Gardner Quad Squad: Bottom Feeding Trailer Trash (Part 11)
-
- True Gossiper
- Posts: 1270
- Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2017 6:55 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Gardner Quad Squad: Bottom Feeding Trailer Trash (Part 1
What the!!
Those KADs are very strange
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: Gardner Quad Squad: Bottom Feeding Trailer Trash (Part 1
I can't think about that without tearing up a little. How sad to be conditioned to know that the two people you should be able to count on to be there, aren't there for you.Krouton wrote:I think they have stopped crying for tgem, because they know they are on their own. When they go to get them up, they are just lying there, wide awake in the dark. They can't even look at books anymore it's so dark. Poor kids.Sunnyunicorn wrote:I wonder what would happen if they didn't bring the cribs to the new house. Do you think it would be traumatic for the girls? Those crib cages are the only constant, secure thing in their lives. They are both trapped there and also given refuge there from the shrieking and violence. Before the crib tents were the girls trying to get into bed with their parents? My daughter didn't struggle with this but I know many kids who do- because they are taught (correctly I might add, some kids just try and take advantage of this) that if they ever need anything in the middle of the night they can always go to their parents.
I can't imagine my three year old daughter waking up from a nightmare and literally being zipped into a cage she cannot unzip herself from. I can't imagine her just laying there screaming until someone wakes up and decides to go check on her. Do you think Trash and Tyler even hear their girls cry for them in the middle of the night, or do you think the girls stopped crying for them because they know they're on their own?
It actually gives me anxiety thinking about those poor girls having a nightmare or being sick or just needing to be cuddled, and no one coming to their rescue. If By$on and Trailer Tra$hley think that's never happened, that one of the girls hasn't given up and just been left to fend for herself, alone and in the dark, then they're even dumber than I can imagine.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
- Night lady
- Guru Gossiper
- Posts: 3567
- Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2017 5:33 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Gardner Quad Squad: Bottom Feeding Trailer Trash (Part 1
WTF?
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Re: Gardner Quad Squad: Bottom Feeding Trailer Trash (Part 1
I wondered if the KAD and/or extended family was reading here.
Re: Gardner Quad Squad: Bottom Feeding Trailer Trash (Part 1
Something is not fair?!? Yeah, life is not fair. The Greedners have been in Hawaii without the Binghams and Revellis. Suck it up buttercup. The grown up world is "not fair".
Re: Gardner Quad Squad: Bottom Feeding Trailer Trash (Part 1
Yes most people I know move kids to beds once they start climbing out. I did think about it being stressful for the girls to have beds instead of their cribs but they are nearly 3! I wouldn't move a younger kid but at that age they are not safe in those cages and should (big should) be old enough to get excited about new beds and to understand cribs are for babies ( like their new cousin). It's a perfect time to transition them.
-
- True Gossiper
- Posts: 1303
- Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2017 8:00 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Gardner Quad Squad: Bottom Feeding Trailer Trash (Part 1
For some reason I read that second comment as excrement, BIG excrement
Welcome to the Snarkside
-
- Gossiper
- Posts: 803
- Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2017 8:26 pm
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 18 times
Re: Gardner Quad Squad: Bottom Feeding Trailer Trash (Part 1
I think the reason this picture comes off as a little uncomfortable, or at least off-putting, is because the Big Walrus has to show off constantly that his children are cuddling him. I'm so glad you filmed this, you Big Dumbass, because no other kids on the planet have ever given their parents hugs and cuddles. If we didn't have you to show us multiple times per day, we would never witness love between a man and his daughters. A$$, too, in the latest Costco vlog kept saying to Esme, "oh, are you giving Mommy loves?" "Do you just love Mommy so much?" Which is weird to me because when my kids hug me, " I usually say, "Mommy loves you sooo much!" But A$$ always looks at everything from her point of view.
Oh, and I
have one other message for Waddles: It is very unlikely that you will ever lose weight unless you crowdfund weightloss surgery or something, but even if you do, we will still call you Fatass, Waddling Whale, etc. Because you will always have a big fat head. So save yourself the effort, 'cuz we won't notice or care.
Re: Gardner Quad Squad: Bottom Feeding Trailer Trash (Part 1
I found this one on the ashandtys.blogspot.com blog dated Wednesday, November 19, 2008
Oh those crazy "kids"
Oh those crazy "kids"
-
- Talker
- Posts: 194
- Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2017 3:11 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Gardner Quad Squad: Bottom Feeding Trailer Trash (Part 1
A daycare would ask the parents to continue with the training at home, if it's not reinforced at home it will be difficult at daycare.
My granddaughter's daycare worked with her mom to train her but it was mom's responsibility to continue the training at home. She also was not allowed to move from the infant room to the 3-4-year-old room until she was trained.
She turned 3 in April and was completely day and night trained by September but it was a joint effort between mom and dad and the daycare.[/quote]
And that is the issue. Day care could do all they could to train the girls at nursery, but it has to be continued and reinforced by the parents at home and over weekends. No "oh I will just pop them in a nappy for x,y,z, it won't hurt", it will. It will confuse them with the mixed messages. And with them as parents it would be put them in a nappy for an easier life.
All the kids I have helped potty train have been additional needs, and you could tell those whose parents followed through the methods at home and during holidays or even just weekends.
They just don't want to believe their girls are growing up, and are no longer babies, but instead little people with thoughts and feelings and expressible emotions. And retaining the nappies, baby talk, bottles, dummies etc is just one way to do that. It might be fear of change, not wanting to lose the baby as they know they will never have another (if ass is to be believed with last eggs), laziness, obsession with young children or anything. I'm not jealous of them, I actually feel sorry for all of them. The girls for how the parents are stunting them, and the parents for not realising this and using some of the stupid amounts of money "they" (read the girls really) earn to enhance their lives with opportunities. They could be giving the girls dance, gym, sport opportunities, day trips to exciting places not just Costco, even hiring a flaming nanny would enhance the girls lives. I know twins younger than the girls who understand two languages, and speak both, and the girls are struggling to understand and comprehend just one. Let alone reproduce it themselves.[/quote]
Ok, so in your comment you said flaming nanny. Was that a typo or did you really mean to describe a really feminine homosexual man nanny?[/quote]
Considering that she called diapers and pacifiers "nappies" and "dummies", it's safe to assume that she is from England since that is what they call diapers and pacifiers over there. The term flaming, used in the context of "hire a flaming nanny" would be the equivalent of saying "hire a darned nanny" or a nicer way of saying "hire a fucking nanny".
My granddaughter's daycare worked with her mom to train her but it was mom's responsibility to continue the training at home. She also was not allowed to move from the infant room to the 3-4-year-old room until she was trained.
She turned 3 in April and was completely day and night trained by September but it was a joint effort between mom and dad and the daycare.[/quote]
And that is the issue. Day care could do all they could to train the girls at nursery, but it has to be continued and reinforced by the parents at home and over weekends. No "oh I will just pop them in a nappy for x,y,z, it won't hurt", it will. It will confuse them with the mixed messages. And with them as parents it would be put them in a nappy for an easier life.
All the kids I have helped potty train have been additional needs, and you could tell those whose parents followed through the methods at home and during holidays or even just weekends.
They just don't want to believe their girls are growing up, and are no longer babies, but instead little people with thoughts and feelings and expressible emotions. And retaining the nappies, baby talk, bottles, dummies etc is just one way to do that. It might be fear of change, not wanting to lose the baby as they know they will never have another (if ass is to be believed with last eggs), laziness, obsession with young children or anything. I'm not jealous of them, I actually feel sorry for all of them. The girls for how the parents are stunting them, and the parents for not realising this and using some of the stupid amounts of money "they" (read the girls really) earn to enhance their lives with opportunities. They could be giving the girls dance, gym, sport opportunities, day trips to exciting places not just Costco, even hiring a flaming nanny would enhance the girls lives. I know twins younger than the girls who understand two languages, and speak both, and the girls are struggling to understand and comprehend just one. Let alone reproduce it themselves.[/quote]
Ok, so in your comment you said flaming nanny. Was that a typo or did you really mean to describe a really feminine homosexual man nanny?[/quote]
Considering that she called diapers and pacifiers "nappies" and "dummies", it's safe to assume that she is from England since that is what they call diapers and pacifiers over there. The term flaming, used in the context of "hire a flaming nanny" would be the equivalent of saying "hire a darned nanny" or a nicer way of saying "hire a fucking nanny".
Last edited by Laughter6789 on Tue Nov 07, 2017 8:53 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Talker
- Posts: 194
- Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2017 3:11 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Gardner Quad Squad: Bottom Feeding Trailer Trash (Part 1
A daycare would ask the parents to continue with the training at home, if it's not reinforced at home it will be difficult at daycare.
My granddaughter's daycare worked with her mom to train her but it was mom's responsibility to continue the training at home. She also was not allowed to move from the infant room to the 3-4-year-old room until she was trained.
She turned 3 in April and was completely day and night trained by September but it was a joint effort between mom and dad and the daycare.[/quote]
And that is the issue. Day care could do all they could to train the girls at nursery, but it has to be continued and reinforced by the parents at home and over weekends. No "oh I will just pop them in a nappy for x,y,z, it won't hurt", it will. It will confuse them with the mixed messages. And with them as parents it would be put them in a nappy for an easier life.
All the kids I have helped potty train have been additional needs, and you could tell those whose parents followed through the methods at home and during holidays or even just weekends.
They just don't want to believe their girls are growing up, and are no longer babies, but instead little people with thoughts and feelings and expressible emotions. And retaining the nappies, baby talk, bottles, dummies etc is just one way to do that. It might be fear of change, not wanting to lose the baby as they know they will never have another (if ass is to be believed with last eggs), laziness, obsession with young children or anything. I'm not jealous of them, I actually feel sorry for all of them. The girls for how the parents are stunting them, and the parents for not realising this and using some of the stupid amounts of money "they" (read the girls really) earn to enhance their lives with opportunities. They could be giving the girls dance, gym, sport opportunities, day trips to exciting places not just Costco, even hiring a flaming nanny would enhance the girls lives. I know twins younger than the girls who understand two languages, and speak both, and the girls are struggling to understand and comprehend just one. Let alone reproduce it themselves.[/quote]
Ok, so in your comment you said flaming nanny. Was that a typo or did you really mean to describe a really feminine homosexual man nanny?[/quote]
Considering that she called diapers and pacifiers "nappies" and "dummies", it's safe to assume that she is from England since that is what they call diapers and pacifiers over there. The term flaming, used in the context of "hire a flaming nanny" would be the equivalent of saying "hire a darned nanny" or a nicer way of saying "hire a fucking nanny".
My granddaughter's daycare worked with her mom to train her but it was mom's responsibility to continue the training at home. She also was not allowed to move from the infant room to the 3-4-year-old room until she was trained.
She turned 3 in April and was completely day and night trained by September but it was a joint effort between mom and dad and the daycare.[/quote]
And that is the issue. Day care could do all they could to train the girls at nursery, but it has to be continued and reinforced by the parents at home and over weekends. No "oh I will just pop them in a nappy for x,y,z, it won't hurt", it will. It will confuse them with the mixed messages. And with them as parents it would be put them in a nappy for an easier life.
All the kids I have helped potty train have been additional needs, and you could tell those whose parents followed through the methods at home and during holidays or even just weekends.
They just don't want to believe their girls are growing up, and are no longer babies, but instead little people with thoughts and feelings and expressible emotions. And retaining the nappies, baby talk, bottles, dummies etc is just one way to do that. It might be fear of change, not wanting to lose the baby as they know they will never have another (if ass is to be believed with last eggs), laziness, obsession with young children or anything. I'm not jealous of them, I actually feel sorry for all of them. The girls for how the parents are stunting them, and the parents for not realising this and using some of the stupid amounts of money "they" (read the girls really) earn to enhance their lives with opportunities. They could be giving the girls dance, gym, sport opportunities, day trips to exciting places not just Costco, even hiring a flaming nanny would enhance the girls lives. I know twins younger than the girls who understand two languages, and speak both, and the girls are struggling to understand and comprehend just one. Let alone reproduce it themselves.[/quote]
Ok, so in your comment you said flaming nanny. Was that a typo or did you really mean to describe a really feminine homosexual man nanny?[/quote]
Considering that she called diapers and pacifiers "nappies" and "dummies", it's safe to assume that she is from England since that is what they call diapers and pacifiers over there. The term flaming, used in the context of "hire a flaming nanny" would be the equivalent of saying "hire a darned nanny" or a nicer way of saying "hire a fucking nanny".
-
- True Gossiper
- Posts: 1303
- Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2017 8:00 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Gardner Quad Squad: Bottom Feeding Trailer Trash (Part 1
Sorry I meant big excrement dripping out. That’s what the Greedners deserve and I most certainly believe they get 1-2X a day X4=8 so that is 8 excrement experiences a day.
Somebody must be enjoying that. Ah, why aren’t they potty training again???
Somebody must be enjoying that. Ah, why aren’t they potty training again???
Welcome to the Snarkside
-
- Talker
- Posts: 194
- Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2017 3:11 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Gardner Quad Squad: Bottom Feeding Trailer Trash (Part 1
Not sure why my last post was posted twice. Sorry guys!
- Night lady
- Guru Gossiper
- Posts: 3567
- Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2017 5:33 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Gardner Quad Squad: Bottom Feeding Trailer Trash (Part 1
Interesting article
http://blog.theautismsite.com/about-echolalia/2/
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
http://blog.theautismsite.com/about-echolalia/2/
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Re: Gardner Quad Squad: Bottom Feeding Trailer Trash (Part 1
say what now? Tequila plantation.....that sounds amazing!lovethispage wrote:OOPS
I went to YouTube to watch agave propagation
Uh oh
There they were, their fresh just rolled out of bed shiny faces, taunting me, watch me, watch me, I couldn’t resist.
I clicked. I thought to myself, I’ll just take a peek before I proceed with my potential tequila plantation.
I couldn’t get past ASSWIT’s neck nuzzle and Fatso’s kiss, kiss, muah.
Her ever so lovingly, longingly gazing at the (insert your favorite TyASSon name) as he spoke his creepy verbal vomit.
What a crock of shit. What a put on. Could she be any more full of shit? How many times has she slided up to her excuse for a father/brother/husband when she has been caught by us jealous haters. Too many times to count.
Wasn’t it just a couple vlogs ago she was seen cringing at his attempts of affection?
So ASS, I guess he’s good for one thing...damage control...
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: Gardner Quad Squad: Bottom Feeding Trailer Trash (Part 1
She DID fall down the stairs. If you listen carefully you can hear Scarlett (holding the camera) say "sissy fall down stairs".PollyKrome wrote:Did anyone else find it strange that she kept the part in the vlog about Indie being hurt on the stairs... then it pans to the stairs like she fell down the stairs.
That's why she was "sad" according to Trashley. No you dumbfuck, she was hurt not sad.
Things like that happen when you teach your children that it's OK to play on stairs. And climb on tables, and stand in high chairs.......
Does Bison not realize how ridiculous it is that his almost 3 year old girls cannot answer simple questions?
It's painful to watch Scarlett try and come up with an answer to anything, or to hear Indie mumble something that vaguely sounds like "purple". (or poo poo) And of course Evie shouts "I need green". They had no idea that he was asking about the color of their rooms - they were just saying random colors that they are familiar with. Indie seems to answer "purple" to everything lately.
It makes me so sad for them, but I'm just beating a dead horse at this point. Nothing is ever going to change.
Which is why I haven't been paying much attention to them lately. Thanks to all of you for keeping me updated.
Oh, and regarding daddies and little girls - there is absolutely nothing wrong with a father tending to a child's physical needs!
I fully expect my husband to share everything about raising our daughter (age 2.5), including bathing and personal care, for many years to come. A man shouldn't have to worry about anyone sexualizing his relationship with his own child.
Re: Gardner Quad Squad: Bottom Feeding Trailer Trash (Part 1
Well lazy asses, at least you wont have to undecorate the "nurseries" and decorate them again since you never, in a year of living there, decorated their rooms. Shameful. You can tell who is important in that family.