C&K: The 'D' Word. Part #17

[askeptichere]

They could have added something in the invite, i mean Jay is a lawyer, surely they know the can of worms they would be opening if they filmed and uploaded 25+ kids without parental knowledge. I wouldnt be surprised if there was something on the invite about being present was consent to film. That's how i would go about it if i were them, and i planned on vlogging the party. Just like every concert or sporting event you go to, buying a ticket and showing up is consent to be filmed.

So what about when Kelley goes to the Kids’ school for lunch and films all of Emily’s friends and the other kids sitting in the cafeteria? The photo consent form sent out by the school does not include other parents taking videos of their kids to post of YT for profit. J&K have no regard for other kids’ privacy.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Playsinrain]

They could have added something in the invite, i mean Jay is a lawyer, surely they know the can of worms they would be opening if they filmed and uploaded 25+ kids without parental knowledge. I wouldnt be surprised if there was something on the invite about being present was consent to film. That's how i would go about it if i were them, and i planned on vlogging the party. Just like every concert or sporting event you go to, buying a ticket and showing up is consent to be filmed.

So what about when Kelley goes to the Kids’ school for lunch and films all of Emily’s friends and the other kids sitting in the cafeteria? The photo consent form sent out by the school does not include other parents taking videos of their kids to post of YT for profit. J&K have no regard for other kids’ privacy.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I don't watch J&K often so i had no idea they regularly filmed the other students. If they didn't have consent or didn't mention it in the invite then they should not filmed it, but since we have no idea if they did or not, my opinion still stands. If it was consensual, and done with permission and transparency then i have no issue with them filming the party. I've never seen people on here get upset when any other vlogger kid bday party was filmed.. *shrug*

[HelloSweetie]

They could have added something in the invite, i mean Jay is a lawyer, surely they know the can of worms they would be opening if they filmed and uploaded 25+ kids without parental knowledge. I wouldnt be surprised if there was something on the invite about being present was consent to film. That's how i would go about it if i were them, and i planned on vlogging the party. Just like every concert or sporting event you go to, buying a ticket and showing up is consent to be filmed.

So what about when Kelley goes to the Kids’ school for lunch and films all of Emily’s friends and the other kids sitting in the cafeteria? The photo consent form sent out by the school does not include other parents taking videos of their kids to post of YT for profit. J&K have no regard for other kids’ privacy.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I don't watch J&K often so i had no idea they regularly filmed the other students. If they didn't have consent or didn't mention it in the invite then they should not filmed it, but since we have no idea if they did or not, my opinion still stands. If it was consensual, and done with permission and transparency then i have no issue with them filming the party. I've never seen people on here get upset when any other vlogger kid bday party was filmed.. *shrug*

All the other birthday parties are for YT kids. Maddie’s friend is NOT.

People have definitely commented before on the filming of other kids at school, gymnastics class, swim class, etc.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Playsinrain]

So what about when Kelley goes to the Kids’ school for lunch and films all of Emily’s friends and the other kids sitting in the cafeteria? The photo consent form sent out by the school does not include other parents taking videos of their kids to post of YT for profit. J&K have no regard for other kids’ privacy.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I don't watch J&K often so i had no idea they regularly filmed the other students. If they didn't have consent or didn't mention it in the invite then they should not filmed it, but since we have no idea if they did or not, my opinion still stands. If it was consensual, and done with permission and transparency then i have no issue with them filming the party. I've never seen people on here get upset when any other vlogger kid bday party was filmed.. *shrug*

All the other birthday parties are for YT kids. Maddie’s friend is NOT.

People have definitely commented before on the filming of other kids at school, gymnastics class, swim class, etc.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I understand that, but do you really think that her best friend's parents have no clue that Kelly vlogs? If they are close enough to want a joint party them i'm certain she and her parents knew the party would be featured in a vlog. Like i said, if it was unknown that the filming was happening to any parent, then yes i agree, it should not have been filmed. Until we have proof someone was filmed without consent i see no harm. I do not agree with filming the kids in classes etc without parents consent..

[HelloSweetie]

I don't watch J&K often so i had no idea they regularly filmed the other students. If they didn't have consent or didn't mention it in the invite then they should not filmed it, but since we have no idea if they did or not, my opinion still stands. If it was consensual, and done with permission and transparency then i have no issue with them filming the party. I've never seen people on here get upset when any other vlogger kid bday party was filmed.. *shrug*

All the other birthday parties are for YT kids. Maddie’s friend is NOT.

People have definitely commented before on the filming of other kids at school, gymnastics class, swim class, etc.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I understand that, but do you really think that her best friend's parents have no clue that Kelly vlogs? If they are close enough to want a joint party them i'm certain she and her parents knew the party would be featured in a vlog. Like i said, if it was unknown that the filming was happening to any parent, then yes i agree, it should not have been filmed. Until we have proof someone was filmed without consent i see no harm. I do not agree with filming the kids in classes etc without parents consent..

Maybe they expected the kids to be in K&J’s vlog, but not necessarily the uncle’s.

That’s like saying I should anticipate my kid showing up in a random uncle’s IG pics because I sent him to a birthday party with an uncle that also had a camera.

It’s common courtesy and being respectful enough to not do something just because you can. Do manners and ethics not apply to YTers?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[askeptichere]

It looked like there were around 50 kids at that party. No way every single parent was made aware that their children would be put on YT. Her best friends’ parents may have known, but I highly doubt every single other parent who had kids there was made aware and asked for the ok.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Playsinrain]

I DO assume that if my kid is going to be at someone's party that they could be in any photos taken at said party. I don't expect people to edit my child out of their candid shots of friends or relatives at a party they were invited too.
Like i said, I do understand your point, but if they were filmed with consent (even so much as a note in the invite saying "Your attendance is consent to be filmed for youtube") it's not a big deal.
Not all the kids at Ollie's parties are yt kids and there are several cameras rolling at those shin digs and ive never seen people concerned about those kids.

[Playsinrain]

It looked like there were around 50 kids at that party. No way every single parent was made aware that their children would be put on YT. Her best friends’ parents may have known, but I highly doubt every single other parent who had kids there was made aware and asked for the ok.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Unless it was stated on the invites... we have no idea how it went down. If no parents were told in advance that the party was going to be vlog footage then they are digging their own hole. Otherwise it's not concerning to me.

[lmmomSD]

I DO assume that if my kid is going to be at someone's party that they could be in any photos taken at said party. I don't expect people to edit my child out of their candid shots of friends or relatives at a party they were invited too.
Like i said, I do understand your point, but if they were filmed with consent (even so much as a note in the invite saying "Your attendance is consent to be filmed for youtube") it's not a big deal.
Not all the kids at Ollie's parties are yt kids and there are several cameras rolling at those shin digs and ive never seen people concerned about those kids.

No, pretty much all of the kids at Ollie's parties are YouTube kids. Or they're his cousins and know that the whole party is a vlogging extravaganza. He doesn't have any real friends. I personally try not to post pictures of other people's children on my social media. So yeah, Cullen especially putting instastories of the party and kids dancing was weird to me
We're approaching dead horse territory here.
Agree to disagree.

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk

[Playsinrain]

Honestly i'm reading this as that no one has an issue with Kelly or Jay filming, just Cullen.
Agree to disagree is correct i suppose.

[lmmomSD]

Honestly i'm reading this as that no one has an issue with Kelly or Jay filming, just Cullen.
Agree to disagree is correct i suppose.

Just wanted to answer the question. I do have an issue with Jay and Kelly filming because it's not just their daughter's party, but not as much as C&K because it _is_ also their daughter's party. They made this point of how no adults were invited, and they were only there to man the photo booth. And then filmed a bunch of 13 year olds.
So yes, I do have a bit of an issue with Jay and Kelly filming it, but they have more right to film it because Maddie is their daughter. I definitely don't think Cullen should have been uploading instastories.
And now I am going to let it drop, lol.

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk

[menehune]

I DO assume that if my kid is going to be at someone's party that they could be in any photos taken at said party. I don't expect people to edit my child out of their candid shots of friends or relatives at a party they were invited too.
Like i said, I do understand your point, but if they were filmed with consent (even so much as a note in the invite saying "Your attendance is consent to be filmed for youtube") it's not a big deal.
Not all the kids at Ollie's parties are yt kids and there are several cameras rolling at those shin digs and ive never seen people concerned about those kids.

No, pretty much all of the kids at Ollie's parties are YouTube kids. Or they're his cousins and know that the whole party is a vlogging extravaganza. He doesn't have any real friends. I personally try not to post pictures of other people's children on my social media. So yeah, Cullen especially putting instastories of the party and kids dancing was weird to me
We're approaching dead horse territory here.
Agree to disagree.

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk

Thank you. People are entitled to their opinion. It gets tiresome seeing the same poster arguing with every single post. Say your point and move on. People are entitled to their opinion!

And I've seen tons of people judge Bryan and Missy for filming non-YT kids. Not sure where they have been given a pass that Cullen and Katie haven't. Jared and Bryan are flamed for things that people give Cullen a pass on all the time.

Can someone direct me to the old C&K that inspired their placement above all other YTers, because I don't see it.

[menehune]

Honestly i'm reading this as that no one has an issue with Kelly or Jay filming, just Cullen.
Agree to disagree is correct i suppose.

I have an issue with them filming, but it is at least their story. It's their kid's party after all. Like you said, I'm sure the parents expect that their kids will be vlogged if they attend.

Cullen didn't need to film. Not his party, and not his place to post it before the actual host of the party anyway. Cullen has waited to post his blogs after Bryan and Missy countless times, this to me signifies he feels like he's above J&K in the YT pecking order and doesn't give two fucks about YT courtesy.

He's desperate for content and views, and people will tune in to see how everyone is behaving in such a difficult time.

[Playsinrain]

Honestly i'm reading this as that no one has an issue with Kelly or Jay filming, just Cullen.
Agree to disagree is correct i suppose.

I have an issue with them filming, but it is at least their story. It's their kid's party after all. Like you said, I'm sure the parents expect that their kids will be vlogged if they attend.

Cullen didn't need to film. Not his party, and not his place to post it before the actual host of the party anyway. Cullen has waited to post his blogs after Bryan and Missy countless times, this to me signifies he feels like he's above J&K in the YT pecking order and doesn't give two fucks about YT courtesy.

He's desperate for content and views, and people will tune in to see how everyone is behaving in such a difficult time.

Or he asked J&K and they didn't mind??

It's clear that B&M tell people not to upload before they do, bc no one ever does, and if they do, it's taken down and reuploaded after B&M get theirs up.

We don't have any indication that they aren't ok with C&K uploading the vlog footage. Other than the vlogs being up..

[HelloSweetie]

Cullen also doesn’t need to IG story Gaines in her underwear


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Baconsgirl]

Cullen also doesn’t need to IG story Gaines in her underwear


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

AMEN so many perverts out there.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Baconsgirl]

Can I just say that I am so happy that their dogs are patient with the kids. In Britney’s vlog Brooks man was being his energetic self and kinda bouncing on Emma and she looked scared, but she didn’t bite him or anything.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[lmmomSD]

I am glad the dogs don't nip the kids, but sometimes I wish they would. Because Cullen and Katie are obviously not teaching those kids to respect the dogs. They let Gaines use them as pillows and as you said they let Brooks bounce on Emma. He's not tiny. And she's old and looks arthritic. It has to hurt. But they don't tell him not to. Just laugh and film it.

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk

[cynthiadancer]

Honestly i'm reading this as that no one has an issue with Kelly or Jay filming, just Cullen.
Agree to disagree is correct i suppose.

I have an issue with them filming, but it is at least their story. It's their kid's party after all. Like you said, I'm sure the parents expect that their kids will be vlogged if they attend.

Cullen didn't need to film. Not his party, and not his place to post it before the actual host of the party anyway. Cullen has waited to post his blogs after Bryan and Missy countless times, this to me signifies he feels like he's above J&K in the YT pecking order and doesn't give two fucks about YT courtesy.

He's desperate for content and views, and people will tune in to see how everyone is behaving in such a difficult time.

Or he asked J&K and they didn't mind??

It's clear that B&M tell people not to upload before they do, bc no one ever does, and if they do, it's taken down and reuploaded after B&M get theirs up.

We don't have any indication that they aren't ok with C&K uploading the vlog footage. Other than the vlogs being up..

Cullen posted on Instagram when his video went up which said "Today’s video is a special one in several different ways! Be sure to check it out! Oh, and I’ve decided that my next bday party is gonna be hosted by @maddietid!" The very first comment on this post is Kelley, which said "We love you guys!! Her party couldn’t have been a success without you there!!" Therefore I assume Kelley is fine with their posting her party first.

[pitbullmommy]

Katie’s whining voice (whether she’s just joking around with Cullen or actually irritated) has been annoying the fuck out of me lately. I’m sure it’s just me, I only recently started to realize it but wow now it’s all I can hear in every video. They may act all lovey on camera but I think he honestly annoys the living hell out of her. Which I guess is understandable, lol, most hubbys/bfs do.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk