Brittani Boren Leach: Theory Thread

Post Reply
Onchao16
Informer
Informer
Posts: 499
Joined: Tue Aug 06, 2019 1:46 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Brittani Boren Leach: Theory Thread

Unread post by Onchao16 »

iheartyt wrote:
Onchao16 wrote: Thu Jan 16, 2020 6:37 am
skippy1931 wrote: I know what sids is. its the comment they will act like it was a random act of god when no one knows what the cause of death is.
She literally typed “SIDS, and act like it was a random act of God”, saying that’s why SIDS is. Instead of SIDS being from neglect. Not sure how you’re reading that any differently. Basically, she is saying that they will label it as SIDS instead of negligence (if negligence was the cause)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
SIDS doesn't come from neglect though. Image SIDS just happens. This is where a lot of confusion comes from. People lump SIDS and accidental suffocation together. It is not the same. I don't understand why you are confused.
She didn’t say SIDS was neglect. She said they would do exactly what you’re saying and lump it in with SIDS if it was neglect.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
babyshark
Amateur
Amateur
Posts: 95
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2019 12:39 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Brittani Boren Leach: Theory Thread

Unread post by babyshark »

Most of you have suggested it was probably unsafe sleep practices, which is definitely possible. I honestly don’t think he rolled off her bed at 3 months old. He had just turned 3 months old a week or so before Christmas. Unless she had posted video evidence in vlogs that showed him rolling, it seems unlikely to me.

My main theory is he was either in his car seat or on an adult bed & one of the other little kids found him & put a blanket over him to attempt to be sweet & tuck him in. That would be a huge reason as to why she isn’t sharing how he died. Her other kids would have to grow up with guilt knowing one of them killed their baby brother even though they didn’t mean to do it.
scojacar
Gossiper
Gossiper
Posts: 522
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2018 10:57 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Brittani Boren Leach: Theory Thread

Unread post by scojacar »

iheartyt wrote:
Onchao16 wrote: Thu Jan 16, 2020 6:37 am
skippy1931 wrote: I know what sids is. its the comment they will act like it was a random act of god when no one knows what the cause of death is.
She literally typed “SIDS, and act like it was a random act of God”, saying that’s why SIDS is. Instead of SIDS being from neglect. Not sure how you’re reading that any differently. Basically, she is saying that they will label it as SIDS instead of negligence (if negligence was the cause)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
SIDS doesn't come from neglect though. Image SIDS just happens. This is where a lot of confusion comes from. People lump SIDS and accidental suffocation together. It is not the same. I don't understand why you are confused.
Nobody said SIDS is neglect. She said that SIDS is NOT neglect, it IS a random act. And that Crew’s death WAS NOT a random act, and thus WAS (in theory) neglect. Therefore, Crew didn’t die of SIDS.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Onchao16
Informer
Informer
Posts: 499
Joined: Tue Aug 06, 2019 1:46 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Brittani Boren Leach: Theory Thread

Unread post by Onchao16 »

scojacar wrote:
iheartyt wrote:
Onchao16 wrote: Thu Jan 16, 2020 6:37 am She literally typed “SIDS, and act like it was a random act of God”, saying that’s why SIDS is. Instead of SIDS being from neglect. Not sure how you’re reading that any differently. Basically, she is saying that they will label it as SIDS instead of negligence (if negligence was the cause)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
SIDS doesn't come from neglect though. Image SIDS just happens. This is where a lot of confusion comes from. People lump SIDS and accidental suffocation together. It is not the same. I don't understand why you are confused.
Nobody said SIDS is neglect. She said that SIDS is NOT neglect, it IS a random act. And that Crew’s death WAS NOT a random act, and thus WAS (in theory) neglect. Therefore, Crew didn’t die of SIDS.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
THANK YOU!!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
User avatar
kabuki
Talker
Talker
Posts: 249
Joined: Sat Mar 30, 2013 4:04 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Brittani Boren Leach: Theory Thread

Unread post by kabuki »

babyshark wrote: Thu Jan 16, 2020 8:37 am Most of you have suggested it was probably unsafe sleep practices, which is definitely possible. I honestly don’t think he rolled off her bed at 3 months old. He had just turned 3 months old a week or so before Christmas. Unless she had posted video evidence in vlogs that showed him rolling, it seems unlikely to me.

