Rachelle & Justin: Overspending & NEVER trending | Part 21

Locked
spicy_dreams
Informer
Informer
Posts: 498
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2019 12:29 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle & Justin: Overspending & NEVER trending | Part 21

Unread post by spicy_dreams »

SJW-19 wrote: Wed Sep 18, 2019 2:47 pm Just that “I want a gallery wall somewhere” whine in today’s vlog. Want want want want want. All these plans for things they want or hope to have. I can’t remember the last time they talked about being grateful, or reflected, looked back on something they once had that they weren’t badmouthing on.

Idk when they’ll wake up and realized that YouTube is temporary and to smell the roses. They’ve clearly rushed into a lot of things, but it’s not too late to stop where they are right now and just enjoy what life they’ve built together. Be happy with Emma while it’s just you three. Work on your marriage. You have a roof over your heads. But no. Pools and vacations and renovations and “I can’t wait till this”. It’s sad.
I couldn't agree more. They've always seemed incredibly ungrateful, especially for Christians. And the way they talked about their old house was actually really despicable. They constantly complained about it, how "awful" it was "like, soooo bad" just because it wasn't brand new. It's still very nice looking, tidy (the condition of the actual house I mean, it definitely could've used a deep clean) maybe some issues with the upstairs carpet being loose but that's about it. I thought it was nice though. But even if it wasn't as nice as it was, it's still terrible to complain about it the way they did. So many people watching them would've been watching from much poorer housing. Like, SO many. And many of those people in poorer houses are probably still much much more grateful for what they've got.

I'm just thinking about the people watching, maybe with kids, who live in houses they can't afford to fix. Maybe with mould issues or structural problems, damaged walls, stained floors, maybe old squatter houses or worse. That kind of living situation is unbearably stressful, whether or not you're doing everything in your power to get into a better house. Sometimes just a dry healthy house is outside the realm of possibility. How do you think it'd feel to be those people, and listen to Rachelle and Justin just endlessly complaining about their nice fucking house? Speaking about it like they live in a literal crack den? Justin especially was bad about that. He likes to exaggerate a lot, and make it out like his life is such a struggle.

I rolled my eyes so hard I went blind when Rachelle was doing the new house tour, she kept saying like "it's not the fanciest" and downplaying it. Meanwhile where I come from, you'd have to work your entire life just to get a CHANCE at owning a home like that. I'm living paycheck to paycheck inside an old apartment about the size of their damn kitchen. I'd not have to be doing this if I wasn't sick however. And yep, I'm definitely jealous, and bitter. That Rachelle gets a house like that and still can't be grateful. But you know, my situation isn't great, and I'm still fucking thankful every day that I have an apartment at all. Thankful is an understatement because I could EASILY be homeless. I'm over here thanking God (and I don't even believe in God lmao) for this shitty apartment that I love, watching these fuckin idiots get everything I could ever dream of and still complain.
RobinSparkles
Talker
Talker
Posts: 129
Joined: Fri Aug 09, 2019 11:12 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Rachelle & Justin: Overspending & NEVER trending | Part 21

Unread post by RobinSparkles »

Mamadrama19 wrote: Wed Sep 18, 2019 3:12 pm
Ld5 wrote:
Bored2018 wrote:Random thought, maybe the old lady that is moving in with her mom was the one that owned the house! So they like bought it from her for a good deal with the deal of her living with rachelles mom for free!!
I thought the same thing


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yeah I agree... I'll probably get shunned for this but I think the house is actually in their name. Image the "proof" going around isn't updated and this a 20+ year old house we're talking about. It probably has quite a few owners tied to it over the years.

It might not of been the best financial decision ever but I think they're stupid and they actually purchased this expensive home even tho it ain't worth it

Sent from my SM-J337P using Tapatalk
I haven’t seen the “proof” going around but I agree with you that they purchased their home. The actual clerk’s website now shows a new deed, recorded 9/3/19, in J and R’s names as individuals (not any other entity such as a trust or an LLC). That means they own it. There’s a deed of trust recorded as well which in CA is the mortgage document. The party named on that is a commercial mortgage lender.

It’s not rent to own; you don’t get a deed when you’re renting. And it’s not a charity based private mortgage.

I don’t have an opinion on whether the house was worth it but I don’t believe they paid more or much more than market value. There may be hundreds of cheaper homes, or larger homes, but the particular constellation of location, land size, and updates I think probably justifies the price otherwise they probably would have heard otherwise from their realtor or the bank’s appraiser.

