I agree. A chemical is just an early miscarriage before a heartbeat. I've had 3 (2 are from IVF transfers where I was closely monitored before my HCG started dropping) and they were all pretty horrific and scarring.pineberry wrote: ↑Mon May 11, 2020 10:34 amI’d agree that obviously, a later loss is way more tragic and emotionally devastating than one that occurs very early such as a chemical pregnancy.skippy1931 wrote: ↑Mon May 11, 2020 9:43 am A miscarriage is very different then a chemical pregnancy . i"m not a heartless bitch yes you can even grieve for a chemical pregnancy because you thought it was real but mostly the grieve is much different
But it’s simply not accurate to say that a chemical pregnancy isn’t a miscarriage and "not real". It literally is defined as a "very early miscarriage" and is very much real - the egg DID implant and you WERE pregnant, it just wasn’t a viable embryo and it ends before the 5th week. It happened to me (twice) and the bleeding was horrific as were the cramps - let alone the emotional aspect of it (it’s even more painful when you had been TTC for a while and *finally* ended up getting that positive, only for it to turn out to end days later). Now it’s not as horrible as a later term loss or stillbirth, but not everything needs to be compared.
Having said that, I 100% do NOT believe Keren had a chemical pregnancy. Those "lines" on her tests were clearly indents IMO and she only called it a chemical pregnancy in order to garner attention and sympathy... which is DISGUSTING! So if she starts calling her next paycheck (i mean baby) her "rainbow" then I’m gonna be so fucking pissed off lol.
I also don't believe she actually had one. I think it was her kidneys the whole time. She's since then said that she was getting positives because of her kidneys. It was all click bait. No surprise there.