My main theory is he was either in his car seat or on an adult bed & one of the other little kids found him & put a blanket over him to attempt to be sweet & tuck him in. That would be a huge reason as to why she isn’t sharing how he died. Her other kids would have to grow up with guilt knowing one of them killed their baby brother even though they didn’t mean to do it.
Babies that young can definitely roll. The AAP actually advises that babies not be swaddled past 8 weeks due to risk of rolling and suffocating.

ETA: I don’t think he rolled his way off the bed but it’s possible.. more likely he just rolled onto his face, or wedged himself somewhere
babyshark
Amateur
Amateur
Posts: 95
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2019 12:39 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Brittani Boren Leach: Theory Thread

Unread post by babyshark »

kabuki wrote: Thu Jan 16, 2020 9:22 am
babyshark wrote: Thu Jan 16, 2020 8:37 am Most of you have suggested it was probably unsafe sleep practices, which is definitely possible. I honestly don’t think he rolled off her bed at 3 months old. He had just turned 3 months old a week or so before Christmas. Unless she had posted video evidence in vlogs that showed him rolling, it seems unlikely to me.

My main theory is he was either in his car seat or on an adult bed & one of the other little kids found him & put a blanket over him to attempt to be sweet & tuck him in. That would be a huge reason as to why she isn’t sharing how he died. Her other kids would have to grow up with guilt knowing one of them killed their baby brother even though they didn’t mean to do it.
Babies that young can definitely roll. The AAP actually advises that babies not be swaddled past 8 weeks due to risk of rolling and suffocating.

ETA: I don’t think he rolled his way off the bed but it’s possible.. more likely he just rolled onto his face, or wedged himself somewhere
Yes that’s what I meant, not rolling off the bed completely. He definitely could’ve gotten wedged somewhere.
Justheretogossip
Informer
Informer
Posts: 474
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2019 6:59 pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Brittani Boren Leach: Theory Thread

Unread post by Justheretogossip »

babyshark wrote: Thu Jan 16, 2020 9:55 am
kabuki wrote: Thu Jan 16, 2020 9:22 am
babyshark wrote: Thu Jan 16, 2020 8:37 am Most of you have suggested it was probably unsafe sleep practices, which is definitely possible. I honestly don’t think he rolled off her bed at 3 months old. He had just turned 3 months old a week or so before Christmas. Unless she had posted video evidence in vlogs that showed him rolling, it seems unlikely to me.

My main theory is he was either in his car seat or on an adult bed & one of the other little kids found him & put a blanket over him to attempt to be sweet & tuck him in. That would be a huge reason as to why she isn’t sharing how he died. Her other kids would have to grow up with guilt knowing one of them killed their baby brother even though they didn’t mean to do it.
Babies that young can definitely roll. The AAP actually advises that babies not be swaddled past 8 weeks due to risk of rolling and suffocating.

ETA: I don’t think he rolled his way off the bed but it’s possible.. more likely he just rolled onto his face, or wedged himself somewhere
Yes that’s what I meant, not rolling off the bed completely. He definitely could’ve gotten wedged somewhere.
That’s what I’m thinking happened, I doubt he was rolling, she would have shared that stuff in vlogs/insta stories and I’ve never seen that. He maybe tried to roll and got
Half way and possibly a pillow being there to prevent rolling off the bed and maybe suffocated do to that.
It’s definitely widely speculated that he was probably on an adult bed, without a baby monitor and probably a blanket since I know she’s used blankets before and something happened within the situation.
But hey we could all be wrong.
As stated before I would hope she would share her story just to simply get the word out there for other mothers who think oh my baby is fine with a blanket, or oh just lay him on an adult bed when not home, whatever the reason I’m sure is something other parents have done without thinking about the consequences.
4littlemonkeys
Informer
Informer
Posts: 257
Joined: Tue Nov 26, 2019 8:38 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Brittani Boren Leach: Theory Thread

