The CA law is ages 13 and under only need a life vest if they're on a moving vessel (even though in my family, little kids can't even step foot on the dock or near water without one). We went boating the other day and my boyfriends brother (who is a sheriff) didn't want to put a life vest on his 6 month old daugther because it was 'too hot' and you better believe I spoke up and said it's literally the law.Dani_465 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 17, 2020 10:41 am Dumb and dumber wouldn’t know water safety if it jumped up and slapped them upside the head. ANYBODY who is acquainted with water knows to wear a life jacket. DUMBASSES probably did go out on jet skis without life jackets too. And IF they went out in a boat, I bet NONE of them had life jackets on then too. It doesn’t matter if you can swim or not you need a life jacket on. Most places it’s the law if you’re on the lake, swimming or boating (or other activities) you need a life jacket on.
These two she not have bred. Two dumbasses and they make fugly kids too.
And lake arrowhead is only a little over an hour away. Oooooh that’s like a day trip. Who the fuck stays an hour away for a vacation?
Also, the nice thing about CA is you can drive an hour or two and be in a completely different atmosphere. Temecula vs. a Lake is a super nice change for a weekend getaway so I don't think it's wierd at all to 'staycation' a short distance away.