Yes!! There’s no other accent like it. My husband constantly mocks a few words I say, he thinks it’s hilarious. Brianna has a super bad case of the accent, and then take how unfortunate her mouth is, mix them together and her voice is just nails on a chalkboard.formerctfxcer wrote: ↑Mon Mar 18, 2019 4:58 pmAgreed. Her Cleveland accent is strong AF. My husband has been in Columbus for the past 20 years but his Cleveland A’s come out all the time I’m from NC and the accent was the first thing I’d notice when I’d meet people from Cleveland.username44 wrote:I think Bri’s Cleveland accent is what people can’t stand. It is unfortunately a thing, I’ve been told I have it since I was also born and raised in Cleveland. My husband is from Dallas, TX and makes fun of me for the way I talk still to this day. The “A” is over exaggerated. It is honestly terrible lol.
However, there’s something seriously fucked up with her mouth. I haven’t watched any of her videos because I simply cannot stand to watch her mush mouth to a mile a minute. She should go take speech therapy with Land O Lakes.. that’s even if she sends him anymore.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Brianna K | Part 2
- username44
- Extreme Gossiper
- Posts: 1620
- Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2018 1:38 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Brianna K | Part 2
Re: Brianna K | Part 2
Holy shit I can’t with this. There’s absolutely nothing wrong with having two parents that work. I’m a working mom and it’s not so I can have a 5000 sq ft house (ours is under 2000), to have expensive cars (I’m a Dave Ramsey follower and we buy used with cash) or have expensive vacations (our last vacation was in 2016 before we had kids).formerctfxcer wrote: ↑Sun Mar 17, 2019 4:43 pm But I DO NO UNDERSTAND why when both parents individually make a good income, one of them does not decide to stay home during the crucial years of 0 to 5. Is it more important to have a 5000+ sf house, 2+ high end cars, multiple $$$ vacations a year, ... than to have one of the parents raise the young child full time? What is more important to these parents - more stuff??? Why do they have children in the first place - is it one more "thing" to check off a list?
I work because my income is higher than my husband’s. I am also the health insurance carrier. Add to that that I want to ensure my kids don’t have to take out tons of student loans if they choose to go to college. And I don’t want them to have to pay for me in my old age. I want all of that to be financially taken care of.
You are 100% allowed to choose to be a SAHM but do NOT shame two working parents for their choices.
[/quote]
Woh - Hang on - I wasn't trying to shame anyone. From what you stated above I would include your family as one where both have to work to provide a modest home for your family. I really just want to understand what goes through the minds of a minority of couples who together make mid six figure incomes and choose to have children yet neither parent will take off time from work even for the first year or two. I personally know of couples who do not even spend 10 hours a week with their children - they dump the care taking off to someone else. I really am curious as to why these couples choose to have children in the first place when they don't want to spend any time with them. Is it something to check off of a list? I also know of couples without children who are married, but one person lives and works in the midwest and the other spouse lives and works on the coast. They have been married for 10+ years and the one that works on the coast comes home on a weekend maybe once every two months. I am curious as to why they got married when they don't even see each other.
And even though my intent was not to shame anyone here, the purpose of this website is to be judgemental.
Re: Brianna K | Part 2
On today's Instastory she totally hit a new low - she clearly said her duty in life is to make herself happy and not be concerned about her children's happiness or her husbands - she is to make herself her number one priority. Well, she has finally admitted to being the selfish NARCISSIST she is! I wonder what Anna, Myka, and Tiff would say about that life philosophy? Adam, get a good lawyer and get the kids out of there while you can. Every woman I know would sacrifice their life for their husband or children. Bri must have forgotten what she signed up for when she said those marriage vows. Who in their right mind idolizes this idiot and posts a** kissing comments on her YT/IG?