Now, whether it was a good choice is an entirely different matter. I said yesterday that there are many economic indicators of a recession on the horizon, and their “career”, if you can even call it that, is not exactly a paragon of stability. It also doesn’t suit them well— it doesn’t have any more space than their rental (except perhaps their common rooms are a little bigger). It lacks a powder room, a real laundry room, an office, a guest room, a real playroom. It’s not a bad house in my opinion, it looked beautiful staged, but it’s an odd choice for a couple that wants four kids and a home office and a guest suite.
RobinSparkles
Talker
Talker
Posts: 129
Joined: Fri Aug 09, 2019 11:12 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Rachelle & Justin: Overspending & NEVER trending | Part 21

Unread post by RobinSparkles »

Mamadrama19 wrote: Wed Sep 18, 2019 3:12 pm
Ld5 wrote:
Bored2018 wrote:Random thought, maybe the old lady that is moving in with her mom was the one that owned the house! So they like bought it from her for a good deal with the deal of her living with rachelles mom for free!!
I thought the same thing


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yeah I agree... I'll probably get shunned for this but I think the house is actually in their name. Image the "proof" going around isn't updated and this a 20+ year old house we're talking about. It probably has quite a few owners tied to it over the years.

It might not of been the best financial decision ever but I think they're stupid and they actually purchased this expensive home even tho it ain't worth it

Sent from my SM-J337P using Tapatalk
The lady who owned it died, her obit is online. Her relative that then inherited it is a male and I believe he’s the one who fixed it up to flip it.
User avatar
Beanmama
Talker
Talker
Posts: 180
Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2019 1:17 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: Rachelle & Justin: Overspending & NEVER trending | Part 21

Unread post by Beanmama »

random_rant wrote:
Mamadrama19 wrote: Wed Sep 18, 2019 8:47 am Hey,

I've never purchased a home but didn't they have their inspection before closing?

What do they do during the inspections? How did they look pass a broken water pipe...
Inspections occur within 2 weeks of an offer being accepted and going under contract, typically. I'd like to think any inspector worth their cost would inspect the sprinkler system for any damage but they would simply turn the system on and run it temporarily to ensure it was in working order, not dig up pipes to inspect their status. I'm not fully sure if inspectors are responsible for inspecting things OUTSIDE of the house, though, but I never owned a property with a sprinkler system TO inspect so I'm not sure.

What could have happened here was:
1) it wasn't broken at the time of inspection and it broke due to a shift in the earth (happened to my sewage drain pipe at my first house I owned after a massive rain where the dirt swelled and then dried up causing the pipe to crack)
2) it WAS broken during the time of inspection but there wasn't enough water running through the pipe to soak the ground to make the break visible
3) the inspector didn't check the sprinkler system and the water was turned off until they closed so nobody knew of its status until Rash and Justine moved in and turned the water on so it flooded enough to be visible.

We had a pin hole leak in our water main into our house and we were told it likely had been leaking for awhile to bring enough water to the surface of the earth to run down our front yard to the street. Their pipe was cracked in two so either they had a smaller stress fracture that was leaking and going unnoticed until it finally cracked enough to pour water out or it broke recently or it just recently broke. Her Mom kept yapping about a local earthquake by J&R's area so that could have been the culprit, though they said they didn't feel it there.
Why were they watering their dirt anyway?
Dirt + water= mud
It’s not just gonna magically grow grass if they water it


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
User avatar
Beanmama
Talker
Talker
Posts: 180
Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2019 1:17 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: Rachelle & Justin: Overspending & NEVER trending | Part 21

Unread post by Beanmama »

RobinSparkles wrote:
Mamadrama19 wrote: Wed Sep 18, 2019 3:12 pm
Ld5 wrote: I thought the same thing


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yeah I agree... I'll probably get shunned for this but I think the house is actually in their name. Image the "proof" going around isn't updated and this a 20+ year old house we're talking about. It probably has quite a few owners tied to it over the years.

It might not of been the best financial decision ever but I think they're stupid and they actually purchased this expensive home even tho it ain't worth it

Sent from my SM-J337P using Tapatalk
I haven’t seen the “proof” going around but I agree with you that they purchased their home. The actual clerk’s website now shows a new deed, recorded 9/3/19, in J and R’s names as individuals (not any other entity such as a trust or an LLC). That means they own it. There’s a deed of trust recorded as well which in CA is the mortgage document. The party named on that is a commercial mortgage lender.

It’s not rent to own; you don’t get a deed when you’re renting. And it’s not a charity based private mortgage.

I don’t have an opinion on whether the house was worth it but I don’t believe they paid more or much more than market value. There may be hundreds of cheaper homes, or larger homes, but the particular constellation of location, land size, and updates I think probably justifies the price otherwise they probably would have heard otherwise from their realtor or the bank’s appraiser.

Now, whether it was a good choice is an entirely different matter. I said yesterday that there are many economic indicators of a recession on the horizon, and their “career”, if you can even call it that, is not exactly a paragon of stability. It also doesn’t suit them well— it doesn’t have any more space than their rental (except perhaps their common rooms are a little bigger). It lacks a powder room, a real laundry room, an office, a guest room, a real playroom. It’s not a bad house in my opinion, it looked beautiful staged, but it’s an odd choice for a couple that wants four kids and a home office and a guest suite.
I find it creepy that you paid actual money to see the deed and are bragging about it. But I also don’t know if I believe you so Image


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
User avatar
Snarky0702
Amateur
Amateur
Posts: 59
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2019 5:45 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle & Justin: Overspending & NEVER trending | Part 21

Unread post by Snarky0702 »

Been lurking for a while and I finally saw something in the vlog today that I just couldn't hold back. She actually dressed Emma in a color other than neutral. I swear I am so sick of seeing mustard yellow on that poor baby. I know she wants to have lots of gender neutral colors for her millions of babies that she wants but come on.
RobinSparkles
Talker
Talker
Posts: 129
Joined: Fri Aug 09, 2019 11:12 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Rachelle & Justin: Overspending & NEVER trending | Part 21

Unread post by RobinSparkles »

Beanmama wrote: Wed Sep 18, 2019 5:35 pm
RobinSparkles wrote:
Mamadrama19 wrote: Wed Sep 18, 2019 3:12 pm Yeah I agree... I'll probably get shunned for this but I think the house is actually in their name. Image the "proof" going around isn't updated and this a 20+ year old house we're talking about. It probably has quite a few owners tied to it over the years.

It might not of been the best financial decision ever but I think they're stupid and they actually purchased this expensive home even tho it ain't worth it

Sent from my SM-J337P using Tapatalk
I haven’t seen the “proof” going around but I agree with you that they purchased their home. The actual clerk’s website now shows a new deed, recorded 9/3/19, in J and R’s names as individuals (not any other entity such as a trust or an LLC). That means they own it. There’s a deed of trust recorded as well which in CA is the mortgage document. The party named on that is a commercial mortgage lender.

It’s not rent to own; you don’t get a deed when you’re renting. And it’s not a charity based private mortgage.

I don’t have an opinion on whether the house was worth it but I don’t believe they paid more or much more than market value. There may be hundreds of cheaper homes, or larger homes, but the particular constellation of location, land size, and updates I think probably justifies the price otherwise they probably would have heard otherwise from their realtor or the bank’s appraiser.

Now, whether it was a good choice is an entirely different matter. I said yesterday that there are many economic indicators of a recession on the horizon, and their “career”, if you can even call it that, is not exactly a paragon of stability. It also doesn’t suit them well— it doesn’t have any more space than their rental (except perhaps their common rooms are a little bigger). It lacks a powder room, a real laundry room, an office, a guest room, a real playroom. It’s not a bad house in my opinion, it looked beautiful staged, but it’s an odd choice for a couple that wants four kids and a home office and a guest suite.
I find it creepy that you paid actual money to see the deed and are bragging about it. But I also don’t know if I believe you so Image


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I didn’t pay to see it. The parties to the documents show up in search results, you only pay if you want the full PDF. You can see for yourself. Google the county clerk.
lavenderlove
Gossiper
Gossiper
Posts: 802
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2018 10:57 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle & Justin: Overspending & NEVER trending | Part 21

Unread post by lavenderlove »

spicy_dreams wrote:
SJW-19 wrote: Wed Sep 18, 2019 2:47 pm Just that “I want a gallery wall somewhere” whine in today’s vlog. Want want want want want. All these plans for things they want or hope to have. I can’t remember the last time they talked about being grateful, or reflected, looked back on something they once had that they weren’t badmouthing on.

Idk when they’ll wake up and realized that YouTube is temporary and to smell the roses. They’ve clearly rushed into a lot of things, but it’s not too late to stop where they are right now and just enjoy what life they’ve built together. Be happy with Emma while it’s just you three. Work on your marriage. You have a roof over your heads. But no. Pools and vacations and renovations and “I can’t wait till this”. It’s sad.
I couldn't agree more. They've always seemed incredibly ungrateful, especially for Christians. And the way they talked about their old house was actually really despicable. They constantly complained about it, how "awful" it was "like, soooo bad" just because it wasn't brand new. It's still very nice looking, tidy (the condition of the actual house I mean, it definitely could've used a deep clean) maybe some issues with the upstairs carpet being loose but that's about it. I thought it was nice though. But even if it wasn't as nice as it was, it's still terrible to complain about it the way they did. So many people watching them would've been watching from much poorer housing. Like, SO many. And many of those people in poorer houses are probably still much much more grateful for what they've got.

I'm just thinking about the people watching, maybe with kids, who live in houses they can't afford to fix. Maybe with mould issues or structural problems, damaged walls, stained floors, maybe old squatter houses or worse. That kind of living situation is unbearably stressful, whether or not you're doing everything in your power to get into a better house. Sometimes just a dry healthy house is outside the realm of possibility. How do you think it'd feel to be those people, and listen to Rachelle and Justin just endlessly complaining about their nice fucking house? Speaking about it like they live in a literal crack den? Justin especially was bad about that. He likes to exaggerate a lot, and make it out like his life is such a struggle.

I rolled my eyes so hard I went blind when Rachelle was doing the new house tour, she kept saying like "it's not the fanciest" and downplaying it. Meanwhile where I come from, you'd have to work your entire life just to get a CHANCE at owning a home like that. I'm living paycheck to paycheck inside an old apartment about the size of their damn kitchen. I'd not have to be doing this if I wasn't sick however. And yep, I'm definitely jealous, and bitter. That Rachelle gets a house like that and still can't be grateful. But you know, my situation isn't great, and I'm still fucking thankful every day that I have an apartment at all. Thankful is an understatement because I could EASILY be homeless. I'm over here thanking God (and I don't even believe in God lmao) for this shitty apartment that I love, watching these fuckin idiots get everything I could ever dream of and still complain.
SJW19 and spicy dreams, these 2 posts are the greatest posts I've ever read on their page, EVER! Seriously. It completely sums up why I can't stand them. They are the 2 most ungrateful people, they're immature, nothing is ever good enough, and they're constantly wanting more "I can't wait for...." I'm so sick of it. Even when they're "thanking" their fans, they sound so forced and fake. They don't give 2 shits about their fans, in fact! They look down on them and view them as a paycheck. They are despicable, ugly people. They really should be ashamed of themselves.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

User avatar
mikanai
Informer
Informer
Posts: 405
Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2019 7:12 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle & Justin: Overspending & NEVER trending | Part 21

Unread post by mikanai »

Snarky0702 wrote: Wed Sep 18, 2019 5:57 pm Been lurking for a while and I finally saw something in the vlog today that I just couldn't hold back. She actually dressed Emma in a color other than neutral. I swear I am so sick of seeing mustard yellow on that poor baby. I know she wants to have lots of gender neutral colors for her millions of babies that she wants but come on.
She's treating Emma like a prop... pushing the red headed leprechaun theme too far. I feel like emma will grow up feeling obliged to live up to this image her mom created. Emma's hair is blond, not red.
torilynn2013
Amateur
Amateur
Posts: 18
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2018 2:34 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle & Justin: Overspending & NEVER trending | Part 21

Unread post by torilynn2013 »

Emils wrote:They actually put a box fan in the doorway of that bathroom and expected all the dust to go out the small window near the ceiling? I can’t.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I was also baffled by this. Seems like that would just circulate the dust around the room. Not saying they should clean it yet because it will just get dirty again with the renovation but why even bother with the fan?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
User avatar
mikanai
Informer
Informer
Posts: 405
Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2019 7:12 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle & Justin: Overspending & NEVER trending | Part 21

Unread post by mikanai »

torilynn2013 wrote: Wed Sep 18, 2019 7:33 pm
Emils wrote:They actually put a box fan in the doorway of that bathroom and expected all the dust to go out the small window near the ceiling? I can’t.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I was also baffled by this. Seems like that would just circulate the dust around the room. Not saying they should clean it yet because it will just get dirty again with the renovation but why even bother with the fan?

