The Grabner Quad Squad: Open It! Open It! Open It! | Part 8

[lovethispage]

Sorry LDS sissies

But that guy they are showing on IG stories name is

Dieter F Uchdorf

I can't help but read that as Fuckdork

[pollycracker]

My oldest turns 20 today. I am looking through his baby book for a picture. On his second birthday page I wrote, "Can count from 1 to 10, knows basic colors, has books memorized, sings abc's, speaks in sentences very clearly." Just found this interesting as I compare to almost 3 years old girls who can do none of the above.

P.S. He was a big boy as you can see in weight and height, but not fat. Very solid. Same today at 20.[img]//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201710 ... 688940.jpg[/img]

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

[Harkette]

I actually took my kids (4 and 7) to the mall today and they were bored out of their skulls. I don't go very often so now having been, I can't imagine going there multiple times a week. With toddlers! Being inside the mall made me feel tired and depressed. It wasn't enjoyable at all.

My kids would've loved that cool play area that the Greedners mall has. The mall we went to didn't have a play area at all.

Random thoughts


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[qsauntiem]

Sorry LDS sissies

But that guy they are showing on IG stories name is

Dieter F Uchdorf

I can't help but read that as Fuckdork

I can see that. But (surprise, surprise) Trailer Tra$hley slightly misspelled his name, is Uchtdorf. He's German, and it's kind of inappropriate to say, (when has that stopped us though?) he's somewhat of a silver fox.


Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

[Aussiegal2017]

[img]//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201710 ... 240f67.jpg[/img]
He’s really stacking on the weight this picture isn’t flattering for him


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[lovethispage]

His sweater is so huge to accommodate his belly that it's way too longer in the sleeves and all baggy at the shoulders. Such a slob.

[reefmango]

OMG-- I'm not even 2 minutes into today's v'log and the girls have discovered the candy. All right, they're right there, the girls can see them, the girls can reach them, of course, they are going to go for them. However, how confusing it must be for the little ones to continue to reach for the candy only to be told, "No, no, you can't touch them", and then the ever repeated, "Good job". WTF, say NO, or DON'T. If "Good job" is said immediately after, how are the girls going to understand? In fairness, to A$S, I believe she was commending them for NOT reaching, however, they were only NOT grabbing for a millisecond. I repeat, WTF!?!

My thoughts exactly. It made me cringe at the mixed message. You can't tell a 2 year old No, and Good Job in the same sentence. Wtf?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

And as an aside, what mother doesn't know the height of one's own children? Or at least their hot relative to that table top? She's always following them around with that eff'n camera, and then editing, editing and editing for all of those hours.... surely she must have known they would see the candy. Oh right, I keep forgetting. These v'logs are are completing staged. I wouldn't be surprised if they even rehearsed that bit. Argh....

[reefmango]

OMG-- I'm not even 2 minutes into today's v'log and the girls have discovered the candy. All right, they're right there, the girls can see them, the girls can reach them, of course, they are going to go for them. However, how confusing it must be for the little ones to continue to reach for the candy only to be told, "No, no, you can't touch them", and then the ever repeated, "Good job". WTF, say NO, or DON'T. If "Good job" is said immediately after, how are the girls going to understand? In fairness, to A$S, I believe she was commending them for NOT reaching, however, they were only NOT grabbing for a millisecond. I repeat, WTF!?!

My thoughts exactly. It made me cringe at the mixed message. You can't tell a 2 year old No, and Good Job in the same sentence. Wtf?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

And as an aside, what mother doesn't know the height of one's own children? Or at least their hot relative to that table top? She's always following them around with that eff'n camera, and then editing, editing and editing for all of those hours.... surely she must have known they would see the candy. Oh right, I keep forgetting. These v'logs are are completing staged. I wouldn't be surprised if they even rehearsed that bit. Argh....

*height

[Howlin17]

The 2 lying grifters set up that scene the night before. Unwrapped candy set out in a candy dish. Just waiting for the grubbies to grab it. Except.....I suspect it was handed to Pie. By the biggest grub of all. The stupid, fake wench just vlogged Heifer pulling Grubs smelly basket off the cabinet. Dumping it everywhere. They knew what would happen. FAKE

[Stellaboo]

Sorry LDS sissies

But that guy they are showing on IG stories name is

Dieter F Uchdorf

I can't help but read that as Fuckdork

Bison posted a quote by that guy last week and I had the exact same thought about his name.

[Snarkadoodle Doo]

OMG-- I'm not even 2 minutes into today's v'log and the girls have discovered the candy. All right, they're right there, the girls can see them, the girls can reach them, of course, they are going to go for them. However, how confusing it must be for the little ones to continue to reach for the candy only to be told, "No, no, you can't touch them", and then the ever repeated, "Good job". WTF, say NO, or DON'T. If "Good job" is said immediately after, how are the girls going to understand? In fairness, to A$S, I believe she was commending them for NOT reaching, however, they were only NOT grabbing for a millisecond. I repeat, WTF!?!

My thoughts exactly. It made me cringe at the mixed message. You can't tell a 2 year old No, and Good Job in the same sentence. Wtf?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

And as an aside, what mother doesn't know the height of one's own children? Or at least their hot relative to that table top? She's always following them around with that eff'n camera, and then editing, editing and editing for all of those hours.... surely she must have known they would see the candy. Oh right, I keep forgetting. These v'logs are are completing staged. I wouldn't be surprised if they even rehearsed that bit. Argh....

Right?!?! I thought the same thing! In the first vlog when she held the camera at the "girlses" height she was under the table and I though she's either a complete moron thinking her kids are that short, or she's setting up something she thinks will go viral. Either is a possibility. Then when she started the next vlog as she went running down the stairs with her video straight up copying a scene from "Paranormal Activity", I knew she was setting up video in hopes of something going viral. Then she showed the kids next to the table and the littles are at least a head taller than the "cereal" dish.

How long do you think it will be before they make a short video of just that clip, hoping it will go viral?

[DoodleBop]

They want to go Viral again. A lot of the vloggers with young children seem to be setting up more and more scenes in the hope of going viral. Yet they also claim their kids aren't working so aren't making the money and thus shouldn't have savings accounts set up for them.

[pollycracker]

Tyler, the princess wannabe [img]//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201710 ... fce293.jpg[/img]

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

[qsauntiem]

Tyler, the princess wannabe [img]//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201710 ... fce293.jpg[/img]

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

He sure makes it easy for us to snark, doesn't he?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

[Lovetoknit]

They want to go Viral again. A lot of the vloggers with young children seem to be setting up more and more scenes in the hope of going viral. Yet they also claim their kids aren't working so aren't making the money and thus shouldn't have savings accounts set up for them.

Wait, did they actually say this??? No savings accounts??? Wonder if they tithe 10% of their earnings?

[Night lady]

They want to go Viral again. A lot of the vloggers with young children seem to be setting up more and more scenes in the hope of going viral. Yet they also claim their kids aren't working so aren't making the money and thus shouldn't have savings accounts set up for them.

Whoa!! My big fat patootie the kids aren't working! It's obvious when they stage things and "perform" for the camera. These 2 must really think we are dumb as rocks. Smh.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

[pollycracker]

They want to go Viral again. A lot of the vloggers with young children seem to be setting up more and more scenes in the hope of going viral. Yet they also claim their kids aren't working so aren't making the money and thus shouldn't have savings accounts set up for them.

Whoa!! My big fat patootie the kids aren't working! It's obvious when they stage things and "perform" for the camera. These 2 must really think we are dumb as rocks. Smh.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

We aren't dumb as rocks. It's the dumb KADs who keep following for and financing their shit show.

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

[DoodleBop]

In a live show someone asked Tyson if they'd set up college savings accounts for the girls - since the majority of the reason people watch is for the girls [aka they make the money] and he said no. This was a while back when I still followed them on FB. I know they're only two but they realistically cannot expect this to last forever. Yet when are they in reality. With how much education costs keep rising.

There are a few other youtubers I watch where the bread & butter of their channel is their kids yet they also say they haven't thought about savings accounts. I'm not an Accountant but you'd think they could pay one to help set up savings accounts that have the lowest taxes etc. There have been several articles now with parent youtubers justifying making money off their kids the main theme is "this allows me to me a stay at home parent".

[GreenTrees003]

In a live show someone asked Tyson if they'd set up college savings accounts for the girls - since the majority of the reason people watch is for the girls [aka they make the money] and he said no. This was a while back when I still followed them on FB. I know they're only two but they realistically cannot expect this to last forever. Yet when are they in reality. With how much education costs keep rising.

There are a few other youtubers I watch where the bread & butter of their channel is their kids yet they also say they haven't thought about savings accounts. I'm not an Accountant but you'd think they could pay one to help set up savings accounts that have the lowest taxes etc. There have been several articles now with parent youtubers justifying making money off their kids the main theme is "this allows me to me a stay at home parent".

Probably because they don't expect them to go to college or they don't plan to pay for college. Some people prioritize education or feel their children should have to come up with the funds for it. Plus paying for college is an unhappy thought and these two much rather focus on all the rainbows and butterflies of now rather then the ugly thought of money running out.

[lovethispage]

The 2 lying grifters set up that scene the night before. Unwrapped candy set out in a candy dish. Just waiting for the grubbies to grab it. Except.....I suspect it was handed to Pie. By the biggest grub of all. The stupid, fake wench just vlogged Heifer pulling Grubs smelly basket off the cabinet. Dumping it everywhere. They knew what would happen. FAKE

The way Indie was carrying the candy dish both times into the kitchen looked like it was placed in her hands. She was holding it by the back part of the shoes and of course it was perfectly level. If she would have done that herself she either would have broken it or the candy would be spilled out because she was holding it crooked. And she did it two times in a row. I'm thinking they used the same footage but I'm not going to watch it over again. Yes it defiantly was staged.