-
- Talker
- Posts: 167
- Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2018 5:43 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Brianna K | Part 2
ds1158 wrote:On today's Instastory she totally hit a new low - she clearly said her duty in life is to make herself happy and not be concerned about her children's happiness or her husbands - she is to make herself her number one priority. Well, she has finally admitted to being the selfish NARCISSIST she is! I wonder what Anna, Myka, and Tiff would say about that life philosophy? Adam, get a good lawyer and get the kids out of there while you can. Every woman I know would sacrifice their life for their husband or children. Bri must have forgotten what she signed up for when she said those marriage vows. Who in their right mind idolizes this idiot and posts a** kissing comments on her YT/IG?
She said her happiness doesn’t revolve around everyone (her kids and husband’s) happiness. I don’t like Bri but I’m giving her the benefit of the doubt. I don’t think she meant it that way.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- bobcat4ever
- Amateur
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2019 5:43 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Brianna K | Part 2
Did Brianna and Adam REALLY have to post a vlog on the KFamily channel focusing on Lando POOPING in the children's playground in the Poconos??? Is nothing SACRED?
I even felt embarrassed for him even though I think he is a brat. And Adam was EXTREMELY PISSED that Bri left him to deal with all of it alone.
I wonder how L will feel when this video pops up in a few years when he is in school?
I even felt embarrassed for him even though I think he is a brat. And Adam was EXTREMELY PISSED that Bri left him to deal with all of it alone.
I wonder how L will feel when this video pops up in a few years when he is in school?
-
- True Gossiper
- Posts: 1242
- Joined: Mon May 04, 2015 10:15 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 6 times
Re: Brianna K | Part 2
Woh - Hang on - I wasn't trying to shame anyone. From what you stated above I would include your family as one where both have to work to provide a modest home for your family. I really just want to understand what goes through the minds of a minority of couples who together make mid six figure incomes and choose to have children yet neither parent will take off time from work even for the first year or two. I personally know of couples who do not even spend 10 hours a week with their children - they dump the care taking off to someone else. I really am curious as to why these couples choose to have children in the first place when they don't want to spend any time with them. Is it something to check off of a list? I also know of couples without children who are married, but one person lives and works in the midwest and the other spouse lives and works on the coast. They have been married for 10+ years and the one that works on the coast comes home on a weekend maybe once every two months. I am curious as to why they got married when they don't even see each other.ds1158 wrote:Holy shit I can’t with this. There’s absolutely nothing wrong with having two parents that work. I’m a working mom and it’s not so I can have a 5000 sq ft house (ours is under 2000), to have expensive cars (I’m a Dave Ramsey follower and we buy used with cash) or have expensive vacations (our last vacation was in 2016 before we had kids).formerctfxcer wrote: ↑Sun Mar 17, 2019 4:43 pm But I DO NO UNDERSTAND why when both parents individually make a good income, one of them does not decide to stay home during the crucial years of 0 to 5. Is it more important to have a 5000+ sf house, 2+ high end cars, multiple $$$ vacations a year, ... than to have one of the parents raise the young child full time? What is more important to these parents - more stuff??? Why do they have children in the first place - is it one more "thing" to check off a list?
I work because my income is higher than my husband’s. I am also the health insurance carrier. Add to that that I want to ensure my kids don’t have to take out tons of student loans if they choose to go to college. And I don’t want them to have to pay for me in my old age. I want all of that to be financially taken care of.
You are 100% allowed to choose to be a SAHM but do NOT shame two working parents for their choices.
And even though my intent was not to shame anyone here, the purpose of this website is to be judgemental. [/quote]
No, both of us don’t HAVE to work. I choose to because it makes good financial sense for our family and because to give up my great income and career would be a bad long term choice for our family. We could live on just my husband’s income but I’d lose a ton of traction in my career, substantial retirement savings, etc. But that’s just us. If my income wasn’t so high I would’ve quit like a hot potato. As I said upthread, I wanted to be a SAHM. But my career took off and it would be more selfish of me to quit and give up everything my career affords our family now and in the future.
Never mind all of the families that have 2 working parents because they both want to have careers? Why should either give that up? How is the school day so much different from going to a daycare?
The purpose of this website is to judge youtubers. Your post was judging working moms everywhere.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- QueenMaleficent
- Gossiper
- Posts: 664
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 6:18 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Brianna K | Part 2
Idolizing is one thing, which I don't think any of these ladies should be idolized, nor their "influential" lifestyle. Being an influencer is not a real job, IMO. But liking what she wears and asking about it is not surprising since she does appeal to a younger (than me at least) audience. I refuse to follow her on social media because I don't want to see her garbage in my feed. I don't see a problem with that some commenting that they like her luggage, or her shoes, whatever, but if someone comments and says she's the next Michelle Obama, I'm about to lose my shit.ds1158 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 18, 2019 5:44 pmOn today's Instastory she totally hit a new low - she clearly said her duty in life is to make herself happy and not be concerned about her children's happiness or her husbands - she is to make herself her number one priority. Well, she has finally admitted to being the selfish NARCISSIST she is! I wonder what Anna, Myka, and Tiff would say about that life philosophy? Adam, get a good lawyer and get the kids out of there while you can. Every woman I know would sacrifice their life for their husband or children. Bri must have forgotten what she signed up for when she said those marriage vows. Who in their right mind idolizes this idiot and posts a** kissing comments on her YT/IG?
Re: Brianna K | Part 2
I invite everyone to listen to her Instastory and judge for yourself. It is a shame that a NARCISSIST like Brianna can hijack the Woman's Empowerment Movement and use it to rationalize her selfish behavior with her "Boss Mom" garbage!makeupjunkie91 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 18, 2019 5:55 pmds1158 wrote:On today's Instastory she totally hit a new low - she clearly said her duty in life is to make herself happy and not be concerned about her children's happiness or her husbands - she is to make herself her number one priority. Well, she has finally admitted to being the selfish NARCISSIST she is! I wonder what Anna, Myka, and Tiff would say about that life philosophy? Adam, get a good lawyer and get the kids out of there while you can. Every woman I know would sacrifice their life for their husband or children. Bri must have forgotten what she signed up for when she said those marriage vows. Who in their right mind idolizes this idiot and posts a** kissing comments on her YT/IG?
She said her happiness doesn’t revolve around everyone (her kids and husband’s) happiness. I don’t like Bri but I’m giving her the benefit of the doubt. I don’t think she meant it that way.
Re: Brianna K | Part 2
No, both of us don’t HAVE to work. I choose to because it makes good financial sense for our family and because to give up my great income and career would be a bad long term choice for our family. We could live on just my husband’s income but I’d lose a ton of traction in my career, substantial retirement savings, etc. But that’s just us. If my income wasn’t so high I would’ve quit like a hot potato. As I said upthread, I wanted to be a SAHM. But my career took off and it would be more selfish of me to quit and give up everything my career affords our family now and in the future.formerctfxcer wrote: ↑Mon Mar 18, 2019 6:07 pm
Woh - Hang on - I wasn't trying to shame anyone. From what you stated above I would include your family as one where both have to work to provide a modest home for your family. I really just want to understand what goes through the minds of a minority of couples who together make mid six figure incomes and choose to have children yet neither parent will take off time from work even for the first year or two. I personally know of couples who do not even spend 10 hours a week with their children - they dump the care taking off to someone else. I really am curious as to why these couples choose to have children in the first place when they don't want to spend any time with them. Is it something to check off of a list? I also know of couples without children who are married, but one person lives and works in the midwest and the other spouse lives and works on the coast. They have been married for 10+ years and the one that works on the coast comes home on a weekend maybe once every two months. I am curious as to why they got married when they don't even see each other.
And even though my intent was not to shame anyone here, the purpose of this website is to be judgemental.
Never mind all of the families that have 2 working parents because they both want to have careers? Why should either give that up? How is the school day so much different from going to a daycare?
The purpose of this website is to judge youtubers. Your post was judging working moms everywhere.
[/quote]
I'm really not judging working moms - let's put it another way - I don't understand people who have children (working or SAH) that don't want to spend time with their children - why did they bother to have them in the first place. Brianna for example - other than the few hours a week that she takes videos of them for the vlog, she prefers to ship them out to GG or others so she can go shopping, get her nails done, have ladies nights out, ...
Why have kids if you don't enjoy their company for companys sake???
-
- True Gossiper
- Posts: 1242
- Joined: Mon May 04, 2015 10:15 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 6 times
Re: Brianna K | Part 2
I'm really not judging working moms - let's put it another way - I don't understand people who have children (working or SAH) that don't want to spend time with their children - why did they bother to have them in the first place. Brianna for example - other than the few hours a week that she takes videos of them for the vlog, she prefers to ship them out to GG or others so she can go shopping, get her nails done, have ladies nights out, ...ds1158 wrote:No, both of us don’t HAVE to work. I choose to because it makes good financial sense for our family and because to give up my great income and career would be a bad long term choice for our family. We could live on just my husband’s income but I’d lose a ton of traction in my career, substantial retirement savings, etc. But that’s just us. If my income wasn’t so high I would’ve quit like a hot potato. As I said upthread, I wanted to be a SAHM. But my career took off and it would be more selfish of me to quit and give up everything my career affords our family now and in the future.formerctfxcer wrote: ↑Mon Mar 18, 2019 6:07 pm
Woh - Hang on - I wasn't trying to shame anyone. From what you stated above I would include your family as one where both have to work to provide a modest home for your family. I really just want to understand what goes through the minds of a minority of couples who together make mid six figure incomes and choose to have children yet neither parent will take off time from work even for the first year or two. I personally know of couples who do not even spend 10 hours a week with their children - they dump the care taking off to someone else. I really am curious as to why these couples choose to have children in the first place when they don't want to spend any time with them. Is it something to check off of a list? I also know of couples without children who are married, but one person lives and works in the midwest and the other spouse lives and works on the coast. They have been married for 10+ years and the one that works on the coast comes home on a weekend maybe once every two months. I am curious as to why they got married when they don't even see each other.
And even though my intent was not to shame anyone here, the purpose of this website is to be judgemental.
Never mind all of the families that have 2 working parents because they both want to have careers? Why should either give that up? How is the school day so much different from going to a daycare?
The purpose of this website is to judge youtubers. Your post was judging working moms everywhere.
Why have kids if you don't enjoy their company for companys sake???[/quote]
And that’s a point that is valid. I can’t imagine shipping my kid off to my relatives house every week so I can film myself cleaning (ya know, something she used to do with her kids present???) and then respond to IG posts and package my shit clothing for Etsy. And for someone who actually WAS a real working mom for years and claimed to have so much pride in it...you’d think she’d be the first to realize how ridiculous she’s been lately.
But I guess not.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- Influencer
- Informer
- Posts: 379
- Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2019 5:29 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Brianna K | Part 2
Yessss! Sooo fucking truegeewhiz wrote:What is with these women trying so hard to be inspirational? Blackout Bri and Yeaston both keep giving their viewers pep talks and referencing Rachel Hollis like they’re someone to model your life after.
Blackout Bri has compared herself to Michelle Obama twice now and while she was in London, she made a passing comment about how if she was the First Lady, she would wear Ted Baker. This bitch really believes she might actually become the First Lady some day. Where does all this grandiosity come from?!
Newsflash BB: nobody wants to be an alcoholic with a failing marriage to a man they view solely as their own personal sperm donor. Nobody wants to exploit their 80 year-old grandma for ten minutes of YouTube fame. Nobody wants a bratty, undisciplined child. Nobody wants shitty fair weather girlfriends, each one more self-absorbed than the last. Nobody wants to live and die by their subscriber count and popping out another child solely for the sake of growing their YouTube channel.
Get a fucking grip, Brianna. You’re not a well-educated, accomplished, respected Boss Mom. You have the easiest, most throwaway degree from a university that has a 75% acceptance rate. You’re a sad, unfulfilled alcoholic.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- Influencer
- Informer
- Posts: 379
- Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2019 5:29 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Brianna K | Part 2
And that’s a point that is valid. I can’t imagine shipping my kid off to my relatives house every week so I can film myself cleaning (ya know, something she used to do with her kids present???) and then respond to IG posts and package my shit clothing for Etsy. And for someone who actually WAS a real working mom for years and claimed to have so much pride in it...you’d think she’d be the first to realize how ridiculous she’s been lately.formerctfxcer wrote:I'm really not judging working moms - let's put it another way - I don't understand people who have children (working or SAH) that don't want to spend time with their children - why did they bother to have them in the first place. Brianna for example - other than the few hours a week that she takes videos of them for the vlog, she prefers to ship them out to GG or others so she can go shopping, get her nails done, have ladies nights out, ...ds1158 wrote:No, both of us don’t HAVE to work. I choose to because it makes good financial sense for our family and because to give up my great income and career would be a bad long term choice for our family. We could live on just my husband’s income but I’d lose a ton of traction in my career, substantial retirement savings, etc. But that’s just us. If my income wasn’t so high I would’ve quit like a hot potato. As I said upthread, I wanted to be a SAHM. But my career took off and it would be more selfish of me to quit and give up everything my career affords our family now and in the future.formerctfxcer wrote: ↑Mon Mar 18, 2019 6:07 pm
Woh - Hang on - I wasn't trying to shame anyone. From what you stated above I would include your family as one where both have to work to provide a modest home for your family. I really just want to understand what goes through the minds of a minority of couples who together make mid six figure incomes and choose to have children yet neither parent will take off time from work even for the first year or two. I personally know of couples who do not even spend 10 hours a week with their children - they dump the care taking off to someone else. I really am curious as to why these couples choose to have children in the first place when they don't want to spend any time with them. Is it something to check off of a list? I also know of couples without children who are married, but one person lives and works in the midwest and the other spouse lives and works on the coast. They have been married for 10+ years and the one that works on the coast comes home on a weekend maybe once every two months. I am curious as to why they got married when they don't even see each other.
And even though my intent was not to shame anyone here, the purpose of this website is to be judgemental.
Never mind all of the families that have 2 working parents because they both want to have careers? Why should either give that up? How is the school day so much different from going to a daycare?
The purpose of this website is to judge youtubers. Your post was judging working moms everywhere.
Why have kids if you don't enjoy their company for companys sake???
But I guess not.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]
Don’t worry about the instantaneously insulted, they tend to forget that this is a gossip forum for Bri K. We trash Bri and Bri alone and some how some get worked up thinking we imply everyone, when in fact we are only talking solely about Bri.
-
- True Gossiper
- Posts: 1242
- Joined: Mon May 04, 2015 10:15 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 6 times
Re: Brianna K | Part 2
Don’t worry about the instantaneously insulted, they tend to forget that this is a gossip forum for Bri K. We trash Bri and Bri alone and some how some get worked up thinking we imply everyone, when in fact we are only talking solely about Bri. [/quote]Influencer wrote:And that’s a point that is valid. I can’t imagine shipping my kid off to my relatives house every week so I can film myself cleaning (ya know, something she used to do with her kids present???) and then respond to IG posts and package my shit clothing for Etsy. And for someone who actually WAS a real working mom for years and claimed to have so much pride in it...you’d think she’d be the first to realize how ridiculous she’s been lately.formerctfxcer wrote:I'm really not judging working moms - let's put it another way - I don't understand people who have children (working or SAH) that don't want to spend time with their children - why did they bother to have them in the first place. Brianna for example - other than the few hours a week that she takes videos of them for the vlog, she prefers to ship them out to GG or others so she can go shopping, get her nails done, have ladies nights out, ...ds1158 wrote: No, both of us don’t HAVE to work. I choose to because it makes good financial sense for our family and because to give up my great income and career would be a bad long term choice for our family. We could live on just my husband’s income but I’d lose a ton of traction in my career, substantial retirement savings, etc. But that’s just us. If my income wasn’t so high I would’ve quit like a hot potato. As I said upthread, I wanted to be a SAHM. But my career took off and it would be more selfish of me to quit and give up everything my career affords our family now and in the future.
Never mind all of the families that have 2 working parents because they both want to have careers? Why should either give that up? How is the school day so much different from going to a daycare?
The purpose of this website is to judge youtubers. Your post was judging working moms everywhere.
Why have kids if you don't enjoy their company for companys sake???
But I guess not.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Oh Tuff, your reading comprehension skills are terrible. Why don’t you go message another YouTuber and try to brag about it?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
- Informer
- Posts: 304
- Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2018 6:11 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Brianna K | Part 2
Judging Brianna for being a lying liar who lies and doing terrible things to herself and members of her family (while putting it on the internet for money) is different than judging an entire population of mothers who make difficult choices for the well-being of their families. DS, your original comment was not a criticism of people who spend no time with their children. It was an attack on women who work. How much money they make is none of your business. I agree with your comments about parents who spend no time with their children, but to put that comment in the same breath as the comment about working women negates your claims that you aren’t judging working women and questioning why they had kids. If anyone on here suddenly said SAHMs were worthless and lazy, you’d be outraged.
And Tuff Influencer, we keep the judgment of Brianna here on this page. Not on her channel or IG, and CERTAINLY not thru DMing other people on social media. That makes you a troll, not a discerning viewer who is critical of her bullshit. Don’t be a troll.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
And Tuff Influencer, we keep the judgment of Brianna here on this page. Not on her channel or IG, and CERTAINLY not thru DMing other people on social media. That makes you a troll, not a discerning viewer who is critical of her bullshit. Don’t be a troll.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
- Amateur
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2019 5:26 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Brianna K | Part 2
Oh boy...[IMG]//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201903 ... 242122.jpg[/IMG]
Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk
-
- Amateur
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2018 5:03 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Brianna K | Part 2
My reaction: “This is Witch!” .... it has now been thrown into full throttle. That poor baby.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- kerenkrazyeyes
- Gossiper
- Posts: 866
- Joined: Sat May 26, 2018 3:52 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Brianna K | Part 2
Soo.. she's ttc? How will she survive without her wine and horrible birdlike eating habits?
Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
Re: Brianna K | Part 2
This poor girl she needs a make-under... Her hair would look better in nice rich brown, no lash extensions, less makeup (stop with the lip liner) .. Eat some food.. she would look so much healthier.Danielsgirl wrote:[IMG]//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201903 ... d5999d.jpg[/IMG]
What is going on here. The frizzy roots, the fried textured hair.
Whyyyy are her brows so dark?
The make up. The lip liner.
She is so full of herself, when she needs to be working herself out. Seriously get off the internet and actually work on yourself from the inside out.
Also no one is ever going to put Bri and Michelle Obama in the same sentence, stop trying to make it happen. You are a fucking disgrace.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my HUAWEI MLA-L03 using Tapatalk
- Lilyrose22
- Talker
- Posts: 204
- Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2018 10:45 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Brianna K | Part 2
THANK YOU for saying this!! The hard swallow makes me equally want to gouge my eyes out! wtf is that? and for the record, girlfriend has the weirdest tongue thrust I've ever seen. The swallow, the weird tongue thing, the slurring..she's one hot mess!Daffodil82 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 18, 2019 2:10 pmYes!! What is that awful squeaky like noise she makes when she tries to close her mouth and harshly swallow?! Once you hear it, you'll never un hear it. I'm glad someone else noticed.LittleMama28 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 18, 2019 11:23 am What really is that lip situation though? Why is one side pointy & why does it feather so bad? Her eye makeup & eyelash extensions are just as tragic. Also, the way she talks with her hands so close to her face & the fact that she swallows so often & so harshly in the middle of talking make me want to gouge my eyes out.
- Lilyrose22
- Talker
- Posts: 204
- Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2018 10:45 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Brianna K | Part 2
TTC? The visual I'm getting is quite unpleasantBlanca1992 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 19, 2019 7:45 am My reaction: “This is Witch!” .... it has now been thrown into full throttle. That poor baby.
It involves two full bottles of Apothic, a whole lot of "pain killers" and "movie night" down in the basement