Sent from my iPhone

This was a dumb idea for sure. They should've draped the doorway with a curtain, moist bedsheet, or at least a big piece of plastic. Imagine their kid is breathing in all that dust :( also they could've placed a humidifier or just sprayed water every 10 min during the demo to ensure the dust didn't fly around.
kayla1112
Talker
Talker
Posts: 210
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2019 11:22 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle & Justin: Overspending & NEVER trending | Part 21

Unread post by kayla1112 »

mikanai wrote:
Snarky0702 wrote: Wed Sep 18, 2019 5:57 pm Been lurking for a while and I finally saw something in the vlog today that I just couldn't hold back. She actually dressed Emma in a color other than neutral. I swear I am so sick of seeing mustard yellow on that poor baby. I know she wants to have lots of gender neutral colors for her millions of babies that she wants but come on.
She's treating Emma like a prop... pushing the red headed leprechaun theme too far. I feel like emma will grow up feeling obliged to live up to this image her mom created. Emma's hair is blond, not red.
Her hair looks to be actually orange not blonde, will probably be sun bleached and blonde in a few years though but right now it is legitimately orange, just not the shade she wanted

Sent from my SM-G610Y using Tapatalk

User avatar
Dani_465
True Gossiper
True Gossiper
Posts: 1381
Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2019 2:28 pm
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Rachelle & Justin: Overspending & NEVER trending | Part 21

Unread post by Dani_465 »

lrs-1992 wrote: Wed Sep 18, 2019 9:38 am When she was scheduling her first ultrasound, the lady asks what time she would like to come in And Rachelle says “anytime is fine honestly, Im pretty open”... These people really do lay on their couch all day.. what Twenty-something Year old WITH a baby, doesn’t have a somewhat Busy schedule...


Verzonden vanaf mijn iPhone met Tapatalk
Yep, “we’re two losers sitting at home. My loser husband doesn’t have a job, because he doesn’t want to miss Emma growing up. But he goes to school and plays video games online.”

I would say most mothers and fathers would love to stay home and watch their children grow up. But realize they have to go to work or they don’t eat. I guess trashelle and twustin don’t read the Bible. The Bible says a man who doesn’t work is worse than an infidel. Choosing to not work is lazy!
Lucianita
Wallflower
Wallflower
Posts: 6
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2019 8:50 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle & Justin: Overspending & NEVER trending | Part 21

Unread post by Lucianita »

Dani_465 wrote: Thu Sep 19, 2019 2:33 am
lrs-1992 wrote: Wed Sep 18, 2019 9:38 am When she was scheduling her first ultrasound, the lady asks what time she would like to come in And Rachelle says “anytime is fine honestly, Im pretty open”... These people really do lay on their couch all day.. what Twenty-something Year old WITH a baby, doesn’t have a somewhat Busy schedule...


Verzonden vanaf mijn iPhone met Tapatalk
Yep, “we’re two losers sitting at home. My loser husband doesn’t have a job, because he doesn’t want to miss Emma growing up. But he goes to school and plays video games online.”

I would say most mothers and fathers would love to stay home and watch their children grow up. But realize they have to go to work or they don’t eat. I guess trashelle and twustin don’t read the Bible. The Bible says a man who doesn’t work is worse than an infidel. Choosing to not work is lazy!
But they work everyday on their YoUtUbEcHaNnEl!
Baz1_
Informer
Informer
Posts: 311
Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2018 8:32 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle & Justin: Overspending & NEVER trending | Part 21

Unread post by Baz1_ »

What is there to miss out on? They don’t do anything with Emma. Justine is not missing out of anything at this point. Sure, if Rachelle took Emma to classes or to do activities then I could kind of see how he could make that not wanting to miss out argument. It’s just an excuse to be lazy and not work.

Do you know how many parents would love to not miss out on their kid’s days? I nannied for 5 years before having my own child. Both parents worked full time jobs to provide the nice lifestyles they wanted for their children. Are they wrong for choosing to work instead of lying around on the couch like lazy shits so they could claim they weren’t missing out on their children growing up?
random_rant
Amateur
Amateur
Posts: 10
Joined: Tue Aug 06, 2019 9:20 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle & Justin: Overspending & NEVER trending | Part 21

Unread post by random_rant »

Beanmama wrote: Wed Sep 18, 2019 5:33 pm
random_rant wrote:
Mamadrama19 wrote: Wed Sep 18, 2019 8:47 am Hey,

I've never purchased a home but didn't they have their inspection before closing?

What do they do during the inspections? How did they look pass a broken water pipe...
Inspections occur within 2 weeks of an offer being accepted and going under contract, typically. I'd like to think any inspector worth their cost would inspect the sprinkler system for any damage but they would simply turn the system on and run it temporarily to ensure it was in working order, not dig up pipes to inspect their status. I'm not fully sure if inspectors are responsible for inspecting things OUTSIDE of the house, though, but I never owned a property with a sprinkler system TO inspect so I'm not sure.

What could have happened here was:
1) it wasn't broken at the time of inspection and it broke due to a shift in the earth (happened to my sewage drain pipe at my first house I owned after a massive rain where the dirt swelled and then dried up causing the pipe to crack)
2) it WAS broken during the time of inspection but there wasn't enough water running through the pipe to soak the ground to make the break visible
3) the inspector didn't check the sprinkler system and the water was turned off until they closed so nobody knew of its status until Rash and Justine moved in and turned the water on so it flooded enough to be visible.

We had a pin hole leak in our water main into our house and we were told it likely had been leaking for awhile to bring enough water to the surface of the earth to run down our front yard to the street. Their pipe was cracked in two so either they had a smaller stress fracture that was leaking and going unnoticed until it finally cracked enough to pour water out or it broke recently or it just recently broke. Her Mom kept yapping about a local earthquake by J&R's area so that could have been the culprit, though they said they didn't feel it there.
Why were they watering their dirt anyway?
Dirt + water= mud
It’s not just gonna magically grow grass if they water it


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Exactly! My hunch was that the sprinkler system was only for the shrubs and minimal landscaping around the back patio and didn't actually go out into the yard since the dirt is always dry. I could be totally wrong.
User avatar
Dani_465
True Gossiper
True Gossiper
Posts: 1381
Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2019 2:28 pm
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Rachelle & Justin: Overspending & NEVER trending | Part 21

Unread post by Dani_465 »

Hasn’t Trashelle and Justine (love that lol) heard of sod (sp?)??? I mean they have money apparently, so why use grass seeds??
User avatar
Dani_465
True Gossiper
True Gossiper
Posts: 1381
Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2019 2:28 pm
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Rachelle & Justin: Overspending & NEVER trending | Part 21

Unread post by Dani_465 »

Justine is such a “wiz” at building things but can’t mount a tv on the wall???
User avatar
Dani_465
True Gossiper
True Gossiper
Posts: 1381
Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2019 2:28 pm
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Rachelle & Justin: Overspending & NEVER trending | Part 21

Unread post by Dani_465 »

Baz1_ wrote: Thu Sep 19, 2019 7:20 am What is there to miss out on? They don’t do anything with Emma. Justine is not missing out of anything at this point. Sure, if Rachelle took Emma to classes or to do activities then I could kind of see how he could make that not wanting to miss out argument. It’s just an excuse to be lazy and not work.

Do you know how many parents would love to not miss out on their kid’s days? I nannied for 5 years before having my own child. Both parents worked full time jobs to provide the nice lifestyles they wanted for their children. Are they wrong for choosing to work instead of lying around on the couch like lazy shits so they could claim they weren’t missing out on their children growing up?
I think both of them are immature. Maybe another 10 yeads they “might” be grown! I would rather be home all day with my children, but it’s not feasible. But hey maybe I should start a YT channel too so I can sit on my behind all day while my husband works.

Trashelle should take Emma to classees and activities. Mommy and me, the library etc. she needs to find a mommy group. She’s in CA, not podunk! I was glad to see trashelle stopped going with Justine to swimming, I really believe trashelle was making Emma anxious.
Sneege07
Talker
Talker
Posts: 121
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2018 10:59 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rachelle & Justin: Overspending & NEVER trending | Part 21

Unread post by Sneege07 »

RobinSparkles wrote:
Mamadrama19 wrote: Wed Sep 18, 2019 3:12 pm
Ld5 wrote: I thought the same thing


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yeah I agree... I'll probably get shunned for this but I think the house is actually in their name. Image the "proof" going around isn't updated and this a 20+ year old house we're talking about. It probably has quite a few owners tied to it over the years.

It might not of been the best financial decision ever but I think they're stupid and they actually purchased this expensive home even tho it ain't worth it

Sent from my SM-J337P using Tapatalk
The lady who owned it died, her obit is online. Her relative that then inherited it is a male and I believe he’s the one who fixed it up to flip it.
Man. I consider myself to be a pretty good sleuther, especially while I'm nursing baby to sleep at night (yes, I know terrible habits), but I at least thought I found the couple that lived there from 95 to when it was sold a few years ago and could only find information about them still being alive. No obits or anything else.

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

Locked

Return to “Rachelle and Justin”