celticrain13 wrote:"Another unnecessary" c-section?? Let's not forget Olly would've died had she not had a c-section. I'm all for VBACs but if she's more comfortable with a c-section then that is her choice and to say having a c-section is "lazy" is ridicuous. I've had both and I know c-section is far worse. We don't have to like her but picking on every personal choice they make in their lives right down to how they should birth their child is insane. She's only just announced she's pregnant and already you're predicting what she's going to say wrong. I also think they waited to tell people because of all they've gone through. I'm surprised they waited because if they were money hungry the longer they can play the pregnancy card the better but obviously they wanted to be somewhat cautious
Yep im sorry but im all for natural homebirths and med free. I am probably the only one here that is for natural homebirths, homeopathic remedies and such. So yes shes lazy and c-sections are very Unnecessary when there is no medical problem.[/quote]
But there WAS a problem, she had a septum in her uterus and Olly would've died had they waited longer, would you have let your child die so you could have the natural birth YOU wanted? That's selfish. I'm all for homebirths and natural births too if that's someone's choice and they are able to do it but you can't insult people because they don't have the same views. If you see a group of 5 year olds lined up I guarntee you'd never be able to figure out if they were natural, c-section, home birth, prem, over due etc etc so let's stop acting as if the way she births a child will be a detriment