Unread post by 4littlemonkeys »


Onchao16 wrote:
4littlemonkeys wrote:
Onchao16 wrote: You are delusional if you think anything attached to your bed can’t shift. Or that a sober parent can’t roll over on their child. Practice any sleep practices you want, but quit spreading false information about bedsharing being safe.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Haven't spread any false information. Just the facts that you choose to ignore.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
You are not staying any FACTS. You are stating unsafe sleep practices that you do, and that you FEEL are ‘safe’ since, thankfully, nothing has happened to your baby. Because nothing has happened to your baby doesn’t make your sleep arrangements safe. So, yes, but saying bedsharing is safe, you are spreading false information. By saying side cars are safe, you are spreading false information. By saying sober parents are aware of their sleep position at all times, you are spreading false information. So stop. Continue to do what you’d like in your home, but quit saying bedsharing is safe. It isn’t.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It is safe when practiced correctly. That's just the facts of the matter. Nothing will happen to my baby as long as I continue to practice safe bedsharing. Sorry I don't take the AAP as gospel.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

User avatar
kabuki
Talker
Talker
Posts: 249
Joined: Sat Mar 30, 2013 4:04 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Brittani Boren Leach: Theory Thread

Unread post by kabuki »

Justheretogossip wrote: Thu Jan 16, 2020 12:00 pm
babyshark wrote: Thu Jan 16, 2020 9:55 am
kabuki wrote: Thu Jan 16, 2020 9:22 am

Babies that young can definitely roll. The AAP actually advises that babies not be swaddled past 8 weeks due to risk of rolling and suffocating.

ETA: I don’t think he rolled his way off the bed but it’s possible.. more likely he just rolled onto his face, or wedged himself somewhere
Yes that’s what I meant, not rolling off the bed completely. He definitely could’ve gotten wedged somewhere.
That’s what I’m thinking happened, I doubt he was rolling, she would have shared that stuff in vlogs/insta stories and I’ve never seen that. He maybe tried to roll and got
Half way and possibly a pillow being there to prevent rolling off the bed and maybe suffocated do to that.
It’s definitely widely speculated that he was probably on an adult bed, without a baby monitor and probably a blanket since I know she’s used blankets before and something happened within the situation.
But hey we could all be wrong.
As stated before I would hope she would share her story just to simply get the word out there for other mothers who think oh my baby is fine with a blanket, or oh just lay him on an adult bed when not home, whatever the reason I’m sure is something other parents have done without thinking about the consequences.
Thinking about that possible situation seriously makes me so sad. My daughter started rolling not long ago and she was so proud and smiling trying to move around. To think he rolled into a pillow and suffocated makes me tear up :( honestly poor little baby if he did suffocate. I know accidents happen but there’s no excuse for putting a baby in a sleep area with blankets and pillows etc. I’m sure she knew better.
LexiRae
Gossiper
Gossiper
Posts: 739
Joined: Sun May 27, 2018 9:57 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Brittani Boren Leach: Theory Thread

Unread post by LexiRae »

babyshark wrote:Most of you have suggested it was probably unsafe sleep practices, which is definitely possible. I honestly don’t think he rolled off her bed at 3 months old. He had just turned 3 months old a week or so before Christmas. Unless she had posted video evidence in vlogs that showed him rolling, it seems unlikely to me.

My main theory is he was either in his car seat or on an adult bed & one of the other little kids found him & put a blanket over him to attempt to be sweet & tuck him in. That would be a huge reason as to why she isn’t sharing how he died. Her other kids would have to grow up with guilt knowing one of them killed their baby brother even though they didn’t mean to do it.
The second I told my mom the story about baby crew she also said she thinks one of the older boys accidentally hurt him. It makes the most sense as to why she would be trying to “cover it up”. To protect her older son. This theory is the least common one but also the one that makes a lot of sense


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
violet08
Talker
Talker
Posts: 244
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2019 2:19 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Brittani Boren Leach: Theory Thread

Unread post by violet08 »

4littlemonkeys wrote:
Onchao16 wrote:
4littlemonkeys wrote:Haven't spread any false information. Just the facts that you choose to ignore.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
You are not staying any FACTS. You are stating unsafe sleep practices that you do, and that you FEEL are ‘safe’ since, thankfully, nothing has happened to your baby. Because nothing has happened to your baby doesn’t make your sleep arrangements safe. So, yes, but saying bedsharing is safe, you are spreading false information. By saying side cars are safe, you are spreading false information. By saying sober parents are aware of their sleep position at all times, you are spreading false information. So stop. Continue to do what you’d like in your home, but quit saying bedsharing is safe. It isn’t.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It is safe when practiced correctly. That's just the facts of the matter. Nothing will happen to my baby as long as I continue to practice safe bedsharing. Sorry I don't take the AAP as gospel.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

I don’t take it as gospel either. But I can guarantee your not a profesional so stop spreading false information. I hope you continue to be so lucky with your baby. It Image is Image not Image safe.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
charliema16
Informer
Informer
Posts: 345
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2018 12:50 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Brittani Boren Leach: Theory Thread

Unread post by charliema16 »

Is it possible that the trauma of finding her baby not breathing has caused some kind of amnesia around how exactly she found him? Maybe she can’t recall if he was face down, covered in a blanket etc, maybe all she remembers is yelling for help and starting cpr.
skippy1931
Super Moddie
Super Moddie
Posts: 1668
Joined: Thu Mar 21, 2019 4:47 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: Brittani Boren Leach: Theory Thread

Unread post by skippy1931 »

unless we all are drs here you can't say it was neglect or intentional or that one of the kids did it. If there was any neglect or any thought about that there would be an investigation his body wouldn't even be released they wouldn't have been given the okay to donate the organs right away. I don't know what happened but simply because I don't I would never say its absolutely neglect, its their fault , or one of the kids no one knows that then them and the police . some can't seem to accept it could just be sids everyone is saying its neglect and unsafe sleeping yet no one knows that and just because they don't want to tell people doesn't mean its neglect or their fault
skippy1931
Super Moddie
Super Moddie
Posts: 1668
Joined: Thu Mar 21, 2019 4:47 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: Brittani Boren Leach: Theory Thread

Unread post by skippy1931 »

violet08 wrote: Wed Jan 15, 2020 1:01 pm Why don’t my posts go through right away? It’s really frustrating o want to participate and dialogue in this thread but my posts never post.
its been brutal but there is also so many people trying to get on and post
skippy1931
Super Moddie
Super Moddie
Posts: 1668
Joined: Thu Mar 21, 2019 4:47 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: Brittani Boren Leach: Theory Thread

Unread post by skippy1931 »

scojacar wrote: Thu Jan 16, 2020 8:48 am
iheartyt wrote:
Onchao16 wrote: Thu Jan 16, 2020 6:37 am
She literally typed “SIDS, and act like it was a random act of God”, saying that’s why SIDS is. Instead of SIDS being from neglect. Not sure how you’re reading that any differently. Basically, she is saying that they will label it as SIDS instead of negligence (if negligence was the cause)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
SIDS doesn't come from neglect though. Image SIDS just happens. This is where a lot of confusion comes from. People lump SIDS and accidental suffocation together. It is not the same. I don't understand why you are confused.
Nobody said SIDS is neglect. She said that SIDS is NOT neglect, it IS a random act. And that Crew’s death WAS NOT a random act, and thus WAS (in theory) neglect. Therefore, Crew didn’t die of SIDS.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
because you say so? you don't know it wasn't sids you don't know it was a random act or neglect no one knows how do you know what he died of you don't
Onchao16
Informer
Informer
Posts: 499
Joined: Tue Aug 06, 2019 1:46 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Brittani Boren Leach: Theory Thread

