insisted that they were just ignorant and uneducated people, but they were right about so many things. He seems to be upset about someone driving past his house and reporting that they saw. She got his address from the phone book. There isn't much he can do about that. He has a history with LSA. He's responsible for much of the "hateful" attitude they have toward him. He brought it on himself.marissalasel wrote:I cannot stand these women on LSA. They're out for blood and it's honestly sickening. The man made a mistake but what would suffice as "enough" for them? They want him to make a vid begging on his knees for us to forgive him? As long as his wife and family forgive him he doesn't really owe us anything. I mean, it's like they want him to start crying blood and slit is own wrist. When you fuck up, all you can do is apologize and never make the same mistake again, literally that's it. He's on LSA trying to follow a lead regarding the possible safety of his children, and instead of taking it more seriously they're just tearing into him more. I seriously cannot with these ugly broads. What Britt said about people being in bad places to do such hateful things has a lot of merit. Sometimes it's too much
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I read that too that GG was a bunch of ruthless white women etc etc and I read and it was nothing compared to what those women were sayingmeganshay wrote:Since he did get the first video taken form down I think he does have a lawyer working for him. I think he's but exposing the misstress(es?) because of that.
I read some of the LSA boards when this first started and was getting confused because they seemed to have it out for GG but the thread on GG never really seemed bad. Everything seemed to be coming from LSA.
Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk
*Ugh I had a whole thing typed out and YTMD ate it! *AutumnLane wrote:Right....how creepy is it that people are saying they've been doing drive bys. New mistress has come forward and as we speak is being interviewed by the same woman who did the last interview. I can't keep up.... All this info is on Twitter and LSA.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Interesting and crazy if it's true.AutumnLane wrote:Well from what I've read the person who spilled the "tea" regarding the mistress being obsessed with Audri was active member of LSA. I guess the mistress was going on and on in emails to LSA members about Audri. Also she was giving the current home address to members. Austin got wind of this information and then today he started posting asking for help regarding his children's safety. All I know is the member gave Austin the email he was looking for.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk