While it is different, it's still mean. It would be one thing if, like Cassie, she and Bryan lived somewhere where they couldn't have pets. But they took Karma, because he was the pet they most recently got and they're smart enough to know they would be REAMED if they get rid of him. They're clearly bored of the poor guy now.whys0seri0us wrote:But the only one truly given away was he rooster. LolHelloSweetie wrote:Didn't realize that a bad decision repeated time and time again shouldn't be judged if that person always makes a good decision in the end.
Missy, the animal lover, scammed a horse ranch (though I guess she did give them money eventually). Let's not forget that. I doubt giving the animals away has anything to do with wanting what's best for them. It's like Finn's naps, it's all about what works best for Missy.
She just left Claire and Leo living where they were living and I guess yea she gave Zuri away but it's still with family.
I just think that is different then like giving them away to a stranger or an animal shelter or something.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Missy got pets. She chose Claire, she chose Leo, and she left them. She could have taken them with her, but they were older, so she didn't want to. Honestly, I don't think she even likes cats. She's one of ~those~ dog people. I prefer dogs, too, but I have a cat who is basically my daughter lol I think I can forgive her for Leo because it seems like he and Mimi are attached to each other, but there's no excuse for Claire. There's no real excuse for Zuri except that Missy didn't like her tbh.
It seems like the only animals she can form ANY attachment to are her chickens. Why chickens? What is it about those chickens that she loves so much? I mean, if I had chickens, I would love them, too...but I also love my other pets. And I'm sure I would love my children, if I had any.
On another note, is Claire Bear still alive??? I think Leo is still kicking, but I haven't heard about the cat in years.