Rachelle, Justin and Baby Shrek | Rachelle and Justin | Part 14

[angelmamma]

Rachelle and Justin are vile and disgusting. Profiting off their DEAD DAUGHTER for views. Everyone report their video. Maybe it'll bring their channel one step closer to being demonitized.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

[Chimama14]

Don’t ask when we’re taking Emma to see Brynn, we’re gonna keep that privaaateeee


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[cupcakezzzzz]

I wonder what they'll do with Brynn's grave if they move.

Sent from my SM-J337P using Tapatalk

[opangatay]

Lmao why would she leave in the clip of specifically getting up and grabbing her phone to be able to read off what she’s supposed to say for the ad. At least try to pretend it’s a casual conversation even though we all know it’s an ad lol.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[emilyjoyce]

She doesn't make any sense, speak proper English Miss TeAcHeR [IMG]//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201904 ... 7d3bea.jpg[/IMG]

Sent from my MHA-L29 using Tapatalk

[Bundy]

New vlog title “Visiting Her Sister”

I’m just gonna leave these here....

[IMG]//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201904 ... f3ca32.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201904 ... 7b8c32.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201904 ... 120cc2.jpg[/IMG]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[10PumpsOfVanilla]

Looks like Emma is saying "help me"

[opangatay]

Looks like Emma is saying "help me"

This isn’t even a dig at Rachelle but just as a product, I hateeeee that swan play mat thing. Every single time it’s on camera I think the swan beaks are just specs of dirt. It would have looked nicer if the beaks were orange or lighter/peachier.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[10PumpsOfVanilla]

Looks like Emma is saying "help me"

This isn’t even a dig at Rachelle but just as a product, I hateeeee that swan play mat thing. Every single time it’s on camera I think the swan beaks are just specs of dirt. It would have looked nicer if the beaks were orange or lighter/peachier.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

True, but she doesn't believe in color. She taught at a MoNtEsSoRi PrE-sChOoL.

[opangatay]

Also, going back to Rachelle saying they should have an almost two year old and a seven month old.. this one of the main things I think about when it comes to loss parents. I don’t have experience with it so I’m always curious. I just really wonder with loss parents how they juggle the grief of losing a child with the fact that their living child that came after probably wouldn’t have existed if it weren’t for the loss. I’m not snarking on anything about this situation and am not even talking about R&J specifically. I just see a lot of loss parents say things like Rachelle did, “we should have x and y together.” In some cases they got pregnant before the first one would have even been born. I know it’s a situation where they wouldn’t know otherwise so it doesn’t do much to dwell on it. I just don’t know how I would process those emotions myself knowing that the loss of one child led to the existence of another. Although In Rachelle’s case their embryos are already ready to go, so technically Emma herself (like the exact child that is Emma) could have came at a later date if they chose that embryo after bringing a healthy Brynn home. I’m just rambling but I hope I’m making sense lol. This kinda stuff fascinates me tbh.

Rachelle also doesn’t seem to consider that Brynn would have been born in September if all went well, and if that were the case and they STILL had Emma, then she and Emma would have been Irish twins, which I’m SURE is something she would have “oopsied” herself into if they could get pregnant naturally.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Ld5]

Also, going back to Rachelle saying they should have an almost two year old and a seven month old.. this one of the main things I think about when it comes to loss parents. I don’t have experience with it so I’m always curious. I just really wonder with loss parents how they juggle the grief of losing a child with the fact that their living child that came after probably wouldn’t have existed if it weren’t for the loss. I’m not snarking on anything about this situation and am not even talking about R&J specifically. I just see a lot of loss parents say things like Rachelle did, “we should have x and y together.” In some cases they got pregnant before the first one would have even been born. I know it’s a situation where they wouldn’t know otherwise so it doesn’t do much to dwell on it. I just don’t know how I would process those emotions myself knowing that the loss of one child led to the existence of another. Although In Rachelle’s case their embryos are already ready to go, so technically Emma herself (like the exact child that is Emma) could have came at a later date if they chose that embryo after bringing a healthy Brynn home. I’m just rambling but I hope I’m making sense lol. This kinda stuff fascinates me tbh.

