]
WheresMyCoffee wrote:heyyyhi wrote:KatherineLouvain wrote:Bit harsh to say I should be fired given my stuff gets proof read but whatever. Some people think it's a word and that's ago, but even so it's an ONLINE FORUM where people say "should of" and "literally" without getting told they should be fired. I can see why people have stopped coming here now.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
While this isn't a forum specifically about grammar, "regardless" is the correct version of the word and no publication company worth their salt would publish information with the word "irregardless" in it.
If someone were to tell me I'm writing a word wrong, I would look it up, take their advice and get over it.
First of all, Gretchen Weiners said "Irregardless" in Mean Girls, there for it is a fucking word.
Second of all, fucking look it up yourself before everyone on here starts arguments and insulting people telling them they should be fired.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jonathon- ... 34749.html
https://www.grammarly.com/blog/irregardless/
It is widely used as a word, we all know it may not be proper but you clearly know what the person meant so picking on them is petty. People on here constantly say "should of", "ain't" etc etc but it is a a forum site. I usually have 10 minutes to read/write on here before one of my kids wants something so I cant always check my grammar/spelling. Sue me.
Well by golly, if Gretchen Weiners used that word, then it truly must be a word!!! Lmao.
I think the fact that she said it kind of proves the point that it is an incorrect, dumb, made-up word. Just like Karen saying "it's like I have ESPN or something". They are dumb, ditzy, whatever.....and people who say irregardless also sound dumb.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]
It was a joke. Move on. Are you serious right now???