Unread post by Onchao16 »

skippy1931 wrote:
scojacar wrote: Thu Jan 16, 2020 8:48 am
iheartyt wrote: SIDS doesn't come from neglect though. Image SIDS just happens. This is where a lot of confusion comes from. People lump SIDS and accidental suffocation together. It is not the same. I don't understand why you are confused.
Nobody said SIDS is neglect. She said that SIDS is NOT neglect, it IS a random act. And that Crew’s death WAS NOT a random act, and thus WAS (in theory) neglect. Therefore, Crew didn’t die of SIDS.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
because you say so? you don't know it wasn't sids you don't know it was a random act or neglect no one knows how do you know what he died of you don't
WTH are you talking about?!?! You do realize your on the theory thread?!?! And people are posting their THEORIES right?!?! No one knows expect his parents and medical team.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
scojacar
Gossiper
Gossiper
Posts: 522
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2018 10:57 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Brittani Boren Leach: Theory Thread

Unread post by scojacar »

skippy1931 wrote:
scojacar wrote: Thu Jan 16, 2020 8:48 am
iheartyt wrote: SIDS doesn't come from neglect though. Image SIDS just happens. This is where a lot of confusion comes from. People lump SIDS and accidental suffocation together. It is not the same. I don't understand why you are confused.
Nobody said SIDS is neglect. She said that SIDS is NOT neglect, it IS a random act. And that Crew’s death WAS NOT a random act, and thus WAS (in theory) neglect. Therefore, Crew didn’t die of SIDS.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
because you say so? you don't know it wasn't sids you don't know it was a random act or neglect no one knows how do you know what he died of you don't
Holy shit, I didn’t say that, I was summarizing what the original poster said for you because you couldn’t understand it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Onchao16
Informer
Informer
Posts: 499
Joined: Tue Aug 06, 2019 1:46 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Brittani Boren Leach: Theory Thread

Unread post by Onchao16 »

scojacar wrote:
skippy1931 wrote:
scojacar wrote: Thu Jan 16, 2020 8:48 am Nobody said SIDS is neglect. She said that SIDS is NOT neglect, it IS a random act. And that Crew’s death WAS NOT a random act, and thus WAS (in theory) neglect. Therefore, Crew didn’t die of SIDS.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
because you say so? you don't know it wasn't sids you don't know it was a random act or neglect no one knows how do you know what he died of you don't
Holy shit, I didn’t say that, I was summarizing what the original poster said for you because you couldn’t understand it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
ImageImage


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
User avatar
kabuki
Talker
Talker
Posts: 249
Joined: Sat Mar 30, 2013 4:04 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Brittani Boren Leach: Theory Thread

Unread post by kabuki »

skippy1931 wrote: Thu Jan 16, 2020 9:14 pm
scojacar wrote: Thu Jan 16, 2020 8:48 am
iheartyt wrote:
SIDS doesn't come from neglect though. Image SIDS just happens. This is where a lot of confusion comes from. People lump SIDS and accidental suffocation together. It is not the same. I don't understand why you are confused.
Nobody said SIDS is neglect. She said that SIDS is NOT neglect, it IS a random act. And that Crew’s death WAS NOT a random act, and thus WAS (in theory) neglect. Therefore, Crew didn’t die of SIDS.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
because you say so? you don't know it wasn't sids you don't know it was a random act or neglect no one knows how do you know what he died of you don't
If this forum bothers you so much why don’t you stay off of it? Or at least stick to the “non theory” forum? You really seem triggered by these posts ...
AutumnLane
Guru Gossiper
Guru Gossiper
Posts: 2292
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2012 7:53 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Brittani Boren Leach: Theory Thread

Unread post by AutumnLane »

I think the baby was left in unsafe sleeping conditions either left in his infant car seat and he overheated or put in an adult size bed for a nap. He probably rolled over and suffocated. I also think that one of the many children at the Christmas party could’ve wandered in unsupervised and covered him up thinking they were doing something sweet. Maybe they just placed a stuffed animal nearby thinking they were sharing.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Show me someone who never gossips, and I'll show you someone who isn't interested in people. ~Barbara Walters
Post Reply

Return to “Brittani Boren Leach”