Rachelle also doesn’t seem to consider that Brynn would have been born in September if all went well, and if that were the case and they STILL had Emma, then she and Emma would have been Irish twins, which I’m SURE is something she would have “oopsied” herself into if they could get pregnant naturally.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Irish twins would have only been possible also if she formula fed from the beginning since she needed to be off nursing for a couple months before starting IVF. She’s said this a couple times now about having an almost two year old and 7 month old as if Brynn was born to term. It’s so odd. It’s like she forgot she was only 20 weeks.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[Sneege07]

Looks like Emma is saying "help me"

She doesssss

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

[Here_2_talk]

Also, going back to Rachelle saying they should have an almost two year old and a seven month old.. this one of the main things I think about when it comes to loss parents. I don’t have experience with it so I’m always curious. I just really wonder with loss parents how they juggle the grief of losing a child with the fact that their living child that came after probably wouldn’t have existed if it weren’t for the loss. I’m not snarking on anything about this situation and am not even talking about R&J specifically. I just see a lot of loss parents say things like Rachelle did, “we should have x and y together.” In some cases they got pregnant before the first one would have even been born. I know it’s a situation where they wouldn’t know otherwise so it doesn’t do much to dwell on it. I just don’t know how I would process those emotions myself knowing that the loss of one child led to the existence of another. Although In Rachelle’s case their embryos are already ready to go, so technically Emma herself (like the exact child that is Emma) could have came at a later date if they chose that embryo after bringing a healthy Brynn home. I’m just rambling but I hope I’m making sense lol. This kinda stuff fascinates me tbh.

Rachelle also doesn’t seem to consider that Brynn would have been born in September if all went well, and if that were the case and they STILL had Emma, then she and Emma would have been Irish twins, which I’m SURE is something she would have “oopsied” herself into if they could get pregnant naturally.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I hate when she says we should have an almost 2year old and a 7month old . Nope! That is what she wants to have, she wants two healthy, living children. In reality she would have never ended up with Emma if it wasn’t for the loss of Brynn.
Let’s say brynn was born premature but made it through the Nicu and probably would have been allowed home sept/Oct ... well, she sure as hell wouldn’t have been doing IVF that soon, especially when stressed out and looking after a premmie.
If Brynn was born full term, same again. She wouldn’t have Emma yet, cause we know she’d wanted to BF a whole year... so ivf after.

But the biggest bug I have about this whole situation is that she somehow takes it for granted that her embryos will produce babies... she got lucky Emma took, and was born healthy. She might get lucky again, but who knows. Every time she mentions future babies, I want to shake her and tell her it’s not guaranteed, it sounds so obnoxious, like she got over her IF hurdle cause she got the embryos ready to go, well not quite! That’s only half the battle. She sure has the memory of a goldfish

[cupcakezzzzz]

Also, going back to Rachelle saying they should have an almost two year old and a seven month old.. this one of the main things I think about when it comes to loss parents. I don’t have experience with it so I’m always curious. I just really wonder with loss parents how they juggle the grief of losing a child with the fact that their living child that came after probably wouldn’t have existed if it weren’t for the loss. I’m not snarking on anything about this situation and am not even talking about R&J specifically. I just see a lot of loss parents say things like Rachelle did, “we should have x and y together.” In some cases they got pregnant before the first one would have even been born. I know it’s a situation where they wouldn’t know otherwise so it doesn’t do much to dwell on it. I just don’t know how I would process those emotions myself knowing that the loss of one child led to the existence of another. Although In Rachelle’s case their embryos are already ready to go, so technically Emma herself (like the exact child that is Emma) could have came at a later date if they chose that embryo after bringing a healthy Brynn home. I’m just rambling but I hope I’m making sense lol. This kinda stuff fascinates me tbh.

Rachelle also doesn’t seem to consider that Brynn would have been born in September if all went well, and if that were the case and they STILL had Emma, then she and Emma would have been Irish twins, which I’m SURE is something she would have “oopsied” herself into if they could get pregnant naturally.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Very true.

With their IVF track record there's a good chance that Emma wouldn't of came along at all had Brynn survived. Like I mentioned before with their track record, assuming she'd automatically get pregnant back to back is kind of reaching. There's like 3 embryos separating infertility and brynn and then like (2, the one she transferred with Brynn and the one she transferred with Emma) so like 2 lost chances at separating Brynn and Emma.

There's a chance this next cycle could fail and there could be some distance between Emma and baby #2.

Family planning is pointless when you're doing IVF. The only thing you can for sure plan is transfers... not children...

Sent from my SM-J337P using Tapatalk

[Ld5]

Also, going back to Rachelle saying they should have an almost two year old and a seven month old.. this one of the main things I think about when it comes to loss parents. I don’t have experience with it so I’m always curious. I just really wonder with loss parents how they juggle the grief of losing a child with the fact that their living child that came after probably wouldn’t have existed if it weren’t for the loss. I’m not snarking on anything about this situation and am not even talking about R&J specifically. I just see a lot of loss parents say things like Rachelle did, “we should have x and y together.” In some cases they got pregnant before the first one would have even been born. I know it’s a situation where they wouldn’t know otherwise so it doesn’t do much to dwell on it. I just don’t know how I would process those emotions myself knowing that the loss of one child led to the existence of another. Although In Rachelle’s case their embryos are already ready to go, so technically Emma herself (like the exact child that is Emma) could have came at a later date if they chose that embryo after bringing a healthy Brynn home. I’m just rambling but I hope I’m making sense lol. This kinda stuff fascinates me tbh.

Rachelle also doesn’t seem to consider that Brynn would have been born in September if all went well, and if that were the case and they STILL had Emma, then she and Emma would have been Irish twins, which I’m SURE is something she would have “oopsied” herself into if they could get pregnant naturally.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I hate when she says we should have an almost 2year old and a 7month old . Nope! That is what she wants to have, she wants two healthy, living children. In reality she would have never ended up with Emma if it wasn’t for the loss of Brynn.
Let’s say brynn was born premature but made it through the Nicu and probably would have been allowed home sept/Oct ... well, she sure as hell wouldn’t have been doing IVF that soon, especially when stressed out and looking after a premmie.
If Brynn was born full term, same again. She wouldn’t have Emma yet, cause we know she’d wanted to BF a whole year... so ivf after.

But the biggest bug I have about this whole situation is that she somehow takes it for granted that her embryos will produce babies... she got lucky Emma took, and was born healthy. She might get lucky again, but who knows. Every time she mentions future babies, I want to shake her and tell her it’s not guaranteed, it sounds so obnoxious, like she got over her IF hurdle cause she got the embryos ready to go, well not quite! That’s only half the battle. She sure has the memory of a goldfish

Especially since one embryo didn’t survive with Emma.. she forgets about that one because according to her blood work, she was originally pregnant with twins and one dissolved, leaving Emma. So really... that’s four embryos that didn’t take?

It still bugs me they didn’t buy that one an angel ornament for the tree.. they made such a huge deal about that last year but totally disregarded it this year.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[opangatay]

Does that mean they have 11 or 12 out of 17 embryos left? Was Brynn a single transfer or did they always do two? 11 or 12 is cutting it pretty close to have their four kids if the same pattern were to repeat for them again. Having twins would up their chances of having 4 kids a bunch but I cannot imagine them with twins and a toddler. You’d think having a toddler would make them decide to slow down and only do one transfer at a time. But I think they said they’d always try for two? I could be wrong.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[lavenderlove]

Why does she ALWAYS turn the camera on when saying bye to Kaylee and family? Every. Single. Time! "bye. I love you. Kiss. Bye. I love you. Bye." and then forces those kids to kiss her. I don't get it. Why film the goodbye? Is it so she can say "see guys? I have friends." it's kind of a weird thing and way to film it because the camera is always down or filming up at nothing.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

[Celia]

Also, going back to Rachelle saying they should have an almost two year old and a seven month old.. this one of the main things I think about when it comes to loss parents. I don’t have experience with it so I’m always curious. I just really wonder with loss parents how they juggle the grief of losing a child with the fact that their living child that came after probably wouldn’t have existed if it weren’t for the loss. I’m not snarking on anything about this situation and am not even talking about R&J specifically. I just see a lot of loss parents say things like Rachelle did, “we should have x and y together.” In some cases they got pregnant before the first one would have even been born. I know it’s a situation where they wouldn’t know otherwise so it doesn’t do much to dwell on it. I just don’t know how I would process those emotions myself knowing that the loss of one child led to the existence of another. Although In Rachelle’s case their embryos are already ready to go, so technically Emma herself (like the exact child that is Emma) could have came at a later date if they chose that embryo after bringing a healthy Brynn home. I’m just rambling but I hope I’m making sense lol. This kinda stuff fascinates me tbh.

Rachelle also doesn’t seem to consider that Brynn would have been born in September if all went well, and if that were the case and they STILL had Emma, then she and Emma would have been Irish twins, which I’m SURE is something she would have “oopsied” herself into if they could get pregnant naturally.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Irish twins would have only been possible also if she formula fed from the beginning since she needed to be off nursing for a couple months before starting IVF. She’s said this a couple times now about having an almost two year old and 7 month old as if Brynn was born to term. It’s so odd. It’s like she forgot she was only 20 weeks.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

You can get pregnant while breastfeeding.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[Celia]

Also, going back to Rachelle saying they should have an almost two year old and a seven month old.. this one of the main things I think about when it comes to loss parents. I don’t have experience with it so I’m always curious. I just really wonder with loss parents how they juggle the grief of losing a child with the fact that their living child that came after probably wouldn’t have existed if it weren’t for the loss. I’m not snarking on anything about this situation and am not even talking about R&J specifically. I just see a lot of loss parents say things like Rachelle did, “we should have x and y together.” In some cases they got pregnant before the first one would have even been born. I know it’s a situation where they wouldn’t know otherwise so it doesn’t do much to dwell on it. I just don’t know how I would process those emotions myself knowing that the loss of one child led to the existence of another. Although In Rachelle’s case their embryos are already ready to go, so technically Emma herself (like the exact child that is Emma) could have came at a later date if they chose that embryo after bringing a healthy Brynn home. I’m just rambling but I hope I’m making sense lol. This kinda stuff fascinates me tbh.

Rachelle also doesn’t seem to consider that Brynn would have been born in September if all went well, and if that were the case and they STILL had Emma, then she and Emma would have been Irish twins, which I’m SURE is something she would have “oopsied” herself into if they could get pregnant naturally.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Irish twins would have only been possible also if she formula fed from the beginning since she needed to be off nursing for a couple months before starting IVF. She’s said this a couple times now about having an almost two year old and 7 month old as if Brynn was born to term. It’s so odd. It’s like she forgot she was only 20 weeks.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

You can get pregnant while breastfeeding.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Ignore me. I didn’t read this properly, I thought you were talking about if she could get pregnant naturally at first. But you clearly said IVF. My bad!


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[Ld5]

Does that mean they have 11 or 12 out of 17 embryos left? Was Brynn a single transfer or did they always do two? 11 or 12 is cutting it pretty close to have their four kids if the same pattern were to repeat for them again. Having twins would up their chances of having 4 kids a bunch but I cannot imagine them with twins and a toddler. You’d think having a toddler would make them decide to slow down and only do one transfer at a time. But I think they said they’d always try for two? I could be wrong.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I believe they transferred two embryos each time. So six embryos total used and two of them babies.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk